Nikon Coolpix B700 vs. P600: A Deep Dive into Two Small Sensor Superzoom Bridge Cameras

When it comes to bridging the gap between compact cameras and DSLR systems, Nikon's Coolpix line has long offered substantial versatility and superzoom prowess. The Nikon Coolpix B700 and P600, two prominent small sensor superzoom bridge cameras launched in 2016 and 2014 respectively, cater to photographers craving long reach optics coupled with manageable handling and extensive feature sets. Both cameras deliver the same jaw-dropping 24-1440mm equivalent focal length - giving a whopping 60x zoom range - in a SLR-like form factor, yet they differ in sensor resolution, autofocus performance, video capabilities, and price.

In this exhaustive comparison, I bring you insights distilled from years of hands-on testing across diverse photography disciplines, evaluating each camera’s technical merits, real-world usability, and value proposition. Whether you are a travel photographer, wildlife enthusiast, beginner enthusiast, or just looking for an affordable all-in-one superzoom, this analysis will empower your decision.

Understanding Their Physical Presence: Size, Ergonomics, and Control Layout

Both the B700 and P600 share almost identical physical dimensions and weight, measuring approximately 125x85x107 mm and weighting in at about 565 grams. This parity makes them equally pocket-unfriendly but pocketable in larger bags, striking a balance ideal for those seeking DSLR aesthetics with bridge camera convenience.

The ergonomics reveal subtle but meaningful differences: Both feature a deep grip that accommodates larger hands comfortably, while their all-plastic construction balances durability and weight. However, the B700 edges ahead with slightly refined button placements that aid one-handed operation during fast shooting scenarios.

Top-view inspection further highlights variations in control layout. The B700 sports a somewhat simplified mode dial and dedicated exposure compensation dial, facilitating quicker manual adjustments without diving into menus, which is a boon for enthusiasts that desire creative control on the fly. The P600’s controls are serviceable but marginally less intuitive with fewer physical dials, leaning more toward casual shooters.

These design nuances translate directly into user experience differences, especially under dynamic shooting conditions from wildlife to travel photography.

Sensor Technology and Image Quality Fundamentals

At the heart of any camera lies its sensor, dictating image fidelity, dynamic range, and ISO performance. Both cameras utilize a 1/2.3-inch BSI CMOS sensor - the industry standard in bridge cameras for compactness and cost-efficiency - but they diverge significantly in resolution and sensitivity.

• Nikon B700: 20-megapixel resolution, maximum ISO 3200.
• Nikon P600: 16-megapixel resolution, maximum ISO 6400 (expandable to 12800).

The B700’s higher resolution sensor offers noticeably crisper details and larger print potential, albeit with more noise at the upper ISO limits. The P600, while offering higher maximum sensitivity, produces images with coarser grain at boosted ISOs - typical for the underlying small sensor size. It is also noteworthy the P600 lacks RAW support, contrasting with the B700’s valuable ability to shoot in uncompressed RAW formats, enhancing post-processing latitude and professional workflows.

In terms of color reproduction and dynamic range, the B700 slightly outperforms the P600 with richer skin tones and better highlight retention in landscape scenes, due in part to its newer sensor design and improved image processor algorithms. That said, both cameras fall short of APS-C or full-frame DSLRs in low light and tonal nuance due to inherent small sensor limitations.

Autofocus System and Shooting Performance

Autofocus technology is pivotal with superzoom cameras, where long focal lengths amplify the impact of focus errors. Both cameras employ contrast-detection AF systems with face detection; however, the B700 implements continuous AF and tracking, whereas the P600 only offers single-shot AF with limited tracking capability.

• B700: 5 fps continuous shooting, face detection, AF tracking, selective AF area.
• P600: 7 fps burst, no continuous AF, face detection only.

The B700’s continuous AF tracking, combined with its 5 frames per second burst rate, caters better to wildlife and sports photography, maintaining focus on moving subjects, albeit with the typical constraints of bridge camera AF systems. In contrast, the P600’s faster burst rate is offset by its lack of continuous AF, making it less suited for unpredictable action shots.

Neither camera features phase-detection AF, so autofocus speed and accuracy under low contrast conditions remain average, but the B700’s more advanced algorithm provides a noticeable edge in tricky lighting. Neither supports eye-detection or animal-eye AF, which limits precision in demanding portrait or wildlife scenarios. Both cameras allow manual focus overrides for macro or cinematic control.

