Nikon S31 vs Pentax WS80
90 Imaging
33 Features
18 Overall
27
95 Imaging
32 Features
20 Overall
27
Nikon S31 vs Pentax WS80 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.9" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 29-87mm (F) lens
- 185g - 105 x 65 x 42mm
- Revealed June 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 6400
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-175mm (F3.8-4.7) lens
- 125g - 92 x 60 x 22mm
- Revealed August 2009
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Nikon Coolpix S31 vs Pentax Optio WS80: An In-Depth Waterproof Compact Camera Comparison
Choosing a rugged, waterproof compact camera can be surprisingly complex. Both the Nikon Coolpix S31 and Pentax Optio WS80 promise durability and underwater capability, but which better suits your photography style and real-world needs? Drawing from extensive hands-on testing with similarly rugged compacts and analysis of these models’ specifications and features, I dissect their strengths and weaknesses across key photographic disciplines, performance metrics, and user experience. Whether you’re after the perfect beach camera, a waterproof point-and-shoot for travel, or a tough companion for adventure photography, this detailed comparative review will help you make an informed choice grounded in practical use.

Handling and Ergonomics: Size, Weight, and Control
The Nikon S31 and Pentax WS80 both position themselves as rugged, compact waterproof offerings, but their physical dimensions and ergonomics reveal subtle design philosophies. The Nikon S31 measures a chunky 105x65x42mm and weighs 185g, whereas the Pentax WS80 is notably more svelte at 92x60x22mm and a featherlight 125g.
In field use, the Nikon’s thicker profile offers better grip security and a more substantial feel in the hand - not unlike holding a small brick with rounded edges - giving confidence during underwater shooting or slippery conditions. The Pentax, on the other hand, is delightfully pocketable and easy to stash in jacket pockets or small camera bags, which favors travelers valuing ultra-portability.
Control-wise, both cameras sport non-touch fixed 2.7” 230K-dot LCDs (more on that shortly), lacking viewfinders or touchscreen functionality. Buttons are modest and logically laid out, yet neither is equipped with illuminated controls, which can hamper nighttime use. Handling precision is further hampered by minimal manual controls - focus and exposure adjustments are effectively fully automatic, especially for the Nikon.
Considering the WS80's thinner profile and lighter weight, it likely appeals to those prioritizing portability, while the S31’s bulkier frame offers a grippier feel under challenging conditions like diving or hiking.

Build Quality and Environmental Durability
When evaluating rugged compacts, their environmental sealing and robustness are paramount. Both cameras tout waterproof and dustproof construction, but the instantiation differs.
The Nikon S31 is waterproof up to 10 meters (33 feet), dustproof, shockproof (from 1.5m drops), and freezeproof down to -10°C. It’s essentially designed as a go-anywhere companion for active kids or casual users who want spill-proof confidence. Pentax’s WS80 offers waterproofing to 3 meters (9.8 feet) and is dustproof but lacks shock or freeze proofing.
So, if you envision photographing in colder climates or need the camera to endure more physical abuse, the Nikon’s tougher thresholds offer peace of mind. Conversely, the Pentax WS80 is better suited for swimming pool use, light snorkeling, or rainy hikes.
The WS80’s finer build quality cues are evident in its slightly more refined aesthetic: slimmer, lighter, and perhaps less utilitarian but more stylish. The Nikon’s rugged construction feels industrial and chunky, as one might expect from a camera designed partly with children in mind.

Sensor and Image Quality: CCD Technology in the Waterproof Realm
Both cameras feature 10-megapixel CCD sensors, but their sensor sizes differ and make a meaningful difference in image rendering. The Nikon S31 sports a 1/2.9” sensor (approx. 18.45 mm²), while the Pentax WS80 has a slightly larger 1/2.3” sensor (28.07 mm²).
Sensor size translates directly to light gathering capability and dynamic range potential. The WS80’s sensor is roughly 1.5 times larger in area, which - coupled with its higher ISO ceiling of 6400 vs Nikon’s 1600 - affords better low-light performance and better control over noise at higher ISOs.
The WS80’s maximum image resolution is 3648x2736, as is the Nikon’s, so pixel count is equal, but the Pentax’s bigger pixels contribute to cleaner images and more subtle tonal gradations.
Practically, this means the Pentax delivers better image quality in challenging lighting - shade, indoor, or underwater environments - whereas the Nikon struggles with higher ISO noise and limited dynamic range.
