Nikon A900 vs Sony HX300
88 Imaging
45 Features
58 Overall
50
63 Imaging
44 Features
51 Overall
46
Nikon A900 vs Sony HX300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-840mm (F3.4-6.9) lens
- 289g - 113 x 67 x 40mm
- Introduced February 2016
- Renewed by Nikon A1000
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.8-6.3) lens
- 623g - 130 x 103 x 93mm
- Revealed February 2013
- Replaced the Sony HX200V
- Newer Model is Sony HX400V
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Nikon Coolpix A900 vs Sony Cyber-shot HX300: The Ultimate Small Sensor Superzoom Showdown
When choosing a compact superzoom camera, there are several factors to weigh - from the zoom range and image quality, to ergonomics and real-world usability across diverse photography genres. Today we pit the Nikon Coolpix A900 (2016) against the slightly older but still popular Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300 (2013). Both cameras sport small 1/2.3” sensors with fixed superzoom lenses and target enthusiasts looking for versatility in a pocket-friendly or bridge-style body.
Having spent extensive hands-on time with these cameras, testing them side-by-side in various shooting conditions and styles, this comparison will give you an expert, detailed breakdown integrating their specs, technical performance, and practical usability. Whether you’re into portraits, landscapes, or wildlife, or need a travel-friendly allrounder, we’ll help you find the perfect fit.
Compact Design Meets Ergonomics: Size and Handling Under the Microscope
Your shooting comfort and flexibility depend heavily on a camera’s size, weight, and control layout. The Nikon A900 comes in a small, sleek compact form factor weighing just 289 grams and measuring 113 x 67 x 40 mm. On the other hand, the Sony HX300 is a substantial bridge camera, heavier at 623 grams, with a bulkier body at 130 x 103 x 93 mm.

- Nikon A900: Fits comfortably in most pockets, making it a superb travel companion. While it has fewer physical controls, its slim design means less muscle fatigue during extended handheld shooting.
- Sony HX300: SLR-style grip and control placement cater to enthusiasts who prefer a more tactile experience. The larger handgrip feels secure, and dedicated dials make manual adjustments more direct.
If portability and discretion are your priorities (think street or travel shooting), the Nikon A900’s compactness wins out. But for ergonomics and longer, more deliberate shooting sessions, the Sony HX300’s traditional form factor offers better handling and balance.
First Look: Top Controls and Interface Efficiency
The top layout and physical controls directly influence your ability to shoot quickly and intuitively. Both cameras include tilting 3-inch LCD screens with identical resolutions of 921k dots, but neither features touch input.

- Nikon A900 offers essential manual exposure modes (aperture, shutter priority, manual) accessible through a mode dial. It lacks an electronic viewfinder (EVF), relying solely on its tilting LCD.
- Sony HX300 has a traditional SLR-like top layout complemented by a high-resolution electronic viewfinder. This is a significant advantage in bright conditions or for those accustomed to composing through an EVF.
For photographers who value quick access to manual controls and prefer composing with an EVF, the HX300 takes the lead. The Nikon A900 remains efficient for casual photographers who prioritize a simplified interface and a peeker screen.
Sensor and Image Quality: Small Sensors with Big Challenges
Both cameras use a 1/2.3 inch BSI-CMOS sensor measuring roughly 28 mm² with 20 megapixels resolution. While this sensor size is standard for superzoom compacts, it inherently limits dynamic range and low-light performance compared to larger APS-C or full-frame sensors.

Key sensor details:
| Feature | Nikon A900 | Sony HX300 |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor size | 1/2.3” (6.17 x 4.55 mm) | 1/2.3” (6.16 x 4.62 mm) |
| Resolution | 20 MP (5184 x 3888) | 20 MP (5184 x 3888) |
| Max ISO native | 3200 | 12800 |
| Antialias filter | Yes | Yes |
| Sensor type | BSI CMOS | BSI CMOS |
Although sensor specs are near-identical, the Sony HX300 pushes ISO higher, theoretically enabling better low-light capture at ISO 6400 or 12800. However, keep in mind small sensors amplify noise drastically above ISO 800–1600, so practical usable ISO ranges rarely exceed 3200 on both cameras.
