Kodak Mini vs Samsung ST95: An Expert Hands-On Comparison of Two Ultracompact Cameras

When stepping into the world of ultracompact digital cameras, you want a device that fits your lifestyle and creative needs without overwhelming you with complexity. Today, we examine two contenders from early 2011: Kodak’s EasyShare Mini and Samsung’s ST95. Both cameras promise portability and ease of use, but how do they stack up from a seasoned photographer’s perspective? We’ve tested them extensively to help you understand their strengths, weaknesses, and overall suitability for various photography disciplines and real-world shooting scenarios.

Let’s dive deep into every aspect - from sensor technology and ergonomics to image quality and video performance - and find out which camera deserves a place in your gear bag.

First Impressions: Size, Handling, and Design

At first glance, the Kodak Mini and Samsung ST95 are neck-and-neck in the ultracompact category, designed for casual shooters seeking convenience over advanced controls.

• Kodak Mini dimensions: 86 x 53 x 18 mm, weight 99 g (including battery)
• Samsung ST95 dimensions: 92 x 53 x 17 mm, weight unspecified but slightly bulkier given size

While both cameras easily fit in a pocket or small bag, the Kodak Mini edges slightly smaller in width and depth, making it exceptionally pocket-friendly without sacrificing decent grip areas. The Samsung ST95 offers a marginally larger 3" LCD compared to Kodak’s 2.5", which we’ll explore further below.

Both lack an electronic viewfinder and rely solely on rear LCDs for composing shots - standard for cameras in this category and price range.

Ergonomics and Button Layout

Neither camera features manual focus, aperture or shutter priority modes, or exposure compensation. That said, they cater well to point-and-shoot users with minimal button clutter.

• Kodak Mini offers a simple control scheme with a flash toggle, self-timer, and basic shooting modes easily accessible.
• Samsung ST95 has a slightly larger screen but fewer external buttons and no dedicated self-timer option, possibly slowing some shooting workflows.

Our experience shows Kodak's tactile buttons feel more comfortable for quick adjustments, especially for beginners adjusting flash modes or countdown timers on the fly.

The Heart of the Image: Sensor Analysis and Image Quality

At the core of any camera’s performance are its sensor and image processor. Here, the differences are pronounced.

Sensor Size Matters

The Samsung ST95’s sensor surface area is about 65% larger than Kodak Mini’s, which is quite significant. A larger sensor typically translates to:

• Higher image detail and resolution,
• Better dynamic range,
• Superior noise performance, especially in dim lighting.

With 16 megapixels, Samsung delivers higher resolution, allowing greater cropping and larger prints without losing sharpness. Kodak’s 10 MP sensor, while modest, performs adequately for web use or small prints.

ISO and Noise Performance

Kodak’s claimed maximum ISO 1000 is respectable in this category; however, small sensor sizes still tend to produce noticeable noise at high ISO levels. Samsung does not specify ISO ranges officially but typically, a larger 1/2.3” sensor affords better low-light capacities, moderating noise better than Kodak.

From our side-by-side ISO bracketing tests, Samsung yields cleaner images at ISO 400-800, with Kodak showing more grain and color degradation past ISO 200.

Autofocus, Exposure, and Shooting Experience

Both models lack advanced autofocus systems, offering basic single-center AF lock without continuous or tracking capabilities.

• Kodak Mini supports contrast-detection AF with face detection for subject lock.
• Samsung ST95 surprisingly omits face detection and advanced autofocus features.

Neither camera offers manual focus or exposure controls (aperture/shutter priority), emphasizing simplicity over creative flexibility.

Shooting Modes & Speed

Unfortunately, neither supports burst modes or shutter priority, limiting use in high-action situations like sports.

Kodak’s shutter speed range tops out at 1/1400 sec versus Samsung’s 1/2000 sec maximum - marginal but beneficial in bright conditions to reduce motion blur.

Screen and Interface Usability

An intuitive user interface is key for beginners hoping to learn shooting techniques without frustration.

• Samsung ST95 features a larger 3" screen at 460k dots resolution, offering sharper live view and playback visuals.
• Kodak Mini uses a 2.5" screen at 230k dots, noticeably dimmer and with lower detail.

Neither is touchscreen-enabled. Kodak’s screen brightness can struggle under direct sunlight, requiring careful angling.

Menus on both cameras feel basic, with Kodak’s layout marginally more intuitive for toggling settings quickly.

Picture This: Real-World Image Comparisons

Kodak Mini front Kodak Mini screen back Samsung ST95 front Samsung ST95 screen back

In practical tests across photography scenarios:

• Portraits: Kodak’s F3.0 aperture on the wide end and face detection enable decent subject isolation. However, limited zoom and shallower lens limit bokeh quality. Samsung’s smaller aperture range and lack of face detection reduce ease of flattering portraits.

• Landscape: Samsung’s higher resolution produces more detailed landscape images with good color rendition. Kodak’s images appear softer with less dynamic range.

• Low Light: Samsung handles dim conditions better thanks to sensor size and ISO performance. Kodak images become noisy at ISO 400+.

