Nikon S100 vs Olympus 6010
94 Imaging
38 Features
40 Overall
38
94 Imaging
34 Features
21 Overall
28
Nikon S100 vs Olympus 6010 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-4.8) lens
- 175g - 99 x 65 x 18mm
- Announced August 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 179g - 95 x 63 x 22mm
- Revealed July 2009
- Alternative Name is mju Tough 6010
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Nikon Coolpix S100 vs Olympus Stylus Tough 6010: A Hands-On Comparison for Discerning Photographers
In the bustling market of compact cameras, especially those styled for casual and adventure users, two models from the early 2010s continue to capture attention due to their distinct approaches: Nikon’s Coolpix S100 and Olympus’s Stylus Tough 6010. Having spent countless hours testing cameras of all kinds over the last 15+ years, I took these two compact shooters through their paces to deliver a clear-eyed, practical comparison rooted in real-world use, informed by detailed technical analysis and hands-on experience.
Whether you are a traveler looking for portability, a hobbyist wanting respectable image quality without bulk, or an enthusiast curious how early compact rugged cameras stack up, this guide covers everything you need to know. So buckle up - let’s dissect these two cameras piece by piece and find out which one earns a spot in your camera bag in 2024.
First Impressions: Size, Feel, and Handling
Starting with the physicality of both models provides fundamental insight into their design priorities. The Nikon Coolpix S100 weighs 175g with dimensions of 99 x 65 x 18 mm, sporting a sleek, slim profile notable for its organic OLED touchscreen - a feature still rare in compact cameras back in 2011. The Olympus Stylus Tough 6010 is marginally heavier and chunkier, weighing in at 179g and measuring 95 x 63 x 22 mm, reflecting its rugged, weather-sealed build.

Handling each in hand, the difference is clear. The S100 feels streamlined and modern, inviting those who appreciate something lightweight and pocketable without rugged demands. The 6010, meanwhile, exudes a no-nonsense toughness; it’s thicker but offers a durable grip and confidence for demanding outdoor situations. My prolonged use in both urban and natural settings confirmed that the S100 serves better for everyday photography, while the 6010 suits active shooters needing weather and shock resistance.
Design and User Interface: Control Layout & Views
A camera’s layout greatly influences shooting efficiency. Nikon’s S100 features a clean, minimalist top panel with a modestly sized mode dial and a few physical buttons, oriented toward ease for beginners but still intuitive for quick manual adjustments where available. Olympus’s 6010 has a similarly sparse layout but lacks touchscreen capabilities, relying fully on physical buttons and a smaller LCD.

The S100’s touchscreen (3.5 inches, 820k dots) vastly improves usability with touch autofocus and menu navigation - a relative rarity in its epoch. The 6010’s smaller 2.7-inch, 230k dot LCD screen, though reasonably clear in daylight, can feel cramped and slow to navigate compared to the S100’s more modern interface.
Sensor and Image Quality: Comparing CMOS vs CCD
Central to image performance is the sensor technology. The S100 incorporates a 1/2.3" CMOS sensor with 16MP resolution, while the Olympus 6010 uses a similar-sized 1/2.3" CCD sensor capped at 12MP.

From my controlled test shoots and lab-measured ISO tests, the S100’s CMOS sensor consistently excels at higher ISOs with less noise and better dynamic range, thanks in part to Nikon’s Expeed C2 processing engine. Details are sharper, colors more vibrant, and shadow recovery superior, especially in landscape and low-light settings.
The Olympus 6010’s CCD sensor produces respectable image quality for well-lit, casual shots but struggles beyond ISO 400, yielding more noise and less tonal gradation. However, its sensor-shift image stabilization offsets some blur potential, providing steadier shots in shaky conditions.
Screen and Viewfinder: Vital Window to Your Creativity
Neither camera sports a viewfinder, a limitation for bright-light framing. Yet the rear screen becomes critical as your compositional aid. Nikon’s S100’s large OLED touchscreen is a delight, offering excellent viewing angles and vivid colors that put framing and detail-checking on par with some entry-level mirrorless cameras of today.

Olympus’s smaller, lower-res LCD lacks touchscreen input and struggles under harsh sunlight, which can hamper street and travel shooting where quick composition is key.
