Nikon S570 vs Sony TF1
95 Imaging
34 Features
14 Overall
26
94 Imaging
39 Features
34 Overall
37
Nikon S570 vs Sony TF1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F2.7-6.6) lens
- 140g - 92 x 57 x 22mm
- Revealed August 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-100mm (F3.6-4.7) lens
- 152g - 102 x 62 x 23mm
- Introduced June 2013
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Nikon Coolpix S570 vs. Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TF1: A Compact Camera Throwdown for Everyday Shooters
Choosing a compact camera in today’s smartphone-saturated market can feel like a quest for a mythical beast. Yet, for those who crave a bit more control, zoom, or ruggedness than a phone offers, cameras like the Nikon Coolpix S570 and the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TF1 still hold relevance. Both hail from the compact segment but with distinct flavors - Nikon’s S570 leans towards traditional compact usability, while Sony’s TF1 aims squarely at the adventurous shooter with waterproofing and durability. Having spent considerable hands-on time testing, prodding, and shooting with each, let’s dive deep to see how these two stack up in today’s photography landscape.

First Impressions: Size, Build, and Handling - Comfort in Your Pocket
Looking at the physical dimensions and build quality, the Nikon Coolpix S570 measures a neat 92 x 57 x 22 mm, weighing in at a light 140 grams, making it genuinely pocket-friendly. The Sony TF1 is slightly larger and chunkier at 102 x 62 x 23 mm and 152 grams, which reflects its rugged build with environmental sealing.
When I first held them side by side, the Nikon felt a bit slick and utilitarian - typical of many lightweight compacts from that era, while the Sony offers a subtly grippier surface and a robust feel, hinting at its waterproof, dustproof, and shockproof credentials. For travelers or beach photographers, that little extra bulk might be a small price to pay for confidence against the elements.
Both models sport a 2.7-inch rear LCD (more on that in a bit), but neither has an electronic viewfinder - a drawback for bright daylight shooting. It’s worth noting neither uses a touchscreen except the Sony TF1, which offers touch commands, adding a modern convenience.
So in terms of everyday comfort, the Nikon wins points for slip-in-your-pocket portability, while the Sony TF1 caters to users who prioritize durability and outdoor resilience.

Controls and User Interface: How Do They Feel in Real Use?
Controlling a compact camera often boils down to how intuitive and responsive its buttons are, especially when time is of the essence.
The Nikon's top layout is sparse but straightforward. It has a power button, shutter release, and a zoom toggle aligned neatly. The fixed aperture and shutter speed controls mean you’re mostly shooting in program or automatic modes - no aperture priority or manual here. It responds well with a slight lag during zoom or capture, understandable with its older Expeed processor.
The Sony TF1 adopts a slightly different approach - it includes touch input on the rear LCD, and while it also sticks to mostly automatic exposure modes, the addition of face detection autofocus and live tracking adds layers of user-friendly automation. The control buttons are small yet well spaced, factoring in wet or gloved hands usage thanks to its rugged intent.
For someone who appreciates minimalist interfaces without fuss, the Nikon S570’s design is approachable and no-nonsense. But if you want a touch of modern convenience and advanced AF features, the Sony TF1 nudges ahead.
Sensor and Image Quality: The Heart of the Matter
Let’s geek out for a moment on sensors - both cameras sport a 1/2.3-inch CCD sensor measuring approximately 6.17 x 4.55 mm, covering an area around 28 mm². This size is pretty standard for compact cameras but naturally restrictive compared to larger APS-C or full-frame sensors. In both cases, this sensor size means moderate depth of field control and challenges with noise at higher ISOs.
The Nikon has a 12-megapixel resolution capped at 4000 x 3000 pixels, whereas the Sony bumps that up to 16 megapixels (4608 x 3456 pixels). More megapixels don't always mean better image quality - those smaller pixels can suffer in low light - but Sony’s sensor and image processing deliver noticeably crisper images with better detail rendition, especially when paired with its wider 25-100mm lens.
However, both feature an optical low-pass (anti-aliasing) filter, which reduces moiré but also softens images slightly - nothing unusual in compacts.
The Nikon uses an Expeed processor that handles JPEG processing but lacks RAW support entirely. Raw files would’ve allowed more creative flexibility in editing, something professionals will find limiting here.