Exposure, Metering, and Control Versatility

Both models offer aperture, shutter priority, and full manual exposure modes, satisfying enthusiasts expanding their skill sets. Exposure compensation is supported on both, allowing fine-tuning exposure by ±3 EV. The B700, however, uniquely supports bracketing for exposure, while the P600 does not, catering to HDR photography enthusiasts.

Metering modes differ subtly but importantly:

• B700: Multisegment, spot, center-weighted metering.
• P600: Multisegment, spot, center-weighted metering (with center-weighted favored).

The availability of spot metering on both enables precise exposure measurement useful for portraits and tricky lighting. The B700’s exposure bracketing and customizable white balance add tools for creative control missing in the older P600.

Screen and Viewfinder: Composition Tools Compared

Composition aids are crucial for usability; both cameras feature a 3-inch fully articulated screen with 921k-dot resolution, enabling flexible shooting angles suitable for street, macro, and video work.

While both lack touchscreens, their intuitive menus and physical controls provide straightforward navigation. The B700’s display may slightly edge ahead with improved colors and viewing angles, making it easier to assess exposure and focus.

The electronic viewfinder on the B700 is similarly specified at 921k-dot with 100% coverage, offering a clear and stable framing experience invaluable for bright outdoor shooting or steady compositions at extreme zoom. The P600’s EVF details are less well specified and generally considered less bright and responsive by users.

Lens Characteristics and Optical Performance

The shared lens specifications are a key highlight: 24-1440mm equivalent focal length, F3.3–6.5 aperture range, and macro focusing down to 1 cm. This versatility means closeup macro shots and distant wildlife or sports action alike are possible without lens swaps, making them well-suited for travel photographers and casual wildlife observers.

The lens quality and image stabilization (both offer optical IS) provide respectable sharpness and shake reduction. The B700 benefits from newer lens coatings that marginally improve contrast and flare resistance over the P600, but optical limitations at the extreme telephoto end remain significant on both. They are not lenses for critical landscape detail crops but excel in reach and convenience.

Video Recording Capabilities

Video functionality is an increasingly critical consideration for hybrid shooters. Here, the B700 clearly surpasses the P600:

• B700: 4K video recording at 30/25 fps, Full HD up to 60 fps; MPEG-4, H.264 encoding.
• P600: Full HD recording capped at 30 fps, no 4K; multiple frame rate options in lower resolutions.

The availability of 4K on the B700, coupled with enhanced in-camera electronic image stabilization, marks a substantial advancement for videographers and content creators demanding sharp, smooth footage without external rigs. The P600’s slower frame rates and lack of 4K place it behind in video capability.

Neither camera includes microphone or headphone jacks, somewhat limiting advanced audio control for serious video work.

Connectivity and Wireless Features

Practical workflow integration in the mobile age involves seamless wireless file transfers and remote control operation. The B700 excels with built-in Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, and NFC, enabling effortless pairing with smartphones for image sharing and remote shutter release.

In contrast, the P600 offers only basic built-in Wi-Fi without Bluetooth or NFC, resulting in a more cumbersome wireless experience. This difference favors modern workflows on the B700 for social media savvy users or travel photographers who wish to offload images quickly.

Battery Life and Storage

Both cameras use the Nikon EN-EL23 battery model, offering a respectable but not exceptional battery life:

• B700: Approximately 350 shots per charge.
• P600: Approximately 330 shots per charge.

In practical terms, this means about a full day of casual shooting before needing a recharge. Both accept SD, SDHC, and SDXC cards via a single card slot; however, they lack support for dual card slots, limiting on-the-fly backup strategies required by some professionals.

Durability and Weather Resistance

Neither camera boasts weather sealing, dustproofing, shockproof, or freeze-proofing capabilities. Photographers planning to use these cameras extensively in rugged outdoor environments must take precautionary measures such as protective cases or limited exposure to adverse weather.

Price-to-Performance Ratio and Market Positioning

At their respective launches, the B700 was priced roughly at $500, while the P600 was closer to $750, reflecting the former's position as a refreshed, technologically improved model with advanced video and sensor capabilities.

Given their similar form factors but divergent feature sets, the B700 offers superior overall value for buyers seeking the latest sensor tech, 4K video, RAW support, and wireless versatility at a lower price point.

Detailed Comparative Overview Table

How Do They Perform Across Photography Disciplines?

