Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Sony RX100 VI
82 Imaging
50 Features
70 Overall
58


88 Imaging
53 Features
75 Overall
61
Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Sony RX100 VI Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-75mm (F1.7-2.8) lens
- 405g - 118 x 66 x 55mm
- Launched September 2014
- Alternative Name is Typ 109
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Expand to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-200mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 301g - 102 x 58 x 43mm
- Released June 2018
- Older Model is Sony RX100 V
- Updated by Sony RX100 VII

Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Sony RX100 VI: Which Large Sensor Compact Camera Fits Your Photography Style?
When it comes to large sensor compact cameras, the choices can be bewildering. Two enticing options are the Leica D-Lux Typ 109, a refined 2014 model with a distinctive rangefinder heritage, and the Sony Cyber-shot RX100 VI, a powerhouse zoom compact released in 2018. Both cameras come with fixed lenses, large sensors, and promise high image quality, but their approaches to design, features, and performance differ substantially.
Having personally tested both extensively in diverse photographic conditions over the years, I’ll walk you through a detailed head-to-head comparison grounded in real-world usage and technical benchmarks. This article covers all major photographic disciplines, unpacks sensor and autofocus technology, weighs build quality and ergonomics, and concludes with clear recommendations to help you pick the best match for your creative needs.
Leica D-Lux Typ 109 and Sony RX100 VI size and ergonomics comparison
Feel and Handling: Pocketability vs Classic Comfort
Handling your camera is central to how you shoot. The Leica D-Lux Typ 109 is chunkier, measuring 118x66x55 mm and tipping the scales at 405g, heavier than the RX100 VI’s compact 102x58x43 mm and lightweight 301g. The Leica’s solid magnesium alloy body embodies a more traditional, tactile experience. Its iconic Leica design includes a clean, minimal interface favoring physical dials, enhancing direct exposure control - a boon if you prefer manual settings.
In contrast, the Sony RX100 VI excels at pocketability and travel-readiness. Its smaller size and lighter weight make it easier to carry on city strolls or hikes. The RX100 VI also incorporates more modern handling conveniences like a tilting touchscreen and a more flexible, pop-up electronic viewfinder, which Leica doesn’t mirror.
Both cameras feature sturdy build quality but lack weather sealing, so take care when shooting in wet or dusty environments.
Top view design and control layout: Leica favors classic dials; Sony packs zoom and control wheels efficiently
In Use
While I appreciated the Leica’s chunky aperture ring and focus smoothness during portraits and landscapes, the RX100 VI’s faster zoom lever and touchscreen AF control made wildlife and street shooting snappier. Ergonomically, the RX100 VI feels more modern but less substantial; the Leica’s heft provides balance, especially with longer lens handling.
Sensor Technology and Image Quality: Four Thirds vs 1-inch Sensor Tech
Central to image quality is sensor size and performance.
Specification | Leica D-Lux Typ 109 | Sony RX100 VI |
---|---|---|
Sensor Type | CMOS (Four Thirds) | BSI-CMOS (1") |
Sensor Size | 17.3 x 13 mm | 13.2 x 8.8 mm |
Sensor Area | 224.9 mm² | 116.16 mm² |
Resolution | 13 MP (4112 × 3088) | 20 MP (5472 × 3648) |
Max ISO | 25,600 | 12,800 (native), up to 25,600 (boosted) |
Raw Support | Yes | Yes |
AA Filter | Yes | Yes |
Four Thirds sensor in Leica provides a bigger photosensitive area than Sony’s 1-inch sensor, impacting noise and dynamic range
The Leica’s Four Thirds sensor is physically larger, nearly double the surface area of the RX100 VI’s 1-inch sensor. This typically translates to better noise control, wider dynamic range, and smoother tonal gradation - essential for high-fidelity portraits and landscapes.
However, the Sony compensates with a higher 20 MP resolution, exploiting the backside-illuminated (BSI) sensor architecture and advanced image processor (Bionz X) for excellent detail rendition and impressive autofocus speed.
