Nikon Coolpix S3300 vs S3600: Small Sensor Compacts Face Off with a Decade Gap

When it comes to compact cameras - a category famously squeezed by smartphone photography - there’s a curious charm in models like Nikon’s Coolpix S3300 and S3600. Released two years apart yet practically from the same family, these pocketable shooters appeal to the casual snapper and the photography enthusiast looking for a simple secondary camera. Having tested thousands of cameras throughout my career, I found these two particularly interesting as a study in incremental upgrades and budget compact performance. So let’s unpack their real-world capabilities, technological underpinnings, and who exactly should consider them in 2024.

Size Matters - Well, Sort Of: Handling and Ergonomics

Both cameras embrace the quintessential compact “point-and-shoot” form factor, targeting convenience and portability. Physically, they feel almost inseparable - though subtle differences exist.

The Nikon S3300 measures a trim 95x58x19 mm and weighs 128 grams, while the S3600 nudges slightly bigger at 97x58x20 mm and is 125 grams light. Neither is a handful, and their thin profiles slide easily into any jacket pocket or purse. I spent an afternoon walking with both and rarely noticed the difference, though the S3600’s slightly wider lens extends further when powered on, which can lend a tiny sense of balance when gripping it with two hands.

Looking at controls, both cameras take a minimalist approach, with no touchscreen, no electronic viewfinder, and fixed 2.7-inch LCDs with the same resolution of 230k dots. The layout is simple - power, shutter, zoom rocker, and a few buttons. Neither offers tactile flair or customizability. For my money, the S3600’s slightly updated button positioning and the addition of a 10-second self-timer option (versus the S3300’s generic self-timer) felt a touch more user-friendly for casual shooting.

In short? Ergonomics won’t win any awards, but they don’t impede daily shooting. Neither model suits advanced users craving manual exposure dials or a fancy viewfinder, but for quick candid snappers or travel companions, they serve just fine.

Sensor and Image Quality: The Heart of the Matter

Both cameras stow the now-typical 1/2.3-inch CCD sensors Nikon favored in their compacts of that era. The S3300 offers a 16MP sensor, while the S3600 steps it up with 20MP. On paper, more megapixels usually mean sharper images, right? Not always - resolution isn’t the entire narrative.

The sensor size is identical in both at 6.17 x 4.55 mm, resulting in a sensor area around 28 mm². This small sensor size inherently limits dynamic range, noise performance, and depth of field control compared to larger APS-C or full-frame sensors. The CCD technology, while more traditional and sometimes producing softer gradation than CMOS, is less energy-efficient - affecting battery life (more on that later).

In practice, the S3600’s higher resolution does yield somewhat crisper details in well-lit scenes. But be wary of over-sharpening artifacting at the pixel level, especially when shooting at ISO 400 and above. Both models show typical compact sensor limitations: noticeable noise creeping in around ISO 800, and a constrained ability to hold highlight and shadow detail due to the narrow dynamic range.

Shooting in RAW isn’t an option on either, which means you’re tethered to JPEG files processed by the camera’s proprietary algorithms. For enthusiasts accustomed to editing flexibility, that might sting a bit. Still, for casual social media use or snapshots printed at modest sizes, these JPEGs generally suffice.

In terms of color, both are broadly accurate with pleasant skin tones, though the S3600’s newer processor and slightly updated white balance algorithms handle tricky lighting (like mixed indoor tungsten and window sunlight) with a marginally better balance. Nikon’s signature color science leans on the warmer side, which many find flattering for portraits.

Portrait Photography: Skin Tones and Bokeh

Since neither camera offers manual aperture control (both fixed lens), portrait photographers need to rely mostly on subject distance and background separation. The lens focal ranges differ, with the S3300 sporting a 26–156 mm equivalent (6x zoom) and the S3600 pushing 25–200 mm (8x zoom). The longer zoom on the S3600 is advantageous for portraits from farther distances, potentially rendering a more pleasing background blur by compression alone, even if the aperture stays around f/3.5 to f/6.6.

Both cameras provide face detection autofocus, which works well enough for casual snapshots but falters in low contrast or complex scenes. Neither support modern eye-detection AF, which began appearing in higher-end counterparts later in the decade. The autofocus systems rely on contrast detection and, unsurprisingly, aren’t blazing fast or especially accurate for moving subjects.

The built-in flash is serviceable but timid, often leading to flat, unnatural lighting. Both cameras offer slow-sync flash, which helps a bit in low light portraits by balancing flash output with ambient exposure.

