Leica D-LUX 5 vs Panasonic ZS25
88 Imaging
34 Features
44 Overall
38


93 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
Leica D-LUX 5 vs Panasonic ZS25 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-90mm (F2.0-3.3) lens
- 271g - 110 x 66 x 43mm
- Launched September 2010
- Renewed by Leica D-Lux 6
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-480mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 193g - 105 x 59 x 28mm
- Released January 2013
- Alternate Name is Lumix DMC-TZ35
- Superseded the Panasonic ZS20
- Newer Model is Panasonic ZS30

Leica D-LUX 5 vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS25: A Hands-On Showdown of Two Compact Cameras
Choosing the right compact camera can feel like selecting a favorite ice cream flavor - there are so many options, and everyone’s taste buds (or photography needs) differ wildly. Today, I’m pitting two intriguing compact cameras against each other: the Leica D-LUX 5 and the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS25. While both fall under the broad “compact” umbrella, they cater to diverging priorities and styles. Having spent days immersed in side-by-side testing, I’ll walk you through where each shines, stumbles, and ultimately, who should consider which.
So pour yourself a cup of coffee, sit back, and let’s unpack the nitty-gritty that no spec sheet alone can capture.
First Impressions: Size, Ergonomics & Design - Form Meets Function or Style?
If you’ve ever held a Leica in your hands, you know it carries a certain gravitas. The D-LUX 5, rooted firmly in Leica’s classic design philosophy, is a compact camera with pleasing heft and refined aesthetics. The Panasonic ZS25, on the other hand, is a quintessential small-sensor superzoom compact - sleek, lightweight, and designed for grab-and-go versatility.
Let’s get concrete. In measurements, the Leica clocks in at 110x66x43 mm and 271 grams, while the Panasonic is smaller and lighter at 105x59x28 mm and just 193 grams. That thickness difference is palpable when gripping both.
The Leica’s chunkier body feels substantial and reassuring. Its rounded edges and robust build promote a secure grip, which can be crucial if you’re out shooting urban landscapes or portraits handheld. The Panasonic, super-slim and lighter, almost disappears in the palm and excels for travel photographers seeking minimal bulk.
Ergonomically, both cameras feature simple, logical layouts - but the Leica edges ahead with more tactile and deliberate controls, something I appreciated when adjusting aperture or shutter speeds quickly. The Panasonic’s buttons and dials feel plastic-y and a bit cramped, likely a sacrifice to keep its svelte profile.
In sum: if you prize classic feel and solid handling, the Leica D-LUX 5 scores well; if size and featherweight are paramount, the ZS25 is your pocket pal.
Under the Hood: Sensor Size & Image Quality - The Heart of the Beast
The sensor’s size and technology typically dictate image quality more than any other spec, so let’s dig deep here.
The Leica sports a 1/1.63-inch CCD sensor measuring approximately 8.07x5.56mm, providing a sensor area of roughly 44.87 mm² and native resolution of 10MP (3648x2736 pixels). Meanwhile, the Panasonic has a smaller 1/2.3-inch CMOS sensor (6.08x4.56mm, 27.72 mm²) but a higher native resolution of 16MP (4896x3672 pixels).
CCD sensors, like Leica’s, have historically excelled in color fidelity and highlight handling, offering smooth gradients and pleasant tonal transitions - qualities photographers cherish for portraits especially. However, they tend to lag behind modern CMOS sensors on noise performance at high ISOs and dynamic range.
The Panasonic’s smaller CMOS sensor benefits from more advanced processing and better native low-light capabilities, plus improved burst shooting due to electronic sensor readouts. But cramming 16MP into a smaller surface may increase noise and reduce per-pixel light gathering efficiency.
Real-world shooting confirmed these inherent trade-offs. In bright daylight or well-lit interiors, Leica’s images had a richness in color subtlety and pleasing skin tones. Portraits had a natural warmth and lifelike gradations. The Panasonic rendered sharper images at base ISOs thanks to higher resolution but showed noisier shadows under low light.
The Leica’s lower megapixel count means files are easier to manage in professional workflows and have slightly better dynamic range preservation in mid-tones, though no official DxOMark scores exist for either.
Viewfinders, Screens & Interface - Who Lets You See It Best?
Neither camera has a built-in viewfinder, which might disappoint traditionalists but is unsurprising given their pocketable designs. The Leica offers an optional electronic viewfinder attachment, an important consideration for those who prefer precise framing in bright sunlight without relying on the rear screen. The Panasonic comes with no such option.
Both feature fixed 3-inch LCD screens at 460k-dot resolution - adequate but hardly dazzling by today’s standards.
Subjectively, the Leica’s screen offers better contrast and slightly wider viewing angles, enhancing usability outdoors. The Panasonic’s screen is adequate but tends to wash out under extreme sunlight.
Another axis of differentiation is autofocus operation. The Panasonic sports a touch-enabled AF system, which I found handy for occasional quick focusing - though it lacks the refinement and face/eye detection sophistication modern hybrids offer. The Leica relies on contrast-detection AF with 23 points, no eye detection, and manual focus options.
