Kodak M575 vs Sony T110
95 Imaging
37 Features
24 Overall
31
![Kodak EasyShare M575 front Kodak EasyShare M575 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Kodak-EasyShare-M575/Kodak-M575-front.jpg)
![Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T110 front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T110 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-T110/Sony-T110-front.jpg)
96 Imaging
39 Features
30 Overall
35
Kodak M575 vs Sony T110 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1000
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F) lens
- 152g - 99 x 58 x 19mm
- Launched January 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-108mm (F3.5-4.6) lens
- 121g - 93 x 56 x 17mm
- Released January 2011
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Kodak M575 vs Sony T110 Overview
The following is a detailed analysis of the Kodak M575 versus Sony T110, both Ultracompact digital cameras by rivals Kodak and Sony. The resolution of the M575 (14MP) and the T110 (16MP) is fairly similar and both cameras have the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
The M575 was announced 12 months before the T110 which means that they are of a similar generation. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before diving right into a full comparison, here is a quick view of how the M575 grades versus the T110 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Kodak M575 vs Sony T110 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Kodak EasyShare M575 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T110. The whole galleries are provided at Kodak M575 Gallery and Sony T110 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak M575 over the Sony T110
M575 | T110 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony T110 over the Kodak M575
T110 | M575 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2011 | ![]() | January 2010 | Newer by 12 months |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Kodak M575 and Sony T110
M575 | T110 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | No manual focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display measurements |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Equal display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen |
Kodak M575 vs Sony T110 Physical Comparison
If you're going to travel with your camera regularly, you need to think about its weight and measurements. The Kodak M575 enjoys outer dimensions of 99mm x 58mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") having a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Sony T110 has proportions of 93mm x 56mm x 17mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs).
See the Kodak M575 versus Sony T110 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you select during that time. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the M575 against the T110.
![Kodak M575 vs Sony T110 size comparison Kodak M575 vs Sony T110 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Kodak-EasyShare-M575-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-T110-size-comparison.jpg)
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the M575 and T110 is 95 and 96 respectively.
![Kodak M575 vs Sony T110 top view buttons comparison Kodak M575 vs Sony T110 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Kodak-EasyShare-M575-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-T110-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Kodak M575 vs Sony T110 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's tough to picture the contrast between sensor dimensions only by reviewing specs. The picture underneath may provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the M575 and T110.
All in all, each of the cameras come with the identical sensor size but different resolution. You should anticipate the Sony T110 to offer extra detail with its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The more aged M575 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
![Kodak M575 vs Sony T110 sensor size comparison Kodak M575 vs Sony T110 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Kodak-EasyShare-M575-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-T110-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Kodak M575 vs Sony T110 Screen and ViewFinder
![Kodak M575 vs Sony T110 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Kodak M575 vs Sony T110 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Kodak-EasyShare-M575-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-T110-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Kodak M575 vs Sony T110 Specifications
Kodak EasyShare M575 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T110 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Kodak | Sony |
Model type | Kodak EasyShare M575 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T110 |
Type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2010-01-05 | 2011-01-06 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | BIONZ |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 1000 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 27-108mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.5-4.6 |
Macro focusing distance | 10cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display technology | - | Clear Photo LCD Plus with touchscreen interface |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 2 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/1400 secs | 1/1600 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.50 m | 2.80 m |
Flash options | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 152g (0.34 pounds) | 121g (0.27 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 99 x 58 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 93 x 56 x 17mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | KLIC-7006 | NP-BG1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail price | $139 | $199 |