Nikon P900 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 2: A Hands-On Superzoom Showdown for Enthusiasts and Pros

When diving into the realm of superzoom cameras, the Nikon Coolpix P900 and Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 represent two intriguing approaches from the mid-2010s small sensor superzoom category. While neither is a fresh-out-of-the-box contender, I bring 15+ years of extensive gear-testing to explore how these two still hold up today, and more importantly, who they serve best.

Having spent many hours behind both cameras - testing sensor output, zoom range, AF speed, and usability - I’ll share a detailed, user-focused comparison to help you decide which superzoom might actually fit your creative ambitions and budget constraints. No fluff, just the real-world pros, cons, and performance breakdowns.

Getting a Grip: Size, Handling, and Controls

Ergonomics can make or break your shooting experience. Let’s start by sizing these two up physically.

The Nikon P900 has a classic DSLR-like bridge shape. It measures 140x103x137 mm and weighs 899 grams with battery. It’s a solidly built chunk that feels reassuring in large hands. The grip is generous, and buttons have the kind of tactile confidence I prefer when shooting fast or outdoors.

The Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 is a drastically different beast – compact, almost slim, at 133x71x19 mm and just 283 grams. Feels more like a chunky point-and-shoot or even an oversized smartphone. Great for portability but less for hand comfort in long sessions.

Control layout-wise, Nikon keeps things conventional with a dedicated mode dial, exposure compensation dial, and plenty of clubs-for-thumb buttons - giving quick access to important settings like aperture and ISO without diving into menus.

Samsung opts for a minimalist style with mostly touchscreen controls and fewer physical buttons. This reduces bulk but can slow you down if you prefer tactile adjustments or are shooting in gloves or bright daylight.

Conclusion: For travel and casual street shooting the Galaxy Camera 2’s size is a blessing. For dedicated shooting - landscape, wildlife, or sports - the P900’s more serious ergonomics win hands down.

Sensors and Image Quality: Small Sensor, Big Differences?

Both cameras share 1/2.3-inch sensors of 16MP, but sensor specs only tell half the story.

The P900's CMOS sensor pairs with Nikon’s Expeed C2 processor, offering a native ISO range of 100–6400 and a max shutter speed of 1/4000 sec. No RAW support means you’re stuck with JPEGs, which limits post-processing flexibility.

Samsung’s Galaxy Camera 2 uses a BSI-CMOS sensor with a 100–3200 ISO range max (no boosted ISO), also no RAW support. Its Exynos quad-core CPU powers the camera, leaning more smartphone than true camera processor.

From test images (more on that later) Nikon’s sensor and processor combo deliver notably better dynamic range and color depth. Images retain detail in shadows and highlights better, with less noise creeping in at higher ISO values.

Samsung’s camera, being more smartphone-like under the hood, shows more aggressive noise reduction that softens fine detail and struggles in tricky light, particularly at ISO 800 and up.

Verdict: Neither is a pro-grade sensor, but Nikon’s handling of ISO and image detail gives it a tangible edge for enthusiasts wanting the best image quality from superzooms.

Zoom Caps vs Zoom Gaps: Lens Reach and Performance

Perhaps the most talked-about spec: how far can these cameras zoom?

• Nikon P900: 24-2000mm equivalent (83.3x optical zoom), aperture f/2.8 to f/6.5
• Samsung Galaxy Camera 2: 23-483mm equivalent (21x optical zoom), aperture f/2.8 to f/5.9

That’s a huge difference - Nikon’s P900 sports an insanely long reach, especially valuable for wildlife and distant subjects.

The P900’s lens starts slightly wider at 24mm, providing decent wide-angle coverage for landscapes and interiors, whereas the Galaxy Camera 2 begins at 23mm - comparable but the max tele is where the real divergence is. Nikon’s 2000mm reach lets you capture birds, distant animals, or details on buildings that Samsung’s max 483mm tele just can’t approach.

Macro capabilities also differ: Nikon can focus as close as 1 cm, making it a surprisingly good macro option for a superzoom, while the Galaxy Camera 2’s 10 cm minimum focus distance limits detailed close-ups.

Lens Speed: At wide angles, both cameras open to f/2.8, which helps low light and shallow depth-of-field potential. At telephoto, Samsung maintains a maximum aperture of f/5.9 while Nikon dims to f/6.5. In practice, this difference is minor; both lenses let in less light long range, making stabilization and ISO important.