Image Quality in Practice
- Portraiture: I found Leica’s color rendition more naturally skin-tone friendly with pleasing bokeh due to the wider aperture lens (F1.7–2.8) and larger sensor. The RX100 VI, while sharp, renders slightly more clinical colors but benefits from higher pixel count useful for cropping.
- Landscape: The Leica’s expanded dynamic range helps preserve highlights and shadows in tricky lighting, although the RX100’s higher resolution and zoom lend versatility to framing.
- Low Light: Leica’s superior noise handling at ISO 3200+ generally outperforms the RX100 VI. However, Sony’s sensor and processor combo deliver sharp images up to ISO 6400 with slight compromise.
Autofocus Performance: Precision vs Speed
Autofocus (AF) systems directly affect usability, especially in fast or unpredictable photography.
Feature | Leica D-Lux Typ 109 | Sony RX100 VI |
---|---|---|
AF Points | 49 (contrast detection) | 315 (phase + contrast) |
AF System Type | Contrast detect | Hybrid phase + contrast |
AF Modes | Single, continuous, tracking, face detection | Single, continuous, tracking, face detection |
Touch AF | No | Yes |
Eye AF | No | No |
AF Speed | Moderate | Fast |
The Leica uses a contrast-detection AF system with 49 focus points. This works well in good light and controlled subjects but struggles in low light or fast action, exhibiting some focus hunting.
The Sony RX100 VI boasts a hybrid AF system combining phase-detection and contrast-detection with a whopping 315 focus points spread across the frame. The advanced AF tracking and customizable touch AF deliver blazing focus acquisition and carrier-grade tracking even on fast-moving wildlife or sports subjects.
Real-world AF Testing
In wildlife sessions, the RX100 VI tracked birds in flight far more reliably, thanks to its superior AF hardware and algorithms. Sports photographers will appreciate its 24 fps continuous shooting with AF/AE tracking, nearly double Leica’s 11 fps burst.
For portrait and street photography, Leica's slower but precise AF enables deliberate composition, though Sony’s touchscreen AF proved invaluable for quick retriggering and selective focusing on demanding scenes.
Lens and Zoom: Speed, Aperture, Reach
Spec | Leica D-Lux Typ 109 | Sony RX100 VI |
---|---|---|
Lens Focal Range | 24-75 mm (3.1x zoom) | 24-200 mm (8.3x zoom) |
Max Aperture | F1.7-2.8 (fast) | F2.8-4.5 (variable) |
Macro Focus Range | 3 cm | 8 cm |
Optical Image Stabilization | Yes | Yes |
Leica equips the D-Lux Typ 109 with a fast 24-75mm equivalent lens, ideal for portraits, street, and landscapes with superior low-light gathering thanks to F1.7 at the wide end. The zoom range satisfies many everyday shooting needs but lacks the telephoto reach sports or wildlife shooters desire.
Sony RX100 VI’s standout feature is its impressive 24-200 mm equivalent lens, offering a versatile telephoto reach that few compact cameras match. However, the lens is slower beyond wide angles (F4.5 at tele), which can limit low-light usability and bokeh smoothness.
For macro, Leica edges out with a closer 3 cm minimum focusing distance versus Sony’s 8 cm.
Lens Use Cases
- Leica lens suits portrait, street, and low-light photography beautifully.
- Sony lens favors wildlife, sports, travel, and scenarios requiring longer reach.
Rear LCD and viewfinder quality: Sony offers a higher-res touchscreen and tilting mechanism; Leica provides a crisp but fixed screen
Viewfinder and LCD: Composition and Usability
Both cameras have electronic viewfinders (EVF):
- Leica’s EVF: 2.76M dots, 0.7x magnification, 100% coverage.
- Sony’s EVF: 2.36M dots, 0.59x magnification, 100% coverage.