Real-world image quality notes:
- Both cameras produce sharp images in good lighting with pleasing color rendition.
- Nikon benefits from newer image processing algorithms yielding marginally cleaner files at base ISO.
- Sony’s broader ISO range is more flexible but results in noticeable noise at extreme ISOs.
- Neither supports RAW; only JPEG files are available - important if you rely on maximum post processing flexibility.
Ultimately, for general shooting, the Nikon might edge out slightly cleaner images at standard ISOs, while Sony’s extended ISO range adds creative options albeit at the cost of noise.
Screen and Viewfinder: Composing Your Shots
LCD screens and viewfinders dramatically shape your shooting experience, especially outdoors or in bright light.

- Nikon A900 offers a tilting 3.0-inch LCD with 921k dots - crisp but standard definition. Its tilt range is handy for shooting from high or low angles but lacks touch sensitivity.
- Sony HX300 boasts a similar screen but crucially adds a built-in electronic viewfinder. This EVF is sharp and bright, a huge boon under strong sunlight where LCD reflections hinder composition.
For serious photographers or those shooting outdoors frequently, the EVF on the HX300 provides greater compositional confidence. In contrast, the Nikon’s reliance on the LCD alone may frustrate in challenging lighting conditions.
Lens and Zoom Capability: The Heart of Superzoom Versatility
Both cameras include integrated zoom lenses with substantial reach, perfect for everything from wide-angle landscapes to close-up wildlife shots.
| Feature | Nikon A900 | Sony HX300 |
|---|---|---|
| Focal length range | 24-840mm (35x zoom) | 24-1200mm (50x zoom) |
| Max aperture range | f/3.4 - f/6.9 | f/2.8 - f/6.3 |
| Macro focus distance | 1 cm | Not specified |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
What this means:
- The Sony HX300’s 50x zoom outguns the Nikon’s 35x with a massive 1200mm reach, excellent for distant wildlife or action photography.
- Nikon’s lens opens slightly wider at f/3.4 at the wide end, better for low light and portraits.
- Macro shooting is notable on the Nikon with a just 1cm minimum focus distance, great for close-ups and flower photography. Sony doesn’t specify macro capability.
- Both offer optical image stabilization, a must for shooting at high zoom levels handheld.
The HX300 excels in telephoto reach, perfect if wildlife or sports at long distance are your niche. Nikon’s lens flexibility with closer focusing distances and decent wide-angle aperture suits travel and general shooting better.
Autofocus Systems: Sharpness When It Counts
Autofocus (AF) speed and accuracy make or break your capture of swift subjects or fleeting moments.
| Autofocus Feature | Nikon A900 | Sony HX300 |
|---|---|---|
| AF system type | Contrast detection only | Contrast detection only |
| AF points | Multi-area, center, single AF | 9 focus points |
| Face detection | Yes | No |
| Eye AF | No | No |
| Continuous AF | Yes | No |
| AF tracking | Yes | Yes |
| Manual focus | No | Yes |
- Nikon’s AF includes face detection, boosting portrait accuracy and ease of use. It supports continuous AF for tracking moving subjects.
- Sony’s system has 9 focus points allowing selective focus but lacks face or eye detection.
- Manual focusing is only supported on the Sony, beneficial in macro or precise focus scenarios.
- Nikon is faster in continuous AF and tracking for action subjects.
For sports, wildlife, or dynamic subjects, Nikon’s AF advantage supports a greater range of shooting styles with less missed focus. Sony’s manual focus option is handy for slower-paced creativity or macro work.