Focusing Capabilities: Accuracy and Speed in the Field
With respect to autofocus, the Nikon S570 relies on contrast-detection AF only and offers single-shot AF without tracking or face detection. In practice, this means you point, half-press, and hope the camera locks focus quickly. For static subjects or bright conditions, it works adequately, but in dim light or with moving subjects, hunting becomes frequent.
The Sony TF1 shifts the experience by introducing face detection and autofocus tracking, albeit still contrast-detection based. This makes a visible difference when photographing people or pets - the camera holds focus longer and produces sharper images of moving subjects. Touch-to-focus on the TF1’s LCD adds another layer of control, which helps compose shots on the fly.
Neither camera offers manual focusing, which would be helpful for macro or creative work.
Zoom and Lenses: Range Versus Aperture Trade-offs
The Nikon’s 5x optical zoom lens spans 28-140mm equivalent, with an aperture range of f/2.7–6.6. This bright-ish wide end is great for snapshots or low-light indoor photos, though the tele end quickly darkens. Nikon’s lens optics are decent - sharp in the center, but softening at edges in telephoto, common in superzoom compacts.
Sony’s TF1 has a slightly shorter 4x zoom, 25-100mm equivalent, but offers a slightly faster maximum aperture at telephoto end, f/3.6-4.7, which improves its low-light tele performance. Remarkably, Sony’s lens allows macro focusing down to 1cm, beating the Nikon’s 3cm minimal focusing distance, meaning it’s better suited for close-up flower or bug photography.
Overall, Nikon offers more reach and wider wide-angle, while Sony balances zoom with faster aperture and better macro capabilities.
LCD Screens and Viewfinding: What You See Is What You Get
Both cameras sport 2.7-inch LCDs with a 4:3 aspect ratio, but resolution is a differentiating factor. Nikon’s screen is a modest 230k-dot fixed-display that’s functional but can be a strain in bright sunlight. On the other hand, Sony’s 460k-dot TFT LCD with touchscreen affords more vivid colors and improved visibility under various lighting conditions.
Lacking an electronic viewfinder on both models isn’t surprising given their compact scope, but this limits usability for those who prefer eye-level shooting - especially outdoors.

Shooting Modes and Video: Don’t Expect Hollywood, But Fun’s There
Both cameras target casual photography, and as such, they forego manual exposure controls. The Nikon S570 is essentially point-and-shoot - no shutter priority, no aperture priority, and no ISO adjustment beyond default auto. It captures HD video at 720p at 30fps with no external microphone input, adequate for casual clips but not videography projects.
The Sony TF1 matches video specs but encapsulates footage in Motion JPEG - less efficient, resulting in larger files. However, it offers built-in optical image stabilization, which gives smoother handheld video compared to the Nikon, which lacks stabilization entirely. This is a notable edge, especially for shaky or active shooting scenarios.
Battery Life and Storage: Practical Considerations on the Go
The Nikon’s battery data isn’t explicitly stated but uses the EN-EL10 rechargeable battery, which historically offers around 200 shots per charge under moderate use - arguably limited by today’s standards.
Sony’s TF1 comes with an NP-BN battery pack rated for approximately 240 shots per charge, slightly better. When traveling or shooting for extended periods, carrying spare batteries is advisable for both models.
Storage wise, both cameras accept SD/SDHC cards, but the Sony’s compatibility extends further to SDXC and even Memory Stick Duo/Pro variants, giving users flexibility depending on memory card preferences.
Toughness and Weatherproofing: Sony’s Waterproof Surprise
If there’s one standout factor for the Sony TF1, it’s the weather sealing - offering waterproof (up to 10 feet), dustproof, and shockproof capabilities. This makes it ideal for poolside adventures, beach trips, or hikes where the elements are a factor.
In contrast, the Nikon S570 is an indoor/outdoor camera but not ruggedized. No weather sealing means risk during rain or dusty conditions.
For those needing a camera that’s not precious around moderate abuse, the Sony TF1’s rugged features tip the scales.
Real-World Shooting Experiences Across Photography Types
Now, how do these translate into actual shoot results across genres? Let’s unpack this.
Portrait Photography: Capturing Skin and Soul
In portraiture, smooth skin tones, reliable eye detection, and pleasing bokeh matter.
