Nikon P500 vs Sony RX10
67 Imaging
35 Features
44 Overall
38


58 Imaging
51 Features
76 Overall
61
Nikon P500 vs Sony RX10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 160 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-810mm (F3.4-5.7) lens
- 494g - 116 x 84 x 103mm
- Announced February 2011
- Replacement is Nikon P510
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Push to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-200mm (F2.8) lens
- 813g - 129 x 88 x 102mm
- Released March 2014
- Replacement is Sony RX10 II

Nikon P500 vs. Sony RX10: Bridging the Superzoom Divide with Expert Insight
Choosing a superzoom camera can feel like navigating a yin and yang of compromises: zoom reach versus sensor size, portability versus image quality, affordability versus features. I’ve spent countless hours behind the viewfinders of hundreds of digital cameras, from entry-level compacts to pro-level mirrorless systems, so I appreciate how nuanced this decision can be. Today, we're diving deep into two iconic bridges from different generations and philosophies - the Nikon Coolpix P500 and the Sony Cyber-shot RX10. Both proudly parade hefty zoom crowns, but they couldn’t be more different under the hood or in real-world use.
Here's what you need to know to decide where your hard-earned dollars/schmeckles should go.
First Impressions: Size, Handling, and Ergonomics - What Fits Your Hands?
The Nikon P500 and Sony RX10 share that classic SLR-shaped bridge form, complete with a comfortable grip and prominent lens barrels. However, the devil is always in the details.
Right off the bat, you’ll notice the Sony RX10 is a good chunk heavier at 813 grams compared to the Nikon’s lightweight 494 grams. If shoulder and pocket strain are considerations for your street or travel shoots, the Nikon leans toward an easier carry. But, the RX10’s heft pays dividends in build quality and balance.
Both sport tilting 3-inch LCD screens, though the RX10’s higher resolution WhiteMagic screen means crisp, vibrant previews, especially useful on sunny days. The Nikon’s anti-reflective TFT-LCD is no slouch but feels a generation behind.
From a top-down view…
Sony’s RX10 embraces a more mature control layout, with dedicated dials for exposure compensation, mode selection, and a prominent mode dial clubs for your thumbs - ideal for faster, intuitive shooting. Nikon's P500, while user-friendly, can feel a bit more simplified, making it friendlier for beginners but perhaps restrictive for pros who crave quick control tweaks.
If you prize a DSLR-like tactile experience tempered with a bridge camera’s convenience, the RX10 shines. If you’re a cheapskate wanting a great zoom range in a nimble package, Nikon’s P500 might tick the right boxes.
The Sensor and Image Quality: Where Size Matters Most
Superzoom cameras are often infamous for tiny sensors limiting image quality - yet not all small sensors are created equal.
The Nikon P500 packs a modest 1/2.3-inch 12MP BSI CMOS sensor with a tiny 28.07mm² sensor area. In contrast, the Sony RX10 rocks a much larger 1-inch, 20MP BSI CMOS sensor measuring 116.16mm² - nearly 4 times larger in surface area, which translates to vastly better image quality, dynamic range, and low-light prowess.
My testing shows the Sony’s sensor delivers exceptionally clean images up to ISO 3200, with usable files even as high as ISO 6400 for critical situations. On the flip side, the Nikon’s higher base ISO of 160 and a ceiling at 3200 means noise creeps in by ISO 800, restricting low-light shooting confidence.
The Sony’s superior DxO Mark scores underscore the tech gap: a dynamic range around 12.6 stops and color depth of 22.9 bits versus Nikon’s untested but expectedly inferior numbers due to sensor size.
Over multiple portrait and landscape shoots, I found the RX10’s files give me latitude in post-processing I simply can’t get from the P500 without sacrificing detail or introducing noise.
Zoom Powers and Optics: Reach vs. Lens Speed and Quality
Here’s where the Nikon P500 flexes hard - a sensational 36x zoom range spanning 23-810mm equivalent focal length, perfect for wildlife and distant sports action where you can’t get close.
Sony’s RX10 offers a shorter zoom reach of 8.3x (24-200mm equivalent), but it pairs that versatility with a fixed f/2.8 aperture throughout its range - a photographer’s dream in low light and for shallow depth of field control. Conversely, Nikon’s lens trails from f/3.4 to f/5.7 wide-open, meaning letting light in becomes a challenge at the telephoto end.
Given practical experience, Nikon obviously wins in absolute reach - but you pay for it in slower lens speed (less light), optical sharpness variation, and likely more distortion and chromatic aberration. Sony’s constant f/2.8 enhances sharpness, background separation (read: beautiful bokeh), and retains consistent exposure settings when zooming.
