Clicky

Kodak M575 vs Samsung ST65

Portability
95
Imaging
37
Features
24
Overall
31
Kodak EasyShare M575 front
 
Samsung ST65 front
Portability
99
Imaging
37
Features
19
Overall
29

Kodak M575 vs Samsung ST65 Key Specs

Kodak M575
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1000
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F) lens
  • 152g - 99 x 58 x 19mm
  • Launched January 2010
Samsung ST65
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 0 - 0
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • ()mm (F) lens
  • n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
  • Launched January 2011
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Kodak M575 vs Samsung ST65 Overview

On this page, we are matching up the Kodak M575 vs Samsung ST65, both Ultracompact digital cameras by companies Kodak and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the M575 (14MP) and the ST65 (14MP) is very well matched and both cameras boast the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The M575 was revealed 12 months before the ST65 and they are of a similar generation. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).

Before getting straight to a full comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the M575 scores vs the ST65 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak M575 over the Samsung ST65

 M575 ST65 

Reasons to pick Samsung ST65 over the Kodak M575

 ST65 M575 
LaunchedJanuary 2011January 2010Newer by 12 months
Display resolution460k230kSharper display (+230k dot)

Common features in the Kodak M575 and Samsung ST65

 M575 ST65 
Focus manually Lack of manual focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimensions3"3"Equal display sizing
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch friendly display No Touch friendly display

Kodak M575 vs Samsung ST65 Physical Comparison

When you are going to travel with your camera frequently, you're going to have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Kodak M575 features exterior dimensions of 99mm x 58mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") and a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Samsung ST65 has dimensions of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).

Compare the Kodak M575 vs Samsung ST65 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are employing at that time. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the M575 compared to the ST65.

Kodak M575 vs Samsung ST65 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the M575 and ST65 is 95 and 99 respectively.

Kodak M575 vs Samsung ST65 top view buttons comparison

Kodak M575 vs Samsung ST65 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it is very hard to picture the contrast between sensor dimensions only by reading through a spec sheet. The pic here will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the M575 and ST65.

As you can see, the two cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the same megapixels and you should expect similar quality of images although you have to factor the release date of the products into consideration. The more aged M575 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.

Kodak M575 vs Samsung ST65 sensor size comparison

Kodak M575 vs Samsung ST65 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak M575 vs Samsung ST65 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak M575 Portrait photography highlights
Samsung ST65 Portrait photography highlights
28
decent MP (14 megapixels)
manual focus not available
manual mode not available
can't use external flash
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
28
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
manual exposure not possible
no external flash support
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Kodak M575 Street photography advice
Samsung ST65 Street photography advice
48
fixed screen
does not have image stabilization
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
heavier than others in class (152g)
maximum ISO low (1,000)
49
screen is fixed
no image stabilization
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
low max ISO (0)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Kodak M575
Sports photography with Samsung ST65
26
decent MP (14 megapixels)
low max shutter speed (1/1,400s)
lack of shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
26
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
fixed focal length (()mm)
lack of shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Kodak M575 Travel photography highlights
Samsung ST65 Travel photography highlights
68
decent MP (14MP)
flash built-in
reasonably wide (28mm)
good max aperture (f)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
heavier than others in class (152 grams)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
71
resolution is good (14MP)
has built in flash
good maximum aperture (f)
lack of Timelapse mode
display isn't selfie friendly
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Kodak M575 Landscape photography factors
Samsung ST65 Landscape photography factors
40
reasonably wide (28mm)
good max aperture (f)
screen is a decent size (3 inch)
decent MP (14 megapixels)
manual focus not available
cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
manual mode not available
does not have image stabilization
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
maximum ISO low (1,000)
lacks RAW format
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
37
good maximum aperture (f)
good sized screen (3")
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (()mm)
manual exposure not possible
no image stabilization
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
low max ISO (0)
lacks RAW files
lack of Timelapse mode
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak M575 Vlogging factors
Samsung ST65 Vlogging factors
28
reasonably wide (28mm)
good max aperture (f)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
does not have image stabilization
low video resolution (1280 x 720 resolution)
doesn't have mic jack
heavier than others in class (152 grams)
27
good maximum aperture (f)
display isn't selfie friendly
no image stabilization
low video resolution (1280 x 720 resolution)
lack of external microphone jack
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Kodak M575 vs Samsung ST65 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak M575 and Samsung ST65
 Kodak EasyShare M575Samsung ST65
General Information
Brand Kodak Samsung
Model Kodak EasyShare M575 Samsung ST65
Category Ultracompact Ultracompact
Launched 2010-01-05 2011-01-19
Body design Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.16 x 4.62mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.5mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Full resolution 4288 x 3216 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 1000 -
Lowest native ISO 80 -
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-140mm (5.0x) ()
Macro focus distance 10cm -
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 3" 3"
Display resolution 230 thousand dot 460 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 8 secs 8 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/1400 secs 1/2000 secs
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 3.50 m -
Flash modes Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off -
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720
Max video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video format Motion JPEG -
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 152g (0.34 lb) -
Physical dimensions 99 x 58 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model KLIC-7006 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) -
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal -
Storage slots One One
Pricing at launch $139 $130