Leica M10 vs Leica SL
75 Imaging
72 Features
45 Overall
61


67 Imaging
71 Features
78 Overall
73
Leica M10 vs Leica SL Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 50000
- No Video
- Leica M Mount
- 660g - 139 x 80 x 39mm
- Released January 2017
- Renewed by Leica M11
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 50000
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Leica L Mount
- 847g - 147 x 104 x 39mm
- Announced October 2015
- Alternative Name is Typ 601
- New Model is Leica SL2

Leica M10 vs Leica SL: A Hands-On Comparison From an Experienced Photographer
When Leica drops a new camera, it commands attention - and for good reason. As someone who has spent over 15 years testing gear from countless brands, including thoroughly vetting Leica’s unique rangefinder heritage and evolving digital lineup, I find the Leica M10 and SL make a fascinating side-by-side study. Both bear the iconic Leica pedigree but serve very different photographic philosophies and user needs.
In this article, I’ll share my extended, hands-on observations comparing these two prosumer mirrorless cameras, helping you make an informed decision tailored to your style, discipline, and workflow.
First Impressions: Design and Ergonomics
Picking up the Leica M10 feels like handling a refined classic. The M10 is a rangefinder-style mirrorless, notably slim and minimalist, echoing decades of Leica’s celebrated M series tradition. Its 139 x 80 x 39 mm body and 660g weight feel balanced yet unobtrusive - a joy for street shooters and lovers of tactile mechanical dials. One thing to note: this camera is no speed demon when it comes to autofocus or burst rates. It’s all about the deliberate, manual-focus experience.
Contrast that with the Leica SL, measuring 147 x 104 x 39 mm and heftier at 847g. This SLR-style mirrorless body screams pro “all-in” performance with a logical, feature-rich control layout you can see clearly in the top view comparison below:
The SL’s more substantial grip, touchscreen interface, dual card slots, and generous button placements facilitate faster operation - essential for demanding environments like sports or wildlife. The 3-inch fixed screens on both feel comparable in size, but the SL boasts touchscreen capability (M10 does not), improving menu navigation.
Ergonomics really boil down to your shooting approach. If you appreciate the analog tactile feedback of dials over digital menus, the M10’s charm is hard to beat. However, if you prioritize control speed and customization, the SL’s robust button layout and touchscreen give it a tangible edge.
Sensor Tech and Image Quality: Measure Twice, Shoot Once
At the heart of every camera is its sensor, and both of these Leicas pack 24MP full-frame CMOS sensors, but with important differences.
The M10 follows a classic Leica design: its sensor includes an anti-aliasing filter, which helps reduce moiré (disruptive patterns at fine details) but can slightly soften microresolution. In contrast, the SL drops this filter entirely, relying on sensor precision to deliver sharper output.
From measured lab data and my real-world tests, the SL wins a slight edge in overall detail rendering. Its lack of AA filter, coupled with newer sensor design, brings sharper images - most noticeable when pixel-peeping landscapes or product shots. The SL’s sensor area is marginally larger (36 x 24 mm vs. 35.8 x 23.9 mm for M10), improving light-gathering capacity and dynamic range just a bit.
Speaking of dynamic range, both cameras hover around an excellent 13+ stops, with the SL nudging slightly ahead at 13.4 EV compared to 13.3 EV for the M10. Color depth measures similarly strong in the mid-20 bits, ensuring sumptuous skin tones and rich landscapes.
However, the M10 pulls ahead in low-light ISO performance, with a DxOMark low-light ISO score of about 2133 versus SL’s 1821, indicating slightly cleaner high-ISO images - which surprised me initially given the SL’s technological advantages. Leica’s Maestro II processor in the M10 optimizes noise reduction elegantly, but with the tradeoff of slower continuous shooting.
Lower minimum ISO on the SL (ISO 50 native vs. 100 on M10) is also a subtle advantage for shooting bright scenes with shallow depth of field.
Viewfinders and Rear LCDs: Analog vs. Digital Luxury
A defining Leica trait - rangefinder viewfinders - lives on in the M10, featuring a 0.73x magnification optical viewfinder with 100% coverage. What you see is exactly what you get, no lag, no battery drain. The downside is that framing with a rangefinder requires some experience, parallax correction, and accepting manual focus challenges.
The SL swings to the modern side with an electronic viewfinder (EVF) boasting an impressive 4.4 million dot resolution and 0.8x magnification. This EVF is bright, crisp, and offers a live exposure preview with zoom to check sharpness in real time.
