Nikon L830 vs Sony RX10 II
71 Imaging
40 Features
45 Overall
42
58 Imaging
51 Features
77 Overall
61
Nikon L830 vs Sony RX10 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-765mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 508g - 110 x 76 x 91mm
- Revealed January 2014
- Earlier Model is Nikon L820
- Renewed by Nikon L840
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Bump to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-200mm (F2.8) lens
- 813g - 129 x 88 x 102mm
- Introduced June 2015
- Previous Model is Sony RX10
- Replacement is Sony RX10 III
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Nikon Coolpix L830 vs Sony RX10 II: A Hands-On Bridge Camera Showdown for Enthusiasts and Pros
When stepping down the bridge camera lane, it’s easy to feel spoilt for choice. Whether you’re a photography enthusiast tired of lugging around multiple lenses or a professional scout needing a versatile travel rig on a budget, bridge cameras offer a compelling all-in-one compromise. Today, I’m rolling up my sleeves to pit two notable models against each other from very different segments of this genre: the Nikon Coolpix L830, a budget superzoom classic, versus the Sony Cyber-shot RX10 II, a more advanced large-sensor superzoom powerhouse.
Having spent countless days in the field with both (and many similar cameras), I’ll walk you through how these contenders compare across physical design, image quality, autofocus, video, and real-world performance - all with an eye toward who each is best suited for. Ready? Let’s dive in.
Getting a Feel for the Cameras: Size, Ergonomics, and Build
First impressions matter - and that starts with how the cameras feel in hand. Here’s where the Nikon L830 and Sony RX10 II immediately part ways.

The Nikon L830 is notably compact, with dimensions at 110x76x91mm and a lightweight 508g. It sports a bulky-but-in-a-good-way grip, much like an SLR, but its plastic build keeps weight and cost down. Because it runs on AA batteries - which you can easily swap anywhere - there’s a certain cheapskate charm for travelers without charger obsession. The L830’s ergonomics are decent for its class, though the lack of an electronic viewfinder (EVF) makes composing shots in bright light a bit challenging.
Conversely, the Sony RX10 II ups the ante in size and substance: 129x88x102mm and tipping the scales at 813g, it definitely feels like a proper tool for serious shooters. The magnesium alloy body with environmental sealing adds durability but also heft - not exactly pocketable but reassuringly rugged. The EVF with high 2359-dot resolution is a godsend outdoors, providing clear framing and quick response, while its top screen panel gives you straight-from-the-lab exposure feedback.

Sony’s RX10 II also features a more complex but practical control layout, including manual exposure dials and customizable buttons, making it friendlier for photographers who want direct clubs-for-thumbs control. Nikon’s L830 takes a more casual approach, with fewer control wheels and menus designed for beginners or quick point-and-shoot action.
Bottom line: If you prize size, portability, and ease of battery swapping, the Nikon L830 wins hands down. But for better build quality, refined controls, and professional feel, the Sony RX10 II is in a different league.
Sensor Technology and Image Quality: Where Bigger Truly Counts
The heart of any camera is its sensor, and this is where the chasm between these two widens drastically.

The Nikon L830 is built around a modest 1/2.3-inch CMOS sensor at 16 megapixels. While this sensor size is typical for budget superzooms, it still imposes fundamental limits on noise performance, dynamic range, and detail capture. On the plus side, Nikon equips the L830 with a massive 34x zoom lens (23-765mm equivalent) covering a broad range but with a slow max aperture shifting from f/3.0 to f/5.9. Zooming like a pro comes with the usual penalty of image softness at telephoto and dimmer apertures.
The Sony RX10 II sports a vastly larger 1-inch BSI-CMOS sensor with 20 megapixels. The sensor’s physical size (about 4x area bigger than Nikon’s) yields cleaner images, richer colors, and significantly better low-light capability. Combined with a bright constant f/2.8 Zeiss zoom from 24-200mm equivalent, it’s engineered for superior optics across the zoom range.
