Leica V-Lux 2 vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS5: A Deep Dive into Two Small Sensor Superzooms

In the realm of small sensor superzoom cameras - where compactness, versatile reach, and ease of use often trump the lofty aspirations of full-frame glory - two contenders from 2010 stand out for different reasons. The Leica V-Lux 2, with its bold, bridge-style SLR-like body, and the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS5, a sleek compact with a modest footprint, both promise to capture far-flung subjects with a hefty zoom. But beyond the megapixels and millimeters, which camera truly delivers for your photography needs? Having spent countless hours with these two, I’m here to unpack their differences, strengths, and where each might fit in your kit.

Let’s get comfortable with the basics before plunging into more complex territory.

Getting a Feel: Size, Ergonomics, and Build Quality

The first impression a camera makes often sets the tone for everything else. Leica’s V-Lux 2 is unmistakably a bridge camera - with a solid, heftier build reminiscent of an SLR. Measuring roughly 124 x 80 x 95 mm and tipping the scales at 520 grams, it sits comfortably in the hands, offering a tactile grip and mechanical dials that invite adventurous shooting.

In contrast, the Panasonic ZS5 is a compact marvel of miniaturization. At just 103 x 60 x 32 mm and weighing a mere 214 grams, it slips effortlessly in a pocket or purse, ready for urban escapades or travel light scenarios.

From personal experience, the V-Lux 2’s bulkiness translates into more control - and arguably better handling for extended shoots. Conversely, the ZS5’s petite frame scores big points when discretion and portability top your priority list. However, small size occasionally compromises control ergonomics, more on that later.

Build-wise, neither camera boasts weather sealing or rugged protection. Both are decidedly consumer-level in durability, handling everyday bumps but no deliberate roughhousing.

Design Details: Button Layout, Display, and Viewfinder

Looking from the top down, the Leica flexes its SLR-like persona with a detailed layout featuring dedicated buttons and a traditional autofocus mode switch, along with a pop-up flash and hot shoe to use external flashes. The ZS5 adopts a simpler, clean design befitting its compact class but sacrifices the external flash option.

Ergonomics go beyond size: the V-Lux 2 uses a fully articulated 3-inch LCD screen with 460k-dot resolution, which I found excellent for composing shots at awkward angles, especially useful for macro or low-angle shooting. The ZS5 sticks to a fixed 2.7-inch screen at 230k-dot resolution, which felt cramped and a little lackluster, particularly under bright daylight.

Neither camera features touchscreens or selfie-friendly modes; however, the Leica's articulated display edges it ahead for flexibility in shooting style.

A killer differentiator is the presence of an electronic viewfinder in the Leica V-Lux 2 (though with unspecified resolution and coverage specs). It greatly aids in bright conditions where LCD glare can be a pain. The Panasonic ZS5, meanwhile, lacks a viewfinder entirely - adhering strictly to live view on its LCD.

Sensor Specs and Image Quality Expectations

Both cameras sport sensors measuring 1/2.3-inch in size - a common small sensor dimension, roughly 6.08 x 4.56 mm, or about 27.7 mm² of surface area. But they differ significantly in sensor technology and resolution.

The Leica V-Lux 2 wields a 14-megapixel CMOS sensor with an anti-aliasing filter. CMOS sensors - especially paired with appropriate processing - typically offer better noise control and dynamic range compared to CCD sensors from the same era.

The Panasonic ZS5 uses a 12-megapixel CCD sensor, also with anti-aliasing. CCDs, while historically prized for color rendition, usually lag in noise performance and power efficiency.

With maximum ISO pegged at 6400 for both, native ISO ranges start at 100 (Leica) and 80 (Panasonic). In real-world testing, the V-Lux 2 produces cleaner high-ISO images with more detail retention and less color noise - a crucial factor for low-light shooters.

Additionally, the Leica’s ability to shoot RAW images gives enthusiasts and pros more latitude in post-processing. The ZS5 restricts you to JPEGs only, limiting creative adjustments after the fact - a downside for anyone serious about image control.

Lens Specifications and Focusing Performance

Both cameras boast fixed superzoom lenses covering a massive focal range but with distinct differences.

• Leica V-Lux 2: 25-600mm equivalent (24× zoom), aperture F2.8-5.2
• Panasonic ZS5: 25-300mm equivalent (12× zoom), aperture F3.3-4.9

The Leica's lens is clearly the champion here, doubling the zoom reach while offering a brighter maximum aperture at the wide end. That F2.8 advantage opens doors for low-light shooting and shallower depth of field effects - an edge for portraits and creative blurring.

Both lenses offer macro capabilities, though the Leica impresses with a minimum focus distance of just 1 cm, practically nose-to-subject, while the ZS5 settles at 3 cm. I found the Leica better for dramatic close-ups, as it allows detailed textures and subject isolation.

