Nikon S30 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS
90 Imaging
32 Features
18 Overall
26
94 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
Nikon S30 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1280 x 720 video
- 29-87mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 214g - 102 x 65 x 40mm
- Released February 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 167g - 98 x 66 x 22mm
- Announced January 2013
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Nikon Coolpix S30 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS: A Hands-On Comparison of Two Compact Cameras for Every Adventure
When it comes to compact cameras, especially models from the early 2010s era, it’s easy to be overwhelmed by the sheer variety of options that promise convenience and decent image quality wrapped into a small form factor. Today, I’m diving deep into comparing two such contenders - the Nikon Coolpix S30 and the Olympus TG-630 iHS. Both were designed with very different user needs in mind, and after extensive hands-on testing, I’m excited to share practical insights you won’t simply find in spec sheets.
If you’re a photography enthusiast or even a professional looking for a secondary camera suitable for travel, kids, or rugged environments, this comparison will provide clarity on which model fits your unique style and requirements.
First Impressions: Size, Design, and Handling
Right out of the gate, physical ergonomics shape the user experience profoundly. Handling a camera for hours - or letting kids use one comfortably - calls for an interface that’s intuitive and a size that feels just right.

The Nikon Coolpix S30 brings a sturdier, chunkier build than you’d expect from a small-sensor compact. With dimensions roughly 102 x 65 x 40 mm and a weight of 214g, it feels substantial, almost toy-like with its vibrant plastic body - likely contributing to its environmental sealing claims. Its grip is firm enough for small hands, which aligns with Nikon’s positioning of this model as a kid-friendly camera. The thick, smooth edges make it easy to hold, but the lack of a dedicated viewfinder nudges users to rely solely on the LCD screen - a relatively small 2.7-inch TFT-LCD with low resolution (230,000 pixels).
By contrast, the Olympus TG-630 iHS is noticeably more compact and slimmer at 98 x 66 x 22 mm and weighs a lighter 167g. This slimmer profile, paired with a non-slip textured finish, translates into a camera that feels fuss-free and unobtrusive during use. The 3-inch, significantly sharper 460,000-pixel LCD offers a better framing and review experience - very welcome when shooting outdoors or on the move.
The TG-630’s design screams rugged readiness: it’s waterproof, dustproof, shockproof, and freezeproof, boasting multiple layers of environmental durability without adding unnecessary bulk. The S30, while having some weather sealing, lacks these all-terrain credentials.
If portability and outdoor versatility top your list, the TG-630 has the ergonomic edge. But the S30’s larger form factor with simple controls makes it friendlier for beginners and children.
Sensor and Image Quality: Tiny Sensors, Big Differences
No comparison of compact cameras can skip the sensor and image quality discussion. Despite both cameras housing relatively small sensors (typical for their class), the differences in sensor technology and processing shape the resulting images.

Nikon S30 employs a 1/3-inch CCD sensor sized at 4.8 x 3.6 mm, delivering a modest 10 megapixels at 3648 x 2736 resolution. CCD sensors are known for their natural color rendering but tend to lag behind CMOS sensors in noise handling and dynamic range. The fixed ISO ceiling at 1600 with a native floor at 80 indicates limited flexibility for varying light conditions.
Olympus TG-630 iHS, on the other hand, features a larger 1/2.3-inch CMOS sensor (6.17 x 4.55 mm) with 12 megapixels, outputting 3968 x 2976 images. The switch to CMOS enables better noise immunity and faster readout speeds. The TG-630 pushes ISO values up to 6400 natively, offering improved performance in low-light settings.
My hours of testing reveal that the larger sensor combined with Olympus’s image processor delivers marked improvements in dynamic range and color depth. Landscapes shot with the TG-630 showcased more nuanced shadow detail and vibrant greens, while the S30’s images often lacked punch and showed earlier signs of noise at higher ISOs.
When it comes to macro and close-up shots, the Olympus’s ability to focus as close as 1cm (versus 5cm on Nikon) gives it an edge in capturing fine details.
To summarize: the Olympus TG-630 offers superior image quality with more detailed, noise-resilient photos - perfect for enthusiasts who want compact convenience without sacrificing too much quality.
Exploring Photography Genres: Where Each Camera Shines
Understanding how these cameras perform across various photography disciplines helps match them to your shooting style.
Portrait Photography: Capturing Skin Tones and Expressions
Portraits depend on color accuracy, smooth skin tone rendering, and effective autofocus on faces and eyes.
While the S30 offers basic face detection autofocus, it lacks continuous AF or eye detection features. Its CCD sensor tends to render skin tones on the warmer side, which some users might like when shooting kids or casual portraits. The relatively slow continuous shooting rate of 1.5 fps hampers action portraits or capturing fleeting expressions.
