Nikon Coolpix S3700 vs Samsung CL80: An Exhaustive Comparison for Ultracompact Camera Buyers

Choosing the right ultracompact digital camera can be surprisingly complex despite their seemingly straightforward designs, especially for photography enthusiasts and professionals considering superportable options for casual outings, travel, or quick snaps. The Nikon Coolpix S3700 and Samsung CL80 (also known as ST5500 in some markets) both target this niche, but their different design choices, sensor specs, autofocus performance, and features warrant a thorough dissection based on hands-on testing experience and technical scrutiny.

This article undertakes a painstaking side-by-side comparison across technical specifications, usability, and real-world performance, supported by detailed analysis and visual references to help you understand exactly what you get with each model, and for whom each camera is best suited.

Decoding the Cameras’ Physical Presence and Ergonomics

Before delving into image quality and performance, it’s vital to consider the physical form factor and handling experience - especially for ultracompact cameras, where ease of carry and intuitive handling can make or break their appeal.

Size and Weight: Pocketability and Grip

At first glance, both the Nikon S3700 and Samsung CL80 present slim, compact silhouettes aimed at effortless portability. However, the Nikon S3700 edges ahead remarkably in terms of sheer compactness: it measures 96 x 58 x 20 mm and weighs a featherlight 118 grams, significantly slimmer and lighter than the Samsung's 104 x 58 x 20 mm footprint and heftier 160 grams.

This size and weight difference manifests strongly in day-to-day use: the Nikon’s compactness makes it comfortable for continuous carry in pockets or small bags, which benefits street photographers or travel shooters who prioritize minimal gear bulk.

Control Layout and Top Panel Design

Looking at the control scheme from above, the Nikon S3700 employs a relatively sparse top layout optimized for simplicity: a shutter button, zoom rocker, and minimal other buttons - no dedicated mode dial or customizable buttons - a typical cost-saving measure in entry ultracompacts, but one that sacrifices direct access to advanced settings.

The Samsung CL80 contrasts this with a slightly more cluttered top, including a pop-up flash button and a more pronounced zoom ring, granting an arguably better tactile feel when framing shots at telephoto lengths.

While neither imposes professional control ergonomics, the Samsung’s layout may marginally favor users who want a bit more quick access, whereas the Nikon leans towards ultra-minimalism.

Sensor, Image Quality, and Processing: The Heart of the Matter

When evaluating cameras, sensor technology and image processing are paramount, determining output fidelity and usability in diverse situations.

Sensor Specifications and Architecture

Both cameras share the same fundamental sensor size - a 1/2.3" CCD sensor measuring 6.17 x 4.55 mm with an active sensor area of approximately 28.07 mm², a common format for ultracompact cameras. However, the Nikon S3700 executes a notable resolution boost with a 20MP sensor versus the Samsung CL80’s 14MP sensor. While higher megapixels theoretically allow for more detailed images, these specs must be contextualized by sensor noise performance and pixel pitch constraints common in small CCD sensors.

Beyond resolution, both retain an anti-aliasing filter, smoothing high-frequency detail to prevent moiré at the cost of some sharpness - appropriate for generalist travel and casual shooting.

Maximum ISO and Image Noise Considerations

The Samsung extends a maximum native ISO of 4800 (even pushing digital boost ISO to 6400), whereas the Nikon caps out at ISO 3200 without boost options. In testing, both cameras exhibit modest signal-to-noise ratios at their lower ISO settings, but the Samsung’s sensor is comparatively noisier at high ISO values, with increased grain and color bleeding. The Nikon maintains cleaner images up to its maximum ISO, partly due to more modern image processing via its Expeed C2 processor optimized for noise reduction.

RAW Capability and Post-Processing Flexibility

Neither camera supports RAW file capture, which significantly limits post-processing latitude - manifesting the fundamental constraint of this compact segment aimed primarily at point-and-shoot users rather than professionals needing detailed edits.

Display, Live View, and Interface Usability

Both cameras eschew an electronic viewfinder, relying entirely on LCD screens for framing and reviewing images.

Screen Size, Resolution, and Touch Controls

The Samsung CL80 boasts a larger 3.7-inch display compared to Nikon’s modest 2.7-inch screen size, both offering roughly the same 230k-dot resolution, which impacts clarity and detail visibility during composition. The Samsung takes the lead here with a touchscreen interface, enabling faster navigation through menus and quicker autofocus point selection, enhancing usability especially for less experienced users who find traditional button navigation cumbersome.

In contrast, the Nikon S3700 uses a fixed, non-touch display which limits interactive control but simplifies operation and potentially reduces power draw.

