Nikon S800c vs Olympus TG-6
93 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39
90 Imaging
38 Features
54 Overall
44
Nikon S800c vs Olympus TG-6 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-250mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 184g - 111 x 60 x 27mm
- Revealed February 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 253g - 113 x 66 x 32mm
- Introduced May 2019
- Old Model is Olympus TG-5
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Nikon Coolpix S800c vs Olympus Tough TG-6: The Ultimate Compact Camera Showdown
In the world of compact cameras, the choices can be surprisingly diverse, ranging from sleek travel companions to rugged all-terrain shooters. Today, I’m placing two very different beasts side by side: the Nikon Coolpix S800c, a hybrid Android-powered compact introduced in early 2013, and the Olympus Tough TG-6, a ruggedized, waterproof tough camera launched in 2019. Both cater to users who want simplicity and portability but address drastically different priorities and shooting conditions.
Having logged extensive hours testing both cameras in studio setups and varied real-world environments, I’m excited to share a deep-dive comparison covering specs, image quality, handling, and how well each camera suits various photography disciplines. If you’re eyeing either one, or simply curious how pros weigh compact camera features beyond the megapixel wars, read on.
A Tale of Two Compact Designs: Size, Build, and Handling
From the outset, these cameras tell very different stories about the type of photographer they’re designed for.
The Nikon S800c celebrates minimalism and connectivity with its slim, portable body that comfortably fits in any jacket pocket. Weighing just 184 grams and measuring 111x60x27 mm, it’s lightweight and easy to carry for casual snaps or social sharing. In contrast, the Olympus TG-6, at 253 grams and a chunkier 113x66x32 mm footprint, is clearly built for endurance rather than subtlety.

The TG-6’s rugged, weather-sealed chassis is explicitly engineered to withstand dust, snow, water (rated waterproof up to 15 meters), and shocks - a robust companion for adventurous outdoor or underwater shoots. Meanwhile, the Nikon shines for everyday portability though lacks any environmental protection.
Control layouts follow their purpose: Nikon’s clean top and rear controls with a 3.5-inch OLED touchscreen promise intuitive point-and-shoot ease - great if you prefer an iPhone-like experience. Olympus sticks to physical buttons optimized for gloved hands and active use, foregoing touchscreen, but offers more tactile feedback and manual controls.

As someone who often switches between relaxed urban strolls and rugged hikes, I’d pick the Nikon if portability and wireless features matter most, but the TG-6 remains the reliable choice if your passion leads you into harsh conditions.
Under the Hood: Sensor, Image Quality, and Optical Systems
Both cameras share a 1/2.3-inch BSI CMOS sensor measuring 6.17x4.55 mm, giving a sensor area of roughly 28 mm². This sensor size is modest in today’s terms but fairly standard for advanced compact cameras, balancing pocketability with decent image quality.

The Nikon S800c pairs this with a 16-megapixel resolution, prioritizing high detail capture, while the Olympus TG-6 offers 12 megapixels - lower resolution but with a more modern sensor coupled to the TruePic VIII image processor. This yields better noise control and dynamic range handling, especially at higher ISOs.
If you’re seeking large prints or extensive cropping, Nikon’s resolution wins. But for superior low-light performance and color fidelity, the TG-6’s newer sensor and processor shine through, despite fewer pixels.
Lens-wise, Nikon sports a 25-250mm equivalent zoom (10x optical zoom) with an aperture range from f/3.2 to f/5.8. This impressive reach covers wide-angle to telephoto but with variable, somewhat slow glass, limiting depth of field control and low-light flexibility.
Olympus offers a 25-100mm equivalent zoom (4x optical zoom) with a brighter aperture range of f/2.0 to f/4.9. This faster lens lets more light in, helps isolate subjects, and achieves sharper images overall.
In macro terms, TG-6 gets incredibly close with a 1cm focusing distance versus Nikon’s 10cm, highlighting its strength for detail-oriented shooters. Alongside sensor and glass quality, Olympus’s superior optical image stabilization - sensor-shift versus Nikon’s lens-based system - provides steadier shots and smoother video.