Resolution-wise, the RX10 II maxes out at 5472x3648 pixels, which helps in landscape and cropping, while the L830 tops out at 4608x3456 pixels - not shabby but less flexible.
In practice, the RX10 II delivers natural color rendition with plenty of detail preserved in shadows and highlights, thanks to a higher native dynamic range (about 12.6 EV stops measured by DxO). The L830’s sensor yields pictures acceptable for casual sharing but lacks the punch and fine gradation needed for professional print work.
Composing Your Shot: Screen and Viewfinder Experiences
Now to framing and reviewing images - areas influencing your shooting comfort and accuracy.

Both cameras get a 3-inch tilting screen, but Sony’s RX10 II boasts a higher resolution 1,229k-dot display versus Nikon’s 921k-dot TFT LCD. The Sony’s screen has richer contrast and more accurate color rendering - important when reviewing images on site. Both lack touchscreens, something I wish manufacturers would universally add by now.
The Nikon’s lack of EVF is a serious downside for bright outdoor shooting; the LCD can wash out under strong sunlight. The Sony RX10 II’s crisp electronic viewfinder makes shooting on sunny days much easier and faster - critical for wildlife and sports shooters who need quick target acquisition.
Autofocus, Shooting Speed, and Burst Performance: Catching the Moment
For wildlife, sports, or spontaneous moments, autofocus and shooting speed are paramount.
The Nikon L830 uses contrast-detection AF with face detection, offering 7 fps continuous shooting. It’s serviceable for casual subjects but can struggle with quick-moving targets or busy streetscapes, often hunting for focus in lower contrast scenes.
The Sony RX10 II ups this considerably with a hybrid AF system consisting of 25 contrast-detection points, plus center-point phase-detection. The tracking algorithms are more sophisticated, enabling reliable eye and face detection. Shooting bursts at 14 fps, it empowers professionals to lock onto birds in flight or fast athletes with greater confidence.
Both offer continuous AF during bursts, but Sony’s system is noticeably snappier and more accurate in challenging light - a crucial detail I confirmed during indoor basketball and birdwatching sessions.
Handling Different Photography Genres: How Do They Perform?
Let’s break down who these cameras serve best by genre and practical demands.
Portrait Photography
Here, nuanced skin tone reproduction and attractive background blur (bokeh) matter.
-
Sony RX10 II: The bigger sensor and wide f/2.8 max aperture at shorter focal lengths mean superior subject isolation and creamier bokeh. Its reliable eye detection further sharpens portraits. Colors appear lifelike, and custom white balance controls let you fine-tune skin tones.
-
Nikon L830: Portraits come out okay for web sharing but the smaller sensor struggles with background separation. Aperture tops out at f/3.0 at wide angle but quickly narrows at telephoto, limiting bokeh quality. Face detection AF works but isn’t as precise.
Landscape Photography
Landscape shooters crave dynamic range, resolution, and durability.
-
Sony RX10 II: The larger sensor captures extended tonal values in shadows and highlights, crucial for dynamic backlit scenes. Its Zeiss lens produces sharp edges edge-to-edge. Environmental sealing also lets you shoot in damp or dusty environments without worry - a major plus for hikers.
-
Nikon L830: The smaller sensor delivers limited dynamic range leading to clipped highlights under harsh light. Resolution is fine for casual prints, but the plastic lens and lack of weather sealing confine this camera to fair-weather weekend use.
Wildlife Photography
Wildlife often means distant, fast, unpredictable.
-
Sony RX10 II: Though its zoom tops out at 200mm equivalent, the fast aperture and large sensor aid autofocus speed and image detail at moderate distances. Combined with 14fps burst shooting and tracking AF, it’s relatively capable for birders and casual wildlife photographers who want image quality more than ultra-telephoto range.
-
Nikon L830: This camera shines with a huge 765mm equivalent zoom, great for distant subjects. Yet autofocus lag and image noise at high zoom and ISO values dampen results. It’s a compelling budget alternative if you prioritize zoom reach over speed and clarity.
