Nikon S9900 vs Sony S930
88 Imaging
40 Features
60 Overall
48


94 Imaging
32 Features
17 Overall
26
Nikon S9900 vs Sony S930 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-750mm (F3.7-6.4) lens
- 289g - 112 x 66 x 40mm
- Announced February 2015
- Succeeded the Nikon S9700
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.4" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 320 x 240 video
- 38-108mm (F2.9-5.4) lens
- 167g - 90 x 61 x 26mm
- Revealed January 2009

Nikon Coolpix S9900 vs Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S930: A Hands-On Comparison for Discerning Photographers
Choosing the right compact camera can be a tricky endeavor, especially when balancing features, image quality, and real-world usability. Having tested thousands of cameras over 15 years, I’ve spent considerable time with both the Nikon Coolpix S9900 and the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S930. In this in-depth comparison, I’ll guide you through each model’s strengths and limitations - across diverse photography styles and technical capabilities - to help you make an informed purchase decision tailored to your photographic ambitions.
Getting to Know the Contenders: Physical Design and Build
When I first held these two cameras side by side, the contrast in their design philosophies became immediately obvious. The Nikon S9900 is a large-bodied superzoom compact, while the Sony S930 is a smaller, entry-level point-and-shoot.
The Nikon S9900 is notably chunkier, measuring 112x66x40 mm and weighing 289g. Its robust feel aligns with the superzoom class, and the comfortable grip helps during extended handheld shooting sessions - a feature I personally appreciate when trekking on landscape or wildlife shoots. The camera’s controls are more traditionally laid out, favoring seasoned users who prefer tactile dials and buttons.
Conversely, the Sony S930 is more pocketable, with dimensions of 90x61x26 mm and weighing just 167g - light enough to slip into a jacket pocket, making it an ideal travel companion for casual shooters. Its minimalistic design speaks to convenience but sacrifices some ergonomic comfort during longer shoots or in demanding conditions.
Both cameras are constructed predominantly from plastic, lacking any environmental sealing - a downside for outdoor photographers needing ruggedness. Neither boasts waterproofing or shock resistance; neither is designed for harsh conditions.
Bottom line: If size and comfort during longer use matter, the Nikon has an ergonomic edge. For spontaneity and ultra-portability, the Sony is beneficial.
Control and Interface: What’s Under Your Fingers
Ergonomics extend beyond size and weight - how a camera feels in your hands and how intuitive its controls are can make or break your shooting experience.
The Nikon S9900 features a more extensive control set, including manual exposure modes (shutter priority, aperture priority, full manual), exposure compensation, and various autofocus options. This affords creative flexibility that I’ve found enhances the capacity to capture fine detail or execute specialized techniques like long exposure landscapes or action shots.
In contrast, the Sony S930 offers a simplified interface with fewer controls and manual overrides. There’s no shutter priority, aperture priority, or manual exposure mode. This reflects its budget-friendly, beginner-oriented positioning, which could feel limiting for users who want to push creative boundaries.
One point I want to emphasize from my testing: the Nikon’s fully articulated 3-inch, 921k-dot LCD screen is a joy in variable shooting angles and self-portraiture, whereas the Sony’s fixed 2.4-inch, 112k-dot screen feels cramped and dim, jeopardizing composition and review accuracy, particularly under challenging lighting.
Tip: An articulated screen is invaluable when shooting at awkward angles - whether for street photography crouching at waist level or macro images of insects near the ground.
Sensor and Image Quality: More Than Just Megapixels
The heart of any camera is its sensor - the image quality linchpin.
Both cameras share a 1/2.3-inch sensor size, measuring approximately 6.17x4.55 mm with an area of 28.07 mm². However, they adopt different sensor technologies:
- Nikon S9900: 16MP CMOS sensor, max native ISO 6400
- Sony S930: 10MP CCD sensor, max native ISO 3200
In my extensive practical assessment, CMOS sensors typically deliver better noise performance, dynamic range, and readout speeds compared to CCDs - especially noticeable in higher ISO settings and video.
Image Resolution & Detail:
The Nikon’s higher 16MP resolution enables larger print sizes and more cropping flexibility without significant quality loss. The Sony’s 10MP output, while sufficient for casual snapshots, limits large-format printing and post-processing latitude.
Noise and Low Light:
The Nikon’s ISO ceiling of 6400 provides a better noise control buffer, yielding usable images in dim environments. The Sony’s maximum 3200 ISO produces grainier images sooner, impacting night or interior shooting.
Color Reproduction and Dynamic Range:
While both cameras employ an anti-aliasing filter and center-weighted metering, the Nikon’s multisegment metering and active face detection afford more accurate exposure and color fidelity. The Sony, lacking face detection, often requires manual compensation to avoid underexposed highlights or muted skin tones.
Autofocus Performance: Speed Meets Precision
From my experience photographing sports and wildlife, autofocus performance is vital. It’s the difference between bagging that perfect moment or missing it altogether.
Nikon S9900:
- Continuous autofocus
- Facedetection-enabled
- Contrast-detection system
- Selective and multiple AF areas
Sony S930:
- Single AF only
- No face detection
- 9 AF points, contrast detection
The Nikon’s continuous and face-detection autofocus system is appreciably faster and more accurate, particularly in tracking movement - a boon in street photography or wildlife sequences. The Sony’s slower, single-shot AF made it challenging to lock focus on moving subjects under dynamic conditions.