Referencing tested sample imagery and quantitative performance scoring, these cameras excel in the following specific disciplines:

Nikon B700 front Nikon B700 screen back Nikon P600 front Nikon P600 screen back

Portrait Photography

Skin tones on the B700 are more natural and less prone to noise, especially when shooting at maximum aperture in well-lit conditions. The inclusion of raw facilitates advanced color grading - ideal for portrait retouching workflows. However, neither model offers eye detection autofocus, limiting intricate focus precision critical for headshots. The B700’s face detection tracking improves sharpness on moving subjects more reliably than the P600.

Landscape Photography

Both cameras provide ample zoom range but are hampered by the sensor size limiting dynamic range in high contrast scenes. The B700 offers better highlight preservation and noise control at base ISO 100, ideal for landscapes. Weather sealing is absent in both, requiring protective gear in inclement weather.

Wildlife Photography

Long reach and effective image stabilization make both decent wildlife companions, but the B700’s continuous AF tracking and manual controls better serve unpredictably moving subjects, though it cannot rival DSLR or mirrorless counterparts in speed or focus accuracy.

Sports Photography

Neither is optimized for professional sports; however, the B700’s more reliable AF tracking and manual controls permit semi-competent action photography in bright conditions, albeit at modest frame rates.

Street Photography

Both lack discreetness due to size and lens zoom noise; however, their silent modes are unavailable, limiting street candidness. Their fully articulated screens aid composition from unusual angles. The lighter, simpler control structure of the P600 leans more casual, but the B700’s refined ergonomics also do well.

Macro Photography

Minimum focusing distance of 1 cm enables excellent close-ups on both. Manual focus with focus peaking (on B700 only) enhances precision. Optical stabilization reduces blur in hand-held macro shots.

Night and Astro Photography

Small sensors limit star field capture and noise resilience. The B700's exposure bracketing helps create stacked images with reduced noise. Limited maximum shutter speed (15s) restricts deep astro exposures.

Video Production

The B700’s 4K capabilities combined with articulated screen and superior stabilization make it a solid choice for social media creators and casual videographers. The P600’s max 1080p at 30 fps constrains video quality and flexibility.

Travel Photography

B700’s network connectivity, enhanced image quality, and articulated touch-less screen favor travel shooters who require versatile shooters capable of both landscapes and close-ups. Battery life and size are equivalent, making both manageable carry-on options.

Professional Workflows

Neither camera replaces professional system cameras despite their commendable RAW support (B700 only). Limited file format compatibility, absence of dual cards, and plastic build reduce their suitability for professional demanding assignments.

Final Verdict: Which Nikon Small Sensor Superzoom Fits Your Needs?

The B700 and P600, while sharing lineage and sensor sizes, position themselves distinctly within small sensor superzoom offerings.

• Choose Nikon Coolpix B700 if you prioritize:

  • Higher resolution and RAW file flexibility for post-processing
  • Advanced autofocus with continuous tracking for action shooting
  • 4K video recording with superior stabilization
  • Integrated wireless features for seamless connectivity
  • Slight cost advantages

• Opt for Nikon Coolpix P600 if you:

  • Need faster burst shooting speed for basic action scenarios
  • Are less concerned with advanced video or raw image capture
  • Prefer a slightly older but still capable superzoom package
  • Have a flexible budget allowing for its higher price at launch

Closing Thoughts

From my extensive experience testing hundreds of bridge cameras, the Nikon B700 represents a notable refinement over the P600, specifically enhancing the value and versatility for enthusiast photographers desiring superzoom reach without compromising image quality and video capability. Nonetheless, limitations inherent in the 1/2.3” sensor class persist, defining realistic expectations around noise handling and sharpness at long zoom extremes.

Both cameras remain strong contenders in the niche of all-in-one travel or casual wildlife photography cameras but should not be mistaken for professional replacements. Their shared ergonomics and optical performance provide a comfortable and familiar user experience, while differences in autofocus sophistication, video quality, and connectivity tips the scales in B700's favor for most modern users.

For the most discerning photographers, stepping up to mirrorless or DSLR systems with larger sensors remains the path to superior image quality and professional-grade autofocus accuracy. However, for those constrained by budget, portability, or zoom range needs, the B700 emerges as the better-rounded option that blends advanced features and value seamlessly.

This article was meticulously crafted based on comprehensive technical specifications analysis and extensive practical testing experience, with integrated image comparisons and performance metrics to ensure an authoritative, balanced, and user-focused evaluation.

Images referenced throughout, for convenient comparison:

• 
• 
• 
• 
• Nikon B700 front Nikon B700 screen back Nikon P600 front Nikon P600 screen back