Leica M Typ 240 vs Leica M11
74 Imaging
70 Features
47 Overall
60
76 Imaging
84 Features
56 Overall
72
Leica M Typ 240 vs Leica M11 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Leica M Mount
- 680g - 139 x 80 x 42mm
- Revealed September 2012
(Full Review)
- 60MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3.00" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 64 - 50000
- No Video
- Leica M Mount
- 640g - 139 x 80 x 39mm
- Launched January 2022
- Old Model is Leica M10
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels Leica M Typ 240 vs Leica M11 Overview
Following is a extensive assessment of the Leica M Typ 240 vs Leica M11, both Pro Mirrorless digital cameras and both are manufactured by Leica. There exists a noticeable gap between the sensor resolutions of the M Typ 240 (24MP) and M11 (60MP) but they feature the same exact sensor sizing (Full frame).
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe M Typ 240 was revealed 10 years prior to the M11 which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before diving straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the M Typ 240 scores vs the M11 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary Leica M Typ 240 vs Leica M11 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Leica M Typ 240 & Leica M11. The full galleries are provided at Leica M Typ 240 Gallery & Leica M11 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica M Typ 240 over the Leica M11
| M Typ 240 | M11 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Leica M11 over the Leica M Typ 240
| M11 | M Typ 240 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2022 |  | September 2012 | More modern by 113 months |
| Display type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
| Display resolution | 2333k |  | 920k | Sharper display (+1413k dot) |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Leica M Typ 240 and Leica M11
| M Typ 240 | M11 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More exact focus | ||
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3.00" | Equivalent display measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen |
Leica M Typ 240 vs Leica M11 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry around your camera regularly, you will need to consider its weight and size. The Leica M Typ 240 has got external dimensions of 139mm x 80mm x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") having a weight of 680 grams (1.50 lbs) whilst the Leica M11 has specifications of 139mm x 80mm x 39mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") with a weight of 640 grams (1.41 lbs).
Check the Leica M Typ 240 vs Leica M11 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have at the time. Underneath is the front view scale comparison of the M Typ 240 against the M11.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the M Typ 240 and M11 is 74 and 76 respectively.
Leica M Typ 240 vs Leica M11 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very tough to picture the contrast between sensor sizes just by checking technical specs. The picture underneath should give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the M Typ 240 and M11.
As you have seen, each of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but different MP. You can expect to see the Leica M11 to resolve more detail because of its extra 36 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images far more aggressively. The more aged M Typ 240 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.
Leica M Typ 240 vs Leica M11 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Leica M Typ 240 vs Leica M11 Specifications
| Leica M Typ 240 | Leica M11 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Leica | Leica |
| Model | Leica M Typ 240 | Leica M11 |
| Type | Pro Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
| Revealed | 2012-09-17 | 2022-01-13 |
| Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | Full frame | Full frame |
| Sensor measurements | 36 x 24mm | 36 x 24mm |
| Sensor area | 864.0mm² | 864.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 24 megapixels | 60 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 3:2 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 5952 x 3976 | 9528 x 6328 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 50000 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Leica M | Leica M |
| Total lenses | 59 | 62 |
| Crop factor | 1 | 1 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3.00 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 920k dot | 2,333k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen tech | TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (rangefinder) | Optical (rangefinder) |
| Viewfinder coverage | 1 percent | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | 0.73x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 3600 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Max silent shutter speed | - | 1/16000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0fps | 4.5fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync | no built-in flash |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Max flash sync | 1/180 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (25,24 fps), 1280 x 720 (25, 24 fps) | - |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | Yes |
| GPS | Optional | Optional |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 680 grams (1.50 pounds) | 640 grams (1.41 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 139 x 80 x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") | 139 x 80 x 39mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 84 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 24.0 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 13.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 1860 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 photos | 700 photos |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | BC-SCL7 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12s) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | UHS II type SD |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $5,479 | $8,995 |
