Nikon P340 vs Samsung NX200
92 Imaging
37 Features
53 Overall
43
90 Imaging
60 Features
57 Overall
58
Nikon P340 vs Samsung NX200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400 (Bump to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-120mm (F1.8-5.6) lens
- 194g - 103 x 58 x 32mm
- Released February 2014
- Previous Model is Nikon P330
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 223g - 117 x 63 x 36mm
- Released February 2012
- Superseded the Samsung NX100
- Replacement is Samsung NX210
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Unpacking Two Distinct Visions: Nikon P340 vs Samsung NX200
In my fifteen years of hands-on camera testing, few comparisons are as intriguing as pairing a high-end compact like the Nikon P340 against a seasoned entry-level mirrorless system such as the Samsung NX200. Each represents a different philosophy in digital photography - the P340’s pocketable convenience versus the NX200’s APS-C sensor muscle and interchangeable lenses. This head-to-head review tackles everything from sensor performance through ergonomics to real-world usage across multiple photography genres, aiming to equip enthusiasts and pros alike with clear, balanced insights.
I had extensive personal testing sessions over varied scenarios and lighting conditions with both cameras, assessing their strengths and limitations. Let’s embark on this technical and experiential journey with an honest, expert narrative that prioritizes practical user benefits over specs alone.
Size, Feel, and Handling - Compactness or Control?
When I first laid hands on these two cameras side-by-side, the difference in their physical presence was immediately apparent.

The Nikon P340 is unmistakably compact - measuring just 103×58×32 mm and tipping the scales at 194 grams with battery. This small sensor compact body fits effortlessly into a jacket pocket or small bag, making it excellent for travel or street shooting without drawing attention.
In contrast, the Samsung NX200, at 117×63×36 mm and 223 grams, feels more substantial - a rangefinder-style mirrorless with a grip that fosters a more secure hold, especially when paired with any of its 32 native Samsung NX lenses. The larger physical footprint means it's less discreet but offers better tactile controls and balance, especially with zoom or telephoto lenses attached.

Looking closer at the control layout, the NX200 has a traditional rangefinder design with customizable dials and buttons that seasoned users will appreciate. The Nikon P340, focusing on portability, adopts a minimalistic approach with fewer external controls, relying more on menus and approvals, which may slow down rapid adjustments but suits casual shooting styles.
Ergonomically, if you crave physical feedback and intuitive manual dials, the NX200 is your pick. For those prioritizing pocketability and grab-and-go ease, the P340 excels.
Sensor Technologies and Image Quality: Size Matters
This is where the story diverges most dramatically. The Nikon P340 packs a 1/1.7" BSI-CMOS sensor sized 7.44x5.58 mm, with a resolution of 12MP. A remarkable feat for a compact camera, yet clearly much smaller than the NX200’s APS-C CMOS sensor (23.5x15.7 mm) boasting 20MP resolution.

In my lab and field testing, the sensor size difference translates into tangible image quality disparities. The P340’s 41.52 mm² sensor area means smaller photosites, generally limiting high ISO performance and dynamic range. Nikon’s BSI (Backside Illuminated) technology helps boost sensitivity and reduce noise at moderate ISOs, but when pushed beyond ISO 800, noise becomes quite visible.
By contrast, the NX200’s 368.95 mm² APS-C sensor delivers substantially cleaner images at high ISO, capturing finer details and greater tonal gradations especially in RAW format. Its 20MP resolution offers flexibility for cropping or large prints without perceptible softness, which the 12MP P340 struggles with in comparison.
I put these cameras through tough landscape shoots emphasizing shadow recovery and highlights retention, and the NX200’s higher dynamic range of 12.6 EV against 11.9 EV of the P340 was noticeable, especially in scenes with contrasting bright skies and foregrounds.
LCDs, Viewfinders, and Composing Images
Neither camera offers a built-in optical viewfinder, but they handle framing differently.
The P340 comes with a fixed 3-inch TFT LCD with 921k dots resolution. It's bright and sharp but uses traditional LCD technology - decent visibility outdoors but not outstanding. The screen lacks touchscreen functionality, which limits navigation speed.
The NX200 has a 3-inch Active Matrix OLED fixed screen but with a lower resolution of 614k dots. Its OLED panel shines with vibrant colors and excellent color accuracy, making manual focus confirmations and playback a more pleasing experience.

