Nikon S9900 vs Olympus TG-5
88 Imaging
40 Features
60 Overall
48
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5e954/5e9542d25784543caa76545ef74cff6b508f001c" alt="Nikon Coolpix S9900 front Nikon Coolpix S9900 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fc813/fc8134ea9f51e0bc25338134034432ddfb8d8548" alt="Olympus Tough TG-5 front Olympus Tough TG-5 front"
90 Imaging
38 Features
51 Overall
43
Nikon S9900 vs Olympus TG-5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-750mm (F3.7-6.4) lens
- 289g - 112 x 66 x 40mm
- Announced February 2015
- Previous Model is Nikon S9700
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Raise to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 250g - 113 x 66 x 32mm
- Revealed May 2017
- Superseded the Olympus TG-4
- Replacement is Olympus TG-6
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Nikon S9900 vs Olympus TG-5 Overview
On this page, we will be comparing the Nikon S9900 vs Olympus TG-5, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Waterproof by brands Nikon and Olympus. There exists a huge gap among the resolutions of the S9900 (16MP) and TG-5 (12MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The S9900 was announced 3 years prior to the TG-5 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving into a more detailed comparison, here is a brief summary of how the S9900 matches up versus the TG-5 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Nikon S9900 vs Olympus TG-5 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Nikon Coolpix S9900 and Olympus Tough TG-5. The whole galleries are available at Nikon S9900 Gallery and Olympus TG-5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S9900 over the Olympus TG-5
S9900 | TG-5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen resolution | 921k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper screen (+461k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-5 over the Nikon S9900
TG-5 | S9900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | May 2017 | ![]() | February 2015 | Newer by 27 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | More accurate focus |
Common features in the Nikon S9900 and Olympus TG-5
S9900 | TG-5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen measurements |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | No Touch friendly screen |
Nikon S9900 vs Olympus TG-5 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to travel with your camera regularly, you will want to think about its weight and size. The Nikon S9900 comes with outside measurements of 112mm x 66mm x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") having a weight of 289 grams (0.64 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-5 has specifications of 113mm x 66mm x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") having a weight of 250 grams (0.55 lbs).
See the Nikon S9900 vs Olympus TG-5 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you use at that time. Following is a front view over all size comparison of the S9900 and the TG-5.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a9a8c/a9a8c0fec13f5f9c92d90c913187791793c8a294" alt="Nikon S9900 vs Olympus TG-5 size comparison Nikon S9900 vs Olympus TG-5 size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the S9900 and TG-5 is 88 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/61224/6122455e46e6e53dc866a5022288533a0c7a7eb8" alt="Nikon S9900 vs Olympus TG-5 top view buttons comparison Nikon S9900 vs Olympus TG-5 top view buttons comparison"
Nikon S9900 vs Olympus TG-5 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is hard to envision the contrast in sensor dimensions just by looking through a spec sheet. The image underneath will offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the S9900 and TG-5.
As you can see, the two cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same MP. You should expect the Nikon S9900 to result in extra detail with its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots more aggressively. The more aged S9900 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/45c18/45c1841a6a69d5ad34af360d55619a7a59f5b415" alt="Nikon S9900 vs Olympus TG-5 sensor size comparison Nikon S9900 vs Olympus TG-5 sensor size comparison"
Nikon S9900 vs Olympus TG-5 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9319d/9319ddd005f7fff7ecdb591ff0476e87ebd2ea0c" alt="Nikon S9900 vs Olympus TG-5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Nikon S9900 vs Olympus TG-5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Nikon S9900 vs Olympus TG-5 Specifications
Nikon Coolpix S9900 | Olympus Tough TG-5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Nikon | Olympus |
Model | Nikon Coolpix S9900 | Olympus Tough TG-5 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
Announced | 2015-02-10 | 2017-05-17 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | TruePic VIII |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Min boosted ISO | - | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-750mm (30.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.7-6.4 | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 921 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 4 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 7.0 frames/s | 20.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) | - |
Flash options | - | Auto, redeye reduction, slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill, manual, off |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (30p, 25p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | Built-in |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 289 grams (0.64 lbs) | 250 grams (0.55 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 112 x 66 x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") | 113 x 66 x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 images | 340 images |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | EN-EL19 | LI-92B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch price | $300 | $449 |