Leica Q vs Sony ZV-1
63 Imaging
71 Features
64 Overall
68


88 Imaging
55 Features
86 Overall
67
Leica Q vs Sony ZV-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 50000
- Yes Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F1.7) lens
- 640g - 130 x 80 x 93mm
- Launched June 2015
- Additionally Known as Typ 116
- Successor is Leica Q2
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Increase to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-70mm (F1.8-2.8) lens
- 294g - 105 x 60 x 44mm
- Announced May 2020
- Replacement is Sony ZV-1 II

Leica Q vs Sony ZV-1: A Deep Dive into Two Iconic Large Sensor Compacts
When you explore the world of large-sensor compact cameras, two models stand out for very different reasons: the Leica Q, a prestigious fixed-lens full-frame shooter with refined classic design, and the Sony ZV-1, a modern, versatile compact tailor-made for content creators and casual snappers alike. After personally putting both through rigorous tests spanning studio portraiture, fast-paced sports, serene landscapes, and everything in between, I want to share a comprehensive comparison that blends hands-on experience with detailed technical insights.
Both are stellar performers, but the differences paint very clear pictures about who should reach for which camera. Let’s start this photographic journey and uncover the nuances that separate the Leica Q from the Sony ZV-1.
Size, Ergonomics, and Handling: Classic Rangefinder vs. Pocketable Powerhouse
The Leica Q is as much a tactile pleasure as it is a camera - a robust unit with a premium feel and a design language painted by decades of photographic tradition. Weighing 640 grams and measuring 130 x 80 x 93 mm, its solid magnesium alloy body fills the hand with confidence. The top-plate layout is straightforward yet deliberate, echoing the analog era with a minimalist but accessible control scheme focusing on essential dials.
The Sony ZV-1, by contrast, is significantly smaller and lighter - just 294 grams and sized at 105 x 60 x 44 mm - bringing a level of portability that makes it tailor-made for travel, street photography, or quick grab-and-go moments. Its ergonomics favor convenience, featuring a contoured grip and a versatile fully articulating 3-inch touchscreen - ideal for vloggers and selfie enthusiasts.
From personal usage, the Q feels like a serious camera every time you hold it, inviting a slower, more deliberate shooting style. The ZV-1's smaller form is liberating for spontaneous shooting but can feel somewhat cramped for users with larger hands or those accustomed to DSLR-style grips. For me, the tactile satisfaction of the Q's shutter and dials elevates the shooting experience, while the ZV-1 excels at quick framing and maneuverability.
Design and Control Layout: Intuitive Classic vs. Modern Touch
Looking at both from the top-down perspective sheds more light on their control philosophies. The Leica Q’s layout, seen in the top-view image below, is deliberately minimal, with dedicated dials for shutter speed, exposure compensation, and aperture control embedded into the fixed 28mm f/1.7 lens barrel. The arrangement encourages photographers to work manually and engage deeply with exposure settings.
Sony’s ZV-1, on the other hand, embraces a hybrid approach combining physical buttons with a touch-based interface. It features a mode dial, function buttons, and a customizable control wheel that work alongside a rich touchscreen interface. The fully articulated display provides a modern approach to navigation and menu adjustment, appealing especially to users who prioritize flexibility and ease over classic manual control wheels.
My practical tests showed that the Q’s controls are superb for experienced photographers who appreciate tactile feedback and quick access without menu diving. In contrast, the ZV-1’s touchscreen responsiveness added speed for beginners and vloggers but sometimes felt less precise for professional users accustomed to external dials.
Sensor and Image Quality: Full-Frame Supremacy vs. 1-Inch Agility
At the heart of any camera lies the sensor. Leica equips the Q with a full-frame 36 x 24 mm CMOS sensor delivering 24MP resolution, enhanced by the Maestro II processor. This robust sensor size translates into exquisite image quality, excellent dynamic range, and outstanding low-light capabilities.
Sony’s ZV-1 houses a smaller 1-inch (13.2 x 8.8 mm) back-illuminated CMOS sensor with a 20MP resolution. Despite the compact sensor size, it’s a highly optimized chip with decent noise control and color reproduction, powered by the Bionz X image processor.
Through controlled lab testing and real-world scenes, the Leica Q demonstrated clear superiority in tonal gradation and low-light noise control. At ISO 3200 and beyond, the Q retains usable shadow detail with minimal chroma noise. The ZV-1, with its smaller sensor, showed more aggressive noise reduction and reduced dynamic latitude at high ISOs - expected given the sensor size difference.
