Nikon A900 vs Olympus FE-5010
88 Imaging
46 Features
58 Overall
50
96 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
Nikon A900 vs Olympus FE-5010 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-840mm (F3.4-6.9) lens
- 289g - 113 x 67 x 40mm
- Revealed February 2016
- Newer Model is Nikon A1000
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-180mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 130g - 96 x 57 x 21mm
- Announced January 2009
Nikon A900 vs Olympus FE-5010 Overview
Following is a extensive analysis of the Nikon A900 versus Olympus FE-5010, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Nikon and Olympus. There exists a crucial gap among the image resolutions of the A900 (20MP) and FE-5010 (12MP) but they come with the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe A900 was launched 7 years after the FE-5010 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going in to a detailed comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the A900 grades against the FE-5010 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Nikon A900 vs Olympus FE-5010 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Nikon Coolpix A900 and Olympus FE-5010. The complete galleries are available at Nikon A900 Gallery and Olympus FE-5010 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon A900 over the Olympus FE-5010
A900 | FE-5010 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2016 | January 2009 | More modern by 87 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 921k | 230k | Clearer display (+691k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-5010 over the Nikon A900
FE-5010 | A900 |
---|
Common features in the Nikon A900 and Olympus FE-5010
A900 | FE-5010 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Lack of manual focus | |||
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Nikon A900 vs Olympus FE-5010 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry around your camera frequently, you're going to have to consider its weight and volume. The Nikon A900 offers outer dimensions of 113mm x 67mm x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") having a weight of 289 grams (0.64 lbs) and the Olympus FE-5010 has sizing of 96mm x 57mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.8") along with a weight of 130 grams (0.29 lbs).
Compare the Nikon A900 versus Olympus FE-5010 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you select at that time. Below is the front view measurement comparison of the A900 versus the FE-5010.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the A900 and FE-5010 is 88 and 96 respectively.
Nikon A900 vs Olympus FE-5010 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's difficult to picture the gap in sensor sizes simply by viewing specs. The pic below will help offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the A900 and FE-5010.
All in all, both the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different megapixels. You should anticipate the Nikon A900 to render greater detail utilizing its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop images somewhat more aggressively. The fresher A900 should have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
Nikon A900 vs Olympus FE-5010 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Nikon A900 vs Olympus FE-5010 Specifications
Nikon Coolpix A900 | Olympus FE-5010 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Nikon | Olympus |
Model type | Nikon Coolpix A900 | Olympus FE-5010 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2016-02-23 | 2009-01-07 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 3968 x 2976 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 64 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-840mm (35.0x) | 36-180mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.4-6.9 | f/3.5-5.6 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of screen | 921k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 4 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 7.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) | 4.00 m |
Flash options | - | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p, 25p) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 640x480 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 289 gr (0.64 lbs) | 130 gr (0.29 lbs) |
Dimensions | 113 x 67 x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") | 96 x 57 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 pictures | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | EN-EL12 | LI-42B |
Self timer | Yes (2, 5, 10 secs) | Yes (12 seconds) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD-Picture Card (1GB, 2GB), microSD (MASD-1 is required) |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at launch | $400 | $130 |