The RX10’s lens also includes optical image stabilization, which paired with its sensor, allows for steady shots even without a tripod at longer focal lengths. Nikon uses sensor-shift stabilization, which works but isn’t quite as effective at extreme telephoto range.
Autofocus, Shooting Speed, and Real-World Responsiveness
What’s the point of huge zoom if the camera can’t lock focus fast or shoot when the moment strikes?
The Nikon P500’s AF system uses contrast-detection only, with 9 focus points and an interesting (though slow) continuous autofocus mode coupled with face detection. In practice, hunting AF and sluggish focus acquisition makes it ill-suited for rapid wildlife or fast-paced sports.
Sony’s RX10 pulls ahead with a 25-point contrast-detection AF that’s notably snappier, paired with Bionz X processor muscle boosting continuous AF and burst rates up to 10fps. This capability means you can track moving subjects with more confidence and capture sequences in action sports, birds in flight, or kids at play with far less missed opportunity.
While neither camera boast phase-detection AF or the latest AI eye/animal detection technologies found in newer mirrorless models, the RX10 feels much more responsive and reliable for tracking if you push it.
Burst Shooting, Buffer, and Storage Flexibility
Burst shooting is a key metric for sports and wildlife photographers I tested thoroughly with both.
The P500 maxes out at a snail’s pace 1fps continuous shooting, making it impractical for action sequences. The RX10 shines, maxing out at 10fps, allowing you to nail peak moments with a little practice and knowing your buffer isn’t immediately overwhelmed.
Regarding storage options, the Nikon takes SD cards exclusively - very common and easy. The RX10 goes a bit fancy, accepting both SD and Sony Memory Stick formats, which may suit Sony ecosystem fans better.
Video Performance: What About Moving Pictures?
Both cameras shoot Full HD video but differ markedly in capabilities and quality.
Nikon’s P500 records 1080p at 30fps, sufficient for casual use but limited in features - no microphone input, no headphone jack, and no advanced codecs for post.
The RX10, however, affords 1080p at 60i and 24p, with support for AVCHD and MPEG-4 formats. Crucially, it offers microphone and headphone jacks - a boon for videographers and multimedia storytellers demanding clean audio monitoring and input. The RX10’s optical image stabilization also makes handheld filming smoother.
Neither camera supports 4K video or slow-motion modes, which reflects their era and market tier.
Build Quality, Weather Sealing & Durability: Will it Survive Your Adventures?
For photographers shooting outdoors under demanding conditions, durability matters as much as IQ.
The Sony RX10 boasts weather sealing, a rarity in bridge cameras, sealing it against splashes and dust ingress. The Nikon P500 lacks such sealing, making it more vulnerable to challenging weather - something to seriously consider if you shoot landscapes, wildlife, or travel extensively in changeable environments.
The RX10’s solid magnesium alloy chassis reinforces that rugged build, while Nikon’s more plastic-heavy construction feels more budget conscious but less reassuring over time.
User Interface and LCD/EVF Experience: Connect to Your Craft
Looking through the electronic viewfinder (EVF) and bending around the screen are key UX moments.
Sony’s RX10 offers a 1440k dot EVF with 100% coverage and 0.7x magnification, ensuring what you see is what you get - ideal for precision framing. Nikon’s EVF is less spectacular, with no specs quoted and notably less sharpness.
Both have tilting LCDs, helpful for shooting at odd angles, yet the RX10’s higher resolution screen and WhiteMagic tech give a clearer, brighter preview.
Menu systems differ in complexity and customizability too, with Sony’s more customizable buttons allowing faster access to preferred settings once you’re past beginner mode.
Macro and Close-Up Capabilities: How Close Can You Get?
If you love macro photography, here we see some interesting tradeoffs.
The Nikon P500 shines with its minimum focus distance of 1cm in macro mode, meaning you can get absurdly close to subjects, perfect for flowers, small critters, or product shots on a budget.
The RX10 doesn’t specify a macro range but due to its lens design and larger sensor, minimum focusing is decent but won’t rival that microscopic approach. That said, its optical performance at close range is sharper and more detailed.
Battery Life and Connectivity: How Long and How Connected?
Sony’s RX10 offers nearly double the battery life - rated at 420 shots vs. Nikon’s 220. For long days on the trail or events without easy charging options, that matters.
Connectivity-wise, the RX10 has built-in Wi-Fi and NFC for wireless file transfer and remote control apps, a clear advantage for quick sharing or tethered shooting with smartphones. Nikon P500 lacks any wireless options, reliant on USB 2.0 wired connection.
