Nikon P950 vs Panasonic FZ200
52 Imaging
43 Features
70 Overall
53
65 Imaging
36 Features
64 Overall
47
Nikon P950 vs Panasonic FZ200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.2" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-2000mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 1005g - 140 x 110 x 150mm
- Released January 2020
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Expand to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F2.8) lens
- 588g - 125 x 87 x 110mm
- Revealed July 2012
- Succeeded the Panasonic FZ100
- New Model is Panasonic FZ300
Nikon P950 vs Panasonic FZ200 Overview
Let's look much closer at the Nikon P950 versus Panasonic FZ200, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by brands Nikon and Panasonic. There exists a large gap between the image resolutions of the P950 (16MP) and FZ200 (12MP) but they come with the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe P950 was introduced 7 years later than the FZ200 and that is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (SLR-like (bridge)).
Before we go in to a detailed comparison, below is a short summation of how the P950 grades versus the FZ200 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Nikon P950 vs Panasonic FZ200 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Nikon Coolpix P950 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200. The whole galleries are available at Nikon P950 Gallery & Panasonic FZ200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon P950 over the Panasonic FZ200
P950 | FZ200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2020 | July 2012 | More recent by 91 months | |
Screen dimension | 3.2" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.2") | |
Screen resolution | 921k | 460k | Crisper screen (+461k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ200 over the Nikon P950
FZ200 | P950 |
---|
Common features in the Nikon P950 and Panasonic FZ200
P950 | FZ200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More exact focus | |||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated screen | |
Selfie screen | Both good for selfies | |||
Touch screen | Neither comes with Touch screen |
Nikon P950 vs Panasonic FZ200 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to lug around your camera regularly, you need to think about its weight and size. The Nikon P950 comes with exterior measurements of 140mm x 110mm x 150mm (5.5" x 4.3" x 5.9") accompanied by a weight of 1005 grams (2.22 lbs) while the Panasonic FZ200 has specifications of 125mm x 87mm x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3") and a weight of 588 grams (1.30 lbs).
Examine the Nikon P950 versus Panasonic FZ200 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you select at that time. Underneath is the front view sizing comparison of the P950 against the FZ200.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the P950 and FZ200 is 52 and 65 respectively.
Nikon P950 vs Panasonic FZ200 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is tough to envision the gap between sensor measurements merely by reading specifications. The graphic here should offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the P950 and FZ200.
To sum up, both the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same resolution. You can count on the Nikon P950 to offer you greater detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The younger P950 will have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
Nikon P950 vs Panasonic FZ200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Nikon P950 vs Panasonic FZ200 Specifications
Nikon Coolpix P950 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Nikon | Panasonic |
Model | Nikon Coolpix P950 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2020-01-07 | 2012-07-18 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Venus Engine VII FHD |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-2000mm (83.3x) | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/2.8 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated |
Display size | 3.2 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 921 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display technology | - | Free-Angle TFT Screen LCD Display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,359 thousand dot | 1,312 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 90% | 100% |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 300 seconds | 60 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 7.0 frames/s | 12.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 11.50 m (at Auto ISO) | 13.50 m |
Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | - | 1/4000 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 25p, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MP4, H.264, AAC | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720p (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 640 x 480 (240, 120, 30, 25 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | EN-EL20a lithium-ion battery & USB charger | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 1005 gr (2.22 pounds) | 588 gr (1.30 pounds) |
Dimensions | 140 x 110 x 150mm (5.5" x 4.3" x 5.9") | 125 x 87 x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 37 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 19.1 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 10.8 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 114 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 290 pictures | 540 pictures |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $797 | $499 |