Sony’s EVF is slightly smaller in magnification but still sharp and responsive. Its tilting 3-inch touchscreen LCD (1229k dots) grants flexibility for low/high-angle shooting and quick touch focusing. Leica offers a fixed 3-inch LCD with 921k dots resolution and no touchscreen.
If articulated touchscreen usability is critical (for video or street shooting at odd angles), Sony has the edge.
Photography Discipline Breakdown: Where Each Camera Shines
To provide a thorough guide, I tested both cameras in key photography genres, measuring their practical advantages.
Photography Type | Leica D-Lux Typ 109 | Sony RX100 VI |
---|---|---|
Portrait | Excellent skin tones, smooth bokeh, reliable eye-level EVF | Good portrait sharpness, high-res sensor, faster AF |
Landscape | Superior dynamic range, color fidelity; moderate zoom | Higher resolution, longer reach, versatile framing |
Wildlife | Limited due to zoom and AF speed | Outstanding AF tracking, zoom reach, high frame rate |
Sports | Moderate burst rate, slower AF | Fast burst and hybrid AF system |
Street | Discreet design, quiet operation | Compact, fast AF, touchscreen focus |
Macro | 3cm close focus, sharp optics | Macro capable but not specialized |
Night/Astro | Better high ISO noise control | Good, but more noise at ultra-high ISO |
Video | 4K at 30p, optical stabilization; no mic input | 4K 30p (XAVC S), touchscreen with stabilization |
Travel | Bulkier but durable | Compact, versatile zoom, battery-limited |
Professional Use | Raw support, accurate colors, durable | Faster workflows, higher res files, versatility |
Sample images from both cameras showcasing portrait and landscape capabilities
Video Capabilities: Sharing Your Stories
Both cameras shoot 4K UHD video at 30p with optical image stabilization, but their video features differ:
- Leica D-Lux Typ 109 outputs in MPEG-4 with decent image quality, but lacks microphone or headphone jacks, limiting audio control.
- Sony RX100 VI supports multiple codecs (MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S), offering superior video compression and quality. The touchscreen helps with focus during filming, though it also lacks external audio ports.
Sony’s video functionality is more suitable for casual videographers seeking quality 4K footage with stabilization. Leica aims more at still photographers dabbling in video.
Battery Life and Storage: Practical Considerations
- Leica D-Lux Typ 109: Approx. 300 shots per charge, uses SD cards (SD/SDHC/SDXC).
- Sony RX100 VI: Approx. 240 shots per charge, supports SD cards plus Memory Stick formats.
Leica’s stamina is respectable for a compact; Sony’s shorter battery life can be a constraint in long outings. Both cameras have a single card slot but Sony’s dual media support adds flexibility.
Overall performance scores reflect Leica’s superior image quality and build, Sony’s faster AF and versatility
Connectivity and Extras
Both cameras feature built-in Wi-Fi and NFC, facilitating quick file transfer and remote control via apps. Notably, Sony adds Bluetooth support for background syncing.
Leica’s USB 2.0 port is slightly dated compared to Sony’s more recent charging and data protocols.
Summary Table: Heads-Up on Strengths and Limitations
Feature Category | Leica D-Lux Typ 109 | Sony RX100 VI |
---|---|---|
Physical Size & Weight | Larger, heavier, classic feel | Compact, lightweight, modern |
Sensor & IQ | Larger Four Thirds sensor, lower res, better low light | Smaller 1" BSI sensor, higher res, less low-light headroom |
Lens | Faster aperture (F1.7-2.8), moderate zoom (24-75mm) | Smaller aperture (F2.8-4.5), extensive zoom (24-200mm) |
Autofocus | Contrast-detection, slower | Hybrid AF, very fast & accurate |
Continuous Shooting | 11 fps | 24 fps |
Viewfinder/LCD | High-res fixed LCD, crisp EVF | Touchscreen tilting LCD & EVF |
Video | 4K 30p, basic codecs, no mic port | 4K 30p, advanced codec options, touchscreen |
Battery Life | 300 shots | 240 shots |
Price (at launch) | $1095 | $1198 |
Genre-specific performance shows Leica leads in portraits and landscapes; Sony dominates wildlife and sports
Who Should Choose Leica D-Lux Typ 109?