Price vs. Performance: Who Gets More Bang for the Buck?
At release, the Nikon P500 launched around $399 while the Sony RX10 started at nearly double at $698. As of now, online pricing varies, but this still represents significant investment difference.
Looking at raw scores and value:
- Nikon P500 offers incredible reach for the price, with respectable image quality for daylight and casual shooters.
- Sony RX10 delivers pro-level sensor performance, sharper optics, ruggedness, and video/audio features justifying its premium.
In specific niches:
Photography Type | Nikon P500 | Sony RX10 |
---|---|---|
Portrait | Moderate (limited depth control and noise) | Excellent (better bokeh and sharpness) |
Landscape | Adequate (less dynamic range) | Excellent (higher resolution, weather sealing) |
Wildlife | Outstanding zoom reach, slow AF | Good zoom, fast AF, better IQ |
Sports | Slow burst, mediocre AF | Fast burst, responsive AF |
Street | Compact, discreet | Bulkier but better IQ |
Macro | Superb minimal focus distance | Strong, but less extreme |
Night/Astro | Limited ISO range | Superior noise handling |
Video | Basic Full HD | Advanced Full HD with mic support |
Travel | Lightweight, less robust | Heavier, more versatile |
Professional | Limited RAW, slower speed | RAW support, better control |
Real-World Shooting Examples: Seeing is Believing
Comparing actual shots outdoors, portraits reveal the RX10’s superior background blur and skin tone rendition, which I attribute to its f/2.8 lens and larger sensor dynamic range. The Nikon’s tighter zoom pulls in distant wildlife but struggles with noise and sharpness in shadows.
Landscape shots favor the RX10’s richer tonal gradation and finer detail - especially in tricky lighting.
Summing Up: Which Should You Choose?
Both cameras cater to enthusiastic photographers craving superzoom versatility without lugging multiple lenses. But your priorities dictate the better fit.
Pick the Nikon P500 if:
- You want the longest zoom stretch possible on a tight budget.
- You prioritize portability and light pocketability.
- You mostly shoot outdoors in good light (daytime travel, street, casual wildlife).
- You don’t need RAW or advanced video features.
- You’re comfortable with slower focusing and shooting speed.
Pick the Sony RX10 if:
- You crave pro image quality thanks to a large 1-inch sensor.
- You want a fast, constant aperture zoom lens for creative control.
- You shoot low light, portraits, landscapes, or videos seriously.
- You demand burst shooting and faster autofocus for sports or wildlife.
- You need rugged build quality and weather sealing.
- You want wireless connectivity and mic/headphone options for video.
- You are willing to pay a premium for these advantages.
Final Thoughts: A Tale of Two Superzooms
The Nikon P500 holds a nostalgic spot as a cheapskate’s superzoom marvel - a bridge camera that still delivers fun with a monster zoom and decent image quality for its time. The Sony RX10, meanwhile, feels like a professional tool masquerading as a bridge camera, delivering class-leading sensor tech and lens quality that punches above its category.
Ultimately, the RX10 is the stronger all-rounder for dedicated enthusiasts or pros who value quality, control, and durability. The P500 remains a solid choice for beginners, budget travelers, or casual shooters chasing the longest zoom without breaking the bank.
Whichever you pick, invest time in mastering your camera’s quirks and strengths - as I always say, the best camera is the one in your hands at the decisive moment.
Happy shooting!
Nikon P500 vs Sony RX10 Specifications
Nikon Coolpix P500 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Nikon | Sony |
Model type | Nikon Coolpix P500 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2011-02-09 | 2014-03-20 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Expeed C2 | Bionz X |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 20MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 5472 x 3648 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Max enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 160 | 125 |
RAW support | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 9 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 23-810mm (35.2x) | 24-200mm (8.3x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.4-5.7 | f/2.8 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Tilting |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 921 thousand dot | 1,290 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | TFT-LCD with Anti-reflection coating | WhiteMagic |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,440 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 8 secs | 30 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/1500 secs | 1/3200 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 8.00 m | 10.20 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow-sync | Auto, fill-flash, slow sync, rear sync, off |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720p (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p) ,1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 494 grams (1.09 lb) | 813 grams (1.79 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 116 x 84 x 103mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 4.1") | 129 x 88 x 102mm (5.1" x 3.5" x 4.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 69 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.9 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.6 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 474 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 220 pictures | 420 pictures |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | EN-EL5 | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes (10 or 2 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, continuous) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $399 | $698 |