Kodak M575 vs Nikon S01
95 Imaging
37 Features
24 Overall
31
![Kodak EasyShare M575 front Kodak EasyShare M575 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Kodak-EasyShare-M575/Kodak-M575-front.jpg)
![Nikon Coolpix S01 front Nikon Coolpix S01 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Nikon-Coolpix-S01/Nikon-S01-front.jpg)
97 Imaging
34 Features
16 Overall
26
Kodak M575 vs Nikon S01 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1000
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F) lens
- 152g - 99 x 58 x 19mm
- Revealed January 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.9" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 29-87mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 96g - 77 x 52 x 17mm
- Introduced June 2013
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Kodak M575 vs Nikon S01 Overview
On this page, we will be reviewing the Kodak M575 versus Nikon S01, both Ultracompact cameras by rivals Kodak and Nikon. There exists a sizeable gap among the sensor resolutions of the M575 (14MP) and S01 (10MP) and the M575 (1/2.3") and S01 (1/2.9") have different sensor size.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
The M575 was brought out 4 years earlier than the S01 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before delving right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a short highlight of how the M575 matches up vs the S01 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Kodak M575 vs Nikon S01 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Kodak EasyShare M575 and Nikon Coolpix S01. The entire galleries are viewable at Kodak M575 Gallery and Nikon S01 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak M575 over the Nikon S01
M575 | S01 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Reasons to pick Nikon S01 over the Kodak M575
S01 | M575 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | June 2013 | ![]() | January 2010 | More recent by 42 months |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Kodak M575 and Nikon S01
M575 | S01 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Lack of manual focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Identical screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen |
Kodak M575 vs Nikon S01 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to lug around your camera frequently, you will have to factor its weight and volume. The Kodak M575 has got outside measurements of 99mm x 58mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") along with a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Nikon S01 has sizing of 77mm x 52mm x 17mm (3.0" x 2.0" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 96 grams (0.21 lbs).
Take a look at the Kodak M575 versus Nikon S01 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Below is a front view over all size comparison of the M575 compared to the S01.
![Kodak M575 vs Nikon S01 size comparison Kodak M575 vs Nikon S01 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Kodak-EasyShare-M575-vs-Nikon-Coolpix-S01-size-comparison.jpg)
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the M575 and S01 is 95 and 97 respectively.
![Kodak M575 vs Nikon S01 top view buttons comparison Kodak M575 vs Nikon S01 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Kodak-EasyShare-M575-vs-Nikon-Coolpix-S01-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Kodak M575 vs Nikon S01 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be tough to imagine the gap in sensor measurements simply by viewing specifications. The graphic underneath will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the M575 and S01.
Plainly, each of these cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The M575 because of its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF simpler and the Kodak M575 will result in more detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop shots more aggressively. The older M575 will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
![Kodak M575 vs Nikon S01 sensor size comparison Kodak M575 vs Nikon S01 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Kodak-EasyShare-M575-vs-Nikon-Coolpix-S01-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Kodak M575 vs Nikon S01 Screen and ViewFinder
![Kodak M575 vs Nikon S01 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Kodak M575 vs Nikon S01 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Kodak-EasyShare-M575-vs-Nikon-Coolpix-S01-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Kodak M575 vs Nikon S01 Specifications
Kodak EasyShare M575 | Nikon Coolpix S01 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Kodak | Nikon |
Model | Kodak EasyShare M575 | Nikon Coolpix S01 |
Type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2010-01-05 | 2013-06-21 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Expeed C2 |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.9" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 4.96 x 3.72mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 18.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 1000 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 29-87mm (3.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focus range | 10cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 7.3 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 2.5 inch |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display tech | - | TFT-LCD with Anti-reflection coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 1 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/1400 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 3.50 m | 1.20 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 152 grams (0.34 lbs) | 96 grams (0.21 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 99 x 58 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 77 x 52 x 17mm (3.0" x 2.0" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 190 photos |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | KLIC-7006 | Built-in |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | - |
Card slots | Single | - |
Cost at launch | $139 | $170 |