The Nikon S570’s lack of face detection autofocus makes nailing focus slightly more manual and frustrating if subjects move unexpectedly. Its relatively narrow apertures at telephoto limit background blur, leading to flatter portraits.
Sony TF1’s face detection and tracking shine here, locking focus on eyes and faces more consistently. Its faster aperture aids subtle background separation, producing more flattering portraits. Skin tones are slightly warmer and better balanced, thanks to Sony’s well-tuned processing.
Neither camera offers RAW to fully finesse skin retouching, but for casual portraits, Sony offers a better experience.
Landscape Photography: Dynamic Range and Resolution
Landscape shooters prize resolution, wide angle, and dynamic range.
Sony’s extra 4 megapixels and brighter wide-angle (25mm versus Nikon’s 28mm) allow slightly more expansive framing and punchier details.
Neither camera features advanced HDR modes or RAW output, limiting exposure latitude. Their small sensors also cap dynamic range, leading to clipped highlights or crushed shadows in high-contrast scenes. Nikon’s sensor seems a touch less noisy at base ISO, but Sony’s superior resolution surfaces on closer inspections.
Neither camera is weather sealed (except Sony’s TF1), making Sony again preferable for outdoor landscapes prone to fog, moisture, or windblown debris.
Wildlife Photography: Speed and Reach
Both cameras are seriously challenged in wildlife scenarios. Their limited zoom (5x at best) isn’t enough for small or distant animals, and autofocus performance struggles with erratic movement.
Nikon’s slower, single-point AF is a liability here, while Sony’s face detect and tracking help only if animals come reasonably close and remain still.
Neither camera sports rapid burst modes - Nikon has no continuous shooting mode at all, Sony offers a sluggish 1 fps.
If wildlife is a priority, neither camera is ideal, but Sony’s stabilization and tracking give it a slight nod.
Sports Photography: Tracking and Frame Rates
Sports demand rapid autofocus and high fps burst rates to freeze action.
Sadly, both cameras are ill-suited: Nikon lacks continuous AF and burst shot; Sony’s single continuous shooting at 1 fps is too slow to capture meaningful action.
autofocus tracking systems fail to live up to professional needs, and shutter speeds max out at 1/4000s (Nikon) and 1/2000s (Sony), sufficient for most daylight scenes but insufficient for very fast motions in low light.
Street Photography: Stealth and Speed
Here, size, quick responsiveness, and subtle appearance count.
Nikon’s smaller body and quieter operation make it less conspicuous - an asset for candid street shots.
Sony’s chunkier frame and louder zoom motor can draw attention, but its quick autofocus tracking and touch UI aid composing shots fast.
Both lack an electronic viewfinder, making bright daylight shooting challenging, yet their compact sizes support casual use.
Ultimately, Nikon is marginally better if discreetness is paramount.
Macro Photography: Up Close and Personal
Sony’s 1cm macro capability significantly outperforms Nikon’s 3cm minimum.
Combined with stabilization and touchscreen focus point selection, Sony enables creative close-ups of insects and flowers that Nikon simply can’t pull off comfortably.
If macro is a big interest, Sony holds the advantage.
Night and Astrophotography: Low Light Challenges
Small sensors and lack of stabilization (in Nikon’s case) limit low-light performance.
Sony’s optical stabilization is a bonus, helping reduce blur from hand shake, but noise creeps in heavily above ISO 800 on both cameras.
Neither supports long exposures beyond 60 seconds (Nikon), and shutter speed tops out at 1/2000s on Sony, further limiting night shots or astro work.
Neither camera is designed for dedicated night photography, so long exposure enthusiasts should look elsewhere.
Video Capabilities: Casual Clips Only
Both capture HD (720p) video at 30fps but lack advanced features like external mic inputs, 4k, or waveform monitors.
Sony’s optical IS makes for smoother handheld video, a boon over Nikon’s jitter-prone footage.
Clarity is serviceable for casual family videos or quick web clips, but professionals will find these insufficient.
Travel Photography: Versatility and Battery Life
Sony TF1’s ruggedness and multi-format card support make it a robust travel companion, backed by decent battery life.
Nikon’s lighter build and smaller size also appeal for pack weight-conscious travelers but lack robustness and stabilization.
Sony’s touchscreen and improved autofocus assist in quick shooting - the kind needed when sightseeing.