Conversely, the TG-630 incorporates face detection and face tracking AF, paired with contrast-detection AF ensuring decent subject sharpness. The sensor-shift image stabilization further aids in handheld shots at slower shutter speeds, reducing blur. The larger sensor and fine-tuned processing deliver more accurate skin tones with natural warmth and smoother gradation.
Neither model produces the dreamy bokeh associated with larger-aperture prime lenses, but the longer zoom range (28-140 mm equivalent for Olympus vs 29-87 mm for Nikon) on the TG-630 offers more framing versatility.
Recommendation for portraits: Olympus TG-630 for better focus accuracy and color fidelity.
Landscape Photography: Dynamic Range and Resolution Matter
Landscape photographers crave high resolution, expansive dynamic range, and if outdoors, weather resistance.
With just 10 MP and a limited sensor size, the Nikon S30 comes up short in resolution and dynamic capability. I noticed highlight clipping in skies and muddied shadow details when shooting HDR scenes.
The Olympus TG-630’s 12 MP sensor with a broader ISO range offers more detailed files with greater latitude for post-processing. Its ruggedness (waterproof down to approx. 10 m, freezeproof to -10°C, and crushproof) lets you shoot confidently in harsh weather, unlike the S30.
Although neither supports RAW image capture (a downside shared by both), the TG-630’s better JPEG engine compensates somewhat. The S30’s max shutter speed of 1/8000s is impressive on paper but less relevant here given exposure control limitations.
Landscape verdict: Olympus TG-630 is the more capable companion in outdoor and challenging lighting.
Wildlife and Sports Photography: Speed and Tracking
Neither camera targets wildlife or sports photography - no interchangeable lenses, no high-speed tracking, and limited burst rates.
But if you must choose:
- The S30 continuous shooting rate is 1.5 fps, significantly slower than the TG-630’s 5 fps burst capability - a notable difference when capturing moving subjects.
- Neither camera has advanced AF tracking or animal eye AF. However, the TG-630’s face tracking can occasionally lock on to moving human subjects.
- The Nikon’s longer effective focal length multiplier (7.5x) results in a relatively tighter zoom range but with slower aperture.
Given these quibbles, the Olympus TG-630’s faster series shooting and image stabilization make it marginally better suited to casual action shots, but don’t expect professional-grade performance.
Street Photography and Travel: Discreteness and Convenience
Here size, weight, and responsiveness dictate suitability.

The TG-630’s slim profile and robust build make it an excellent travel companion, especially where the risk of water or shock damage exists (beaches, rain, hiking). The snappy operation and quick access to its 5x optical zoom (28-140 mm) mean you can capture everything from wide scenes to candid street portraits without fuss.
The Nikon Coolpix S30, while pocketable in a larger pocket, feels bulkier and toy-ish - potentially deterring adult street photographers keen on discretion. Its slower AF and shutter lag may also frustrate when seeking spontaneous shots.
The TG-630’s improved LCD and HDMI output support reviewing images on larger screens - a thoughtful touch missing from the S30’s minimal interface.
For travel and street work: Olympus TG-630 wins handily.
Macro Close-Ups and Night/Astro Photography
If you’re into macro photography:
- The TG-630’s 1cm minimum focus distance lets you get impressively close to tiny subjects.
- The Nikon’s 5cm minimum focus limits creative close-ups somewhat.
- Neither camera offers focus stacking or bracketing, reducing creative macro options.
Night and astro photography require high ISO performance and manual modes:
- S30 max ISO of 1600 pales compared to TG-630’s 6400, though noise is still significant on small sensors.
- Neither camera offers exposure priority or manual exposure control - handicap for astrophotographers.
- The Olympus “Sensor-shift” stabilization helps reduce camera shake at long exposures but can’t compensate fully for star trailing without a tripod.
Video and Multimedia Capabilities
Video is often an afterthought for cameras of this class, but the TG-630 leads comfortably here.
- The Nikon S30 shoots max 1280 x 720p at 30fps in MPEG-4 format.
- The Olympus TG-630 offers 1080p Full HD video at 60fps, with H.264 encoding - sharper footage with smoother motion.
- Olympus adds HDMI output for direct playback, simplifying multi-device workflows.
- Neither camera includes microphone or headphone ports, limiting audio quality and monitoring options.
- No touchscreen, no Wi-Fi or Bluetooth on either, so wireless convenience is absent.
For casual video, Olympus TG-630 provides notably better specs and quality.
Build Quality and Environmental Toughness
Environmentally sealed? Not all compacts are created equal.
- The Nikon Coolpix S30 mentions some degree of environmental sealing but is neither waterproof nor shockproof, limiting rugged outdoor use.
- The Olympus TG-630 iHS pushes the envelope with waterproofing, freezeproof, dustproof, crushproof, and shockproof certifications - exceptional for adventure photographers.
If your photography involves unpredictable conditions or you’re seeking a more durable shooter to toss into bags or backpacks, the Olympus stands head and shoulders above the Nikon.
Ergonomics and User Interface: How Intuitive Are They?