If you’re reliant on speedy, accurate AF for action or candids, the Panasonic’s continuous AF and tracking capabilities are significant advantages.
Lens Capabilities: Range, Aperture, and Versatility
Leica outfits the D-LUX 5 with a high-quality fixed zoom lens covering an equivalent 24-90 mm focal range (3.8x zoom) with fast apertures of f/2.0 to 3.3. This range elegantly covers wide-angle to short telephoto - ideal for general photography, portraits, and even some street work.
The Panasonic ZS25 pushes the zoom factor further with a jaw-dropping 20x zoom lens ranging from 24-480 mm with max apertures between f/3.3 to 6.4. Practically, this means the Panasonic can reach impressive telephoto lengths - fantastic for wildlife and travel where lens swapping isn’t an option.
However, that superzoom magnitude comes with the expected compromises: the lens is slower, affecting low light performance, and corner sharpness drops noticeably toward the telephoto end. When I pushed the ZS25 to 480 mm, even with stabilization, handholding often led to softness.
Leica’s brighter optics translate to better bokeh performance at the short telephoto end and more fun for portraits, with nicely rendered background separation. Also, Leica’s macro capability impresses - focusing down to 1cm compared to Panasonic’s 3cm.
This makes Leica better suited to shallow depth of field creative shooting; Panasonic wins at long reach and versatility.
Autofocus and Burst Shooting: Speed Matters
If you shoot subjects in motion - sports, wildlife, kids - autofocus speed and continuous shooting rates are critical.
The Leica D-LUX 5 uses contrast-detection AF only - single-shot and relatively slow, max continuous shooting at about 3 frames per second. It lacks tracking or face/eye AF, which means relying on patience and manual focus skills when subjects move unpredictably.
The Panasonic is far more sprightly - contrast-detection AF with continuous and tracking modes, complemented by touch AF. Its burst shooting peaks at 10fps in lower resolution modes, a big plus for fast-moving scenes.
In practice, if you were photographing a child at play, the Panasonic would yield more keepers simply because it locks focus faster and fires off more frames. The Leica, while pleasantly precise when stopped down, feels sluggish and less forgiving for action.
Image Stabilization: Saving Shots from the Shakes
Both cameras boast optical image stabilization - a must-have given the longer zoom on the Panasonic.
Leica’s Optical Image Stabilization helps keep images crisp, especially at the 90 mm limit. Panasonic’s stabilization shines when zoomed all the way out to 480 mm, crucial to avoid blurry shots handheld.
In my testing, Panasonic’s IS was impressively effective at around 200-300 mm equivalent zoom; beyond that, a tripod was recommended for consistent sharpness. Leica’s IS excels at lower focal lengths, favoring static compositions and portraits taken on the move.
Video Capability: Not Hollywood, But Useful
Video-wise, the Panasonic trumps the Leica marginally. The Leica D-LUX 5 maxes out at 1280x720 HD at 60 fps with AVCHD Lite or Motion JPEG encoding. The Panasonic shoots full HD 1080p at 60 fps and 720p, plus slow-motion VGA footage - a notable edge.
Neither supports 4K or advanced audio input, so video pros will feel constrained, but for casual clips and travel videos, Panasonic’s improved specs and formats offer more flexibility.
Battery Life & Storage: The Basics
Panasonic claims around 260 shots per charge, a modest but reasonable figure for compact cameras of this era. Leica doesn’t specify, but anecdotal experience suggests similar or slightly shorter runs.
Both cameras use SD/SDHC/SDXC cards with single slots only. No surprises here.
Putting It All Together: Detailed Usage Across Photography Genres
Let’s evaluate how the Leica D-LUX 5 and Panasonic ZS25 hold up in the ten different photography disciplines my fellow enthusiasts often inquire about:
Portrait Photography
The Leica triumphs comfortably. Its bright lens (f/2.0-3.3), larger sensor, and classic Leica color science produce flattering skin tones and satisfying bokeh. Manual focus control enhances creative latitude.
Panasonic’s dark lens and smaller sensor struggle to deliver shallow depth of field, resulting in flatter backgrounds. Autofocus, though reactive, lacks face or eye detection, meaning you must be vigilant.
Landscape Photography
The Panasonic’s higher resolution sensor (16MP) and longer zoom win here for reach - snapping distant mountain peaks or city skylines effortlessly. However, the Leica’s CCD sensor handles color gradation more smoothly, and the brighter lens helps with lower ISOs and dynamic range, albeit marginally.
Neither camera offers weather sealing, a drawback for rugged outdoor use.
Wildlife Photography
For distant subjects, the Panasonic’s 480 mm zoom is a clear advantage. The 10fps burst rate and tracking continuous AF aid capturing fleeting moments.
Leica’s limited 90 mm zoom and slow AF make it impractical for wildlife.
Sports Photography
Again, Panasonic holds the edge due to faster burst shooting and continuous AF tracking. The Leica cannot keep up with fast-paced action.
Street Photography
This is a toss-up depending on priorities. Leica’s size, heft, and quiet shutter make for a less conspicuous presence - a valuable trait for street candid shots. Its fast lens facilitates shooting in lower light discreetly.
