Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Samsung WB750
65 Imaging
45 Features
56 Overall
49
![Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 front Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Kodak-Pixpro-Astro-Zoom-AZ651/Kodak-Astro-Zoom-AZ651-front.jpg)
![Samsung WB750 front Samsung WB750 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/w300/fronton/Samsung-WB750.jpg)
93 Imaging
36 Features
50 Overall
41
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Samsung WB750 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 21MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1560mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 567g - 125 x 114 x 89mm
- Launched January 2014
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 193g - 105 x 59 x 25mm
- Introduced September 2011
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Samsung WB750 Overview
Following is a in-depth assessment of the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 versus Samsung WB750, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by rivals Kodak and Samsung. There exists a huge gap between the sensor resolutions of the Astro Zoom AZ651 (21MP) and WB750 (13MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
The Astro Zoom AZ651 was released 2 years after the WB750 which is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung WB750 being a Compact camera.
Before diving into a detailed comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the Astro Zoom AZ651 grades vs the WB750 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Samsung WB750 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 and Samsung WB750. The complete galleries are viewable at Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Gallery and Samsung WB750 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 over the Samsung WB750
Astro Zoom AZ651 | WB750 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2014 | ![]() | September 2011 | More modern by 29 months |
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer display (+460k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB750 over the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651
WB750 | Astro Zoom AZ651 |
---|
Common features in the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 and Samsung WB750
Astro Zoom AZ651 | WB750 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More precise focusing | ||
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display sizing |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Missing Touch friendly display |
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Samsung WB750 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to carry around your camera often, you'll need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 features exterior measurements of 125mm x 114mm x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5") having a weight of 567 grams (1.25 lbs) while the Samsung WB750 has measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 25mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
See the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 versus Samsung WB750 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have at the time. Here is a front view scale comparison of the Astro Zoom AZ651 vs the WB750.
![Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Samsung WB750 size comparison Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Samsung WB750 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Kodak-Pixpro-Astro-Zoom-AZ651-vs-Samsung-WB750-size-comparison.jpg)
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Astro Zoom AZ651 and WB750 is 65 and 93 respectively.
![Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Samsung WB750 top view buttons comparison Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Samsung WB750 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Kodak-Pixpro-Astro-Zoom-AZ651-vs-Samsung-WB750-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Samsung WB750 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very difficult to envision the gap between sensor sizes merely by reading through specs. The picture underneath will help provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the Astro Zoom AZ651 and WB750.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras have the same sensor dimensions but not the same resolution. You should expect to see the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 to give greater detail as a result of its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The newer Astro Zoom AZ651 is going to have an edge with regard to sensor technology.
![Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Samsung WB750 sensor size comparison Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Samsung WB750 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Kodak-Pixpro-Astro-Zoom-AZ651-vs-Samsung-WB750-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Samsung WB750 Screen and ViewFinder
![Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Samsung WB750 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Samsung WB750 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Kodak-Pixpro-Astro-Zoom-AZ651-vs-Samsung-WB750-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Samsung WB750 Specifications
Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 | Samsung WB750 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Kodak | Samsung |
Model | Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 | Samsung WB750 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2014-01-07 | 2011-09-01 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 21 megapixels | 13 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4096 x 3072 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 25 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-1560mm (65.0x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/3.2-5.8 |
Macro focus distance | 3cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 920k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | - | 8s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 9.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | 3.30 m |
Flash modes | - | On, Off, Fill, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30/15 fps), 640 x 480 (30/15 fps), 320x 240 fps (30/15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 567g (1.25 lb) | 193g (0.43 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 125 x 114 x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5") | 105 x 59 x 25mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | - | SLB-10A |
Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $419 | $339 |