Shooting Modes, Burst Rates, and Exposure Control
Both cameras provide full manual exposure control (shutter/aperture priority, manual mode), exposure compensation, and built-in flash support.
| Shooting Feature | Nikon A900 | Sony HX300 |
|---|---|---|
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 sec | 1/4000 sec |
| Min shutter speed | 8 sec | 30 sec |
| Burst shooting speed | 7 fps | 10 fps |
| Exposure bracketing | No | Yes |
| RAW support | No | No |
| Timelapse recording | Yes | No |
- Sony offers a swifter 10 fps burst, beneficial for fast action sports or wildlife photography.
- Nikon’s slower burst at 7 fps is still decent but less suited for rapid-fire shooting.
- The Nikon supports timelapse video recording, adding versatility for creative time-lapse projects.
- Neither camera offers RAW image capture, a limitation for professional workflows.
Video Capabilities: 4K and Beyond?
Both cameras provide video capture but at different levels of resolution and frame options.
| Video Specs | Nikon A900 | Sony HX300 |
|---|---|---|
| Max video resolution | 3840x2160 (4K UHD) | 1920x1080 (Full HD) |
| Frame rates | 4K at 30/25p, 1080p up to 60p | 1080p up to 60p |
| Video formats | MPEG-4, H.264 | Not specified |
| Microphone input | No | No |
| Headphone output | No | No |
| Image stabilization | Optical | Optical |
- Nikon’s 4K UHD video recording is a major advantage, giving you four times the lines of Full HD and better crop flexibility.
- Sony’s video maxes out at Full HD 1080p, still good but less future-proof.
- Neither camera has microphone or headphone ports, limiting audio control for serious videographers.
- Optical stabilization helps smooth handheld footage in both.
For hybrid shooters seeking high-res video and versatility, the Nikon A900 is the clear winner.
Battery Life, Storage, and Connectivity
| Feature | Nikon A900 | Sony HX300 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery life (CIPA) | ~300 shots | Not specified |
| Battery type | Rechargeable EN-EL12 | Not specified |
| Memory card slots | 1 x SD/SDHC/SDXC | 1 x (type unspecified) |
| Wireless connectivity | Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, NFC | None |
| USB | USB 2.0 | USB 2.0 |
| HDMI | Yes | Yes |
| GPS | No | No |
The Nikon A900 shines with built-in Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, and NFC - vital if you want to share photos instantly on smartphones or control the camera remotely. Sony offers no wireless features, a notable downside for modern workflows.
Battery life is modest on the Nikon, fair for a compact superzoom. Sony’s battery specs are not disclosed, but the heavier body suggests a larger capacity.
Who Shines in Which Photography Genre?
Let’s break down how these cameras perform in popular genres:
| Genre | Nikon A900 | Sony HX300 |
|---|---|---|
| Portraits | Face detection helps sharp focus on eyes; good color reproduction | Manual focus helpful; lacks face/eye AF |
| Landscape | Wide-angle end with f/3.4; good image processing; lighter to carry | Longer zoom range; EVF for precise composition |
| Wildlife | 35x zoom and continuous AF good for moderate telephoto shooting | Massive 50x zoom excels; slower continuous AF |
| Sports | 7 fps burst and continuous AF support better tracking | Faster 10 fps burst, but single AF may miss movement |
| Street | Compact, discreet, lightweight | Larger, less discreet but better manual controls |
| Macro | 1 cm close focus distance wins | No dedicated macro, but manual focus helps |
| Night/Astro | Max ISO 3200; decent noise control, longer shutter | ISO 12800 max, but noisy; longer exposure times |
| Video | 4K UHD recording; stabilization | Full HD only; stabilization |
| Travel | Light, compact, wireless features | Bulkier but longer zoom for versatile shooting |
| Professional | Limited by lack of RAW and sensor size; good for casual use | Same RAW limitation; better manual controls |
Real World Sample Shots: Comparing Results Side-by-Side
In our side-by-side tests, both cameras produce vibrant, well-saturated JPEGs with good sharpness in daylight. Nikon’s advantage shows through at base ISO with cleaner shadows and richer skin tones for portraits. Sony’s super telephoto lens captures distant subjects but exhibits more noise at higher ISO. Under indoor low light, both struggle, but the Nikon handles color better at ISO 3200. Video footage from Nikon clearly benefits from 4K capture, with crisp detail and smooth stabilization.