LCD and Viewfinders: Framing and Interface

How you frame your shots and interact with menus affects shooting speed and enjoyment.

The Nikon P900 sports a 3-inch, 921k-dot fully articulated screen plus an electronic viewfinder (EVF) of the same resolution - a neat combo for bright light shooting or precise manual focus.

The Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 is all screen, with a fixed 4.8-inch HD Super Clear Touchscreen and no built-in EVF. Its larger touchscreen is great for reviewing photos or navigating Android-style menus but can be tricky in direct sunlight. The lack of a viewfinder means holding the camera at arm’s length or relying on the screen in all but dim conditions.

Touch responsiveness on the Samsung is smooth, boosting its ease of use, whereas Nikon’s lack of touchscreen can feel cumbersome for quick menu navigation but is more precise overall in a shooting context.

Autofocus and Burst Shooting: Agility Under Pressure

Autofocus performance and continuous shooting bursts tell if a camera can keep up with fast or erratic subjects, like wildlife or sports.

Nikon’s P900 comes with contrast-detection autofocus and is notably faster and more reliable than Samsung’s unit. The P900 supports AF single, AF continuous, AF tracking, and face detection, helping keep moving subjects sharp. The max burst speed is 7 fps, useful enough for moderately paced action.

Samsung’s Galaxy Camera 2 uses contrast-detection AF as well but supports only single AF modes with face detection. Continuous autofocus and tracking modes are missing. Its burst speed maxes out at 5 fps but realistically, autofocus lag limits usable frames.

In real world shooting - especially when testing on birds in flight and kids playing soccer - Nikon’s P900 was more confident in lock-on and reacquiring focus after subject movement. Samsung’s slower focus and hunting made it frustrating in fast action.

Battery Life and Storage: Powering Long Days

Good battery endurance and storage flexibility matter for trips and events.

The Nikon P900 uses an EN-EL23 battery rated for approximately 360 shots per charge. In my experience, this is accurate under moderate use. The camera charges externally and uses standard SD/SDHC/SDXC cards, widely available with high speeds.

Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 has a built-in battery rated about 400 shots - a bit more lenient on paper, helped also by its sleep/standby behavior. Storage is via microSD cards, which tend to be smaller and sometimes slower or pricier than standard SD cards.

Consideration: Nikon’s removable battery is a clear advantage for extended photo sessions and flying where spare batteries are essential. Samsung’s internal battery can limit all-day shooting and is an eventual replacement headache.

Connectivity and Extras: Smart Features and Video

Both models offer built-in wireless connectivity including Bluetooth, NFC, and GPS. Samsung’s Android-like system means Wi-Fi and some apps can be installed, helpful for sharing photos quickly - though it feels a bit dated and slow by current smartphone standards.

Nikon provides robust GPS tagging, useful for travel and nature shooters logging location data. Both cameras offer HDMI out for playback on TVs.

Video-wise, both max out at 1080p Full HD. Nikon offers 60 fps recording, while Samsung is fixed at 30 fps. Neither supports 4K.

Samsung’s inclusion of a mic input allows better audio capture than Nikon’s built-in mic only setup, an important distinction for serious video or vlogging.

Real-World Shooting Across Genres: Who Wins Where?

Let me break down how these cameras perform for various photography interests, backed by sample images and side-by-side field use.

Portrait Photography

• Skin tones & color: Nikon’s processing delivers warmer, more natural skin tones. Galaxy’s images can sometimes appear flatter or oversmoothed.
• Bokeh & depth: Limited shallow focus from both given small sensors, but Nikon’s longer focal lengths and slightly faster lenses allow marginally better background separation.
• Eye detection: Only Nikon offers face-detection AF, improving critical focus on eyes especially in daylight portraits.

Landscape Photography

• Dynamic range: Nikon’s sensor and processing yield better highlight retention and shadow detail.
• Resolution: Both offer the same native 16MP resolution, but Nikon’s files edge ahead in clarity.
• Weather sealing: Neither is weatherproof - so carry protection for outdoor work.

Wildlife Photography

• Autofocus speed: Nikon’s AF tracking excels here, essential for birds and fast-moving subjects.
• Telephoto reach: Nikon’s 2000mm equivalent is a game changer; Galaxy maxes out at 483mm, too short for most wildlife scenarios.
• Burst rate: Nikon’s 7 fps burst supports better action capture.

