Nikon A900 vs Panasonic ZS25
88 Imaging
46 Features
58 Overall
50
93 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
Nikon A900 vs Panasonic ZS25 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-840mm (F3.4-6.9) lens
- 289g - 113 x 67 x 40mm
- Revealed February 2016
- Newer Model is Nikon A1000
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-480mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 193g - 105 x 59 x 28mm
- Released January 2013
- Other Name is Lumix DMC-TZ35
- Earlier Model is Panasonic ZS20
- New Model is Panasonic ZS30
Nikon A900 vs Panasonic ZS25 Overview
Here, we will be analyzing the Nikon A900 vs Panasonic ZS25, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by brands Nikon and Panasonic. There is a significant difference between the sensor resolutions of the A900 (20MP) and ZS25 (16MP) but both cameras offer the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe A900 was brought out 3 years later than the ZS25 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving straight to a thorough comparison, here is a simple summary of how the A900 matches up versus the ZS25 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Nikon A900 vs Panasonic ZS25 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Nikon Coolpix A900 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS25. The entire galleries are viewable at Nikon A900 Gallery and Panasonic ZS25 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon A900 over the Panasonic ZS25
A900 | ZS25 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2016 | January 2013 | More recent by 39 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen resolution | 921k | 460k | Clearer screen (+461k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS25 over the Nikon A900
ZS25 | A900 |
---|
Common features in the Nikon A900 and Panasonic ZS25
A900 | ZS25 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | No manual focusing | |||
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen measurement | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Lack of Touch screen |
Nikon A900 vs Panasonic ZS25 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you will have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Nikon A900 has got outer dimensions of 113mm x 67mm x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") and a weight of 289 grams (0.64 lbs) while the Panasonic ZS25 has dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 28mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Check the Nikon A900 vs Panasonic ZS25 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you use at the time. Below is a front view size comparison of the A900 versus the ZS25.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the A900 and ZS25 is 88 and 93 respectively.
Nikon A900 vs Panasonic ZS25 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its difficult to picture the difference between sensor measurements merely by reading specifications. The photograph underneath will help give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the A900 and ZS25.
Plainly, both of these cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different megapixels. You should count on the Nikon A900 to offer extra detail having its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop photographs way more aggressively. The younger A900 should have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
Nikon A900 vs Panasonic ZS25 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Nikon A900 vs Panasonic ZS25 Specifications
Nikon Coolpix A900 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS25 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Nikon | Panasonic |
Model | Nikon Coolpix A900 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS25 |
Also called as | - | Lumix DMC-TZ35 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2016-02-23 | 2013-01-07 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4896 x 3672 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-840mm (35.0x) | 24-480mm (20.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.4-6.9 | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 921 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 15 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1200 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 7.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) | 6.40 m |
Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p, 25p) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (220 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 289g (0.64 pounds) | 193g (0.43 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 113 x 67 x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") | 105 x 59 x 28mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 images | 260 images |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | EN-EL12 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2, 5, 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch price | $400 | $300 |