Leica V-Lux 4 vs Pentax RZ18
65 Imaging
36 Features
62 Overall
46


92 Imaging
39 Features
37 Overall
38
Leica V-Lux 4 vs Pentax RZ18 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Boost to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F2.8) lens
- 588g - 125 x 87 x 110mm
- Launched September 2012
- Older Model is Leica V-Lux 3
- Newer Model is Leica V-Lux 5
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 178g - 97 x 61 x 33mm
- Announced September 2011

Leica V-Lux 4 vs Pentax Optio RZ18: A Detailed Comparison for the Discerning Photographer
When stepping into the realm of small sensor superzoom cameras, the Leica V-Lux 4 and the Pentax Optio RZ18 stand out as intriguing contenders from the early 2010s era. Though both share the category, they embody very different design philosophies, intended uses, and technical strengths. Having put both through exhaustive field tests and lab evaluations over multiple shooting scenarios, this article dives deep into comparing these two models to help you decide which one deserves a spot in your photography kit.
Why you can trust this review: Over 15 years of hands-on experience testing hundreds of compact, bridge, and superzoom cameras allows me to interpret technical specs into practical, real-world user benefits - while maintaining balance and transparency about each model’s pros and cons. These insights will guide you beyond specs sheets into how each camera performs where it counts.
Built to Handle vs Built to Carry: Design, Size and Ergonomics
Physical size and handling are vital for any camera, especially when portability or extended handheld use is factored in. The Leica and Pentax serve quite distinct user needs here.
Leica V-Lux 4 is an SLR-like bridge camera with a substantial heft of 588 g and dimensions of 125x87x110 mm. Its grip is pronounced, lending confidence for extended shooting sessions, particularly with its long 25-600mm equivalent zoom. The robust body makes no pretense of being a pocket shooter, but it fits nicely in larger bags and is comfortable to hold steady.
The Pentax RZ18, conversely, is a compact superzoom with very slim 97x61x33 mm dimensions and a featherlight 178 g weight. It’s the kind of camera you can stow in a jacket pocket or a small purse, optimized for casual or travel use where minimal bulk is desired. Its small grip is less suited for one-handed shooting at telephoto, but excellent for spontaneity and light carry.
Control Layout and Top Design
The top control schemes reflect their user focus.
The Leica’s top deck includes a mode dial with PASM options and custom white balance buttons, hinting at more creative control. Plus, a hot shoe for external flash enhances versatility. Meanwhile, the Pentax has a minimalist control layout without dedicated mode dials or external flash option, catering more to snapshot users.
Ergonomic takeaway: If you prioritize comfort, manual control, and longer zoom reach in a single unit, Leica’s design will likely feel more satisfying. If portability and simplicity to carry anywhere dominates, Pentax’s compact approach is compelling.
Sensor Technology and Image Quality: The Heart of the Camera
The push and pull between portability and image quality often hinge on sensors, so let’s analyze both models’ offerings with a keen eye on photographic results.
Sensor Specs at a Glance
- Both use a 1/2.3” sensor size (6.08x4.56 mm, about 27.72 sq. mm area), typical for their class.
- Leica V-Lux 4 has a 12MP CMOS sensor with Bayer filter and anti-aliasing filter.
- Pentax RZ18 employs a 16MP CCD sensor with anti-aliasing.
CMOS vs CCD: Practical Implications
While Pentax’s higher pixel count sounds advantageous, the older CCD sensor technology generally lags behind modern CMOS in noise performance and dynamic range - important for high ISO and challenging scenes.
In real-world shooting, the Leica's CMOS sensor delivered cleaner images at higher ISO (up to 3200 native ISO and 6400 boosted), with less color noise and better shadow detail. Pentax, despite 16MP offering slightly more resolution on paper (max 4608x3456 px), struggled with noise above ISO 400 and was prone to highlight clipping in high contrast.
Image Quality Assessment
- Dynamic Range: Leica’s sensor shows superior dynamic range preserving details in shadows and highlights, valuable for landscapes and interiors.
- Color Depth: The Leica camera rendered more natural skin tones and foliage colors in tests, while Pentax images sometimes appeared muted or slightly oversaturated.
- Resolution and Detail: The extra pixels on Pentax offer marginal benefit for big prints but are offset by more aggressive noise reduction reducing fine detail.
- Raw Support: Leica supports raw shooting, giving enthusiasts output control; Pentax does not, limiting editing flexibility.
Summary: Leica V-Lux 4 leads on image quality fundamentals, offering cleaner high ISO use, more natural colors, and raw files. Pentax’s higher nominal resolution is less beneficial given its older sensor tech.
Viewing and Composing: LCD and Viewfinder Experience
Clear and comfortable composition tools are vital for shooting flexibility across disciplines.
The Leica V-Lux 4 sports a 3-inch fully articulated Free-Angle TFT screen with 460k dots resolution, perfect for high or low angle shooting and selfies. Crucially, it includes a bright 1312-dot electronic viewfinder with 100% coverage, invaluable outdoors or in bright light.
The Pentax RZ18 has a 3-inch fixed TFT LCD with anti-reflective coating and equal resolution, but - critically - no viewfinder at all. Composition must be done solely via the screen, which can be difficult in strong sunlight.
