Clicky

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-P1

Portability
74
Imaging
69
Features
47
Overall
60
Leica M Typ 240 front
 
Olympus PEN E-P1 front
Portability
86
Imaging
46
Features
42
Overall
44

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-P1 Key Specs

Leica M Typ 240
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - Full frame Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Leica M Mount
  • 680g - 139 x 80 x 42mm
  • Introduced September 2012
Olympus E-P1
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 355g - 121 x 70 x 36mm
  • Announced July 2009
  • Updated by Olympus E-P2
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-P1 Overview

Its time to look a little more closely at the Leica M Typ 240 and Olympus E-P1, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Leica and Olympus. There is a large difference between the sensor resolutions of the M Typ 240 (24MP) and E-P1 (12MP) and the M Typ 240 (Full frame) and E-P1 (Four Thirds) have different sensor dimensions.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The M Typ 240 was announced 3 years later than the E-P1 and that is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras have the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).

Before getting right into a more detailed comparison, here is a simple summary of how the M Typ 240 matches up against the E-P1 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Leica M Typ 240 over the Olympus E-P1

 M Typ 240 E-P1 
AnnouncedSeptember 2012July 2009More recent by 39 months
Display resolution920k230kClearer display (+690k dot)

Reasons to pick Olympus E-P1 over the Leica M Typ 240

 E-P1 M Typ 240 

Common features in the Leica M Typ 240 and Olympus E-P1

 M Typ 240 E-P1 
Focus manually More precise focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimensions3"3"Equal display sizing
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen
Touch display Absent Touch display

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-P1 Physical Comparison

When you are aiming to lug around your camera often, you will have to think about its weight and volume. The Leica M Typ 240 offers external measurements of 139mm x 80mm x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") with a weight of 680 grams (1.50 lbs) while the Olympus E-P1 has sizing of 121mm x 70mm x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") having a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs).

Analyze the Leica M Typ 240 and Olympus E-P1 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have attached at that moment. The following is a front view dimension comparison of the M Typ 240 against the E-P1.

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-P1 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the M Typ 240 and E-P1 is 74 and 86 respectively.

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-P1 top view buttons comparison

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-P1 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, its hard to picture the contrast between sensor measurements only by reading through specifications. The graphic below will give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the M Typ 240 and E-P1.

Plainly, both of these cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The M Typ 240 using its larger sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Leica M Typ 240 will resolve greater detail with its extra 12MP. Greater resolution will help you crop photos more aggressively. The younger M Typ 240 should have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-P1 sensor size comparison

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-P1 Screen and ViewFinder

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-P1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Leica M Typ 240 Portrait photography information
Olympus E-P1 Portrait photography information
81
manual focus
resolution is good (24MP)
sensor size is big (Full frame)
supports RAW formats
59
manual focus
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
features face detect autofocus
exports RAW files
MP count low (12MP)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Leica M Typ 240 Street photography information
Olympus E-P1 Street photography information
67
sensor size is big (Full frame)
supports RAW formats
weather proofing
no moving screen
lack of image stabilization
73
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
screen does not articulate
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Leica M Typ 240
Sports photography with Olympus E-P1
55
resolution is good (24 megapixels)
sensor size is big (Full frame)
weather proofing
painfully slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority
lack of image stabilization
lacks phase detect autofocus
39
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
max frames per second very slow (3.0 frames/s)
MP count low (12MP)
bad battery power (300 CIPA)
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Leica M Typ 240 Travel photography highlights
Olympus E-P1 Travel photography highlights
63
weather proofing
resolution is good (24 megapixels)
does not have Timelapse recording
display is not selfie friendly
43
lack of Time Lapse function
bad battery power (300 shots)
MP count low (12 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Leica M Typ 240
Landscape photography with Olympus E-P1
73
manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Leica M mount)
good sized screen (3 inch)
resolution is good (24MP)
sensor size is big (Full frame)
supports RAW formats
weather proofing
lack of image stabilization
does not have Timelapse recording
60
manual focus
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is decent (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
MP count low (12 megapixels)
bad battery power (300 CIPA)
lack of Time Lapse function
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Leica M Typ 240
Vlogging with Olympus E-P1
26
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
display is not selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
does not have external microphone port
29
image stabilization (Sensor based)
features face detect autofocus
screen isn't selfie friendly
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of mic jack
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Leica M Typ 240 vs Olympus E-P1 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Leica M Typ 240 and Olympus E-P1
 Leica M Typ 240Olympus PEN E-P1
General Information
Brand Name Leica Olympus
Model Leica M Typ 240 Olympus PEN E-P1
Class Pro Mirrorless Entry-Level Mirrorless
Introduced 2012-09-17 2009-07-29
Body design Rangefinder-style mirrorless Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor - TruePic V
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Full frame Four Thirds
Sensor dimensions 36 x 24mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor area 864.0mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 24 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 3:2 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 5952 x 3976 4032 x 3024
Max native ISO 6400 6400
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Number of focus points - 11
Lens
Lens mount Leica M Micro Four Thirds
Available lenses 59 107
Focal length multiplier 1 2.1
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 920k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Screen technology TFT color LCD HyperCrystal LCD with AR(Anti-Reflective) coating
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (rangefinder) None
Viewfinder coverage 1 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.68x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 secs 60 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shooting speed 3.0fps 3.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range no built-in flash no built-in flash
Flash settings Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels)
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Highest flash sync 1/180 secs 1/180 secs
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (25,24 fps), 1280 x 720 (25, 24 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video file format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS Optional None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 680g (1.50 lb) 355g (0.78 lb)
Physical dimensions 139 x 80 x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") 121 x 70 x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 84 55
DXO Color Depth score 24.0 21.4
DXO Dynamic range score 13.3 10.4
DXO Low light score 1860 536
Other
Battery life 500 photographs 300 photographs
Form of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model - BLS-1
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse feature
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC card
Storage slots 1 1
Launch pricing $5,479 $182