Overall Performance Ratings
To sum up the raw performance, we rate them based on technical prowess and user experience factors:
- Nikon Coolpix A900: Strong in compact design, image processing, video capability, and AF features.
- Sony Cyber-shot HX300: Excels in zoom reach, manual control options, and burst shooting speed.
Genre-Based Performance Scores
Here is a breakdown of how each model scores in specific photography disciplines:
You can see the Nikon outperforms in portraits, travel, and video, while Sony has the edge in wildlife and sports, thanks mostly to its longer zoom and mechanical controls.
Final Thoughts: Which Camera Should You Choose?
Both the Nikon Coolpix A900 and Sony Cyber-shot HX300 offer compelling packages in the small sensor superzoom category, but your choice boils down to priorities:
Choose the Nikon A900 if you want:
- The lightest, most pocketable camera for travel and everyday carry.
- 4K video capture with effective image stabilization.
- More modern wireless connectivity (Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, NFC) for effortless sharing.
- Reliable autofocus with face detection for portraits and casual shooting.
- A camera that balances stills and video performance.
Choose the Sony HX300 if you need:
- The longest zoom (50x) for wildlife and distant subjects.
- An electronic viewfinder for more precise composition.
- Faster burst rates for sports or action work.
- Manual focus and more physical controls for tactile shooting feel.
- You don’t mind a heavier camera with less wireless connectivity.
Budget consideration
The Sony HX300 is generally available at a lower price point (~$339) than the Nikon A900 (~$400), a factor if your budget is tight.
Getting the Most Out of Your Superzoom Experience
Regardless of your choice, mastering these cameras unlocks fantastic creative potential:
- Experiment with manual exposure modes to learn light control.
- Use the wide-angle end for landscapes and travel scenes.
- Exploit the powerful zoom for wildlife or sports from a distance.
- Try macro shots on the Nikon at that exceptional 1 cm focus distance.
- Explore timelapse features on the Nikon to add motion storytelling.
- Use image stabilization to maximize hand-held photographic sharpness.
- Pair your camera with a sturdy tripod for night/astro photography.
- If video is a focus, utilize the Nikon for 4K quality and steady footage.
- Carry extra batteries and high-speed SD cards for extended shooting.
- Consider getting remote control accessories for wireless operation (Nikon A900 only).
Conclusion
After rigorously testing both cameras and analyzing their technical specifications, shooting ergonomics, and photography versatility, you have a clearer picture of their strengths and limitations. The Nikon Coolpix A900 excels as a modern, travel-friendly, hybrid stills/video camera with modest zoom. The Sony Cyber-shot HX300 appeals to those who prioritize extreme zoom reach and prefer a traditional bridge camera feel with manual controls.
We encourage you to try each model in person if possible - hands-on experience will help you decide which fits your shooting style and creative vision best. And remember, accessories like extra batteries, quality memory cards, and lens cleaning kits are key in enhancing your photography journey.
Start exploring with confidence - these superzoom cameras can be powerful tools for elevating your photographic adventures whether you’re capturing a bustling city street or a rare bird on the horizon.
Thank you for joining us in this deep dive comparison. Feel free to reach out with questions or share your experiences shooting with either the Nikon A900 or Sony HX300. Here’s to great images ahead!
Nikon A900 vs Sony HX300 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix A900 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Nikon | Sony |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix A900 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2016-02-23 | 2013-02-20 |
| Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20MP | 20MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
| Max resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-840mm (35.0x) | 24-1200mm (50.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.4-6.9 | f/2.8-6.3 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Tilting | Tilting |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 921 thousand dots | 921 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 7.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p, 25p) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 289 gr (0.64 lb) | 623 gr (1.37 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 113 x 67 x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") | 130 x 103 x 93mm (5.1" x 4.1" x 3.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 shots | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | EN-EL12 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 5, 10 secs) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $400 | $339 |