Nikon S9900 vs Pentax XG-1
88 Imaging
41 Features
60 Overall
48
66 Imaging
41 Features
37 Overall
39
Nikon S9900 vs Pentax XG-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-750mm (F3.7-6.4) lens
- 289g - 112 x 66 x 40mm
- Launched February 2015
- Superseded the Nikon S9700
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1248mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 567g - 119 x 89 x 98mm
- Introduced July 2014
Nikon S9900 vs Pentax XG-1 Overview
Here is a detailed analysis of the Nikon S9900 vs Pentax XG-1, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by competitors Nikon and Pentax. The sensor resolution of the S9900 (16MP) and the XG-1 (16MP) is relatively similar and they possess the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Apple patent reveals improved iPhone camera durabilityThe S9900 was brought out 7 months later than the XG-1 and they are both of a similar age. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Nikon S9900 being a Compact camera and the Pentax XG-1 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before going through a in depth comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the S9900 grades vs the XG-1 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Nikon S9900 vs Pentax XG-1 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Nikon Coolpix S9900 & Pentax XG-1. The entire galleries are viewable at Nikon S9900 Gallery & Pentax XG-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S9900 over the Pentax XG-1
S9900 | XG-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2015 | July 2014 | Fresher by 7 months | |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen resolution | 921k | 460k | Crisper screen (+461k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Pentax XG-1 over the Nikon S9900
XG-1 | S9900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More exact focusing |
Common features in the Nikon S9900 and Pentax XG-1
S9900 | XG-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen measurement | |
Touch screen | Neither offers Touch screen |
Nikon S9900 vs Pentax XG-1 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry your camera regularly, you will want to take into account its weight and volume. The Nikon S9900 offers outer dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") along with a weight of 289 grams (0.64 lbs) whilst the Pentax XG-1 has sizing of 119mm x 89mm x 98mm (4.7" x 3.5" x 3.9") accompanied by a weight of 567 grams (1.25 lbs).
Take a look at the Nikon S9900 vs Pentax XG-1 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are working with during that time. The following is the front view physical size comparison of the S9900 against the XG-1.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the S9900 and XG-1 is 88 and 66 respectively.
Nikon S9900 vs Pentax XG-1 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be tough to imagine the gap between sensor sizing simply by going over technical specs. The visual here should give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the S9900 and XG-1.
As you have seen, both of those cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the identical resolution and you can expect similar quality of files however you should really factor the age of the products into consideration. The fresher S9900 provides an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
Nikon S9900 vs Pentax XG-1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Nikon S9900 vs Pentax XG-1 Specifications
Nikon Coolpix S9900 | Pentax XG-1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Nikon | Pentax |
Model | Nikon Coolpix S9900 | Pentax XG-1 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2015-02-10 | 2014-07-15 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-750mm (30.0x) | 24-1248mm (52.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.7-6.4 | f/2.8-5.6 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 921 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 200 thousand dot |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 8s | 4s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 7.0 frames per sec | 9.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) | 6.00 m |
Flash settings | - | Force Off, Flash Auto, Force Flash, Slow Sync., Slow Sync. + Red-Eye, Red-Eye Reduction |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (30p, 25p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 289g (0.64 lbs) | 567g (1.25 lbs) |
Dimensions | 112 x 66 x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") | 119 x 89 x 98mm (4.7" x 3.5" x 3.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photographs | 240 photographs |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | EN-EL19 | LB-060 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $300 | $599 |