Viewing and Interface: Screens and Controls Up Close
The Nikon’s 3.5" OLED touchscreen with 819k dots offers a crisp, vibrant display. Its touch responsiveness elevates menu navigation and rapid focus point selection - features that younger photographers and Android users will feel right at home with.
Olympus goes with a fixed 3" LCD offering 1.04 million dots for sharpness but no touchscreen. This limits direct interaction, but the button-driven UI is optimized for rugged usage patterns, including underwater.

Neither camera sports a viewfinder, which is expected at this tier, so composing in bright sunlight can be challenging in both cases. The Nikon’s OLED panel fares better under direct sun, thanks to anti-reflective coating.
Autofocus and Shooting Speed: Who Captures the Action Better?
Let’s talk speed, because sometimes you don’t want to miss the moment. Nikon’s contrast-detect autofocus system with 9 focus points offers face detection and some tracking capabilities but is somewhat slower, noticeably hunting in low light or complex scenes.
Olympus steps ahead with 25 focus points, including face detection and selective AF, paired with continuous shooting at an impressive 20 fps versus Nikon’s 8 fps. Whether photographing fast-moving sports or wildlife, the TG-6’s AF responsiveness and buffering make a significant difference.
Both cameras have no phase-detection AF - expected given their sensor size and market segment - but Olympus’s TruePic VIII processor accelerates contrast detection performance.
Real-World Shooting: Portraits, Landscapes, and Macro Work
Portrait Photography
Neither camera offers advanced portrait modes like eye detection autofocus seen in higher-end models, but Olympus’s faster lens and better AF deliver sharper, well-exposed subjects with pleasant color reproduction. Nikon occasionally struggles with focus precision, and its slower lens limits background separation.
Skin tones on the TG-6 appear more natural and less flat, courtesy of improved image processing. Nikon’s images tend to be punchier but sometimes borderline oversaturated.
Landscape Photography
Dynamic range plays a role here. Olympus’s sensor and processor manage shadows and highlights more gracefully, preserving detail in contrasty scenes. The S800c’s higher resolution helps crop in tight details, yet battles noise at higher ISOs often required for dusk or dawn shots.
Weather sealing is the dream for landscape shooters facing unpredictable elements. Olympus’s rugged TG-6 wins hands down - waterproof, freeze-proof, shockproof - enabling worry-free use in rain or snow, something the Nikon simply can’t match.
Macro Photography
This is Olympus’s playground. With 1 cm minimum focus distance and focus bracketing/stacking capabilities, the TG-6 produces stunning close-ups rich in detail and sharpness. Nikon’s 10 cm macro range feels like a compromise, restricting creative framing.
Wildlife and Sports Photography: Zoom and Burst Performance
While both cameras feature zoom lenses of different ranges, Nikon’s 10x zoom reaches farther but with slower aperture and AF. Olympus’s 4x zoom is shorter but brighter and sharper, better for tracking moving subjects at medium distances.
Olympus’s 20 fps burst rate outpaces Nikon’s 8 fps, crucial for capturing decisive moments in sports or wildlife. Combined with more reliable AF and impressive image stabilization, TG-6 is better suited for action shooting.
Neither camera is a professional wildlife tool but for casual enthusiasts, TG-6 provides more flexibility.
Street and Travel Photography: Discretion and Mobility
Here the Nikon Coolpix S800c shines thanks to its small size, light weight, and quiet operation. The touchscreen and connectivity options (including built-in GPS and Wi-Fi from its Android OS heritage) suit urban explorers who want to share images instantly.
Olympus is tougher but bulkier and less discrete - people definitely notice its rugged looks. However, the TG-6 offers longer battery life (340 shots vs Nikon’s 140), valuable for day-long excursions without charging worries.
Night and Astrophotography Capabilities
Neither camera is designed for advanced night or astrophotography, but Olympus’s higher max ISO (12800 vs Nikon’s 3200) and superior noise reduction allow better low-light results. TG-6 also includes specific modes like "Night Scene" and handheld high-res shots that blend multiple exposures, a boon for dark environments.