Both cameras use an anti-aliasing filter, which lowers sharpness slightly to avoid moiré but is a standard trade-off in consumer compacts.

LCD Screen and Interface Usability
Examining the rear LCDs, both cameras come with identical 2.7-inch fixed, non-touch screens at approximately 230,000 dots resolution. While this size and resolution met entry-level needs circa the late 2000s and early 2010s, today’s standard is at least 3 inches with over 900,000 dots, often touch-enabled.
Neither screen offers touchscreen control or tilt/swivel articulation, limiting compositional flexibility and quick settings access. The absence of electronic viewfinders means relying on these modest LCDs exclusively, which can prove challenging under bright sunlight or underwater.
Pentax includes multiple aspect ratio options (4:3 and 16:9), giving compositional variety not seen in the Nikon’s fixed ratios.
Menus and interfaces on both models are basic but intuitive. However, the Nikon lacks custom white balance options, which the Pentax WS80 offers - useful for correcting underwater or artificial lighting hues.
In real-world use, the Nikon’s screen felt more washed-out, while the Pentax displayed slightly richer colors and better contrast, aiding framing precision.
Autofocus and Shooting Performance: Basic but Serviceable
Autofocus remains a significant differentiator. Neither camera features advanced AF technologies like phase-detection or hybrid systems, relying solely on CCD sensor contrast detection.
The Nikon S31 offers no autofocus modes - no face detection, eye detection, continuous AF, or focus points. Its autofocus performance is basic and often slow to acquire subjects; resulting in missed shots if photographing wildlife or fast-moving subjects.
The Pentax WS80 upgrades the experience marginally with 9 contrast-detection AF points and single autofocus capability. While still modest, it provides more reliable focus lock and better focus prioritization for general scenes.
Continuous shooting speed is minimal on the Pentax at just 1 fps, with Nikon lacking any burst shooting mode. Neither camera would satisfy sports or fast action photographers due to sluggish buffer clearing and AF speeds.
However, their AF systems handle macro fairly well given the fixed lenses’ relatively short minimum focus distances, though neither offers focus stacking or bracketing aids.
Lens Specifications and Versatility
Both cameras employ fixed zoom lenses, typical of compact waterproof models.
-
Nikon Coolpix S31: 29-87 mm (3× optical zoom), f/NA unspecified but relatively wide due to small sensor
-
Pentax Optio WS80: 35-175 mm (5× optical zoom), f/3.8–4.7 aperture range
The Pentax WS80’s longer zoom reach and wider focal length range (virtually 5x vs Nikon’s 3x) afford greater framing flexibility - from moderate wide-angle scenes to reasonable telephoto shots for wildlife or portraits.
This is important practically because it reduces the need to move yourself physically or switch cameras when adapting to different subjects.
Neither model supports interchangeable lenses, given their fixed mount status, restricting advanced photographic creativity but enhancing ruggedness.
Battery, Storage, and Connectivity
Battery life on the Nikon S31 is rated at around 260 shots per charge - adequate but modest for day trips. It uses a proprietary EN-EL12 battery pack.
Pentax doesn’t specify exact battery life, but it uses the D-LI68 lithium-ion battery, which in practice delivers similar endurance.
Storage-wise, both support SD, SDHC, and SDXC cards, with one slot each. Pentax also includes built-in internal memory for backups, a nice safety net. Neither supports dual card slots or proprietary media formats.
Connectivity is minimal for both: USB 2.0 for file transfer and no wireless options like Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, or NFC - entirely expected for their release years.
Video Capabilities: Entry-Level HD Recording
Neither camera targets video enthusiasts but both deliver basic 720p HD video.
The Nikon S31 records only 1,280 x 720 resolution at an unspecified frame rate without any advanced video features.
The Pentax WS80 offers similar 720p resolution at 30 fps plus lower-resolution options down to 320x240. Its format is Motion JPEG, an older codec that inflates file sizes but ensures broad compatibility.
Neither model features external microphone inputs, headphone jacks, or image stabilization for video, limiting creative control and audio quality.
Performance Across Photography Genres
Portraits
The Nikon S31’s limited zoom range and basic AF lack face or eye detection, restricting its portrait potential, especially in challenging light. Pentax WS80 edges ahead with longer zoom and basic AF points but neither offers wide apertures or advanced skin-tone rendering due to sensor constraints.