On the back, both have fixed 3-inch LCDs with roughly 1 million dots. The SL’s touchscreen and slightly more refined menu design give it a clear usability advantage during live view shooting or menus. The M10’s screen serves more as a supplementary utility display, given the analog focus experience.
Autofocus and Performance: Stillness vs. Speed
Here’s where the difference becomes striking. The Leica M10 relies solely on manual focus with no autofocus whatsoever - true to its M-series lineage. If you adore precision manual focusing, zone focusing, or rangefinder framing, this is fantastic. However, if you consistently shoot fast-moving subjects or require autofocus flexibility, the M10 is not your camera.
By contrast, the SL impresses with a 49-point contrast-detect autofocus system, supporting face detection, tracking, and continuous AF - responsive and reliable within its constraints. While it doesn’t use phase detection, I found autofocus quite capable for portraits and moderately fast subjects.
The SL also wins with a burst frame rate of 11 fps, more than double the M10’s modest 5 fps, making it a better choice for wildlife, sports, or fleeting moments.
Lens Ecosystem: Heritage Meets Modernity
The M10 uses Leica’s iconic M-mount, with a vast legacy of over 50 lenses, including legendary fast primes and compact street lenses. It’s a joy to manually focus those classic glass offerings, though you’ll be limited by the digital body’s slower responsiveness and lack of stabilization.
The SL, in contrast, mounts Leica’s newer L-mount, a modern system shared with Mitakon and Panasonic through the L-Mount Alliance. It offers wider compatibility with professional zooms, primes, and modern optics with autofocus and optical stabilization built-in some models.
Currently, the L-mount lineup is more limited than the M-mount’s classic glass collection but rapidly growing. The SL also adapts M-mount lenses with adapters, although autofocus obviously won’t work.
Durability and Weather Sealing
If you shoot outdoors often, weather sealing and durability count a lot.
The Leica SL features weather sealing, providing dust and splash resistance - very welcome in unpredictable environments like outdoor sports or nature. It’s a reassuring step up for demanding professional use and travel in challenging conditions.
The M10 lacks any notable environmental sealing, so you must be cautious with exposure to moisture or dust.
Battery Life and Storage
A standout practical advantage for the SL is its battery life: rated at 400 shots compared to the M10’s 210 - a significant factor if you’re away from charging for a full day of shooting. The SL also offers dual SD card slots, supporting UHS-II speeds for backup or overflow - a professional necessity.
The M10 has a single SD slot, and slower write performance, which may not satisfy pace-heavy workflows.
Connectivity and Extras
Both have built-in Wi-Fi for tethering and image transfer, but only the SL offers GPS built-in. The SL includes USB 3.0 for fast file transfer and a full suite of ports including headphone and mic jacks - critical for videographers.
The M10 omits HDMI or USB ports and has no audio support, reaffirming its photo-centric design.
Video: Silent Partner vs. Serious Tool
Important to many shooters is video capability. The M10 offers none, focusing entirely on exquisite stills.
The SL delivers a solid 4K UHD video recording at 30p, plus high frame rates in Full HD up to 120 fps for slow-motion - great tools for multimedia shooters. Its microphone and headphone jacks allow professional audio monitoring, a rare feature for Leica.
Real-World Test Gallery
Enough tech specs - how do these cameras perform in real life? Here’s a selection of sample images I captured using each, showing portrait skin tones, landscape dynamic range, and street photography candid moments.
Notice how the M10’s images have a slightly softer, filmic texture - the result of the optical characteristics and processing style, beloved by Leica purists. The SL’s files appear crisper, with more punch and microcontrast, better suited for commercial or landscape photographers who want pixel-peeping detail.
Performance Summaries: Scoring Each Camera
Based on comprehensive lab tests and real use, here’s an overall performance rating visualized:
The SL edges out the M10 in technical performance and versatility, but the M10 holds its place for manual-focusing enthusiasts and those valuing the tactile rangefinder charm.
Photography Discipline Suitability: Matching Camera to Genre
How do these cameras fit with different photography types? Let’s break it down:
- Portraits: SL's autofocus and high-res viewfinder win for fast capture and eye detection; M10 excels in skin tone rendering with its Leica character.
- Landscape: SL boasts better dynamic range, weather sealing, and ruggedness - often preferable for outdoors; M10 can deliver beautiful files but demands slower, contemplative shooting.
- Wildlife: SL’s fast burst and AF capabilities make it the clear choice.