However, the Leica’s 5.9x focal length multiplier indicates a smaller sensor than a typical Micro Four Thirds or APS-C body, which limits the physical aperture size relative to sensor area. Still, it pushes the envelope for a compact bridge camera.

Autofocus performance is an interesting comparison:

• The Leica relies on contrast-detection AF only with no face or eye detection, no continuous tracking, and just single AF mode. It led to a slower, more deliberate focus hunting, especially in low-contrast or low-light scenarios.
• Panasonic employs 11 AF points with contrast detection plus face detection and AF tracking capabilities. In practice, this resulted in faster, more consistent focusing - particularly useful for moving subjects or street photography.

This difference became very apparent when shooting children or pets - the ZS5 kept locked focus better, reducing missed shots having hunted for focus.

Shooting Experience and Controls

The Leica offers full manual exposure controls, including aperture priority, shutter priority, and full manual, alongside exposure compensation. The Panasonic also supports similar modes but lacks some manual-focus flexibility.

Continuous shooting speeds further differentiate them: Leica’s snappy 11 frames per second burst rate blows away the Panasonic’s more pedestrian 2 fps, critical if you’re chasing wildlife action or fleeting moments in street photography.

However, the V-Lux 2’s single SD card slot and somewhat dated USB 2.0 interface (combined with no wireless connectivity) show its age in an increasingly connected world. The Panasonic mimics this with similarly modest storage and connectivity.

Flash-wise, the Leica built-in flash reaches approximately 9.5 meters versus Panasonic’s 5.3 meters, and the Leica accepts external flashes via hot shoe - something enthusiast photographers appreciate. Panasonic’s flash, by contrast, is fixed and less powerful.

Putting It All Together: Performance in Different Photography Genres

With this technical backdrop, how do these cameras fare in various photography disciplines? Here are my impressions based on hands-on use paired with their specs.

Portrait Photography: Skin Tones, Bokeh, and Face Detection

Portraits thrive on accurate skin tones, smooth bokeh, and reliable subject detection.

• The Leica V-Lux 2’s brighter lens and 14MP sensor offer better color rendition and the potential for tighter background separation. But lacking face or eye detection means relying more on manual focus precision.
• The Panasonic ZS5 performs admirably in recognizing faces automatically, smoothing skin tones thanks to its CCD sensor characteristics, but struggles to create creamy bokeh due to smaller aperture and less zoom reach.

If your priority is portrait work without external lighting setup and you like a quick autofocus assist, the ZS5 feels like a safer bet. For those wanting skill-based control of blur effects and RAW processing, the Leica wins but demands more photographer involvement.

Landscape Photography: Dynamic Range and Resolution Matters

Here, sensor prowess and lens sharpness take center stage.

Leica’s slightly higher resolution and better dynamic range enable richer detail preservation in highlights and shadows - it won’t compete with modern APS-C or full-frame setups but is respectable for this sensor class.

The Panasonic’s CCD sensor yields images with a classic look, but highlight clipping is more likely, and images can look less nuanced in challenging light.

Neither camera is weather sealed, which limits rugged landscape use; however, weightier Leica feels more stable on a tripod.

Wildlife Photography: Telephoto Performance and Autofocus Speed

The Leica’s astonishing 25-600mm reach makes it an obvious contender for wildlife fans on a budget.

Yet, autofocus speed and tracking reliability are crucial when animals don’t hold still. Unfortunately, Leica’s AF system - focused on single contrast-detection - is slow and prone to missing fast-moving subjects.

In contrast, Panasonic’s 300mm max zoom caps magnification but integrates continuous AF and subject tracking, making it a safer bet for active wildlife shooting where capturing the moment quickly outweighs sheer reach.

Sports Photography: Tracking and Frame Rates

The V-Lux 2’s 11 fps continuous mode is impressive on paper, giving it the edge over Panasonic's measurable 2 fps. Still, this is tempered by the slow AF system and the small sensor’s noise in low light.

Panasonic handles autofocus tracking better but can’t keep up with speed demands as well.

Bottom line: Neither camera is a DSLR or mirrorless speed demon designed for serious sports shooters. The Leica provides burst shooting fun for casual action, but neither camera is the professional tool for sports.

Street Photography: Discretion and Low Light Ability

For street photographers, discretion, quick autofocus, and size matter.

The ZS5’s compact size and quiet operation make it an unassuming street companion, while Leica’s bulkier frame makes a statement.

Panasonic’s face detection and quick autofocus help capture spontaneous expressions. However, the slower lens and smaller aperture mean low light shots often require cranking ISO, revealing noise.

Leica’s brighter lens helps a bit in low light, but the slower AF hinders fast candid snaps.

Macro Photography: Close Focus and Sharpness

Leica’s 1 cm macro minimum focus distance is a delight, providing close-ups that reveal textures with richness, especially when combined with manual focus precision.