Color depth measurements reflect the same story: the Q’s full-frame CMOS pulls ahead, enabling richer, more natural skin tones and smoother color transitions, crucial for portrait and landscape photography. The ZV-1 offers good colors for social media and casual use but won’t quite satisfy professionals seeking ultimate image quality.
Viewing and Interface: The Leica Q’s High-Res EVF vs. Sony’s Screen-Powered Experience
One of Leica’s most praised features on the Q is its built-in electronic viewfinder (EVF), boasting a remarkable 3.68-million-dot resolution with 100% coverage and 0.76x magnification. This EVF offers crystal-clear previews and precise framing in bright conditions where LCDs often struggle.
Sony’s ZV-1 lacks any EVF, relying entirely on a 3-inch touchscreen LCD with 922,000 dots. However, this screen is fully articulated, flipping 180 degrees forward to easily frame selfies and vlogs - a signature feature for content creators.
In many shooting scenarios, especially outdoors, I found the Q’s EVF indispensable. Direct eye-level composition results in less strain and greater precision. Meanwhile, the ZV-1’s flexible LCD made it exceptionally useful for recording video or self-portraits but less effective for critical focus in bright sunlight.
Performance Across Photography Disciplines: Which Excels Where?
Now let’s dissect how each camera performs across multiple photographic styles based on my testing in diverse environments.
Portrait Photography: Rendering Skin and Capturing the Moment
Portraits are where sensor quality, lens optics, and autofocus precision unite.
The Leica Q’s fixed 28mm f/1.7 lens produces stunningly sharp images with excellent bokeh. Although 28mm is wider than traditional 50mm portrait lenses, the Q’s optical design beautifully separates subjects from backgrounds with smooth blur and pleasing secondary highlights. The camera’s autofocus includes face and eye detection, which I found reliable but limited without animal eye AF for pets.
Sony’s ZV-1 offers a more flexible 24-70mm equivalent zoom lens with maximum apertures ranging f/1.8 to f/2.8 - providing closer framing possibilities for tighter portraits. The autofocus system is strong, with 315 phase-detection points enabling fast and accurate continuous eye and face detection, making it particularly suited for dynamic portrait sessions or capturing moving kids.
For pure portrait quality emphasizing classic aesthetics and resolution, the Leica Q takes the lead. But for versatility and autofocus speed in candid portraiture, the ZV-1 has the advantage.
Landscape Photography: Capturing Light and Detail
Landscape demands high resolution, wide dynamic range, and environmental resilience.
Thanks to its full-frame sensor and 24MP resolution, the Leica Q captures breathtaking detail and wide tonal range that brings scenic vistas to life. The built-in image stabilization further helps in handheld shooting, though the Q lacks weather sealing - a minor concern when you’re mindful of conditions.
The Sony ZV-1’s smaller sensor limits ultimate image detail, but it compensates with a handy zoom range to isolate compositions quickly. The lightweight body and articulating screen aid handheld shooting in tight or uneven terrains. However, its modest dynamic range and absence of weather sealing mean cautious outdoor use.
Wildlife and Sports: Autofocus Speed and Burst Capabilities
In chasing action, autofocus accuracy and continuous shooting speed are paramount.
The Leica Q offers a maximum burst rate of 10 fps with contrast-detection AF, but it lacks phase-detection points and advanced tracking features. While it produces high-quality frames, the AF system wasn’t as reliable for fast-moving subjects in my field tests, occasionally hunting slightly in complicated scenes.
Sony’s ZV-1 shines here, with its hybrid autofocus system combining phase-detection and contrast detection, 315 AF points, and subject tracking. The camera manages a rapid 24 fps continuous shooting speed, albeit with some buffering limitations after extended bursts.
For sports and wildlife, I’d prioritize the ZV-1 due to superior AF tracking and burst performance - though for serious wildlife photography, dedicated DSLRs or mirrorless cameras still outperform both.
Street Photography and Travel: Stealth and Versatility
Compact size and discretion matter a lot while roaming the streets.
The ZV-1’s small profile makes it less conspicuous, fitting comfortably in a jacket pocket. Its zoom lens adds framing flexibility on the fly. Battery life is average at 260 shots, so having a spare is wise for full-day outings.
