Clicky

Kodak M320 vs Samsung ST80

Portability
95
Imaging
32
Features
10
Overall
23
Kodak EasyShare M320 front
 
Samsung ST80 front
Portability
96
Imaging
37
Features
34
Overall
35

Kodak M320 vs Samsung ST80 Key Specs

Kodak M320
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 34-102mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
  • 155g - 97 x 60 x 21mm
  • Announced January 2009
Samsung ST80
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 4800 (Bump to 6400)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 35-105mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
  • 118g - 92 x 55 x 19mm
  • Introduced January 2010
Photography Glossary

Kodak M320 vs Samsung ST80 Overview

The following is a extended comparison of the Kodak M320 versus Samsung ST80, both Ultracompact digital cameras by manufacturers Kodak and Samsung. There is a large difference between the resolutions of the M320 (9MP) and ST80 (14MP) and the M320 (1/2.5") and ST80 (1/2.3") have totally different sensor sizing.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The M320 was introduced 12 months before the ST80 which means that they are of a similar age. The two cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).

Before we go into a detailed comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the M320 matches up vs the ST80 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak M320 over the Samsung ST80

 M320 ST80 

Reasons to pick Samsung ST80 over the Kodak M320

 ST80 M320 
IntroducedJanuary 2010January 2009Newer by 12 months
Display dimensions3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Common features in the Kodak M320 and Samsung ST80

 M320 ST80 
Manual focus No manual focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display resolution230k230kEqual display resolution
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen

Kodak M320 vs Samsung ST80 Physical Comparison

When you are looking to travel with your camera frequently, you will need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Kodak M320 features physical dimensions of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Samsung ST80 has dimensions of 92mm x 55mm x 19mm (3.6" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 118 grams (0.26 lbs).

Look at the Kodak M320 versus Samsung ST80 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have attached at that time. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the M320 compared to the ST80.

Kodak M320 vs Samsung ST80 size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the M320 and ST80 is 95 and 96 respectively.

Kodak M320 vs Samsung ST80 top view buttons comparison

Kodak M320 vs Samsung ST80 Sensor Comparison

Generally, it is tough to visualise the gap between sensor dimensions just by looking at specs. The picture underneath might offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the M320 and ST80.

As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras have different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The M320 with its tinier sensor will make getting bokeh trickier and the Samsung ST80 will give greater detail using its extra 5MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The more aged M320 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.

Kodak M320 vs Samsung ST80 sensor size comparison

Kodak M320 vs Samsung ST80 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak M320 vs Samsung ST80 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak M320 Portrait photography highlights
Samsung ST80 Portrait photography highlights
19
lack of manual focus
no manual exposure
cannot use external flash
low MP (9MP)
small sensor (1/2.5")
lack of RAW files
30
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
cannot use external flash
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Kodak M320 Street photography factors
Samsung ST80 Street photography factors
47
screen is fixed
lack of image stabilization
small sensor (1/2.5")
lack of RAW files
heavier than competitors (155g)
63
image stabilization (Optical)
has focus by touch
fixed screen
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Kodak M320 Sports photography features
Samsung ST80 Sports photography features
16
max shutter speed is low (1/1,400 seconds)
lack of shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
low MP (9 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.5")
lack of phase detect autofocus
43
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (14MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Kodak M320 Travel photography highlights
Samsung ST80 Travel photography highlights
50
built-in flash
missing Time Lapse mode
heavier than competitors (155 grams)
low MP (9MP)
screen is not selfie friendly
wide angle not the best (34mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
62
has focus by touch
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
lack of Time Lapse function
display isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not great (35mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.3)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Kodak M320 Landscape photography details
Samsung ST80 Landscape photography details
22
lack of manual focus
can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (34mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inches)
no manual exposure
lack of image stabilization
low MP (9MP)
small sensor (1/2.5")
lack of RAW files
missing Time Lapse mode
39
screen is a good size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (14MP)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (35mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.3)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
lack of Time Lapse function
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Kodak M320
Vlogging with Samsung ST80
22
wide angle not the best (34mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen is not selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
video res low (640 x 480 pxls)
missing external mic socket
heavier than competitors (155 grams)
28
touchscreen enabled
image stabilization (Optical)
wide angle not great (35mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.3)
display isn't selfie friendly
low res video (1280 x 720 resolution)
lack of mic jack
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Kodak M320 vs Samsung ST80 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak M320 and Samsung ST80
 Kodak EasyShare M320Samsung ST80
General Information
Company Kodak Samsung
Model Kodak EasyShare M320 Samsung ST80
Category Ultracompact Ultracompact
Announced 2009-01-08 2010-01-06
Body design Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.5" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 5.744 x 4.308mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 24.7mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 9 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Max resolution 3472 x 2604 4320 x 3240
Max native ISO 1600 4800
Max enhanced ISO - 6400
Lowest native ISO 80 80
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Number of focus points 25 -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 34-102mm (3.0x) 35-105mm (3.0x)
Largest aperture f/2.8-5.1 f/3.3-5.5
Macro focus range 10cm 5cm
Crop factor 6.3 5.9
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 2.7" 3"
Resolution of display 230k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Min shutter speed 4 seconds 8 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/1400 seconds 1/1500 seconds
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 3.00 m 5.00 m
Flash modes Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps)
Max video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video file format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 155g (0.34 lb) 118g (0.26 lb)
Physical dimensions 97 x 60 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") 92 x 55 x 19mm (3.6" x 2.2" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model KLIC-7001 BP70A
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal
Storage slots 1 1
Price at release $39 $249