Leica M Typ 262 vs OM System OM-1
77 Imaging
72 Features
35 Overall
57
65 Imaging
63 Features
96 Overall
76
Leica M Typ 262 vs OM System OM-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 6400
- Leica M Mount
- 600g - 139 x 80 x 42mm
- Introduced November 2015
- Additionally referred to as Typ 262
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3.00" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600 (Push to 102400)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 599g - 135 x 92 x 73mm
- Released February 2022
Leica M Typ 262 vs OM System OM-1 Overview
Let's look more closely at the Leica M Typ 262 and OM System OM-1, both Pro Mirrorless cameras by competitors Leica and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the M Typ 262 (24MP) and the OM System OM-1 (20MP) is very close but the M Typ 262 (Full frame) and OM System OM-1 (Four Thirds) feature different sensor measurements.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe M Typ 262 was revealed 7 years prior to the OM System OM-1 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Leica M Typ 262 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the OM System OM-1 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before going straight into a detailed comparison, below is a concise summation of how the M Typ 262 matches up vs the OM System OM-1 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Leica M Typ 262 vs OM System OM-1 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Leica M Typ 262 and OM System OM-1. The full galleries are provided at Leica M Typ 262 Gallery and OM System OM-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica M Typ 262 over the OM System OM-1
M Typ 262 | OM System OM-1 |
---|
Reasons to pick OM System OM-1 over the Leica M Typ 262
OM System OM-1 | M Typ 262 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2022 | November 2015 | Newer by 76 months | |
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display resolution | 1620k | 921k | Clearer display (+699k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Leica M Typ 262 and OM System OM-1
M Typ 262 | OM System OM-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial accurate focus | |||
Display sizing | 3" | 3.00" | Equivalent display measurements |
Leica M Typ 262 vs OM System OM-1 Physical Comparison
When you are going to travel with your camera, you will need to factor its weight and proportions. The Leica M Typ 262 has outside dimensions of 139mm x 80mm x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") with a weight of 600 grams (1.32 lbs) while the OM System OM-1 has measurements of 135mm x 92mm x 73mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.9") with a weight of 599 grams (1.32 lbs).
Check out the Leica M Typ 262 and OM System OM-1 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you select at the time. Following is the front view overall size comparison of the M Typ 262 and the OM System OM-1.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the M Typ 262 and OM System OM-1 is 77 and 65 respectively.
Leica M Typ 262 vs OM System OM-1 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's hard to imagine the gap in sensor dimensions only by viewing specifications. The image below should give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the M Typ 262 and OM System OM-1.
Plainly, the two cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The M Typ 262 having a larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field easier and the Leica M Typ 262 will render extra detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop images far more aggressively. The more aged M Typ 262 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Leica M Typ 262 vs OM System OM-1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Leica M Typ 262 vs OM System OM-1 Specifications
Leica M Typ 262 | OM System OM-1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Leica | Olympus |
Model | Leica M Typ 262 | OM System OM-1 |
Also referred to as | Typ 262 | - |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2015-11-19 | 2022-02-15 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Maestro | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | Stacked BSI Live MOS Sensor |
Sensor size | Full frame | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 35.8 x 23.9mm | 17.4 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 855.6mm² | 226.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3 |
Full resolution | 5952 x 3976 | 5184 x 3888 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
Max boosted ISO | - | 102400 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 200 |
RAW files | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 100 | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 1053 |
Cross focus points | - | 1053 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Leica M | Micro Four Thirds |
Amount of lenses | 59 | 118 |
Crop factor | 1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3.00 inch |
Resolution of screen | 921k dots | 1,620k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (rangefinder) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 5,760k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | 0.83x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
Highest silent shutter speed | - | 1/32000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | no built-in flash | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/250 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Max video resolution | - | 4096x2160 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4, H.264, H.265, HEVC |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | Optional | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 600g (1.32 pounds) | 599g (1.32 pounds) |
Dimensions | 139 x 80 x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") | 135 x 92 x 73mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 520 photographs |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BP-SCL2 | BLX-1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II on first slot) |
Card slots | Single | 2 |
Launch price | $5,069 | $2,199 |