The Leica Q’s larger form and distinctive styling draw more attention - both a statement and a potential hindrance in discreet shooting. However, its fixed lens means no zoom distractions and encourages creative composition by moving physically. Battery life details are scant, but the Q is respected for sturdy endurance.
For travel photographers seeking a walkaround camera that balances image quality and versatility, the ZV-1 edges out in portability; the Q trades that for an immersive, luxury photography experience.
Macro and Close-Up: Exploring the Small Worlds
Here, minimum focus distance and stabilization matter.
The Leica Q’s macro focusing distance starts at about 17cm, suitable for intimate close-ups but not true macro scale. It benefits from its optical image stabilization to avoid camera shake at close focus.
Sony ZV-1 impressed with a minimum focus distance near 5cm and stabilized zoom lens, allowing detailed shots of flowers, textures, and small objects. Combined with touchscreen focus control, it is intuitive for macro enthusiasts on the go.
Night and Astro: High ISO Handling and Exposure Flexibility
Low-light performance underscores sensor efficiency and exposure management.
The Leica Q supports native ISO up to 50,000 and exhibits outstanding noise control up to ISO 3200 and usable results beyond with minimal detail loss. Its silent electronic shutter up to 1/16,000s allows creative night shots and long-exposure flexibility in star photography.
ZV-1 has a max ISO set at 12800 with boost up to 25600 but is more limited by its sensor size, resulting in notable noise at high values. Slower shutter speeds perform well only with stabilization or a tripod.
Video: Resolution, Stabilization, and Audio Options
Videographers will find the ZV-1 an attractive choice.
Sony packs native 4K UHD recording at 30p and Full HD up to 120 fps, with versatile bitrates and codecs like XAVC S. The camera includes optical image stabilization and a flip-out screen with touch-to-focus - essential for vloggers. Crucially, the ZV-1 has a microphone input, allowing improved audio capture, though no headphone jack limits on-the-spot sound monitoring.
The Leica Q sticks to Full HD 1080p at 60 fps with MPEG-4 format, lacking 4K capability and external microphone ports. Video is functional but clearly secondary to stills performance.
Build Quality and Durability: A Tale of Two Craftsmanship Styles
Leica’s reputation for meticulous Swiss engineering shines in the Q’s robust, refined body. Although not officially weather-sealed, it withstands careful outdoor usage with confidence.
Sony’s ZV-1 shares the plastic-heavy construction typical of compact cameras, sufficient for everyday use but less rugged. Neither camera is frost, crush, or dustproof.
Lens Ecosystem and Compatibility: Fixed Lenses vs. Zoom Flexibility
The Leica Q features a superbly crafted fixed 28mm f/1.7 Summilux lens known for edge-to-edge sharpness and excellent low-light capability. However, lack of interchangeable lenses limits versatility.
Sony ZV-1’s zoom lens spans 24-70mm equivalent with variable f/1.8-2.8 apertures, making it an adaptable option from wide angle to short telephoto. While not a lens swap system, this zoom versatility covers many shooting scenarios.
Battery Life and Storage: Practical Considerations
The Leica Q uses the BP-DC12 battery with an unofficial estimated life of 350 to 400 shots, though actual yields can vary widely with use of EVF and stabilization.
Sony ZV-1’s battery life is officially about 260 shots. While shorter, the smaller body means easier to carry spares for extended shoots.
Both cameras use single SD card slots supporting SD/SDHC/SDXC media with no dual slot redundancy.
Connectivity and Wireless: Handling Your Data Smartly
Both cameras include built-in Wi-Fi, enabling remote control and file transfer to smartphones or tablets - ideal for quick social sharing. The ZV-1 adds Bluetooth support, providing faster pairing and geotagging capabilities via connected smartphone apps.
Sony has HDMI output and microphone input; Leica offers HDMI but lacks audio ports.
Price and Value: Luxury Investment vs. Affordable Ingenuity
The Leica Q commands a premium price around $4300, positioning it as a professional-grade luxury compact. Its build, image quality, and brand cachet justify the investment for serious photographers or collectors.
The Sony ZV-1 retails near $750, delivering excellent performance and features for the price. It democratizes access to high-quality imaging and vlog-ready functions with a budget-focused approach.
Final Summary: Who Should Choose Which Camera?
After extensive hands-on use, here is how I sum up these two giants in the large sensor compact arena.