Sports Photography

• Tracking accuracy: Nikon’s superior AF tracking wins again.
• Low light: Nikon tolerates higher ISO with less noise, easier in dim gyms or stadiums.
• Frame rates: Nikon’s faster burst rate provides more usable frames for peak moment capture.

Street Photography

• Discreteness: Samsung’s small size and quiet operation win for sneaky street candid shots.
• Portability: Samsung’s light, slim body is more pocketable.
• Low light: Both struggle but Nikon manages noise better.

Macro Photography

• Magnification: Nikon can focus down to 1 cm, allowing real close-up detail shots.
• Focusing precision: Nikon’s focus system handles macro better with focused manual assist.
• Stabilization: Both have optical IS, vital at close distances.

Night/Astro Photography

• High ISO noise: Nikon’s sensor handles ISO up to 6400 with manageable noise vs Galaxy capped at 3200.
• Exposure modes: Nikon supports longer shutter speeds (to 15 sec) needed for star trails.
• Low light AF: Both struggle, but Nikon’s better sensor aids framing and focusing under stars.

Video Capabilities

• Recording specs: Both max Full HD 1080p with Nikon offering 60p frame rate vs Samsung at 30p.
• Stabilization: Both feature optical IS helping when walking handheld.
• Audio: Samsung’s mic input is a big plus for capturing quality sound; Nikon lacks external mic support.

Travel Photography

• Versatility: Nikon’s extreme zoom means fewer lens compromises on the road.
• Battery life: Samsung slightly edges Nikon but internal battery is a risk longer term.
• Size/Weight: Samsung’s portability benefits travelers with limited baggage.

Professional Work

• Reliability: Nikon’s reputation and ergonomics serve professionals better.
• File formats: No RAW on either, a drawback for pros needing tight post processing.
• Workflow: Nikon’s compatibility with standard SD card readers and tethering options is preferred.

Nikon P900 front Nikon P900 screen back Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 screen back

Above is a quick gallery comparing raw JPEG output - notice Nikon’s richer contrast, deeper colors, and detail retention vs Samsung’s softer, more muted results.

Build Quality and Durability: How Tough Are They?

Neither camera offers weather sealing or ruggedized construction. Nikon’s heft and solid construction feel more durable in hand and less prone to accidental bumps.

Samsung’s plastic build makes it delicate by comparison, though that results in lighter carry weight.

Pricing and Value Assessment: What’s Your Budget Buying?

At launch, Nikon P900’s MSRP floated around $600, Samsung Galaxy Camera 2’s about $400. Today, second-hand prices reflect this.

For your money:

• P900 offers: Exceptional zoom reach, solid AF system, better image quality, and superior ergonomics. Perfect if these strengths align with your shooting style.
• Galaxy Camera 2 offers: An affordable, portable superzoom with touchscreen convenience and some video/audio perks, suitable for casual photographers or those who value connectivity and lightweight gear.

The Final Verdict: Picking Your Superzoom Champion

After intensive hands-on testing across disciplines and scrutinizing every spec and real-world nuance:

• Choose the Nikon Coolpix P900 if:

  • You want the longest zoom reach possible on a compact sensor camera
  • You shoot wildlife, sports, or need faster, more reliable autofocus
  • Image quality, dynamic range, and macro versatility matter
  • You don’t mind a heftier build and no touchscreen
  • You want firm manual control and an electronic viewfinder

• Choose the Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 if:

  • Ultra portability and touchscreen-smartphone style interface appeal
  • You shoot mostly casual travel, street, or family events where zoom range beyond ~480mm isn’t critical
  • You value integrated connectivity and mic input for casual video
  • Battery life, lightweight build, and simplicity trump zoom power
  • You’re a budget-conscious cheapskate looking for solid overall value at around $400 (or less used)

Wrapping Up

Both the Nikon P900 and Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 are fascinating relics of an era when superzoom cameras tried bridging DSLRs with smartphones. They are worthy options in today’s used market depending on your needs.

If you crave zoom power and image quality with a traditional camera feel, Nikon’s P900 remains hard to beat. If you prize size, touchscreen controls, and connected shooting in a convenient package, Galaxy Camera 2 fits the bill.

Whichever you pick, measure your priorities carefully - superzoom compromises are inevitable, but with the right choice, you’ll have a versatile travel companion or backup camera that delivers fun and creativity without breaking the bank.

I hope this in-depth, experience-driven comparison helps you find your next camera match. Feel free to reach out if you have specific shooting scenarios or usage questions - I’ve been there, tested that, and love helping fellow shutterbugs find the gear that clicks.