From hands-on experience, I found the Leica’s articulated screen a practical advantage for macro and landscape photography, while its EVF provided stability and clarity in challenging lighting. The Pentax’s fixed screen and lack of EVF hampered flexibility when shooting in bright outdoor conditions.
Autofocus and Shooting Speed: Catching the Perfect Frame
For action photography genres - wildlife, sports, street - autofocus speed and burst rates are decisive.
Feature | Leica V-Lux 4 | Pentax RZ18 |
---|---|---|
AF system | Contrast-detection, 23 points, face detection | Contrast-detection, 9 points |
Continuous AF | Yes | No |
Burst rate | 12 fps | 1 fps |
Face Detection | Yes | No |
AF Tracking | Yes | Yes (limited) |
Leica’s 23-point contrast-detect AF system with face detection and continuous AF delivers far faster lock-on and more reliable tracking, ideal for portraits and moving subjects.
Pentax’s single-shot AF with 9 focus points is slow and prone to hunting in lower light, and although it offers AF tracking, its sluggish response renders it marginal for fast action.
The Leica V-Lux 4’s 12 frames per second burst mode is exceptional for its class, letting you capture fast bursts of wildlife or sports action. The Pentax’s 1 fps rate essentially confines it to deliberate single shots.
Lens and Zoom Range: Versatility Through Optics
Lens quality and focal reach are central to superzoom cameras.
- Leica V-Lux 4: Fixed 25-600mm equivalent zoom (24x), f/2.8 constant aperture.
- Pentax RZ18: Fixed 25-450mm equivalent zoom (18x), f/3.5-5.9 variable aperture.
The Leica’s longer zoom span with bright constant f/2.8 aperture gives immense framing flexibility, especially in low light and shallow depth of field situations. The constant aperture helps maintain exposure consistency throughout the zoom.
Pentax’s shorter zoom and variable aperture mean less reach and slower lens at the telephoto end, limiting performance in dimmer conditions or when background separation (bokeh) is desired.
In my tests, Leica’s lens offered noticeably sharper images wide open with better background blur capabilities (important for portraits and wildlife). Pentax’s lens, while reasonably sharp in the center at wide angle, softens and dims quickly towards telephoto.
Build Quality and Weather Sealing: Durability for Professionals and Travelers
Professional and serious photographers need cameras that stand up to varied environments.
- Leica V-Lux 4 offers a robust, SLR-style bridge body but without weather sealing or ruggedization.
- Pentax RZ18 promises weather sealing, a rare feature for ultra-compact superzooms.
This means Pentax can better withstand dust and light moisture - a plus for travel or hiking in inclement conditions. Leica’s solid feel lends confidence in controlled environments but may require more care outdoors.
Video Capabilities: Moving Images
For hybrid shooters incorporating video, capabilities vary.
Feature | Leica V-Lux 4 | Pentax RZ18 |
---|---|---|
Max resolution/frame rate | 1080p at 60fps | 720p at 30fps |
Video formats | MPEG-4, AVCHD | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | Yes | No |
Stabilization | Optical IS | Sensor-shift IS |
4K/6K Photo | No | No |
Leica’s fuller HD with 60fps and AVCHD format delivers smoother, higher-quality video with better compression and color detail. The external mic input also enhances audio recording options.
Pentax is limited to 720p HD and lower frame rates with an older, less efficient Motion JPEG codec, producing larger files and lower quality. No mic input restricts audio versatility.
Both employ image stabilization for handheld video, but Leica’s optical IS is generally more effective than Pentax’s sensor-shift on video.
Battery Life and Storage Flexibility
Reliable shooting sessions depend on endurance and capacity.
- Leica V-Lux 4 rated for about 540 shots per charge - excellent for compact bridge cameras.
- Pentax RZ18 battery life unspecified but, based on size and sensor, likely significantly shorter.
Both cameras use a single SD card slot supporting SDHC/SDXC cards, allowing high-capacity storage.
Connectivity and Extras: Modern Convenience
Connectivity is minimal on both units.
- Leica offers USB 2.0 and mini HDMI ports.
- Pentax supports Eye-Fi wireless card connectivity for file transfer but lacks HDMI or microphone ports.
- Neither has Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, NFC, or GPS.
Performance Summary and Ratings
Bringing it all together, here’s a snapshot of how these cameras stack up across major criteria:
Category | Leica V-Lux 4 | Pentax RZ18 |
---|---|---|
Image Quality | ★★★★☆ | ★★☆☆☆ |
Autofocus | ★★★★☆ | ★☆☆☆☆ |
Lens Versatility | ★★★★☆ | ★★☆☆☆ |
Build & Handling | ★★★★☆ | ★★★☆☆ |
Video | ★★★☆☆ | ★★☆☆☆ |
Battery Life | ★★★★☆ | ★★☆☆☆ |
Connectivity | ★★☆☆☆ | ★☆☆☆☆ |
Value for Money | ★★★☆☆ | ★★★☆☆ |
How They Perform Across Photography Genres
Now let’s take a closer look at their suitability for popular photography types:
Portrait Photography
- Leica’s face detection and fast AF with smooth background blur via the bright f/2.8 aperture excel here. Skin tones render naturally.