Professional Use: Not Their Intended Market
Neither camera offers RAW support, robust manual controls, or dual card slots needed for professional reliability.
They’re ideal as casual backups but should not replace dedicated professional gear.
Technical Summary and Scoring
To put it all in perspective, here’s a quick comparative rating based on key performance areas from my hands-on tests and industry benchmarks:
| Performance Area | Nikon S570 | Sony TF1 |
|---|---|---|
| Build and Ergonomics | 3/5 (lightweight) | 4/5 (ruggedized) |
| Image Quality | 3/5 (12MP CCD) | 3.5/5 (16MP CCD) |
| Autofocus Speed/Accuracy | 2.5/5 (basic AF) | 3.5/5 (face detect) |
| Zoom and Macro | 3.5/5 (5x zoom) | 3.5/5 (4x zoom + macro) |
| Low Light Performance | 2.5/5 (no IS) | 3/5 (optical IS) |
| Video | 2.5/5 (720p only) | 3/5 (720p + IS) |
| Battery and Storage | 3/5 | 3.5/5 |
| Overall Versatility | 3/5 | 3.5/5 |
Genre-Specific Performance: What Each Camera Does Best
Let’s zoom in on how they fare across popular photographic styles:
| Genre | Nikon S570 | Sony TF1 |
|---|---|---|
| Portrait | Adequate but limited AF | Better face detect AF+ |
| Landscape | Decent resolution, limited DR | Higher res, weather sealed |
| Wildlife | Poor AF and zoom | Modest AF advantages |
| Sports | Slow burst, weak AF | Slightly better AF but slow |
| Street | Compact, discreet | Rugged, quick AF |
| Macro | Limited close focus | Excellent macro capability |
| Night/Astro | Poor ISO, no IS | IS helps but sensor limited |
| Video | Basic 720p, no stabilization | 720p with optical IS |
| Travel | Lightweight but delicate | Rugged with more power |
| Professional | Not recommended | Not recommended |
Final Recommendations: Who Should Choose Which?
Pick the Nikon Coolpix S570 if:
- Your priority is lightweight, easy pocket portability for casual snapshots.
- You rarely shoot in challenging weather or environments.
- You’re content with basic automatic exposure and simple point-and-shoot usage.
- Your budget favors a more affordable, entry-level compact camera.
- You don’t need video stabilization or macro close-ups.
Opt for the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TF1 if:
- You want a rugged, weatherproof camera suited for travel and outdoor adventures.
- You value better autofocus automation (especially face detection) and touchscreen control.
- Macro shooting matters - the 1cm focus range is a big plus.
- You appreciate optical stabilization for video and low-light stills.
- You can accept a slightly bigger and heavier camera for these benefits.
Wrapping It Up: Compact Cameras - Still Worth It?
After pushing both cameras hard, it’s clear that while smartphone cameras have leapt forward, compact cameras like the Nikon S570 and Sony TF1 still carve out niches - one prioritizing portability, the other ruggedness. Both have limitations: small sensors, lack of manual controls, and relatively basic video capabilities.
But if your photographic ambitions align with simple, fun, and occasionally demanding situations - waterproof snaps by the pool or lightweight city strolls - they deliver respectable results for casual novices or enthusiasts on a budget.
Considering the Sony TF1’s relatively newer debut (2013 vs. 2009), it benefits from modest technological leaps, like face detect and stabilization. Nonetheless, neither is truly designed for serious enthusiasts or pro work.
For most, I recommend shooting with what feels good in your hand and matches your lifestyle. And if you’re torn, ask yourself: Do I need rugged reliability or simple portability more? Your answer will guide you true.
Thanks for tagging along on this compact camera matchup - I hope my real-world insights help you navigate your next photography choice with confidence.
Happy shooting!
Nikon S570 vs Sony TF1 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S570 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TF1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Nikon | Sony |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix S570 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TF1 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2009-08-04 | 2013-06-21 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Expeed | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.7-6.6 | f/3.6-4.7 |
| Macro focusing range | 3cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 2.7" |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT LCD display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 2 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 1.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 3.90 m |
| Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Advanced Flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 140 grams (0.31 pounds) | 152 grams (0.34 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 92 x 57 x 22mm (3.6" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 102 x 62 x 23mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 shots |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | EN-EL10 | NP-BN |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $180 | $266 |