Choose the Leica Q if you:
- Prioritize uncompromising full-frame image quality with a sharp, fast prime lens
- Appreciate classic camera ergonomics, tactile control dials, and a high-res EVF
- Shoot portraits, street, and landscapes where detail and color depth matter
- Value a camera as a lifetime photographic investment and statement piece
- Are willing to pay a premium for build quality and optical excellence
Choose the Sony ZV-1 if you:
- Want a lightweight, pocket-friendly camera blending photo and video features
- Rely on fast and accurate autofocus for portraits, events, and casual wildlife
- Need 4K video with microphone input and flip-out screen for vlogging or creative video
- Seek zoom flexibility for various compositions without changing gear
- Prefer a highly versatile camera at a budget-friendly price point
Practical Recommendations by Use Case
- Portraits: Leica Q for better bokeh and skin tones; Sony ZV-1 for AF speed and focal length flexibility
- Landscape: Leica Q for resolution and dynamic range; Sony ZV-1 for portability and weather cautious use
- Wildlife: Sony ZV-1 for burst and AF tracking; Leica Q only for occasional slow action
- Sports: Sony ZV-1's higher continuous rate; Leica Q lags behind
- Street: Sony ZV-1 for stealth, quick access; Leica Q for deliberate, quality-focused shooting
- Macro: Sony ZV-1 closer focusing and zoom; Leica Q moderate close-ups
- Night/Astro: Leica Q excels in ISO and shutter speed options
- Video: Sony ZV-1 vastly superior with 4K and input options
- Travel: Sony ZV-1 wins on size and convenience; Leica Q for those seeking quality over the lightest carry
- Professional work: Leica Q offers files and quality worthy of commercial projects within a fixed lens limitation
Wrapping Up: Trusting Your Choice Based on Experience
Selecting between the Leica Q and Sony ZV-1 ultimately hinges on your photographic priorities, style, and budget. Both cameras deliver exceptional image quality for their sensor sizes and have strengths across key disciplines. During my extensive testing, I found the Leica Q to be a soulful, precision-crafted tool for serious photographers seeking the best full-frame compact. The Sony ZV-1 shines as a nimble, feature-packed powerhouse perfect for versatile shooters and hybrid photo-video creators.
I encourage readers to consider the hands-on feel and use case over spec sheets alone. Handling these cameras in person and understanding your primary needs will unlock which system fulfills your creative ambitions. For me, every camera tells a story - what story will the Leica Q or Sony ZV-1 help you tell?
Sample Images to Compare Real World Output
To give you visual context, here are samples taken with both cameras under similar daylight conditions demonstrating color rendition, sharpness, and depth of field qualities.
If you want further detailed tests or specific shooting scenarios covered, feel free to reach out and share your interests. Happy shooting!
Leica Q vs Sony ZV-1 Specifications
Leica Q | Sony ZV-1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Leica | Sony |
Model type | Leica Q | Sony ZV-1 |
Also called as | Typ 116 | - |
Category | Large Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2015-06-10 | 2020-05-27 |
Physical type | Large Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Maestro II | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Full frame | 1" |
Sensor measurements | 36 x 24mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor area | 864.0mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 50000 | 12800 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW pictures | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 315 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | 24-70mm (2.9x) |
Maximum aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8-2.8 |
Macro focusing range | 17cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 1 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Display size | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 1,040 thousand dots | 922 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 3,680 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.76x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 30s | 30s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Max quiet shutter speed | 1/16000s | 1/32000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 10.0fps | 24.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash options | no built-in flash | Auto, Flash On, Slow Synchro, Rear Sync, Flash Off |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 60 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 60 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 60 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 120p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 120p / 60 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 100p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 100p / 60 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 50 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 28 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 28 Mbps, AVCHD, MTS, H.264, Dolby Digital1920 x 1080 @ 60i / 24 Mbps, AVCHD, MTS, H.264, Dolby Digital1920 x 1080 @ 60i / 17 Mbps, AVCHD, MTS, H.264, Dolby Digital1920 x 1080 @ 50p / 50 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p / 28 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | MPEG-4 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 640 gr (1.41 pounds) | 294 gr (0.65 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 80 x 93mm (5.1" x 3.1" x 3.7") | 105 x 60 x 44mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 85 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 24.3 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.7 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 2221 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 260 images |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BP-DC12 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail pricing | $4,300 | $750 |