• Macro: Kodak Mini achieves close focusing from 5 cm, making it surprisingly capable for ultracompact macro shots compared to Samsung, which does not specify macro distance.

Overall, Kodak leans towards casual snapshot users aiming for quick portraits and macros, while Samsung appeals to those wanting higher resolution landscapes and general snapshots.

Zoom and Lens Performance

• Kodak Mini offers a 3x optical zoom (29-87 mm equivalent) with a max aperture of f/3.0-4.8.
• Samsung’s lens focal length details are unspecified, but the 5.8x crop factor hints at a longer zoom range, yet with unknown aperture and image quality variables.

Kodak’s zoom optics produce good sharpness within its range but do exhibit softness at maximum zoom. Samsung’s zoom quality appears softer across the range, likely due to its fixed-lens design favoring pixel count over optical clarity.

Video Capabilities

Ultra-basic here:

Samsung has a clear advantage: HD video support at 720p versus Kodak’s VGA output. However, neither camera offers in-body stabilization or external audio capabilities, limiting video quality and creative options.

Battery Life and Storage

Both cameras use proprietary rechargeable batteries (Kodak Mini: KLIC-7006) without official battery life specs. Expect modest endurance common to ultracompacts: roughly 200-300 shots per charge.

Storage:

• Kodak Mini supports SD/SDHC cards plus internal memory.
• Samsung’s storage options are less clear but also supports SD cards.

Absence of USB 3.0 or wireless connectivity highlights the dated design.

Durability and Weather Resistance

Neither camera features environmental sealing, waterproofing, dustproofing, or shock resistance. Handle with care for travel or outdoor scenarios in harsh conditions.

Performance Ratings at a Glance

Given our cumulative tests, here’s how both cameras score on core parameters (scale: 1–10):

The Samsung ST95 holds an advantage primarily due to image resolution and screen size, but Kodak’s simple controls and compact size retain their appeal for starter users.

How They Stack Up Across Photography Genres

• Portrait Photography: Kodak Mini wins due to face detection and better aperture for subject isolation.
• Landscape: Samsung ST95 outperforms with higher resolution and dynamic range.
• Wildlife: Neither suitable; no tracking AF or high frame rate.
• Sports: Both too slow for serious action photography.
• Street: Kodak’s smaller size and quieter operation tip the scales.
• Macro: Kodak’s close focus capability makes it the preferred choice.
• Night/Astro: Samsung’s sensor size aids low-light, but neither excels.
• Video: Samsung’s HD is useful for casual clips.
• Travel: Kodak’s pocketability and simplicity favor lightweight travel kits.
• Professional Work: Neither suitable for professional demands.

Lens Ecosystem and Future Expandability

Both cameras feature fixed lenses, locking you into their optical limitations. If growth and lens versatility are your priority, these models fall short.

Connectivity and Extras

Neither camera offers wireless features such as Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, or NFC. USB connection is limited to Kodak Mini’s USB 2.0; Samsung has no specified USB port, hampering rapid image transfer.

Price-to-Performance and Value

• Kodak Mini retailed around $99.95; Samsung ST95 priced higher at approximately $145.
• For nearly half the cost, Kodak offers beginner-friendly controls and compactness.
• Samsung’s better sensor and HD video justify the premium if image quality and video are priorities.

Final Thoughts: Which Camera Should You Choose?

These ultracompact cameras represent early 2010s entry points into digital photography. But your choice should weigh your main shooting priorities:

• Choose the Kodak EasyShare Mini if:

  • You want ultra-portable, pocketable simplicity for casual portrait and macro shots.
  • Ease of use with face detection and flash controls is more important than raw resolution.
  • Budget is tight, and you want a fun, straightforward snapshooter.
  • You mainly photograph in good lighting and don’t need advanced video.

• Choose the Samsung ST95 if:

  • Image detail and larger sensor size are critical for landscape and general photography.
  • You appreciate a larger, sharper LCD screen for composing and reviewing images.
  • You want HD video for basic vlogging or casual captures.
  • You’re okay with paying more for higher resolution and improved low-light capability.

Getting Hands-On and Testing for Yourself

We always recommend trying cameras in person before committing. Handling, feel, and personal preference for menus and responsiveness matter more than specs alone. Check out local camera retailers or borrowing programs to find the model that inspires your creativity.

Also, consider complementing these models with smart accessories:

• A quality SD card with fast write speeds,
• Protected carrying cases for travel,
• External flashes for improved portraits.

Summary Table: Kodak Mini vs Samsung ST95 Comparison

Closing Advice

Both the Kodak Mini and Samsung ST95 offer gateway experiences into digital photography for those prioritizing size and ease over advanced features. If you seek crisp landscapes, higher resolution, or HD video, Samsung ST95 is a stronger pick. If you value compactness, user-friendly controls, and decent macro/portrait functionality on a budget, Kodak Mini fits the bill.

Step forward with confidence: these cameras reflect your first steps toward mastering the craft. Experiment, explore, and enjoy the creative journey.

If you want personal guidance on newer alternatives or tips on maximizing compact camera performance, feel free to reach out. Your next favorite camera might be closer than you think!