Nikon S220 vs Olympus VG-120
97 Imaging
33 Features
11 Overall
24
96 Imaging
37 Features
24 Overall
31
Nikon S220 vs Olympus VG-120 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 2000
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 100g - 90 x 56 x 18mm
- Launched February 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 120g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Launched January 2011
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Nikon S220 vs Olympus VG-120 Overview
Let's look a little more in depth at the Nikon S220 versus Olympus VG-120, both Ultracompact cameras by companies Nikon and Olympus. There exists a sizable gap among the image resolutions of the S220 (10MP) and VG-120 (14MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe S220 was manufactured 23 months earlier than the VG-120 making them a generation away from one another. The two cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before going into a detailed comparison, here is a quick summary of how the S220 grades against the VG-120 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Nikon S220 vs Olympus VG-120 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Nikon Coolpix S220 & Olympus VG-120. The entire galleries are provided at Nikon S220 Gallery & Olympus VG-120 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S220 over the Olympus VG-120
| S220 | VG-120 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-120 over the Nikon S220
| VG-120 | S220 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2011 |  | February 2009 | More modern by 23 months |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Common features in the Nikon S220 and Olympus VG-120
| S220 | VG-120 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Exact same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither contains Touch display |
Nikon S220 vs Olympus VG-120 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry around your camera, you'll have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Nikon S220 has got outside dimensions of 90mm x 56mm x 18mm (3.5" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of 100 grams (0.22 lbs) while the Olympus VG-120 has dimensions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 120 grams (0.26 lbs).
See the Nikon S220 versus Olympus VG-120 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you select at that time. Underneath is a front view measurements comparison of the S220 versus the VG-120.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the S220 and VG-120 is 97 and 96 respectively.
Nikon S220 vs Olympus VG-120 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is tough to visualise the gap in sensor sizes simply by checking out technical specs. The image here may offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the S220 and VG-120.
As you have seen, both the cameras have the same sensor dimensions but not the same resolution. You can anticipate the Olympus VG-120 to provide more detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics a bit more aggressively. The more aged S220 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Nikon S220 vs Olympus VG-120 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Nikon S220 vs Olympus VG-120 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S220 | Olympus VG-120 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix S220 | Olympus VG-120 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2009-02-03 | 2011-01-06 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 2000 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | f/2.8-6.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | 10cm | 7cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 11.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 4.40 m |
| Flash options | Auto, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On, Slow sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 100 grams (0.22 lb) | 120 grams (0.26 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 90 x 56 x 18mm (3.5" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 160 images |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | EN-EL10 | LI-70B |
| Self timer | Yes (3 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $56 | $190 |