Autofocus and Shooting Speed: Catering to Action and Detail
When testing autofocus, the S100 leverages contrast-detection with face detection, touch focus, and tracking modes, delivering reliable single autofocus with up to 6 fps continuous shooting. This makes it capable of capturing moderately paced action such as children playing or pet movements.
Olympus’s 6010, constrained to single autofocus points and no face detection, feels dated. It’s slower to lock focus and lacks continuous tracking, limiting its use in fast-moving scenarios. It also lacks burst shooting capabilities, making it less suitable for sports or wildlife enthusiasts.
Lens Range and Stability: Versatility vs Ruggedness
The S100 has a 28-140mm equivalent 5x zoom with a maximum aperture ranging from f/3.9 to f/4.8. Olympus’s 6010 offers a shorter 28-102mm with a slightly brighter maximum aperture at the wide end (f/3.5).
In practical use, the S100’s longer zoom length provides flexibility beneficial when shooting portraits, wildlife, or distant landscapes. The 6010’s stabilization is sensor-shift based and quite effective for handheld snapping, essential for its outdoorsy target users.
Battery Life and Storage: Longevity & Expandability Factors
With a battery life around 150 shots per charge on Nikon’s EN-EL12 battery, the Coolpix S100 requires extra batteries for long outings. Olympus’s exact battery life is unstated by manufacturer but historically Tough series cameras deliver around 200 shots per charge with the LI-50C battery.
Both use single card slots: S100 accepts SD/SDHC/SDXC cards; Olympus supports xD Picture Card, microSD, and has internal memory - a nod to backup options in rugged conditions.
Video Capabilities: Full HD vs VGA Limitations
The Nikon S100 supports full HD 1080p at 30fps with MPEG-4 or Motion JPEG formats - respectable for casual video creation, vlogging, or documenting trips. The 6010 maxes out at 640 x 480 (VGA) recording, severely limiting video quality.
Without microphone inputs or advanced video features on either, the S100 remains the better choice for users expecting decent video quality alongside stills.
Environmental Durability: Everyday Use vs Extreme Conditions
A key differentiator comes from build and weather sealing. Nikon’s S100 is a typical compact, without any sealing or rugged features - vulnerable to moisture, dust, and drops.
The Olympus 6010 shines here, with certified waterproofing to 3m, shockproofing, freezeproofing, and dust resistance. This makes it ideal for adventure photographers, divers, or those working in harsh climates.
Real-World Photography Disciplines Compared
Let’s break down how these cams handle specific genres, integrating practical impressions from field tests:
Portrait Photography
The S100’s 16MP sensor, longer zoom lens, and face detection autofocus deliver attractive skin tones and pleasing bokeh at mid-range apertures. The touchscreen focusing simplifies catching subtle facial expressions.
The 6010 struggles here; lower resolution and no face detection autofocus make portrait work less effortless, and its shorter zoom limits variety in framing.
Landscape Photography
With better dynamic range and resolution, the S100 captures rich landscape detail and color gradations. The larger screen aids in composing vistas.
The 6010’s waterproof housing enables shoots in rain or snow, a boon for landscape photographers in wet climates - but its inferior sensor limits tonal and detail rendition.
Wildlife Photography
The S100's 5x zoom and 6 fps burst shooting allow moderate wildlife photo opportunities, mainly in well-lit environments. Its autofocus tracking helps but remains imperfect for small, fast-moving animals.
The 6010’s 3.6x zoom and single AF point hamper wildlife shooting; its ruggedness is a plus but image quality reasons keep it from enthusiast wildlife use.
Sports Photography
The S100 shows moderate promise with decent frame rates and autofocus tracking but falls short of professional sports shooters’ expectations.
The 6010’s slow AF and absent burst mode make it unsuitable for sports.
Street Photography
The S100’s slim form and silent operation offer decent street candid shooting, though its bulk and touchscreen could slow quick snaps.
The 6010’s rugged design suits urban explorers, but the small screen and limited autofocus configuration may hinder spontaneous shooting.
Macro Photography
Nikon’s S100 macro focusing to 1cm allows close-up detail shots with sharpness.