The Nikon S30’s simple controls and fewer buttons are suitable for beginners and children, but also limit creative control. The small, low-resolution screen makes manual review and framing less precise, especially in bright daylight.
Olympus’s TG-630 packs more buttons and a higher-quality LCD, although it drops touchscreen functionality. The menus feel more modern and responsive, with useful options like pet auto shutter and customizable self-timer features.
Lens and Zoom: Flexibility vs Simplicity
Both cameras use fixed zoom lenses, not interchangeable optics.
- Nikon S30: 29-87mm equivalent, 3x zoom, aperture f/3.3-5.9.
- Olympus TG-630: 28-140mm equivalent, 5x zoom, aperture f/3.9-5.9.
The TG-630’s longer zoom range grants wider versatility - anything from landscapes to moderate telephoto shots without lens changes, ideal for travel and everyday shooting.
Battery Life and Storage
- Nikon S30 uses 2 x AA batteries (lasting ~240 shots). AA batteries can be handy in remote areas but add weight and bulk.
- Olympus TG-630 relies on an LI-50B rechargeable battery offering around 220 shots per charge. Despite slightly fewer shots, the lithium pack is lighter and chargeable via USB or charger.
Both accept SD/SDHC/SDXC cards in single card slots, standard for their class.
Connectivity and Extras
Neither camera supports Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, or NFC, reflecting their era and market positioning - limiting instant sharing options.
Olympus provides an HDMI port; Nikon does not.
Putting It All Together: Performance Scores and Recommendations
Our expert reviewers, after quantifying scores across image quality, autofocus, usability, build, and video, place the Olympus TG-630 notably ahead. Its compact ruggedness, superior sensor and video, and ergonomic improvements offer excellent value against a higher but reasonable price point (~$200 vs ~$120 for Nikon).
In the chart above, you can see TG-630 leading in virtually every photography category - from landscapes and macro to travel and video. The Nikon S30 holds some ground in kid-friendliness and ease of use but is largely outmatched.
Sample Shots: Real-World Images Side by Side
Looking at several comparisons highlights:
- Olympus’ sharper details and wider dynamic range in outdoor scenes.
- More vivid and true-to-life color rendering on the TG-630.
- Nikon images trend softer and noisier at higher ISOs.
- Macro close-ups from Olympus reveal finer textures.
- Video clips from Olympus provide smooth, clearer 1080p at 60fps versus Nikon’s choppier 720p.
Who Should Buy Each Camera?
Choose the Nikon Coolpix S30 if:
- You want a simple, robust camera mostly for kids or casual family use.
- You prefer user-friendly controls with fewer menus and options.
- You don’t need advanced video or rugged features.
- Budget is tight, and you prioritize affordability over performance.
- AA batteries are preferred for easy replacement on the go.
Choose the Olympus TG-630 iHS if:
- You want a versatile compact that can survive a tropical rainforest or snowy hike.
- High-quality stills and Full HD video matter.
- You appreciate a longer zoom and stabilization.
- You need better macro capabilities and faster shooting.
- Design and handling for adults and travelers appeal to you.
- Willing to pay a moderate premium for upgraded features and durability.
Final Thoughts: Which Compact Reigns Supreme?
It’s clear to me, after side-by-side field testing and lab analysis, that the Olympus TG-630 iHS embodies the next step for compact cameras offering solid image quality and rugged, all-condition reliability. It balances photo and video capabilities, usability, and endurance, making it a top pick for travelers, hiking enthusiasts, and everyday shooters who want a do-it-all pocket camera.
The Nikon Coolpix S30 occupies a niche as a fun, kid-friendly, easy-to-use digital camera with a basic feature set and reliable simplicity at a bargain price. For parents or casual users who don’t want to fuss over settings, it’s a decent choice. But for anyone demanding better images, more versatility, and future-proof ruggedness, the TG-630 clearly takes the crown.
In a market flooded with compact options, this Nikon vs Olympus face-off reminds us that sensor size, processing technology, and build integrity profoundly affect your shooting experience. Always try to test cameras firsthand and match features against your practical needs - because no spec sheet fully prepares you for the nuances of real-world photography.
Whichever you choose, both cameras reflect their design eras well and provide a straightforward entry into digital photography, but only one is truly at home in rough-and-tumble adventure settings with professional-minded results.
Happy shooting!
Nikon S30 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S30 | Olympus TG-630 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model | Nikon Coolpix S30 | Olympus TG-630 iHS |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Released | 2012-02-01 | 2013-01-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 4.8 x 3.6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 17.3mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 29-87mm (3.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.3-5.9 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 7.5 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen tech | TFT-LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.5fps | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow-sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720p (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 214 grams (0.47 pounds) | 167 grams (0.37 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 65 x 40mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.6") | 98 x 66 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 photos | 220 photos |
| Battery format | AA | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | 2 x AA | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Price at release | $119 | $200 |