Clicky

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Samsung WB750

Portability
65
Imaging
45
Features
56
Overall
49
Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 front
 
Samsung WB750 front
Portability
93
Imaging
36
Features
50
Overall
41

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Samsung WB750 Key Specs

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651
(Full Review)
  • 21MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-1560mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
  • 567g - 125 x 114 x 89mm
  • Launched January 2014
Samsung WB750
(Full Review)
  • 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
  • 193g - 105 x 59 x 25mm
  • Introduced September 2011
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Samsung WB750 Overview

Following is a in-depth assessment of the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 versus Samsung WB750, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by rivals Kodak and Samsung. There exists a huge gap between the sensor resolutions of the Astro Zoom AZ651 (21MP) and WB750 (13MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The Astro Zoom AZ651 was released 2 years after the WB750 which is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung WB750 being a Compact camera.

Before diving into a detailed comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the Astro Zoom AZ651 grades vs the WB750 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 over the Samsung WB750

 Astro Zoom AZ651 WB750 
IntroducedJanuary 2014September 2011More modern by 29 months
Display typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Display resolution920k460kClearer display (+460k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies

Reasons to pick Samsung WB750 over the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651

 WB750 Astro Zoom AZ651 

Common features in the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 and Samsung WB750

 Astro Zoom AZ651 WB750 
Manual focus More precise focusing
Display dimensions3"3"Equal display sizing
Touch friendly display Missing Touch friendly display

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Samsung WB750 Physical Comparison

When you are intending to carry around your camera often, you'll need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 features exterior measurements of 125mm x 114mm x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5") having a weight of 567 grams (1.25 lbs) while the Samsung WB750 has measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 25mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).

See the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 versus Samsung WB750 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have at the time. Here is a front view scale comparison of the Astro Zoom AZ651 vs the WB750.

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Samsung WB750 size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Astro Zoom AZ651 and WB750 is 65 and 93 respectively.

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Samsung WB750 top view buttons comparison

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Samsung WB750 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it is very difficult to envision the gap between sensor sizes merely by reading through specs. The picture underneath will help provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the Astro Zoom AZ651 and WB750.

As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras have the same sensor dimensions but not the same resolution. You should expect to see the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 to give greater detail as a result of its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The newer Astro Zoom AZ651 is going to have an edge with regard to sensor technology.

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Samsung WB750 sensor size comparison

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Samsung WB750 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Samsung WB750 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Portrait photography information
Samsung WB750 Portrait photography information
53
manual focus
megapixel count good (21MP)
includes face detect focusing
supports RAW files
no external flash support
sensor is small (1/2.3")
41
manual focus
decent MP (13 megapixels)
features face detect focus
no external flash support
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Street photography factors
Samsung WB750 Street photography factors
59
screen articulates fully
has image stabilization (Optical)
supports RAW files
sensor is small (1/2.3")
more heavy than competition in class (567g)
61
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than average (193g)
screen is fixed
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Sports photography details
Samsung WB750 Sports photography details
51
excellent zoom range (24-1560mm 65.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (21MP)
includes tracking focus
no shutter priority mode
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
51
great zoom range (24-432mm 18.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (13 megapixels)
features tracking focus
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 as a Travel photography camera
Samsung WB750 as a Travel photography camera
60
megapixel count good (21MP)
flash built-in
screen is selfie friendly
quite wide (24mm)
very long zoom (1560mm)
missing Timelapse function
more heavy than competition in class (567 grams)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
69
lighter than average (193 grams)
decent MP (13MP)
built-in flash
rather wide (24mm)
long zoom (432mm)
does not have Timelapse function
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
slow max aperture (f3.2)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 as a Landscape photography camera
Samsung WB750 as a Landscape photography camera
54
manual focus
quite wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (21MP)
supports RAW files
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
missing Timelapse function
48
manual focus
rather wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3")
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (13 megapixels)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.2)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
does not have Timelapse function
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Vlogging factors
Samsung WB750 Vlogging factors
60
quite wide (24mm)
screen is selfie friendly
has image stabilization (Optical)
includes face detect focusing
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
missing microphone socket
more heavy than competition in class (567 grams)
34
rather wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
features face detect focus
high video quality (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than average (193g)
slow max aperture (f3.2)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
does not have microphone jack
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Samsung WB750 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 and Samsung WB750
 Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651Samsung WB750
General Information
Manufacturer Kodak Samsung
Model Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 Samsung WB750
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2014-01-07 2011-09-01
Body design SLR-like (bridge) Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 21 megapixels 13 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Full resolution 5184 x 3888 4096 x 3072
Max native ISO 3200 3200
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Number of focus points 25 -
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 24-1560mm (65.0x) 24-432mm (18.0x)
Maximal aperture f/2.9-6.5 f/3.2-5.8
Macro focus distance 3cm 5cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 920k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Screen tech - TFT color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic None
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent -
Features
Lowest shutter speed - 8s
Highest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Continuous shooting speed 9.0 frames/s 10.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range - 3.30 m
Flash modes - On, Off, Fill, Red-eye, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30/15 fps), 640 x 480 (30/15 fps), 320x 240 fps (30/15 fps)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video format - MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB none USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 567g (1.25 lb) 193g (0.43 lb)
Physical dimensions 125 x 114 x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5") 105 x 59 x 25mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.0")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model - SLB-10A
Self timer - Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Storage media - SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots 1 1
Pricing at launch $419 $339