Nikon S6300 vs Samsung WB850F

Here, we will be evaluating the Nikon S6300 vs Samsung WB850F, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Nikon and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the S6300 (16MP) and the WB850F (16MP) is relatively comparable and both cameras offer the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The S6300 was unveiled very close to the WB850F and they are both of a similar age. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before going straight to a full comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the S6300 scores versus the WB850F in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Nikon Coolpix S6300 & Samsung WB850F. The full galleries are available at Nikon S6300 Gallery & Samsung WB850F Gallery.

If you're aiming to lug around your camera, you will want to think about its weight and size. The Nikon S6300 comes with outer measurements of 94mm x 58mm x 26mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB850F has specifications of 109mm x 62mm x 25mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 250 grams (0.55 lbs).

Check the Nikon S6300 vs Samsung WB850F in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilising at that time. The following is a front view size comparison of the S6300 against the WB850F.

Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the S6300 and WB850F is 94 and 91 respectively.

Oftentimes, it can be hard to envision the contrast in sensor measurements simply by checking out specifications. The visual underneath should give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the S6300 and WB850F.

Plainly, the two cameras come with the identical sensor size and the exact same resolution and you can expect comparable quality of files although you should consider the age of the cameras into account.