Kodak M530 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS
95 Imaging
35 Features
14 Overall
26
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
Kodak M530 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1000
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-108mm (F) lens
- 150g - 94 x 57 x 23mm
- Launched January 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Released June 2013
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Kodak M530 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Overview
In this write-up, we are comparing the Kodak M530 versus Olympus TG-2 iHS, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by rivals Kodak and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the M530 (12MP) and the TG-2 iHS (12MP) is very well matched and they enjoy the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe M530 was introduced 4 years prior to the TG-2 iHS and that is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a short summary of how the M530 scores vs the TG-2 iHS in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Kodak M530 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Kodak EasyShare M530 and Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS. The whole galleries are provided at Kodak M530 Gallery and Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak M530 over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
| M530 | TG-2 iHS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Kodak M530
| TG-2 iHS | M530 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | June 2013 |  | January 2010 | More recent by 42 months |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 610k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+380k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak M530 and Olympus TG-2 iHS
| M530 | TG-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither comes with Touch friendly display |
Kodak M530 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to lug around your camera, you have to take into account its weight and volume. The Kodak M530 comes with outer dimensions of 94mm x 57mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") having a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-2 iHS has sizing of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Contrast the Kodak M530 versus Olympus TG-2 iHS in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen at that time. Below is the front view measurements comparison of the M530 vs the TG-2 iHS.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the M530 and TG-2 iHS is 95 and 91 respectively.
Kodak M530 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be tough to visualize the difference between sensor measurements merely by looking at a spec sheet. The graphic here will give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the M530 and TG-2 iHS.
As you can see, both the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the same exact MP therefore you should expect similar quality of photographs but you should always take the release date of the products into consideration. The older M530 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Kodak M530 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Kodak M530 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare M530 | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Kodak | Olympus |
| Model type | Kodak EasyShare M530 | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2010-01-05 | 2013-06-28 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Max native ISO | 1000 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 36-108mm (3.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | - | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 10cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 610 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display technology | - | OLED |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 1/8 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1400 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 5.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | - |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 150 grams (0.33 lb) | 230 grams (0.51 lb) |
| Dimensions | 94 x 57 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 350 pictures |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | KLIC-7006 | Li-90B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | - |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail price | $110 | $380 |