Sports Photography
High frame rates and focus tracking define sports shooting.
-
Sony RX10 II: Its 14fps burst is great, and autofocus algorithms handle fast tracking indoors and outdoors competently, though it’s no DSLR competitor for pro-level sports. Low-light ISO performance is respectable, enabling action captures in gyms or evening matches.
-
Nikon L830: At 7fps, it’s sufficient for casual sports, but autofocus limitations reduce keeper rates. The small sensor’s ISO ceiling of 3200 struggles in dimly lit sports venues.
Street Photography
Discretion and quick operation are king here.
-
Nikon L830: Smaller, lighter, and quieter, the L830’s compactness aids in low-key street shooting. Its lens covers many focal lengths for everyday situations, albeit with slower AF.
-
Sony RX10 II: Bulkier and more conspicuous, but its fast AF and EVF help in low light and fast-paced urban environments. The high-res screen is nice for reviewing shots on the go.
Macro Photography
Close-up sharpness and focusing precision matter.
-
Sony RX10 II: Minimum focus distance of 3cm and image stabilization deliver sharp close-ups with creamy background blur, ideal for flower or insect shots.
-
Nikon L830: Claimed 1cm macro is impressive on paper, but image sharpness and autofocus hunting at close distances limit practical use.
Night and Astro Photography
Low noise and exposure flexibility come to the fore.
-
Sony RX10 II: Handles high ISO cleanly up to 6400 native ISO (extendable to 25600), which aids night scenes beautifully. Sizable shutter speed range (up to 30s) and RAW support allow serious astrophotographers some creative latitude.
-
Nikon L830: With max ISO of 3200, noise rises quickly in dark conditions. No RAW format and limited manual exposure control hold back night photography aspirations.
Video Capabilities: Beyond the Stills
For hybrid shooters, video specs can be deal breakers.
The Nikon L830 captures full HD (1080p) video at 60i or 30p, suitable for casual HD clips but limited by lack of microphone input and stabilization is basic though optical.
The Sony RX10 II steps things up to UHD 4K video (3840x2160) at 30p along with a highly capable Bionz X processor. It offers advanced video codecs (MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S), optical image stabilization, and ports for external mic and headphones. This makes it a versatile travel and documentary rig, bridging photo and video worlds.
Workflow, Storage, and Connectivity
Beyond image capture, practical handling speaks volumes.
-
Nikon L830 uses common SD/SDHC/SDXC cards with single slot and USB 2.0 transfer. It lacks wireless features like Wi-Fi or NFC, which means offloading photos is somewhat old school.
-
Sony RX10 II supports SD cards plus Memory Stick formats, also with fast USB 2.0. Critically, it has built-in Wi-Fi and NFC for smooth wireless sharing and tethered shooting - a must for modern workflows.
Battery life is roughly comparable: Nikon’s 390 shots per charge (powered by easily swapping AAs) and Sony’s 400 shots per charge (using proprietary NP-FW50 battery). The Nikon’s obsession-free AA battery scheme appeals for extended trips without access to chargers.
Price-to-Performance: What Are You Getting for Your Money?
Price is king for most buyers, so let’s be crystal clear:
-
Nikon Coolpix L830 retailing around $300 is a friendly budget option for casual photographers needing a hefty zoom without splurging.
-
Sony RX10 II commands approximately $1,000, reflecting its premium sensor, Zeiss lens, rugged build, and advanced features.
Is the price difference justifiable? If you need superior image quality, better video, and pro-level handling with environmental sealing, yes. For simple superzoom and casual shooting, Nikon fits the bill.