Panasonic’s 3 cm minimum distance still works fine, but the difference in working distance can matter when shooting skittish subjects like insects.

Image stabilization in both aids hand-held macro shots, but Leica’s optical stabilization paired with articulating screen creates a better user experience when shooting odd angles.

Night and Astro Photography: High ISO and Exposure

Small sensor cameras are not known for stellar night shots, but Leica’s CMOS sensor with RAW support again wins here - its images possess better low-light detail and less chroma noise at ISO 1600 and above.

Panasonic, shackled to JPEG output and noisier CCD sensor at high ISOs, falls short.

Neither offers specialized astro modes or longer exposure capabilities beyond a 60-second shutter limit, but Leica’s manual control feels more precise for night scenes.

Video Capabilities: Recording Quality and Stabilization

Both cameras cap video resolution at 1280 x 720 (720p HD), not exactly cutting-edge even in 2010.

Leica saves footage in AVCHD Lite format, generally offering better compression and quality compared to Panasonic’s Motion JPEG files.

Neither camera supports microphone or headphone jacks, limiting professional audio capture.

Optical image stabilization aids handheld video shooting on both, but weak low light sensor performance and limited frame rates make these cameras suitable mainly for casual video.

Travel Photography: Versatility and Battery Life

I found the Leica more versatile thanks to its extensive zoom range - perfect for sightseeing where switching lenses isn’t an option.

Yet Panasonic’s smaller size, lighter weight, and pocketability won over for everyday adventures where carry comfort matters.

Both cameras use proprietary batteries with moderately average stamina for the era - expect to carry spares on long trips.

Professional Reliability, Workflow, and Integration

Neither camera is intended as a professional workhorse, lacking weather sealing and advanced connectivity.

Leica’s RAW files integrate better into professional Lightroom or Photoshop workflows, while Panasonic’s JPEG-only approach limits post-production flexibility.

The Leica V-Lux 2 supports external flash for controlled lighting - a necessity for portrait or event shooters. Panasonic does not.

Overall Image Quality and Performance Summary

To synthesize these assessments:

Leica V Lux 2 front Leica V Lux 2 screen back Panasonic ZS5 front Panasonic ZS5 screen back

Performance Scores and Genre Suitability

Here’s a broad-stroke rating of each camera’s performance in various photography areas, based on a weighted combination of sensor quality, lens flexibility, AF speed, and user features.

And genre-specific scores contextualize how these cameras serve different photographic passions:

Technical Verdict: Strengths and Weaknesses

• Leica V-Lux 2
  Strengths: Wide zoom range and bright aperture, RAW shooting, articulated screen, external flash compatibility, fast burst rate.
  Weaknesses: Slow autofocus, heavy size for a superzoom, outdated connectivity, no weather sealing.

• Panasonic ZS5
  Strengths: Compact and light, fast and accurate autofocus with tracking, face detection, intuitive controls.
  Weaknesses: Limited zoom range, CCD sensor noise limitations, no RAW output, no viewfinder or external flash.

Who Should Choose Which?

Choosing between these cameras boils down to your priorities. If I had to pick for different user types:

• For the enthusiast who loves maximum zoom reach, manual control, and higher image quality potential: Choose the Leica V-Lux 2. It’s an all-in-one travel lens and manual exposure playground, great for portraits, landscapes, and macro work with an invested, hands-on approach.

• For the casual shooter prioritizing portability, quick autofocus, and easy handling: The Panasonic ZS5 is your pocket-sized buddy. Street photographers, travelers, and those nervous about fiddling with settings will appreciate the smooth autofocus and face detection.

Budget also plays a role; Leica’s premium price reflects its advanced optics and features, while Panasonic offers excellent value for under $300.

Final Thoughts: Experience Beyond Specs

I’ve spent days in the field toggling between these two cameras. Each has a personality shaped by design choices that reflect differing philosophies: Leica’s approach leans into photographic craftsmanship and control, ideal for thoughtful shooting. Panasonic embraces snapshot agility and compactness with savvy AF.

In a fast-changing camera market with mirrorless giants and smartphone competition, both stand as interesting historical cases of what small sensor superzooms offered in 2010 - a bridge between compact convenience and telephoto freedom.

If you appreciate a camera that rewards your effort with greater creative control, the Leica V-Lux 2 feels like an old friend. If spontaneity and portability win your heart, the Panasonic ZS5 will keep pace without fuss.

Happy shooting - and may this comparison guide your next optical adventure!

Disclosure: I've personally tested each camera extensively under comparable conditions, using controlled light setups and real-world scenarios, to inform this comparison with practical, firsthand insights.

Images used in this article:

1. 
2. 
3. 
4. 
5. Leica V Lux 2 front Leica V Lux 2 screen back Panasonic ZS5 front Panasonic ZS5 screen back