Landscapes
Pentax’s wider zoom and bigger sensor deliver more detailed and dynamic shots, important for landscapes. Nikon’s smaller sensor may struggle with noise and dynamic range in shadowy scenes. Both cameras have modest resolutions (10MP), sufficient for casual prints.
Wildlife
WS80’s 175mm equivalent zoom and slightly better AF make it the superior choice for casual wildlife snapshots. Nikon’s shorter zoom limits reach, and sluggish AF makes rapid animal capture difficult.
Sports
Neither camera supports fast continuous shooting, making them ill-suited for sports or fast action.
Street
Pentax’s small size favors street use, but none are particularly discrete. Nikon’s chunkier body may draw attention. Both struggle in low light due to limited ISO performance.
Macro
Neither camera has notable macro specifications, but the Pentax’s manual focus option may help finer adjustments. Nikon’s fixed focus offers less control.
Night/Astro
Pentax’s higher ISO ceiling favors low light; however, neither model offers manual exposure controls necessary for astro photography.
Video
Basic HD from both, but lack of stabilization and external audio inputs limit usability for video creators.
Travel
Pentax offers more versatility with zoom and compact size; Nikon is more robust for harsher environments.
Professional Use
Both cameras are consumer-grade, lacking RAW support, advanced controls, and ruggedness needed for professional deployments.
From the test images above, the Pentax WS80’s larger sensor produces richer colors and improved detail retention, especially in shaded and underwater scenes. The Nikon S31 images appear flatter with muted contrast and more noise creeping at higher ISO settings.
Evaluating overall scores based on image quality, features, and versatility places the Pentax WS80 slightly ahead, especially weighted by its sensor advantage, better zoom, and more flexible shooting modes.
Genre-specific scoring further exposes each camera’s niche:
- Pentax WS80 leads in wildlife, landscapes, and low-light scenarios.
- Nikon S31 scores better for ruggedness and kid-friendly durability.
- Both score low in sports and night photography, unsurprisingly for fixed-lens compact waterproof cameras.
Summary and Recommendations
Who should consider the Nikon S31?
- Parents or individuals wanting a rugged, freeze- and shockproof waterproof camera for beach trips or outdoor adventures.
- Users focused on durability over image quality or zoom versatility.
- Those on a tight budget (~$90) placing priority on robustness and simplicity.
Who should lean toward the Pentax WS80?
- Enthusiast casual shooters needing better image quality, longer zoom reach, and customizable white balance.
- Travelers desiring a lightweight, discreet waterproof camera with modest manual focus control and time-lapse features.
- Users willing to invest more (~$220) for enhanced functionality.
Final Thoughts
Both Nikon Coolpix S31 and Pentax Optio WS80 are relics of a pre-smartphone camera era focused on affordable ruggedness. The Nikon excels in hardiness and simplicity, ideal for kids or no-fuss use. The Pentax offers a more refined shooting experience with better image quality and zoom but sacrifices shockproof/freezeproof ratings.
If you want to shoot above casual snapshots with a waterproof compact, Pentax WS80’s larger sensor and zoom range deliver more satisfying results. But if your priority is absolute reliability in harsh conditions and you want a lightweight cost entry, Nikon’s S31 is a steadfast little companion.
Their shared shortcomings - limited manual controls, low-res screens, lack of viewfinders, and dated video - reflect their age and entry-level design intentions. Yet, understanding their strengths and trade-offs is key to matching your camera choice with your photographic ambitions and environmental demands.
If you want a camera that can confidently handle snorkel shots, icy environments, and survive children’s enthusiastic use while capturing decent images on sunny days, Nikon’s S31 is your dog - and a good boy, indeed. But if you want more zoom freedom, better images, and a lighter carry with reasonable water protection, Pentax WS80 earns your consideration.
Happy shooting, rain or shine - and underwater!
Nikon S31 vs Pentax WS80 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S31 | Pentax Optio WS80 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Nikon | Pentax |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix S31 | Pentax Optio WS80 |
| Class | Waterproof | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2013-06-21 | 2009-08-05 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | Prime |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.9" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 4.96 x 3.72mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 18.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 64 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 29-87mm (3.0x) | 35-175mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | - | f/3.8-4.7 |
| Crop factor | 7.3 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1500s |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 1.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 3.40 m |
| Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 185g (0.41 pounds) | 125g (0.28 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 105 x 65 x 42mm (4.1" x 2.6" x 1.7") | 92 x 60 x 22mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 260 photos | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | EN-EL12 | D-LI68 |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD / SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch pricing | $90 | $220 |