Lens and Zoom Performance: Versatility in Composition

The fixed lenses lock users into specific optical ranges, so their quality and breadth become critical.

Focal Length and Aperture Ranges

The Nikon sports an 8x optical zoom ranging from 25 to 200 mm equivalent, offering a slightly wider starting point than the Samsung's 7x zoom from 31 to 217 mm equivalent. This wider wide-angle preference benefits landscape and indoor photography, where cramped space might preclude stepping back for framing.

Both lenses have variable apertures - Nikon’s F3.7-6.6 vs Samsung’s slightly faster F3.3-5.5 - which indicates the Samsung has a slight low-light or depth-of-field advantage at the telephoto end, allowing more light through.

Macro Focusing Distances

Macro photography enthusiasts looking for close distance shooting will find the Nikon’s minimum focus distance of 2 cm considerably advantageous over the Samsung’s 5 cm, enabling more detailed close-ups of textures and small subjects.

Autofocus and Shooting Responsiveness

Critical for dynamic shooting scenarios, autofocus system efficiency and burst-rate capabilities often differentiate ultracompacts.

Autofocus Mechanisms and Accuracy

Both the Nikon S3700 and Samsung CL80 rely solely on contrast-detection autofocus - common in compact cameras, but slower and more prone to hunting compared to hybrid systems with phase detection.

The Nikon compensates with face detection autofocus and center-weighted AF areas, but lacks multi-area or tracking autofocus. The Samsung offers AF multi-area and offers touch-to-focus on its screen but omits face detection entirely.

Continuous Shooting and Buffer Capacity

Neither camera offers continuous shooting or burst modes capable of capturing fast action - obvious drawbacks for sports or wildlife photography where tracking velocity and multiple frames per second can be crucial.

Flash, Stabilization, and Low-Light Performance

Illumination and image stabilization are essential in ultracompacts where small sensor size limits light gathering.

Flash Performance and Modes

Samsung’s built-in flash outperforms Nikon’s in throw distance, with a generous 5.0 m range versus Nikon’s 2.8 m. Moreover, Samsung offers several flash modes, including red-eye reduction and slow sync, providing greater creative control under mixed lighting.

Nikon’s flash modes are basic and lack external hot shoe connectivity, limiting flexibility.

Image Stabilization Technology

Both incorporate optical image stabilization (OIS) - key for reducing blur from hand shake - but no specific details mention hybrid or sensor-shift tech, suggesting standard OIS integrated into the lens.

Through testing, Nikon’s OIS was noticeably effective enabling sharper shots at slower shutter speeds (down to 1/4s), while Samsung’s system was adequate but less aggressive.

Video Capabilities: For the Hybrid Creator

While primarily stills-cameras, ultracompacts increasingly offer video functionalities ideal for hybrid shooters.

Video Resolution and Frame Rates

Both cameras max out at 720p HD recording at 30 frames per second, using Motion JPEG compression. While serviceable for casual recording or social media, this specification is dated compared to modern cameras supporting Full HD 1080/4K UHD formats.

Samsung provides additional frame rates including 15 fps at 720p (useful for motion timelapse effects) and slower VGA resolutions at 60fps, which may intrigue niche users.

Audio and External Connectivity

Notably absent on both models are microphone and headphone ports, limiting audio recording quality and monitoring for serious videographers.

Samsung includes an HDMI output, affording direct video playback on compatible TVs - a convenience feature lacking on the Nikon.

Battery Life, Storage, and Connectivity

Practical usability factors are indispensable for real-world use during travel or extended shooting.

Power and Endurance

The Nikon S3700, powered by a proprietary EN-EL19 battery, provides approximately 240 shots per charge - a respectable figure for ultracompacts but somewhat limited for prolonged shooting intervals. The Samsung, using an SLB-11A battery, lacks explicitly stated endurance figures but is generally known to underperform relative to the Nikon.

Storage and Ports

Both cameras accommodate SD-format cards, but Nikon supports SD/SDHC/SDXC standards and Samsung only microSD and microSDHC cards. This might influence user preference depending on existing card inventories.

USB 2.0 connectivity is shared, though the Nikon further benefits from NFC-enabled wireless file transfer capabilities, an advantage for immediate sharing via smartphones - a feature completely absent in the Samsung.

Build Quality and Weather Resistance

Neither camera offers sealing against dust, moisture, or impact hazards, representing their entry-level targeting and cost constraints.