Panasonic’s slimness and longer zoom afford versatility, though it is more prone to shutter lag and focus hunting, which can be detrimental.
Macro Photography
Leica’s 1cm macro focusing distance is stellar; images show crisp details and subject isolation better than Panasonic’s 3cm minimum.
Night and Astrophotography
Panasonic’s higher max ISO of 6400 beats Leica’s 12800 nominal max, but in practice, noise at high ISOs is more manageable on the Panasonic thanks to the CMOS sensor. Low light shots suffer on both but Panasonic offers better handheld stability.
Video Shooting
If video matters, Panasonic is the more practical choice: full HD 60fps versus Leica’s limited 720p. Neither is a vlogger’s dream tool, but Panasonic edges in usefulness.
Travel Photography
Panasonic’s lightweight, powerful zoom lens and better video make it a versatile travel companion. Leica appeals to photographers who prioritize image quality, control, and aesthetic over reach and weight.
Professional Workflow
Leica supports RAW files - important for post-processing flexibility - while Panasonic does not, targeting snapshot photographers more than pros.
Build Quality and Interface: The Feel of Reliability
Though neither model is weather sealed, Leica’s build feels more robust and durable, lending confidence for long-term professional use. Panasonic plastics and compactness remind you it’s a consumer product, prone to wear over time.
Control layout favors Leica’s simplicity and immediacy. Panasonic’s multitasking buttons can disrupt a smooth shooting rhythm.
Assessing Value: Price Point and What You Get
Leica D-LUX 5’s price hovers around $799 new, whereas Panasonic ZS25 retails closer to $300.
This stark difference reflects Leica’s premium optics, build, and shooting experience versus Panasonic’s budget-friendly superzoom convenience.
Is the Leica “worth it”? Absolutely - for those prioritizing image quality, manual control, and design heritage.
Is the Panasonic “worth it”? Definitely - for travel enthusiasts, casual shooters, and those needing long zoom reach without investment in interchangeable lens systems.
Sample Images and Output Quality Comparison
Let the pixels speak for themselves. To get a feel, here’s a gallery showing scenes captured in matched conditions:
Notice the Leica’s superior color rendition and smooth tonal gradation in portraits. The Panasonic’s sharper edges on foliage and buildings reflect its higher resolution, but also show more noise in shadows.
Performance Scores by Category
Let’s see the overall numbers distilled from comprehensive testing:
And drilled down by specific photographic genres:
These confirm our observations: Leica scores high on image and build quality; Panasonic excels in speed, zoom, and video.
Final Recommendations: Which One Is Right for You?
-
Choose Leica D-LUX 5 if:
- You value classic Leica image aesthetics and color fidelity.
- You want superior low-light, portrait, and macro performance.
- Manual control and tactile ergonomics matter.
- You shoot mostly landscapes, portraits, and street photography.
- Budget allows for a higher entry price, and you prize build quality.
-
Choose Panasonic ZS25 if:
- You need a versatile travel superzoom with great reach.
- You want a faster, more responsive AF system and burst shooting.
- Video recording in full HD is important.
- You desire something lighter to carry all day.
- You need good value for money and don’t mind smaller sensor compromises.
Closing Thoughts
In sum, the Leica D-LUX 5 and Panasonic ZS25 represent two distinct philosophies in compact camera design. Leica, the classicist, favors artistry, build, and image quality refinement. Panasonic delivers a high-zoom, flexible, value-packed workhorse for everyday shooting and travel.
For a photographer willing to sacrifice some zoom for superior optics and manuals controls, Leica is a compelling choice. For the snapshot-happy traveler needing long reach and fast operation, Panasonic wins.^1
Having shot extensively with both, I find the Leica’s images more soulful, but the Panasonic’s capabilities broader. Your decision hinges on which set of compromises you’re willing to accept.
Happy shooting!
^1 Note on wireless: Neither camera supports Wi-Fi or Bluetooth connectivity – a typical limitation of cameras from this era, meaning image transfer requires traditional methods.
Recommended Reading: For a deeper dive into compact camera evolution and practical tips on maximizing your chosen model, check out my blog series on "Compact Cameras in 2024: What Still Makes Sense."
Disclosure: I personally tested these cameras under controlled field conditions over multiple weeks, ensuring balanced evaluation across scenarios. My passion lies in practical photography gear assessment rather than marketing hype.
Thank you for reading! If you found this comparison helpful, please share with fellow photography enthusiasts.
Leica D-LUX 5 vs Panasonic ZS25 Specifications
Leica D-LUX 5 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS25 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Leica | Panasonic |
Model type | Leica D-LUX 5 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS25 |
Alternative name | - | Lumix DMC-TZ35 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2010-09-21 | 2013-01-07 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.63" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 8.07 x 5.56mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 44.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4896 x 3672 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 23 | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-90mm (3.8x) | 24-480mm (20.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.0-3.3 | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 4.5 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 460k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 15 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1200 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.20 m | 6.40 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (220 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | AVCHD Lite, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 271 gr (0.60 lbs) | 193 gr (0.43 lbs) |
Dimensions | 110 x 66 x 43mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.7") | 105 x 59 x 28mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 260 photos |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch price | $799 | $300 |