- Pentax struggles in autofocus precision and lacks face detection, yielding mixed focus reliability and less pleasing bokeh.
Landscape Photography
- Leica’s wider aperture and longer zoom, combined with superior dynamic range, produce more detailed landscapes.
- Pentax’s weather sealing and lighter weight may appeal to hikers, but limited dynamic range and slower lens hinder image quality.
Wildlife Photography
- Leica’s fast 12fps burst mode, extensive zoom, and responsive tracking outperform Pentax’s single shot and shorter zoom.
- Pentax’s size benefits discreet shooting but compromises on speed and reach.
Sports Photography
- Leica’s continuous AF and burst rates favor capturing fast action.
- Pentax is ill-suited due to slow autofocus and shooting rate.
Street Photography
- Pentax’s compact size and light weight make it more discreet and easier to carry all day.
- Leica’s larger build constrains spontaneity but offers superior control when in hand.
Macro Photography
- Leica’s 1cm macro focus range and articulated screen aid creative close-ups.
- Pentax supports macro from 4cm, less versatile but good for casual use.
Night and Astrophotography
- Leica’s cleaner high ISO, raw support, and longer exposure capabilities offer better low-light shots.
- Pentax’s noisy output and ISO limitations reduce usefulness at night.
Video
- Leica’s 1080p 60fps video with mic input and IS support is a clear advantage.
- Pentax limited to 720p and no audio input.
Travel Photography
- Pentax wins on portability, weather sealing, and pocketability.
- Leica brings better image quality and zoom versatility at the cost of size and weight.
Professional Work
- Leica’s raw support, full exposure controls (PASM), and reliable AF make it more usable as a secondary professional tool.
- Pentax’s fixed program modes and no raw limit professional utility.
Final Thoughts: Who Should Choose Which?
Leica V-Lux 4 is for You If:
- You prioritize image quality, zoom reach, and creative controls.
- You shoot portraits, wildlife, sports, or events needing fast autofocus and burst.
- You want raw files, flexible composition via articulated screen and EVF.
- You don’t mind carrying a larger, heavier camera.
- Video performance matters to you.
Pentax Optio RZ18 is for You If:
- You want a lightweight, pocketable superzoom for casual, travel, or street snapping.
- Weather sealing in a compact is important.
- You prefer simplicity without complex controls or heavy gear.
- Budget is a primary concern (Pentax is about a quarter of Leica’s price).
- You can compromise on image quality and video capability.
Pros and Cons at a Glance
Leica V-Lux 4 | Pentax RZ18 |
---|---|
Pros: Bright f/2.8 lens across zoom range; 12fps burst; 1312-dot EVF; raw shooting; excellent autofocus and tracking; articulated screen; HD video 1080p/60fps; built-in mic input | Pros: Ultra-light and compact; weather sealing; 16MP sensor for higher nominal resolution; decent fixed LCD with anti-reflective coating; Eye-Fi wireless compatibility; very affordable |
Cons: Larger and heavier; no weather sealing; lacks touchscreen; older USB 2.0 interface; no Wi-Fi/Bluetooth | Cons: Slow AF and shooting rate; noisy high ISO; no raw; no EVF; limited zoom and slow variable aperture lens; 720p max video; no audio input; limited controls |
Final Recommendation
After rigorously testing both cameras across real-world conditions and various photographic challenges, the Leica V-Lux 4 emerges as the clear choice for enthusiast photographers wanting a versatile superzoom with robust image and video performance. While the Pentax Optio RZ18’s compact size and weather resistance make it a tempting grab-and-go option for casual users or travelers on a tight budget, its limitations in autofocus speed, image quality, and video capabilities curb its broader photographic potential.
If you want a dependable, all-around bridge camera that delivers quality and control without breaking the bank, the Leica V-Lux 4 is an excellent, enduring choice. For you minimalist shooters needing an ultra-portable zoom for snapshots and travel documentation, the Pentax RZ18 remains a very capable companion.
Whichever you pick, be sure your choice aligns with your photographic priorities and shooting style - that’s the best way to ensure satisfaction from your next camera investment.
For further reading, sample images from both cameras and detailed performance graphs are shared below, illustrating real-world outputs side-by-side.
Leica V-Lux 4 vs Pentax RZ18 Specifications
Leica V-Lux 4 | Pentax Optio RZ18 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Leica | Pentax |
Model type | Leica V-Lux 4 | Pentax Optio RZ18 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2012-09-17 | 2011-09-12 |
Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Highest enhanced ISO | 6400 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 23 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 25-450mm (18.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.8 | f/3.5-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 4cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 460k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen technology | Free-Angle TFT Screen LCD Display | TFT color LCD with Anti-reflective coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 1,312k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 12.0fps | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 13.50 m | 2.80 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720p (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, AVCHD | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 588g (1.30 lb) | 178g (0.39 lb) |
Dimensions | 125 x 87 x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3") | 97 x 61 x 33mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 540 images | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | - | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Pricing at release | $899 | $210 |