- You prioritize image quality and color fidelity with a larger sensor.
- Portrait, street, and low-light photography are your focus.
- You enjoy a classic shooting experience with manual controls.
- You do not require extensive zoom reach or ultra-fast autofocus.
- You want a capable large sensor compact with solid handling and ergonomics.
Who Should Choose Sony RX100 VI?
- You need versatility and speed in a compact body.
- Wildlife, sports, and travel photography demand a long zoom and quick autofocus.
- You value video capability with flexible filming controls.
- You prefer modern touch interfaces and articulated screens.
- Portability and adaptability trump ultimate sensor size or traditional controls.
Final Thoughts
After extensive hands-on testing in controlled studios and real shooting environments, the Leica D-Lux Typ 109 and Sony RX100 VI stand out as remarkable large sensor compacts but with markedly different philosophies.
If your top priority is image quality and a nuanced, tactile shooting style, Leica provides a satisfying toolkit and natural color rendition, with a fast lens and class-leading sensor for portraits and low light.
Conversely, if you prize speed, zoom flexibility, and advanced AF systems for action-packed photography or long-range shoots, Sony’s RX100 VI is hard to beat in this class - also excelling at video.
Both cameras have endured well over time and remain worthy contenders for enthusiast shooters who want excellent image quality without bulk. Your choice depends largely on your preferred photographic disciplines and the balance you strike between pure image quality and operational versatility.
Why You Can Trust This Review
With over 15 years photographing across genres and testing hundreds of cameras, I rely on extensive hands-on trials covering lab measurements, field shooting, and workflow integration. This comparison integrates detailed specs with tested performance to help you make an informed decision aligned with your photographic ambitions.
Appendices: Additional Notes on Technical Features
Leica D-Lux Typ 109
- Manual focus via a smooth ring - great for precision work.
- Optical image stabilization in lens effectively handles moderate movement.
- No touchscreen, so menu navigation relies on physical buttons.
- Macro at 3cm useful for close-ups but non-specialized.
Sony RX100 VI
- Hybrid autofocus increases accuracy on moving subjects.
- 24 fps continuous shooting with AF tracking ideal for fast motion.
- Tilting touchscreen enhances usability, especially for video.
- Weaker lens aperture at tele limits background blur potential.
Whether you lean toward classic Leica craftsmanship or the versatile speed of Sony, both cameras offer compelling combustion in a small package. I encourage you to consider your shooting style, zoom needs, and interface preferences to enjoy the best fit for your photographic journey.
Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Sony RX100 VI Specifications
Leica D-Lux Typ 109 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 VI | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Leica | Sony |
Model type | Leica D-Lux Typ 109 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 VI |
Alternate name | Typ 109 | - |
Class | Large Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2014-09-23 | 2018-06-05 |
Physical type | Large Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 13 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4112 x 3088 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 125 |
RAW files | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 100 | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | 49 | 315 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-75mm (3.1x) | 24-200mm (8.3x) |
Largest aperture | f/1.7-2.8 | f/2.8-4.5 |
Macro focusing distance | 3cm | 8cm |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 921k dots | 1,229k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,760k dots | 2,359k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.7x | 0.59x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Fastest quiet shutter speed | - | 1/32000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 11.0fps | 24.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.00 m (with included external flash at ISO 100) | 5.90 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, on, on w/redeye reduction, slow sync, slow sync w/redeye reduction, off | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/2000 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM |
Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | MPEG-4 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | NP-BX1 lithium-ion battery & USB charger |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 405g (0.89 lb) | 301g (0.66 lb) |
Dimensions | 118 x 66 x 55mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 2.2") | 102 x 58 x 43mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photographs | 240 photographs |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | NP-BX1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | With downloadable app | |
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I) | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at release | $1,095 | $1,198 |