Nikon S3500 vs Olympus TG-4
95 Imaging
45 Features
25 Overall
37
90 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
Nikon S3500 vs Olympus TG-4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-182mm (F3.4-6.4) lens
- 129g - 97 x 58 x 21mm
- Revealed February 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Introduced April 2015
- Old Model is Olympus TG-3
- Newer Model is Olympus TG-5
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Nikon S3500 vs Olympus TG-4 Overview
Lets look more closely at the Nikon S3500 vs Olympus TG-4, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by manufacturers Nikon and Olympus. There exists a sizeable gap between the image resolutions of the S3500 (20MP) and TG-4 (16MP) but both cameras provide the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe S3500 was revealed 3 years earlier than the TG-4 which is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving into a in depth comparison, here is a brief summation of how the S3500 scores versus the TG-4 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Nikon S3500 vs Olympus TG-4 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Nikon Coolpix S3500 and Olympus Tough TG-4. The full galleries are provided at Nikon S3500 Gallery and Olympus TG-4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S3500 over the Olympus TG-4
| S3500 | TG-4 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-4 over the Nikon S3500
| TG-4 | S3500 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | April 2015 |  | February 2013 | More modern by 26 months |
| Manually focus |  | Very accurate focus | ||
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Nikon S3500 and Olympus TG-4
| S3500 | TG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither has Touch friendly display |
Nikon S3500 vs Olympus TG-4 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry around your camera frequently, you should take into account its weight and size. The Nikon S3500 has external dimensions of 97mm x 58mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.8") along with a weight of 129 grams (0.28 lbs) while the Olympus TG-4 has specifications of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
Compare the Nikon S3500 vs Olympus TG-4 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have attached at that time. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the S3500 vs the TG-4.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the S3500 and TG-4 is 95 and 90 respectively.
Nikon S3500 vs Olympus TG-4 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its hard to envision the contrast between sensor sizes simply by looking at specs. The picture below may provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the S3500 and TG-4.
All in all, both of these cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same megapixels. You should expect to see the Nikon S3500 to give you greater detail because of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop images way more aggressively. The more aged S3500 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Nikon S3500 vs Olympus TG-4 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Nikon S3500 vs Olympus TG-4 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S3500 | Olympus Tough TG-4 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix S3500 | Olympus Tough TG-4 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2013-02-21 | 2015-04-13 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.16 x 4.62mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 5152 x 3864 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 25 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-182mm (7.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.4-6.4 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen tech | TFT-LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 5.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 7.90 m (at ISO 1600) |
| Flash options | - | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | - | H.264, Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 129g (0.28 lb) | 247g (0.54 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 97 x 58 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 380 photos |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | LI-92B |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | - | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $85 | $379 |