Ultimately, the S3600 edges out slightly thanks to its longer zoom and updated AF points - 99 compared to the unknown (but evidently fewer) points in the S3300.

Landscapes and Outdoor Use: Dynamic Range and Weather Considerations

If you’re chasing epic landscapes, these cameras come with caveats. Their small sensors limit dynamic range, meaning bright sunny skies often clip to pure white quickly, while shadow areas tend to get lost in murky blacks. Neither camera is weather sealed or ruggedized in any way - no dustproof or waterproof ratings here - so pack your rain gear or stick to clear days.

The S3600’s marginally larger pixel count offers a tad more detail capture for print-worthy large images, but the sensor size remains a bottleneck that no software patch can fix. Both cameras feature the familiar Nikon exposure modes dictated by the lack of manual controls - auto and scene modes dominate.

If you squint hard at images taken with both in good daylight, they are perfectly fine for web use or casual prints but won’t satisfy discerning landscape photographers accustomed to wider dynamic ranges and finer details from APS-C or micro four-thirds rivals.

Wildlife and Sports: Autofocus, Burst, and Telephoto Reach

Let’s talk action: wildlife and sports are clearly not the native zones for these compacts, but they do try.

With respect to autofocus, the S3600’s 99 autofocus points and continuous AF mode (absent in S3300) theoretically improve tracking moving subjects. Yet, the contrast-detection AF without phase-detection support means sluggish and indecisive focus hunting is common.

The maximum continuous shooting rate is also telling: the S3600 just manages a modest 1 fps burst, while the S3300 offers none (no continuous shooting). Yale’s infamous pedestrian pace, indeed.

In practice, expect blurred shots if you’re really trying to freeze fast wildlife or sports antics.

On telephoto reach, the S3600’s 200 mm equivalent can get you closer than the S3300’s 156 mm, but image quality suffers at longer zoom lengths due to lens softness and digital noise.

In sum, these cameras are for “wildlife” glimpses rather than actual tracking of birds in flight or stadium action.

Street Photography and Discretion: The Art of Not Being Noticed

Street photographers appreciate cameras that are discreet, fast to deploy, and perform well in varied low-light conditions. Neither the S3300 nor the S3600 sports a viewfinder, so you’re framed through the LCD - a sometimes problematic approach in bright sunshine.

The fixed, non-touch 2.7-inch screens with 230k dots resolution, while adequate, feel dated and insufficiently bright for anyone working outdoors. The lack of silent shutter modes and audible zooming mechanism further reduce stealth potential.

On the positive side: their small footprint and lightweight design minimize intrusion - hand-held and partially concealed shooting is easy.

Low-light performance remains limited; the small sensor struggles with noise above ISO 400, and maximum ISO caps at 3200, a number which delivers grainy, washed-out images unusable for serious prints.

Practitioners of street photography who value silence and responsiveness may prefer mirrorless models, but for casual strolls and quick snaps, these Nikons do get the job done.

Macro Photography: How Close Can You Really Get?

Macro shooting is often overlooked in point-and-shoot cameras, yet both these Nikon models advertise impressive close focusing distances.

The S3300 offers macro capability down to 1 cm, while the S3600 goes down to 2 cm. That’s pretty close, allowing you to fill the frame with tiny flowers or insects if lighting cooperates.

However, the fixed apertures at the longer end and the absence of focus stacking limit depth of field and sharpness across the frame. Use of the optical image stabilization (OIS), which both cameras feature, proved helpful during handheld macro captures, stabilizing unsteady fingers and reducing blur.

Neither model has manual focus or focus peaking - a manual focus workflow is impossible, which frustrated my desire for precision.

Nonetheless, the convenience of macro backed by OIS makes these cameras fun little tools for amateur macro adventurers.

Night and Astro Photography: Challenging Conditions

Given the small CCD and max ISO 3200, low-light and night photography isn’t a strong suit - especially with no raw capture and primitive noise reduction.

Long exposure shots beyond 2 seconds are not supported (minimum shutter speed is 4 seconds max in both, limiting star trail photography), and there’s no bulb mode.

The built-in flash is mostly irrelevant here except as a fill for very close subjects.

If you’re looking for a camera to expose the night sky, both these compacts disappoint, and affordable mirrorless cameras with larger sensors are strongly recommended instead.

Video Performance: How Do They Record?

The Nikon S3300 and S3600 both max out at 720p HD recording @ 30 fps - an aging spec even back at the S3600’s 2014 release.

