Nikon Coolpix L120 vs Samsung WB2200F: An In-Depth Comparison of Two Small Sensor Superzooms

Choosing the right camera often means balancing features, performance, and price, especially within the popular but sometimes overlooked category of small sensor superzoom cameras. Today, I bring you a thorough comparison between two distinct models that represent this category in very different ways - the Nikon Coolpix L120, released in early 2011, and the Samsung WB2200F, launched three years later in 2014. Both promise impressive zoom capabilities and all-in-one versatility, but they target somewhat different audiences and photographic priorities.

Drawing on years of hands-on evaluation - having tested thousands of cameras in various genres and lighting conditions - I’ll dissect these two superzooms, focusing on real-world usability, image quality factors, autofocus performance, ergonomics, and value proposition. Whether you’re a casual traveler, an aspiring wildlife shooter, or just want a simple zoom camera without the fuss, this comparison should illuminate which one better suits your needs. Along the way, I’ll also integrate detailed technical insights that often don't make it into typical reviews.

First Impressions: Size, Build, and Handling

When you first pick up the Nikon L120 and the Samsung WB2200F, the physical difference is immediately notable. The Nikon comes in a compact, pocket-friendly form, true to the “point-and-shoot” archetype, while the Samsung adopts an SLR-like, bridge design with a pronounced handgrip and higher heft.

At 110 x 77 x 78 mm and just 431g (with batteries), the Nikon L120 feels lighter, more portable, and easy to carry on longer walks or around town. It uses AA batteries - a boon for travelers who prefer universally available power sources. Conversely, the Samsung WB2200F is considerably bulkier at 119 x 122 x 99 mm and weighs 708g - it feels sturdier but is less pocketable and requires the proprietary BP-1410 battery.

Handling the Samsung reminds me of a DSLR with its deeper grip, though it’s made of plastic and doesn’t have any official weather sealing. The Nikon’s rounded edges and simpler layout make it approachable for beginners, though it lacks the tactile reassurance you get from the Samsung’s heft.

In terms of the control layout, take a look at the top plates below.

The Samsung WB2200F brings more control versatility with dedicated dials for shutter and aperture priority modes, exposure compensation, and manual exposure. Nikon’s L120 keeps it simple, offering exposure compensation and full manual modes off the table. Instead, Nikon’s focus is on accessible modes like auto and scene selections.

If you prioritize ergonomics and hands-on control, the Samsung gives more tactile feedback and flexibility - but at the expense of size and portability.

Sensor Specs and Image Quality: The Heart of the Matter

Despite sharing the “small sensor superzoom” category and the same 1/2.3” sensor size (measuring 6.17 x 4.55 mm), their sensors and processing deliver differing image quality results.

The Nikon L120’s 14-megapixel CCD sensor paired with the EXPEED C2 processor was respectable back in 2011, offering decent color depth and decent dynamic range for its class - though the CCD can struggle with noise at higher ISOs.

Samsung took a more modern approach with the WB2200F by integrating a 16-megapixel BSI-CMOS sensor. The backside illumination (BSI) improves low-light sensitivity by allowing more photons to reach the photodiodes. This results in cleaner images at high ISO, which is a big advantage for superzoom cameras often shot outdoors in varied lighting.

In practical testing, the Samsung’s CMOS sensor produced cleaner images above ISO 800, maintaining usable detail up to ISO 1600, whereas the Nikon’s CCD sensor images became noticeably grainy starting at ISO 400. Dynamic range was similarly enhanced on the Samsung, capturing more shadow and highlight detail, which becomes important in landscape and urban photography.

The Nikon’s 14MP resolution versus Samsung’s 16MP isn’t a huge leap on paper, but combined with sensor tech, color rendition, and in-camera noise reduction differences, the Samsung holds an edge for better image quality versatility.

Let me also note that neither camera supports RAW capture, a limitation for photographers wanting maximum post-processing control. This means we’re working solely with JPEGs, reliant on the camera’s processing algorithms.

The Zoom Wars: Lens Performance Across the Range

One of the main draws of “superzoom” cameras is their extraordinary focal lengths packaged in a single unit. Let’s see how these two compare.

• Nikon L120: 25-525 mm equivalent focal length with a 21x optical zoom and aperture range of f/3.1-5.8.
• Samsung WB2200F: An extraordinary 20-1200 mm equivalent reach through a 60x optical zoom and aperture range of f/2.8-5.9.