Summary of Strengths and Considerations
| Feature | Nikon Coolpix L830 | Sony Cyber-shot RX10 II |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor Size | 1/2.3" CMOS (16MP) | 1" BSI-CMOS (20MP) |
| Zoom Range | 23-765mm eq. (34x) | 24-200mm eq. (8.3x) |
| Max Aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | Constant f/2.8 |
| Autofocus | Contrast-detection, face detection | Hybrid phase+contrast, 25 points |
| Continuous Shooting | 7 fps | 14 fps |
| Video | 1080p (60i/30p), no mic input | 4K UHD (30p), mic & headphone ports |
| Build Quality | Plastic, no weather sealing | Magnesium alloy, weather-sealed |
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic, 2359-dot |
| Screen | 3" tilting, 921k dots | 3" tilting, 1229k dots |
| Battery | AA batteries (390 shots) | Proprietary NP-FW50 (400 shots) |
| Wireless | None | Wi-Fi, NFC |
| Price (approximate) | $300 | $1,000 |
Who Should Choose Which Camera?
Choose the Nikon Coolpix L830 if:
- You’re a budget-conscious enthusiast wanting a big zoom range on a tight budget
- You want a compact, easy-to-use camera for casual travel, family events, or street shooting
- Swappable AA batteries and simple operation appeal to you
- You primarily share images digitally and don’t need RAW or advanced video
Choose the Sony RX10 II if:
- Image quality - especially dynamic range and low light - is a priority across genres
- You appreciate robust build quality with environmental sealing for all-weather shooting
- You need high-quality 4K video alongside pro-level control and connectivity
- You want fast, accurate autofocus and burst rates for wildlife or sports
- You value an EVF and advanced exposure modes for precise shooting
- Your budget can stretch to around $1,000 for a versatile, do-it-all bridge camera
Final Thoughts From My Experience
In my hands-on testing, the Nikon L830 impressed me with its accessible superzoom reach, lightweight nature, and battery flexibility, making it ideal for cheapskate travelers or casual photographers. Yet, I consistently found its image quality and autofocus holding back potential, especially in demanding conditions or low light.
The Sony RX10 II carved out a distinctly superior niche. With a strikingly larger sensor and constant f/2.8 lens, it delivered crisp, vibrant images across a wide range of lighting and subjects. Its higher build standard and professional controls meant I was more confident shooting in varied environments. Video capabilities and wireless features further sweetened the deal, justifying the heftier price tag.
If your budget allows and quality counts, the RX10 II is a brilliant all-rounder that can handle landscapes, portraits, wildlife, sports, and video with convincing skill. The L830 remains a viable choice for those who just want a straightforward, large-zoom shooter they can pick up and run with - though don’t expect miracles in image finesse.
Seeing side-by-side sample images (like the ones above) from both cameras reveals just how much difference sensor size and optics can make to your final photo - a crucial takeaway for anyone weighing a similar purchase.
These ratings neatly capture the Sony RX10 II’s dominance across most photography types, with the Nikon L830 mainly scoring in zoom reach and casual handling.
I hope this deep dive provides clarity as you hunt for the right bridge camera. Feel free to reach out if you want sample RAW files, test images, or have specific scenarios to discuss. Until next time - happy shooting!
– Your friendly neighborhood camera nerd with a soft spot for practical gear
Nikon L830 vs Sony RX10 II Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix L830 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 II | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Nikon | Sony |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix L830 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 II |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2014-01-07 | 2015-06-10 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | Bionz X |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 125 |
| RAW images | ||
| Min boosted ISO | - | 64 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 25 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 23-765mm (33.3x) | 24-200mm (8.3x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 2.7 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Tilting | Tilting |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 921 thousand dots | 1,229 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen technology | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359 thousand dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1500s | 1/2000s |
| Highest silent shutter speed | - | 1/32000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 7.0 frames/s | 14.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 9.00 m (Auto ISO) | 10.20 m |
| Flash options | - | Auto, fill-flash, slow sync, rear sync, off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 30p), 1280 x 960 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p) ,1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
| Video file format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 508 gr (1.12 lbs) | 813 gr (1.79 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 110 x 76 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.0" x 3.6") | 129 x 88 x 102mm (5.1" x 3.5" x 4.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 70 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.0 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.6 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 531 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 390 images | 400 images |
| Style of battery | AA | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | NP-FW50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, continuous) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SC/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $300 | $998 |