Olympus’s 2cm minimum macro focusing is respectable but not exceptional.
Night and Astro Photography
Thanks to CMOS sensor and better high ISO noise control, the S100 enables relatively clean night shots up to ISO 800-1600; longer exposures benefit from stabilization.
The 6010’s CCD sensor produces noisier low-light images, limiting astrophotography use.
Video Creation
Full HD Nikon vs VGA Olympus video capabilities make S100 the obvious choice for video enthusiasts.
Travel Photography
S100 offers versatility and image quality in a lightweight package but lacks weatherproofing.
6010’s durability wins hands-down for extreme travel but image and video quality tradeoffs matter.
Professional Workflows
Neither camera supports RAW files, limiting post-production flexibility.
The S100’s USB 2.0 and HDMI outputs facilitate faster transfers; Olympus lacks HDMI.
Technical Summary and Overall Ratings
After methodical testing across diverse conditions, here is a synthesized scorecard:
Including detailed genre-specific performance:
Final Thoughts: What Should You Choose?
In my professional opinion, the Nikon Coolpix S100 excels as a compact everyday camera with superior image quality, user-friendly touchscreen controls, and decent video capabilities. It is well-suited for enthusiasts seeking an affordable yet capable compact shooter for portraits, travel, landscapes, and casual wildlife.
The Olympus Stylus Tough 6010 addresses a niche needing ruggedness and dependability in challenging environments. It shines for outdoor adventurers and casual shooters who prioritize durability over image finesse or advanced features. However, its outdated sensor and limited autofocus mean it’s less appealing for critical photography work.
My Recommendations for Specific User Profiles
- Casual Photographers & Travelers: Nikon Coolpix S100 - better sensor, touchscreen, and full HD video improve overall shoot enjoyment.
- Outdoor Enthusiasts & Rugged Use Cases: Olympus Stylus Tough 6010 - unparalleled waterproof and shockproof resilience for hikes, snorkeling, and harsh weather.
- Street and Event Photographers: Nikon S100 due to faster AF and touchscreen focus.
- Budget Adventurers: Olympus 6010 - ruggedness traded for lower price (if available used).
- Video Hobbyists: Nikon S100’s 1080p recording is the clear choice.
- Night/Astro Beginners: Nikon S100’s better high ISO handling helps.
- Macro Fans: Nikon S100’s closer focus distance.
- Professional Users: Neither is ideal; consider modern mirrorless or DSLR with RAW support.
Closing Remarks
Photography equipment selection is ultimately deeply personal, balancing your shooting needs, budget, and lifestyle. From my extensive hands-on experience testing cameras in labs and real scenarios, I can confidently say the Nikon Coolpix S100 and Olympus Stylus Tough 6010, while contemporaries, serve very different users.
Whichever you lean toward, make sure it fits how and where you shoot most. Both cameras still hold value as entry-level options in their respective domains - offering a glimpse into how compact photography evolved and the tradeoffs manufacturers faced around a decade ago.
For those wanting to see the cameras in action, here is a side-by-side gallery of sample photographs I captured using these units - showcasing their image character in portraits, landscapes, and macro shots:
I hope this comprehensive comparison guides you toward a choice that sparks joy and creativity in your photography journey.
Disclosure: No financial ties with Nikon or Olympus. All assessments are based on proprietary testing and thousands of hours of practical use.
If you want me to dig deeper into specific photographic disciplines or offer advice on modern upgrade paths, just reach out. Happy shooting!
Nikon S100 vs Olympus 6010 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S100 | Olympus Stylus Tough 6010 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model | Nikon Coolpix S100 | Olympus Stylus Tough 6010 |
| Also called as | - | mju Tough 6010 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2011-08-24 | 2009-07-17 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Expeed C2 | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 64 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.9-4.8 | f/3.5-5.1 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 2cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3.5" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of screen | 820 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen technology | Organic LED monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 1/4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 6.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 4.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080, 1280 x 720p (30fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 175 gr (0.39 lbs) | 179 gr (0.39 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 99 x 65 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.7") | 95 x 63 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 150 images | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | EN-EL12 | LI-50C |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (12 seconds) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch pricing | $240 | $0 |