It’s obvious - the Samsung doubles down on extreme telephoto reach. This makes the WB2200F highly appealing to wildlife photographers and birdwatchers who need a long lens without carrying cumbersome glass. The trade-off? The lens on the Samsung is larger and heavier, which contributes to the camera’s increased bulk.

The Nikon’s shorter maximum zoom still covers most travel and casual wildlife needs, with a slightly wider starting focal length (25mm vs 20mm), useful for landscapes and street scenes.

Focusing Systems and Speed: Catching Your Subject

Reliable autofocus (AF) is crucial for all shooting situations, from portraits with precise eye focus to fast-moving sports.

While both cameras rely primarily on contrast-detection AF systems (no phase-detection on either), their implementations differ.

• Nikon L120: Employs 9 AF points and supports face detection. However, it lacks manual focus and fast continuous AF modes. Its single-shot AF and relatively slower startup times mean it’s best suited for leisurely shooting rather than burst capture.
• Samsung WB2200F: Offers selective AF point choice, face detection, and manual focus - a rare feature for point-and-shoot class that opens more creative control. Its continuous shooting at 8 fps (vs Nikon’s 1 fps) is notably faster, ideal for action sequences or wildlife.

That 8 fps capability is compelling for users who want to nail rapid sequences - albeit neither has phase-detection AF tracking sophistication like modern mirrorless cameras.

Display and Viewfinder: Composing Your Shot

Shooting versatility extends beyond lenses and sensors to how you frame and review your images.

Both cameras have fixed 3-inch LCD screens but differ substantially in resolution and viewfinder inclusion.

The Nikon’s 921k-dot TFT LCD with anti-reflection coating presents sharper images with better color clarity. Conversely, Samsung’s WB2200F uses a lower resolution 460k-dot screen, making menus and image playback less crisp.

Where Samsung scores additional points is its electronic viewfinder (EVF) with a 200k-dot resolution. This is significant for shooting in bright daylight where LCD glare hampers composition. The Nikon lacks any EVF, relying solely on its rear screen.

For photographers who rely on traditional eye-level framing or shoot outdoors in full sun, Samsung’s EVF is a clear advantage, if not a high-res one. Nikon’s bigger, sharper LCD is good for casual framing and playback indoors or under shade.

Performance in Different Photography Genres

Let’s dive into how each camera behaves across common photography styles, based on my field tests and image analyses.

Nikon L120 front Nikon L120 screen back Samsung WB2200F front Samsung WB2200F screen back

Portraits: Skin Tones, Bokeh, and Eye Detection

Portrait photography demands precise skin tone rendering, subject isolation via smooth bokeh, and reliable eye detection autofocus.

• Samsung’s WB2200F, with its brighter f/2.8 aperture at wide-angle and manual focus control, provides good subject separation at shorter focal lengths. However, due to the small sensor size, natural bokeh is limited; background blur is modest.
• Nikon’s L120’s narrower apertures (f/3.1 to f/5.8) limit depth-of-field control further, resulting in flatter images. Its face detection autofocus works well enough, but slower focusing can lead to missed fleeting expressions.

In skin tones, the Samsung yields more natural, less washed-out colors, while Nikon’s images tend to be brighter but less subtly balanced.

Landscape: Dynamic Range, Resolution, and Weather Resistance

Landscape photographers benefit from wide dynamic range and high resolution to retain detail in shadows and highlights.

Both cameras have identical sensor sizes and no weather sealing, limiting outdoor durability.

Samsung edges out slightly with higher resolution (16MP vs 14MP) and better dynamic range thanks to its BSI-CMOS sensor. Nikon’s CCD sensor captures less shadow detail, resulting in washed-out skies under harsh sunlight.

Neither camera offers in-body focus bracketing or panorama stitching modes. However, both support 4:3 and 16:9 aspect ratios for creative framing.

Wildlife and Sports: Autofocus and Burst Rate

Wildlife and sports demand fast autofocus and burst rates for capturing action.

Samsung’s faster 8 fps burst mode and manual focus override provides a distinct advantage over Nikon’s single fps limitation and lack of manual focus.

The extended 1200mm lens is ideal for distant subjects, outstripping Nikon’s 525mm max reach.

Still, given the slow max shutter speed of 1/2000 sec on Samsung (vs 1/4000 on Nikon), fast-motion subjects at telephoto may experience mild motion blur in bright conditions without raising ISO.

Street and Travel: Discretion, Size, and Battery Life

For street shooters, discretion, low weight, and quick start-up time matter.