While the NX200 offers an optional electronic viewfinder accessory, the P340 does not, which might be a dealbreaker for some who prefer composing with their eye rather than the rear screen. However, the compactness and design of the P340 encourage quick framing and spontaneity.
Autofocus Performance: Speed, Accuracy, and Tracking
Autofocus is the heart of candid, wildlife, and sports photography. The P340 employs contrast-detection autofocus with face detection and center-weighted area focusing but lacks continuous autofocus tracking or phase detection points. Its 10 fps burst speed is swift, but AF lag and hunting in low light reduce practical continuous shooting reliability.
The NX200 also uses contrast-detection AF but improves with 15 focus points, including selective area focusing. It supports continuous AF (AF-C), allowing subject tracking during burst shooting at up to 7 fps. In real-world wildlife tests, the NX200 was more responsive to erratic animal movement, whereas the P340 occasionally struggled to maintain focus on fast-moving subjects.
Neither camera supports animal eye detection, now becoming common on modern cameras, but the NX200’s finer AF control makes it better for action photography.
Lens Ecosystems and Versatility
A major advantage of the NX200 is its native lens mount system with 32 available Samsung NX lenses covering everything from ultra-wide 12mm to super-telephoto 300mm. This versatility is invaluable for users who want tailored optics for portraits, macro, wildlife, or landscapes.
The Nikon P340 features a fixed 5× zoom lens spanning 24-120mm equivalent, with a bright f/1.8 aperture at the wide end, enabling good low light capture and shallow depth of field for portraits. However, being non-interchangeable, its utility is limited to what this one lens can achieve.
Samsung’s mirrorless platform means you can customize your kit extensively, while the P340 appeals strictly to those satisfied by an all-in-one pocket camera approach.
Real-World Performance Across Photography Genres
Portrait Photography
In my portrait sessions under studio-like and natural lighting, the NX200 excelled with 20MP detail rendering skin textures smoothly and with natural color rendition. Selective area AF and face detection helped nail focus on eyes.
The P340’s f/1.8 aperture on the wide end produced pleasant bokeh on close-ups, but the 12MP sensor and smaller size limit resolution for large prints. I found face detection reliable, yet the limited focus points made precise placement slightly less consistent.
Landscape Photography
For landscapes, resolution and dynamic range are critical. The NX200’s APS-C sensor captured landscapes with stunning clarity and better highlight recovery in bright skies. Built-in HDR bracketing functions enhanced detail retention.
The P340 did well under good conditions but showed more noise in shadow areas and less flexibility for post-processing. Weather sealing is absent on both, but the P340's compactness aids in travel hikes where weight matters.
Wildlife and Sports Photography
Sports shooters will appreciate the NX200’s 7 fps burst with continuous AF, plus a broad selection of fast telephoto lenses. The P340's 10 fps burst is tempting but lacks reliable AF tracking.
I personally found the NX200 better at capturing wildlife in dynamic settings, though neither camera would satisfy high-end professional demands in these categories.
Street Photography
For unobtrusiveness, the P340’s pocket size wins hands-down. Its quiet operation and compact frame make candid street photos less intrusive. The NX200's extra bulk and lens size are trade-offs for image quality.
Low-light street scenes benefit from the P340’s f/1.8 aperture compensating for the sensor size, although the NX200 can push higher ISO with less noise.
Macro Photography
The P340 boasts a close focusing distance of 2 cm, allowing detailed macro shots without an additional lens. However, the smaller sensor limits shallow depth of field and fine texture rendering compared to the NX200 mounted with dedicated macro lenses.
Night and Astro Photography
The APS-C sensor's superior high ISO performance makes the NX200 noticeably better at star photography and low-light scenes. The P340’s high-ISO noise limits utility beyond ISO 800 in dark conditions.
Neither camera supports bulb mode or specialized astro exposure modes, so I recommend pairing the NX200 with a sturdy tripod and remote shutter release for best results.
Video Capabilities
Both cameras offer Full HD 1080p video capture. The P340 supports multiple frame rates including 30p and interlaced 60i formats, and features optical stabilization, which smooths handheld footage.
The NX200, while lacking image stabilization, records 1080p at 30 fps and 720p at 60 fps, offering smooth video but requires stabilization aids like gimbals for steady shots.
Both lack microphone inputs, limiting advanced audio recording options.
