Clicky

Kodak Touch vs Samsung TL320

Portability
95
Imaging
36
Features
34
Overall
35
Kodak EasyShare Touch front
 
Samsung TL320 front
Portability
98
Imaging
35
Features
36
Overall
35

Kodak Touch vs Samsung TL320 Key Specs

Kodak Touch
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F) lens
  • 150g - 101 x 58 x 19mm
  • Announced January 2011
Samsung TL320
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-120mm (F2.8-5.8) lens
  • n/ag - 97 x 61 x 21mm
  • Launched February 2009
  • Alternate Name is WB1000
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Kodak Touch vs Samsung TL320 Overview

On this page, we are evaluating the Kodak Touch vs Samsung TL320, both Ultracompact cameras by competitors Kodak and Samsung. The resolution of the Touch (14MP) and the TL320 (12MP) is fairly close but the Touch (1/3") and TL320 (1/2.3") have totally different sensor measurements.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The Touch was launched 23 months after the TL320 making them a generation away from each other. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).

Before delving right into a thorough comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the Touch grades versus the TL320 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak Touch over the Samsung TL320

 Touch TL320 
LaunchedJanuary 2011February 2009Newer by 23 months
Touch display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Samsung TL320 over the Kodak Touch

 TL320 Touch 
Manual focus Very precise focusing

Common features in the Kodak Touch and Samsung TL320

 Touch TL320 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimensions3"3"Equal display measurements
Display resolution460k460kThe same display resolution
Selfie screen Neither includes selfie screen

Kodak Touch vs Samsung TL320 Physical Comparison

If you are going to travel with your camera, you will need to think about its weight and size. The Kodak Touch features outside measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") with a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs) whilst the Samsung TL320 has specifications of 97mm x 61mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).

Take a look at the Kodak Touch vs Samsung TL320 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have at that moment. Following is a front view scale comparison of the Touch and the TL320.

Kodak Touch vs Samsung TL320 size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the Touch and TL320 is 95 and 98 respectively.

Kodak Touch vs Samsung TL320 top view buttons comparison

Kodak Touch vs Samsung TL320 Sensor Comparison

Generally, its difficult to see the difference in sensor dimensions just by researching specifications. The pic underneath will give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the Touch and TL320.

Plainly, both the cameras have different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The Touch featuring a smaller sensor will make getting shallower depth of field tougher and the Kodak Touch will result in greater detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The fresher Touch is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.

Kodak Touch vs Samsung TL320 sensor size comparison

Kodak Touch vs Samsung TL320 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak Touch vs Samsung TL320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Kodak Touch
Portrait photography with Samsung TL320
33
resolution is good (14MP)
provides face detect focusing
lack of manual focus
lack of manual exposure
no external flash support
sensor size is tiny (1/3")
lacks RAW files
34
has manual focus
features face detect focusing
cannot use external flash
low resolution (12MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Street photography with Kodak Touch
Street photography with Samsung TL320
48
screen does not articulate
no image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/3")
lacks RAW files
heavier than competition in class (150 grams)
58
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no articulating screen
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Kodak Touch
Sports photography with Samsung TL320
28
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
no shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/3")
lacks phase detect AF
30
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
low resolution (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Travel Comparison

Kodak Touch as a Travel photography camera
Samsung TL320 as a Travel photography camera
68
resolution is good (14MP)
flash built-in
relatively wide (28mm)
very good max aperture (f)
lack of Time Lapse recording
heavier than competition in class (150g)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
59
built-in flash
relatively wide (24mm)
missing Time Lapse function
low resolution (12 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Kodak Touch Landscape photography highlights
Samsung TL320 Landscape photography highlights
42
relatively wide (28mm)
very good max aperture (f)
screen size is good (3 inch)
resolution is good (14MP)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
lack of manual exposure
no image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/3")
lacks RAW files
lack of Time Lapse recording
43
has manual focus
relatively wide (24mm)
screen is a good size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
low resolution (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
missing Time Lapse function
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak Touch as a Vlogging camera
Samsung TL320 as a Vlogging camera
31
relatively wide (28mm)
very good max aperture (f)
touchscreen enabled
provides face detect focusing
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
no image stabilization
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of mic port
heavier than competition in class (150 grams)
31
relatively wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features face detect focusing
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
display is not selfie friendly
low quality video (1280 x 720 pixels)
missing mic support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Kodak Touch vs Samsung TL320 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak Touch and Samsung TL320
 Kodak EasyShare TouchSamsung TL320
General Information
Company Kodak Samsung
Model type Kodak EasyShare Touch Samsung TL320
Otherwise known as - WB1000
Class Ultracompact Ultracompact
Announced 2011-01-04 2009-02-23
Physical type Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 4.8 x 3.6mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 17.3mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2
Highest resolution 4288 x 3216 4000 x 3000
Highest native ISO 1600 3200
Minimum native ISO 100 80
RAW data
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch to focus
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-140mm (5.0x) 24-120mm (5.0x)
Maximal aperture - f/2.8-5.8
Macro focusing range 5cm 5cm
Crop factor 7.5 5.9
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3 inch 3 inch
Display resolution 460k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Display technology TFT color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 8 secs 16 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/1600 secs 1/2000 secs
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 3.20 m 5.00 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video data format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 150 grams (0.33 lbs) -
Physical dimensions 101 x 58 x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") 97 x 61 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID KLIC-7006 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer)
Time lapse feature
Storage type MicroSD/MicroSDHC card, Internal SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal
Card slots Single Single
Retail price $100 $380