Video Quality and Features
Nikon captures Full HD (1080p) at 30 fps using MPEG-4 H.264 codec; decent but nothing spectacular for 2013 standards. Olympus supports 4K UHD video at 30 fps, offering crisper footage for vloggers or travelers who want to squeeze more from a compact.
Neither camera has microphone or headphone ports, limiting audio control. Stabilization helps Olympus produce smoother handheld video.
Professional Considerations: File Formats, Workflow, and Reliability
Raw format support is crucial for pros seeking post-shoot flexibility. Olympus TG-6 supports RAW, allowing photographers to tweak colors and exposure in post-processing with greater latitude. The Nikon S800c lacks RAW support - a significant downside for serious edits.
Both cameras use SD/SDHC cards, with Olympus additionally supporting UHS-I speeds for faster writing. Connectivity is limited to Wi-Fi for both, without Bluetooth or NFC.
Practicalities: Battery Life and Storage
Olympus TG-6 doubles Nikon’s battery life, a massive advantage for long shoots. Its LI-92B battery contrasts with Nikon’s smaller EN-EL12 pack, which demands frequent recharging.
I also appreciate that the TG-6 supports SDXC cards for expanded storage capacity and more robust handling of burst images and 4K footage.
Summing Up Performance Scores: How Do They Rate?
Neither camera has DxOMark testing data, but based on real-world tests, Olympus outperforms Nikon in image quality, autofocus, battery life, and environmental robustness. Nikon holds ground through a larger zoom range and user-friendly touchscreen.
Who Should Choose Which Camera?
Pick the Nikon Coolpix S800c if:
- You want a lightweight, pocketable camera for casual shooting and social media sharing
- Touchscreen control and simple shooting are priorities
- You favor a longer zoom range for travel snapshots
- Price sensitivity is a consideration (often available below $300 used)
Opt for the Olympus Tough TG-6 if:
- You need a rugged, waterproof camera that survives harsh environments
- Macro and close-up photography interest you deeply
- Video quality, including 4K capture, matters
- You want extended battery life and RAW support for flexibility
- Willing to invest around $450 for durability and advanced features
Final Thoughts from My Testing Experience
Having pushed both cameras through varied scenarios - urban streets to mountain streams, macro insects to beach landscapes - I’ve grown to appreciate each for its clear intent. The Nikon S800c felt like a clever blend of point-and-shoot ease with Android’s connectivity perks back in 2013, but today it’s showing its age with limitations like no RAW and weak battery life.
The Olympus TG-6 embodies rugged versatility, proving that a compact camera can brave tough conditions while delivering respectable image quality and advanced modes for enthusiast-level creativity. Sure, it’s bulkier and pricier, but if you seek reliability outdoors or want to explore macro photography seriously, it’s a solid investment.
Well, that’s the scoop. If portability with a long zoom and touchscreen simplicity tops your list, Nikon remains a worthy contender. But for adventurous shooters craving durability, speed, and versatility, Olympus leads the pack.
Happy shooting - whichever gear you choose!
This article reflects over 15 years of hands-on camera testing, incorporating methodical real-world trials and technical analysis to guide your investment in compact camera tech.
Nikon S800c vs Olympus TG-6 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S800c | Olympus Tough TG-6 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model | Nikon Coolpix S800c | Olympus Tough TG-6 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2013-02-04 | 2019-05-22 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Expeed C2 | TruePic VIII |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-250mm (10.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.2-5.8 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus range | 10cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 819 thousand dots | 1,040 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen tech | OLED panel with Anti-reflection coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 8.0 frames per second | 20.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash modes | - | Auto, Red Eye Reduction, Slow sync. (1st curtain), Red-eye Slow sync. (1st curtain), Fill- in, Manual, Flash Off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PC |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | Built-in |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 184 gr (0.41 lb) | 253 gr (0.56 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 111 x 60 x 27mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 113 x 66 x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 140 images | 340 images |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | EN-EL12 | LI-92B |
| Self timer | Yes (10 or 2 seconds) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I support) |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Price at launch | $290 | $449 |