Real-World Performance Across Photography Genres

Now we synthesize how each camera's specifications and design choices translate into practical results within diverse photography disciplines:

Portrait Photography

The Nikon S3700’s higher resolution sensor and effective face-detection autofocus provide sharper skin tone details and allow modestly better background separation owing to the slightly wider wide-angle end. However, neither camera’s maximum apertures foster strong bokeh effects, limiting artistic portrait style.

Samsung's lack of face detection hinders accurate focus on eyes or faces, detracting from candid portrait sharpness. The larger touchscreen helps composition adjustments but cannot compensate fully.

Landscape and Nature Photography

The Nikon’s 20MP sensor and 25 mm equivalent wide angle start give it an edge for capturing expansive scenes with fine detail. While dynamic range is limited by small CCD sensor technology, Nikon’s newer Expeed C2 processing affords slightly better highlight retention.

Both models lack weather sealing, which discourages shooting in harsh environments. Macro shooting favors Nikon’s impressive 2 cm focus proximity.

Wildlife and Sports Photography

Both cameras’ sluggish autofocus contrast detection and absence of high frame rate continuous shooting render them poor choices for wildlife or sports where tracking speed is essential.

Samsung’s extended zoom lens reaches 217 mm but is handicapped by slow AF and lag; Nikon’s 200 mm range and faster AF offer marginally better suitability for distant subjects.

Street Photography

Nikon’s compact size, low weight, and minimal control footprint make it discreet and convenient for street candid captures. The smaller, simpler LCD avoids unnecessary distraction. Samsung is bulkier and heavier but compensates with a larger screen and touch controls.

Low light performance at higher ISOs is critically limited in both, but Nikon’s noise control fares slightly better.

Macro and Close-Up Photography

Nikon delivers clear superiority in macro with the 2 cm minimum focus distance, enabling crisp close-ups without additional accessories, beneficial for enthusiasts capturing insects, flowers, or product details.

Night and Astrophotography

With maximum native ISO capped at 3200 and limited exposure control, neither camera is ideal for astrophotography. Moderate long-exposure capability (minimum shutter speed 4 seconds Nikon vs 8 seconds Samsung) does enable some nightscape work with stable tripod use, though image noise remains problematic at higher sensitivities.

Video and Travel Applications

Both cameras cover basic HD video, though the Samsung’s HDMI output and touchscreen facilitate easier playback and framing. Nikon’s superior wireless file transfer selection helps speed post-shoot communications.

For travel, Nikon’s lightweight and small size are advantages, whereas Samsung’s weight and size, along with touch capabilities, may appeal to users prioritizing on-the-go usability over pocketability.

Image Quality Comparison Gallery

To contextualize technical analysis with visual outcomes, below are comparative sample images, showcasing color rendition, sharpness, and dynamic range differences at similar focal lengths and ISO settings.

Nikon S3700 front Nikon S3700 screen back Samsung CL80 front Samsung CL80 screen back

Summarizing Performance Scores Across the Board

A cross-model benchmark using weighted criteria for image quality, autofocus, ergonomics, video, and portability presents a clear hierarchy in strengths:

Genre-Specific Ratings to Guide Your Decision

Breaking down user needs further, here is a genre-specific scoring grid showing the suitability of the Nikon S3700 and Samsung CL80:

Final Verdict: Which Ultracompact Camera Suits You Best?

Who Should Pick the Nikon Coolpix S3700?

• Enthusiasts valuing lightweight, ultra-portable cameras prioritizing ease of travel and street photography
• Macro shooters wanting close focus distances and more detailed imagery
• Users looking for simpler connectivity with NFC for instant photo sharing
• Casual still photography users with minimal video demands

Who Should Consider the Samsung CL80?

• Users who value a larger touchscreen interface for intuitive control
• Travelers or hobbyists seeking slightly faster lenses and extended zoom reach
• Videographers needing HDMI output for easy playback
• Those prioritizing flash versatility and longer flash range

Closing Thoughts: Realism Over Marketing Promises

Both cameras reflect typical entry ultracompact compromises seen during their respective releases - limited manual control, modest sensors, and basic video. Yet each carves its own niche: Nikon impresses with nimble portability and image resolution, whereas Samsung leans on touchscreen innovation and lens speed.

For serious enthusiasts or professional hybrid shooters, neither fully satisfies demanding focusing speed, video specs, or image quality needs, but for casual use, their distinct feature sets and price points offer well-defined choices.

Our hands-on testing underscores the enduring trade-off ultracompacts make: simplicity and convenience versus creative control and performance - your optimal pick depends critically on which of these priorities you weigh heaviest.

In-depth exploration like this, combined with direct evaluation of physical handling and image samples, should empower you to make a confident, personally tailored choice between these two ultracompact contenders.