Kodak Z950 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS
89 Imaging
35 Features
29 Overall
32
93 Imaging
37 Features
31 Overall
34
Kodak Z950 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Expand to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-350mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 243g - 110 x 67 x 36mm
- Launched June 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 167g - 116 x 59 x 29mm
- Announced August 2011
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Kodak Z950 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Overview
Below, we will be analyzing the Kodak Z950 and Pentax WG-1 GPS, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by brands Kodak and Pentax. The sensor resolution of the Z950 (12MP) and the WG-1 GPS (14MP) is relatively close and they use the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe Z950 was announced 14 months earlier than the WG-1 GPS which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go straight into a in depth comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the Z950 matches up against the WG-1 GPS in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Kodak Z950 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Kodak EasyShare Z950 and Pentax Optio WG-1 GPS. The whole galleries are viewable at Kodak Z950 Gallery and Pentax WG-1 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Z950 over the Pentax WG-1 GPS
| Z950 | WG-1 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-1 GPS over the Kodak Z950
| WG-1 GPS | Z950 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | August 2011 |  | June 2010 | More modern by 14 months |
Common features in the Kodak Z950 and Pentax WG-1 GPS
| Z950 | WG-1 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very exact focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Equal screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Missing Touch screen |
Kodak Z950 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry around your camera regularly, you are going to need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Kodak Z950 features outer measurements of 110mm x 67mm x 36mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") along with a weight of 243 grams (0.54 lbs) and the Pentax WG-1 GPS has proportions of 116mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.6" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Analyze the Kodak Z950 and Pentax WG-1 GPS in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are employing during that time. The following is the front view physical size comparison of the Z950 and the WG-1 GPS.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the Z950 and WG-1 GPS is 89 and 93 respectively.
Kodak Z950 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be hard to visualise the difference in sensor sizes merely by researching technical specs. The picture below may provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the Z950 and WG-1 GPS.
As you can tell, each of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same MP. You should count on the Pentax WG-1 GPS to result in extra detail with its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures much more aggressively. The more aged Z950 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Kodak Z950 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Kodak Z950 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare Z950 | Pentax Optio WG-1 GPS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Kodak | Pentax |
| Model type | Kodak EasyShare Z950 | Pentax Optio WG-1 GPS |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2010-06-16 | 2011-08-16 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Highest boosted ISO | 3200 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 35-350mm (10.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.5-4.8 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | 6cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
| Screen resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT color LCD with Anti-reflective coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 1/8 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1250 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 1.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.40 m | 3.90 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 243 gr (0.54 pounds) | 167 gr (0.37 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 110 x 67 x 36mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") | 116 x 59 x 29mm (4.6" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 260 images |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | KLIC-7003 | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Price at launch | $250 | $350 |