Travel Photography
The P340’s lightness, small size, and built-in image stabilization make it a superb travel companion. It won’t weigh down your pack and delivers respectable image quality for everyday scenes.
The NX200, benefitting from battery life rated at 330 shots versus the P340’s sub-220, is better for longer sessions. The broader lens selection means more flexibility but at a cost of larger bag size.
Technician’s Corner: Build, Battery, and Connectivity
Neither camera features environmental sealing, so I advise caution shooting in rain or dust. Build quality is solid in both, but the NX200’s metal body lends a more premium feel.
Battery life is a real differentiator: The NX200’s BC1030 battery lasted significantly longer than the P340's EN-EL12 in my extended field tests.
Connectivity is sparse in both; the P340 offers built-in wireless but no Bluetooth or NFC, while the NX200 has no wireless options at all, relying on USB 2.0 and optional GPS accessories for geotagging.
Performance Overview and Genre-specific Scores
After extensive empirical testing and benchmarking, here are the overall scores based on DxOMark data and my field evaluations:
The NX200 leads the pack in sensor performance and versatility, scoring 69 overall compared to the P340’s 54. This gap reflects the sensor size and lens system advantage.
For portraits, landscapes, and variable lighting conditions, the NX200 generally outperforms. The P340 fares well for street, macro, and travel niches prioritizing portability.
Sample Shots: Real Images Tell the Story
I invite you to examine a curated set of images from both cameras captured under identical conditions - from vibrant cityscapes to intimate portraits.
Assessing these images yourself reveals the NX200’s sharper details and cleaner shadows, while the P340 impresses with punchy colors and usable quality in a small form factor.
Final Thoughts and Recommendations
Having explored the Nikon P340 and Samsung NX200 in depth, I want to distill key takeaways to guide your choice:
-
Choose the Nikon P340 if:
You want an ultra-compact, easy-to-use camera with excellent image stabilization, a bright lens for low light, and respectable image quality in a pocketable design. Ideal for street photo lovers, casual travelers, and those who dislike changing lenses. -
Choose the Samsung NX200 if:
You demand superior image quality from a larger APS-C sensor, need continuous autofocus tracking for wildlife or sports, and want the creative freedom offered by an interchangeable lens system. Perfect for enthusiasts stepping up from compact cameras or professionals needing a light secondary body.
While the P340 is a marvel in small sensor compacts, the NX200 remains compelling as a still capable but affordable mirrorless camera, even years after release.
A Closing Word
No camera is perfect; the best choice depends heavily on your style, budget, and shooting priorities. I emphasize always handling cameras firsthand if possible and considering lens costs with mirrorless systems.
Throughout my career reviewing thousands of cameras, I have learned this: understanding what tools complement your vision is as essential as the gear itself.
I hope this detailed Nikon P340 vs Samsung NX200 guide empowers you to make a confident, informed decision tailored to your photographic journey.
Happy shooting!
Disclosure: I have no financial affiliation with Nikon or Samsung. All opinions are based on independent, hands-on testing and long-term experience.
Nikon P340 vs Samsung NX200 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix P340 | Samsung NX200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Nikon | Samsung |
| Model | Nikon Coolpix P340 | Samsung NX200 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Released | 2014-02-07 | 2012-02-28 |
| Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 5472 x 3648 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 15 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
| Lens focal range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | - |
| Maximal aperture | f/1.8-5.6 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 2cm | - |
| Available lenses | - | 32 |
| Crop factor | 4.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 921k dots | 614k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen tech | TFT-LCD | Active Matrix OLED screen |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 10.0 frames per sec | 7.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.50 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/180 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920x1080 (30p, 25p, 60i, 50i), 1280x720 (30p, 25p), 1920x1080 (15p, 12.5p), 640x480 (120p, 100p), 1280x720 (60p, 50p), 320x240 (240p, 200p), iFrame 720 (30p, 25p), 640x480 (30p, 25p) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | No | Optional |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 194 gr (0.43 lb) | 223 gr (0.49 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 103 x 58 x 32mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 117 x 63 x 36mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 54 | 69 |
| DXO Color Depth score | 20.7 | 22.6 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 11.9 | 12.6 |
| DXO Low light score | 273 | 618 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 220 photographs | 330 photographs |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | EN-EL12 | BC1030 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Price at launch | $380 | $818 |