Nikon B600 vs Olympus VR-320
67 Imaging
43 Features
38 Overall
41
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
Nikon B600 vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1440mm (F3.3-6.5) lens
- 500g - 122 x 82 x 99mm
- Announced January 2019
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Introduced July 2011
- Renewed by Olympus VR-330
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Nikon B600 vs Olympus VR-320 Overview
On this page, we are comparing the Nikon B600 versus Olympus VR-320, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by rivals Nikon and Olympus. The image resolution of the B600 (16MP) and the VR-320 (14MP) is fairly comparable and both cameras boast the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe B600 was released 7 years later than the VR-320 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Nikon B600 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight to a detailed comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the B600 scores versus the VR-320 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels Nikon B600 vs Olympus VR-320 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Nikon Coolpix B600 & Olympus VR-320. The complete galleries are provided at Nikon B600 Gallery & Olympus VR-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon B600 over the Olympus VR-320
| B600 | VR-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2019 |  | July 2011 | Fresher by 92 months |
| Display resolution | 921k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+691k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Nikon B600
| VR-320 | B600 |
|---|
Common features in the Nikon B600 and Olympus VR-320
| B600 | VR-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither contains Touch display |
Nikon B600 vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry your camera frequently, you'll have to factor in its weight and volume. The Nikon B600 has got external measurements of 122mm x 82mm x 99mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.9") with a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs) and the Olympus VR-320 has sizing of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Compare the Nikon B600 versus Olympus VR-320 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are working with during that time. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the B600 against the VR-320.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the B600 and VR-320 is 67 and 94 respectively.
Nikon B600 vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be hard to picture the contrast in sensor sizing just by seeing specifications. The graphic here may give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the B600 and VR-320.
To sum up, both of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different resolution. You can anticipate the Nikon B600 to produce greater detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics a bit more aggressively. The fresher B600 provides an edge with regard to sensor technology.
Nikon B600 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Nikon B600 vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix B600 | Olympus VR-320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix B600 | Olympus VR-320 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2019-01-18 | 2011-07-19 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-1440mm (60.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.3-6.5 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 921k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 1 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 6.80 m (with Auto ISO) | 4.70 m |
| Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 60i, MP4, H.264, AAC | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | EN-EL12 lithium-ion battery & USB charger | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 500 gr (1.10 pounds) | 158 gr (0.35 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 122 x 82 x 99mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.9") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 280 photos | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | - | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (3 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $297 | $179 |