- Sports: SL again outperforms with tracking AF and faster FPS.
- Street: M10’s compactness, discretion, and quiet operation favor street photographers who cherish slow, thoughtful shooting.
- Macro: Both need macro-specific lenses; SL’s autofocus helps, but dedicated macro work often relies on manual precision, so M10 still valid.
- Night/Astro: SL’s lower minimum ISO and EVF aid night shooting; M10’s cleaner high ISO keep noise down.
- Video: Only SL has serious video features.
- Travel: Weight difference and battery life favor SL for all-day use; M10’s size suits minimalist packing.
- Professional Work: SL’s dual cards, sealing, metadata, and file transfers suit pro environments better.
Price and Value Analysis
Currently, both hover at premium price points around $7,400–7,600, reflecting Leica’s luxury standing. Given the SL offers more extensive features, versatility, and newer tech, it arguably provides more bang for the buck - especially if you plan to shoot professionally or diversify into video and fast-paced genres.
The M10 appeals to those who prioritize craft, manual focus, legacy lenses, and slower shooting. Its value is in the Leica rangefinder experience, not tech specs.
Which Leica Should You Choose?
So, what’s my recommendation?
-
Choose the Leica M10 if:
- You crave legendary Leica rangefinder experience with manual focus
- You shoot mostly portraits, street, and controlled landscapes with a contemplative approach
- You have an affinity for the M-mount lens ecosystem and don’t need autofocus or video
- You want a compact, discreet camera with classic design
- Battery life and burst shooting aren’t priorities
-
Choose the Leica SL if:
- You want the most versatile system for portraits, landscapes, wildlife, sports, macro, and video
- You need fast, reliable autofocus and high burst speeds
- You shoot professionally requiring weather sealing, dual card slots, and robust connectivity
- You want a modern EVF and touchscreen interface
- Video capability is important in your workflow
- You want the flexibility of the growing L-Mount lens ecosystem
Closing Thoughts
Both the Leica M10 and SL embody Leica’s commitment to quality, craftsmanship, and excellence, yet they serve very different photographers. The M10 is a loving nod to analog heritage and slow photography ritual, while the SL is a forward-looking tool for speed, accuracy, and multimedia creatives.
Ultimately, the choice depends on your shooting style and needs. My extensive hands-on evaluation over years of using both sides has reinforced that Leica’s cameras are about emotional connection as much as image quality.
If you appreciate tactile control, optical viewfinding, and the joy of manual focus, the M10 is uniquely rewarding. For workhorses needing speed, autofocus, weather resistance, and robust features, the SL delivers in spades.
I hope this deep dive helps you find the Leica that aligns with your photographic passion and vision.
- Thanks for reading! For more on Leica gear and detailed image comparisons, check out my other reviews or feel free to ask questions below.
Note: All specs and images are as per official Leica data and my personal testing sessions conducted over multiple shoots spanning diverse scenarios.
Leica M10 vs Leica SL Specifications
Leica M10 | Leica SL | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Leica | Leica |
Model | Leica M10 | Leica SL |
Also called | - | Typ 601 |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
Released | 2017-01-18 | 2015-10-21 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Maestro II | Maestro II |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Full frame | Full frame |
Sensor dimensions | 35.8 x 23.9mm | 36 x 24mm |
Sensor area | 855.6mm² | 864.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24 megapixel | 24 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 3:2 |
Full resolution | 5952 x 3992 | 6000 x 4000 |
Max native ISO | 50000 | 50000 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 50 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Leica M | Leica L |
Number of lenses | 59 | 30 |
Crop factor | 1 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 1,037k dot | 1,040k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (rangefinder) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 4,400k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.73x | 0.8x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 60 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames/s | 11.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 4096 x 2160 (24p), 3840 x 2160 (30p), 1920 x 1080 (120p, 60p, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (120p, 60p, 30p, 24p) |
Max video resolution | None | 4096x2160 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | Optional | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 660 gr (1.46 lb) | 847 gr (1.87 lb) |
Dimensions | 139 x 80 x 39mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") | 147 x 104 x 39mm (5.8" x 4.1" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 86 | 88 |
DXO Color Depth score | 24.4 | 25.0 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 13.3 | 13.4 |
DXO Low light score | 2133 | 1821 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 210 pictures | 400 pictures |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | BP-SCL4 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs) | Yes (2 or 12 secs) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-II supported on slot 1) |
Storage slots | One | Dual |
Cost at launch | $7,595 | $7,450 |