Clicky

Kodak M575 vs Nikon S6400

Portability
95
Imaging
37
Features
24
Overall
31
Kodak EasyShare M575 front
 
Nikon Coolpix S6400 front
Portability
94
Imaging
40
Features
37
Overall
38

Kodak M575 vs Nikon S6400 Key Specs

Kodak M575
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1000
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F) lens
  • 152g - 99 x 58 x 19mm
  • Released January 2010
Nikon S6400
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 125 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-300mm (F3.1-6.5) lens
  • 150g - 95 x 58 x 27mm
  • Launched August 2012
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Kodak M575 vs Nikon S6400 Overview

In this write-up, we are reviewing the Kodak M575 and Nikon S6400, both Ultracompact digital cameras by competitors Kodak and Nikon. The sensor resolution of the M575 (14MP) and the S6400 (16MP) is fairly similar and they enjoy the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

The M575 was brought out 3 years before the S6400 and that is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Ultracompact).

Before getting in to a detailed comparison, below is a simple view of how the M575 matches up against the S6400 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak M575 over the Nikon S6400

 M575 S6400 

Reasons to pick Nikon S6400 over the Kodak M575

 S6400 M575 
LaunchedAugust 2012January 2010Fresher by 32 months
Display resolution460k230kCrisper display (+230k dot)
Touch display Easily navigate

Common features in the Kodak M575 and Nikon S6400

 M575 S6400 
Manual focus No manual focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display sizing3"3"Equivalent display measurements
Selfie screen Neither comes with selfie screen

Kodak M575 vs Nikon S6400 Physical Comparison

When you are going to carry your camera regularly, you have to think about its weight and size. The Kodak M575 comes with outside dimensions of 99mm x 58mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") and a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Nikon S6400 has specifications of 95mm x 58mm x 27mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs).

Analyze the Kodak M575 and Nikon S6400 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have chosen during that time. Following is the front view dimensions comparison of the M575 vs the S6400.

Kodak M575 vs Nikon S6400 size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the M575 and S6400 is 95 and 94 respectively.

Kodak M575 vs Nikon S6400 top view buttons comparison

Kodak M575 vs Nikon S6400 Sensor Comparison

Often, it is hard to envision the gap between sensor sizing purely by reviewing technical specs. The photograph underneath will give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the M575 and S6400.

As you can tell, both the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but not the same resolution. You can anticipate the Nikon S6400 to offer you greater detail having its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop images a little more aggressively. The older M575 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.

Kodak M575 vs Nikon S6400 sensor size comparison

Kodak M575 vs Nikon S6400 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak M575 vs Nikon S6400 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak M575 Portrait photography advice
Nikon S6400 Portrait photography advice
28
MP count good (14 megapixels)
manual focus not available
no manual control
external flash not possible
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
35
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
has face detection focusing
focusing manually not possible
lack of manual exposure
cannot use external flash
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Kodak M575 as a Street photography camera
Nikon S6400 as a Street photography camera
48
no articulating screen
does not have image stabilization
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
more heavy than average in class (152g)
maximum ISO low (1,000)
55
built in image stabilization (Optical)
no moving screen
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
more heavy than competition (150g)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Kodak M575
Sports photography with Nikon S6400
26
MP count good (14MP)
low max shutter speed (1/1,400 seconds)
no shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
41
built in image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
has tracking autofocus
no shutter priority mode
sensor is small (1/2.3")
bad battery life (160 CIPA)
no phase detect AF
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Travel Comparison

Kodak M575 Travel photography details
Nikon S6400 Travel photography details
68
MP count good (14 megapixels)
has built in flash
quite wide (28mm)
great max aperture (f)
lack of Timelapse function
more heavy than average in class (152g)
does not have a selfie friendly display
63
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
pretty wide (25mm)
great zoom (300mm)
does not have Timelapse recording
bad battery life (160 per charge)
more heavy than competition (150 grams)
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Kodak M575 Landscape photography features
Nikon S6400 Landscape photography features
40
quite wide (28mm)
great max aperture (f)
screen size is good (3 inch)
MP count good (14 megapixels)
manual focus not available
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
no manual control
does not have image stabilization
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
maximum ISO low (1,000)
no RAW format
lack of Timelapse function
42
pretty wide (25mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
lack of manual exposure
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
bad battery life (160 shots)
does not have Timelapse recording
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Kodak M575
Vlogging with Nikon S6400
28
quite wide (28mm)
great max aperture (f)
does not have a selfie friendly display
does not have image stabilization
video quality not great (1280 x 720 resolution)
lack of microphone support
more heavy than average in class (152g)
33
pretty wide (25mm)
has touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Optical)
has face detection focusing
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
screen isn't selfie friendly
does not have external microphone support
more heavy than competition (150g)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Kodak M575 vs Nikon S6400 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak M575 and Nikon S6400
 Kodak EasyShare M575Nikon Coolpix S6400
General Information
Company Kodak Nikon
Model Kodak EasyShare M575 Nikon Coolpix S6400
Type Ultracompact Ultracompact
Released 2010-01-05 2012-08-22
Physical type Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Powered by - Expeed C2
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 14MP 16MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Max resolution 4288 x 3216 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 1000 3200
Lowest native ISO 80 125
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-140mm (5.0x) 25-300mm (12.0x)
Highest aperture - f/3.1-6.5
Macro focus distance 10cm 10cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 230 thousand dots 460 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Screen tech - TFT LCD monitor
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 8 seconds 4 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/1400 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 3.50 m -
Flash options Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off -
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video file format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 152 grams (0.34 pounds) 150 grams (0.33 pounds)
Dimensions 99 x 58 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") 95 x 58 x 27mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 160 pictures
Type of battery - Battery Pack
Battery model KLIC-7006 EN-EL19
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (10 or 2 seconds)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots 1 1
Cost at release $139 $500