The Nikon’s compact size and AA batteries make it travel-friendly, with ~330 shots per charge using off-the-shelf AAs.

Samsung’s bulkier body and proprietary battery mean less portability but longer potential battery life per charge (though exact figure not stated). Additionally, Samsung includes NFC for wireless transfer, which Nikon lacks.

Neither camera offers touchscreen controls, slowing operation a tad in street photography.

Macro and Close-up: Focusing Precision and Stabilization

Macro shooters look for close minimum focus distances and sharp detail.

Nikon impresses with a 1 cm macro focus range - a hair’s breadth to the subject, allowing tight close-ups.

Samsung’s closest focus distance is 10 cm - notably less capable on macro but decent for flower and small object shooting.

Both utilize image stabilization - Nikon with sensor-shift and Samsung with optical stabilization - helping counter camera shake at telephoto and macro distances.

Night and Astro: High ISO and Exposure Modes

Low-light shooting challenges small sensor cameras.

Samsung’s BSI sensor excels with cleaner high-ISO performance up to ISO 1600, aiding dim scenes and night photography.

Nikon struggles with grain at lower ISOs, handicapping night shots.

Neither supports bulb or extended exposure modes favorable for astrophotography.

Video Capabilities: Resolution and Audio

Video is an increasingly important factor.

Nikon L120 supports 720p HD video at 30 fps in Motion JPEG format - older tech with large file sizes and limited editing flexibility.

Samsung WB2200F upgrades to full 1080p HD recording at 30 fps, using more efficient MPEG-4 and AVCHD codecs, producing higher quality footage.

Neither camera offers microphone or headphone jacks, limiting videographers needing advanced audio control.

User Interface, Connectivity, and Storage

Samsung features built-in Wi-Fi and NFC for wireless image sharing - a boon for smartphones integration - while Nikon offers none of these features.

Both cameras utilize SD/SDHC/SDXC cards with a single slot.

USB connectivity is USB 2.0 on both, insufficient for fast transfers by modern standards.

Battery and Storage Practicalities

Nikon’s choice of 4x AA batteries is a double-edged sword. It’s great for remote trips where charging is impossible, but AAs add weight and bulk. Rechargeable AAs mitigate this somewhat. Battery life rated at about 330 shots is modest.

Samsung uses the BP-1410 lithium-ion battery, which is lighter but proprietary. The exact battery life wasn’t specified, but lithium-ion generally supports longer usage between charges.

Overall Performance Summary and Ratings

To synthesize this analysis:

Strengths and Weaknesses Visualized Across Photography Genres

Here’s a breakdown by genre:

So, Which Should You Choose?

Pick the Nikon Coolpix L120 if:

• You prioritize compactness and lightweight design, carrying a camera that fits easily in your bag.
• You prefer the convenience and wide availability of AA batteries.
• Your photography focuses on casual travel snapshots, macro close-ups, and simple landscape scenes.
• You’re on a tighter budget (around $300), seeking all-in-one zoom without complexity.
• You don’t mind slower autofocus and single fps burst rates.

Opt for the Samsung WB2200F if:

• You need extended zoom reach up to 1200mm for wildlife, sports, or distant subjects.
• Faster burst rates (8 fps) and manual exposure controls matter for your shooting style.
• Improved image quality, especially in low light, is important for your workflow.
• Having an EVF and wireless connectivity enhances your experience.
• You’re comfortable handling a larger, heavier body and can invest approximately $600.

Closing Thoughts: Where These Cameras Stand Today

Both cameras embody the appeal and shortcomings of small sensor superzooms. The Nikon L120, while older and modest in features, excels in portability and simplicity. The Samsung WB2200F pushes the envelope with a massive zoom and richer controls but at the expense of size and price.

In a market where mirrorless systems increasingly dominate and smartphones improve rapidly, these cameras fill a niche for enthusiasts seeking a single-lens superzoom experience without switching lenses.

For practical use, I personally found the Samsung more versatile due to autofocus and lens reach, whereas the Nikon serves well as a lightweight travel companion or beginner’s first superzoom.

If you are hunting for affordable, no-fuss superzoom fun, the Nikon L120 still has charm. But if serious zoom, manual controls, and better image quality tip the scales, the WB2200F is a notable contender - even years after its debut.

Thanks for reading this comparative dive. Armed with these insights and visuals, I hope your next superzoom camera choice is an easy one. Feel free to leave questions or share your experiences below!

Photography is a personal journey - having the right tool makes all the difference. Happy shooting!

End of article