Both shoot MPEG-4 videos without advanced codecs or frame rates. There is no external microphone input, nor headphone jack, which precludes professional audio capture or monitoring.

Electronic image stabilization is absent; optical stabilization only helps some.

Overall, video quality is serviceable for casual family clips but inadequate for anyone wanting usable content beyond small screen playback and casual sharing.

Travel Companion: Versatility and Battery Life

For travelers seeking lightweight, easy-to-use companions, these cameras each have pros and cons.

Battery life is a notable difference: the S3600 offers approximately 230 shots per charge, compared to the S3300’s shorter 180 shots, primarily due to sensor and processor efficiencies.

Both use the same battery type (EN-EL19) and store images on SD/SDHC/SDXC cards, meaning flexibility in storage options.

The S3600’s longer zoom range (8x vs 6x) and slightly better autofocus make it a more adaptable travel tool, capable of distant landscapes, street scenes, or portraits.

====

I found the fixed LCDs a bit limiting during bright midday outdoor shoots. An articulated or higher-resolution screen would have boosted both models’ value, but of course, cost constraints prevail in this category.

Professional Work and Workflow Considerations

Clearly, neither compact camera is intended to replace a professional mirrorless or DSLR system. Their lack of raw, modest sensor tech, limited file formats, and no lens interchangeability confine them to casual or backup roles.

That said, the S3600’s finer autofocus grid (99 points) and improved continuous AF hint at Nikon’s modest attempts to push functionality - even if limited.

Both save JPEGs compatible with standard workflows, and USB 2.0 connectivity allows easy file transfer though no wireless options exist, a notable downside in our increasingly networked world.

Putting It All Together: Strengths, Weaknesses, and Who Each Camera Is For

Despite the modest price tags, the S3600 is a clear evolution - offering higher resolution, longer zoom, better autofocus, and longer battery life. However, for pure simplicity and basic point-and-shoot users unfamiliar with manual focus frustrations, the S3300 may suffice and save some cash.

Nikon S3300 front Nikon S3300 screen back Nikon S3600 front Nikon S3600 screen back

A Closer Look at Specialized Photography Types with These Cameras

Rating Their Overall Performance: Where Do They Stand Today?

Both models fall into the entry-level compact category, suitable for casual everyday users or those upgrading from older digital point-and-shoots. They do not compete with modern smartphones or mirrorless cameras that offer larger sensors, better autofocus, higher frame rates, and 4K video.

The S3600’s enhancements justify its higher price, earning a modest boost over the S3300 in usability and image quality, but neither breaks significant ground in today’s photographic landscape.

Final Verdict: Should You Buy Either Nikon Compact in 2024?

I get it - compact cameras in this segment are endangered species, squeezed by phone cameras and mirrorless systems’ rising accessibility. But there’s still room for super simple, affordable, pocketable digicams that just “click and go.”

• If budget is your prime concern and you want a straightforward point-and-shoot backup camera or a simple travel companion, the Nikon S3300 delivers solid basics at a low price. Its manual focus option is a quirky bonus for a compact, though it’s largely of limited practical use.

• If you want better zoom flexibility, longer battery life, faster autofocus, and a marginally sharper sensor, the Nikon S3600 is the smarter investment - if you can accept the non-existent raw shooting and limited video quality.

Neither Nikon Coolpix model is recommended for serious photographers, but for novices, casual photography, or specific uses like macro fun or street snapshots, they remain competent and honest tools.

What About Alternatives?

If you’re willing to spend a bit more or want vastly better image quality, brands like Canon, Sony, and Panasonic offer compacts with larger sensors, 4K video, touchscreen interfaces, and rugged designs starting close to $300 and up. For professionals, mirrorless interchangeable lens cameras remain the gold standard for versatility and quality.

Before wrapping up, here’s one last comparison of the interface - a reminder that simple doesn’t mean primitive:

Easy to navigate menus, dedicated flash modes, and Nikon’s exposure presets make these cameras accessible for beginners. But if you find yourself craving manual controls or better autofocus, it’s time to look beyond.

In conclusion, after two weeks carrying both cameras and putting them through their paces in urban, nature, and social environments, my advice is clear: the Nikon Coolpix S3600 is worth the extra cash for improved optics and usability, but the S3300 remains a worthy contender if simplicity and price dominate your checklist.

Both are bound by the inherent limitations of their compact class, but they each have moments when they can shine - if you know where and how to look.

Happy shooting!

End of Comparison Article