Burst Rate and Buffer:
The Nikon outpaces the Sony with 7 fps continuous shooting, doubling the Sony’s 2 fps. Although both have modest buffers, the Nikon gives better action shooting opportunities.
Lens and Zoom: Ranges Tailored for Different Needs
Lens versatility often dictates a camera’s appeal.
- Nikon S9900: Fixed 25-750 mm (30x) superzoom, max aperture F3.7-6.4
- Sony S930: Fixed 38-108 mm (2.8x) zoom, max aperture F2.9-5.4
Let me put it plainly: The Nikon’s 30x zoom offers outstanding reach for wildlife, landscape detail, and distant subjects. During my field tests, this long reach allowed me to photograph craggy mountain peaks and shy birds from afar without disturbing the scene - something impossible with the Sony’s narrow zoom.
However, the softer maximum aperture at telephoto (F6.4) means less light gathering at the long end compared to the Sony’s relatively brighter telephoto max aperture.
The Sony’s brighter aperture at wide-angle offers advantages indoors and in low-light conditions, albeit with very limited zoom range, restricting utility to casual snapshots.
Real-World Performance and Use Cases
Let’s break down how these cameras perform in specific photography disciplines based on my professional tests.
Portrait Photography
When shooting portraits, skin tone rendering and bokeh quality are paramount.
- Nikon’s 16MP sensor and face-detection AF produced pleasing skin tones with natural color gradations. The long zoom offered some pleasing compression, but the lens aperture limited shallow depth-of-field bokeh effects.
- Sony struggled with subtle skin tone nuances due to lower resolution and no face detection. The brighter F2.9 aperture allowed more background blur at wide-angle but zoom length was restrictive.
Winner: Nikon, for autofocus precision and image fidelity.
Landscape Photography
Landscape photography demands high resolution, wide dynamic range, and weather resilience.
- Neither camera is weather-sealed, but the Nikon’s higher resolution and 30x zoom enabled breathtaking landscape framing. Its slower shutter speeds (down to 8 seconds) allowed effective long exposures to smooth waterfalls.
- Sony’s lower resolution and limited zoom let it down, plus no weather sealing restricted outdoor use.
Winner: Nikon hands down for landscapes.
Wildlife Photography
Action-packed, often requiring telephoto reach and rapid focus.
- Nikon with its 30x zoom, 7fps burst, and tracking AF excels at distant wildlife.
- Sony’s 2x zoom and slower AF meant missed shots.
Winner: Clear cut Nikon for wildlife.
Sports Photography
High frame rates and reliable focus tracking are essential.
- Nikon’s 7fps burst and continuous AF provide competent performance in casual sports.
- Sony’s 2fps and single AF point make it unsuitable.
Winner: Nikon.
Street Photography
This genre benefits from portability and discretion.
- Sony’s compact, lightweight build made it ideal for candid, unobtrusive shooting.
- Nikon’s size is a drawback here, though its articulated screen aids creative angles.
Winner: Sony for discreet street shooting.
Macro Photography
Closely capturing small subjects with precision.
- Nikon’s 1 cm macro focus is exceptional, combined with stabilization for handheld close-ups.
- Sony macro starts at 5 cm, less ideal for extreme close-ups.
Winner: Nikon.
Night and Astro Photography
Sensitive ISO performance and exposure modes enable creative night photos.
- Nikon’s ISO 6400 ceiling and exposure compensation/manual modes made night shots feasible.
- Sony’s ISO 3200 max and lack of manual control limited night photography.
Winner: Nikon.
Video Capabilities
Both cameras offer video, but the Nikon supports Full HD 1080p at multiple frame rates and H.264 codec, while Sony shoots VGA at 320x240 only.
Winner: Nikon for video versatility and quality.
Travel Photography
Looking for a balance: size, battery life, zoom, and connectivity.
- Nikon's extended zoom and built-in GPS and wireless connectivity simplify travel documentation.
- Sony is lighter but lacks wireless and GPS.
Winner: Nikon overall, but Sony is good for light packers.
Professional Work
Workflow compatibility and file formats matter.
- Neither camera shoots RAW, limiting professional-grade post-processing.
- Nikon offers more exposure and manual controls.
Neither model matches professional standards, but Nikon’s flexibility has an edge.
Assessing Ergonomics, Connectivity, and Battery Life
These practical factors often influence daily usability.
- Ergonomics: Nikon’s better grip and articulated screen make extended use comfortable.
- Battery: Nikon’s proprietary EN-EL19 battery offers ~300 shots per charge; Sony uses AA batteries with unknown endurance, less convenient for travel.
- Connectivity: Nikon includes built-in WiFi, NFC, GPS, and HDMI output - great for sharing and geotagging. Sony lacks wireless features entirely.
Image Samples: Seeing is Believing
To illustrate differences, I compared sample images from both cameras under identical conditions.
Notice the Nikon’s sharper details, richer colors, and better low-light exposure on the landscape and portrait shots. The Sony images appear softer with more noise at higher ISOs.
Scores and Rankings: Objective Performance Breakdown
While I rely on hands-on experience, I’ve compiled industry-standard metrics into composite scores for impartial reference.
The Nikon S9900 scores higher overall, particularly excelling in image quality, autofocus, and video capabilities. The Sony S930’s main strengths are portability and simplicity.
Specialized Genre Ratings: Focused Insights
Breaking down performance across photographic genres:
Here, the Nikon leads in nearly all areas except street photography, where Sony’s smaller size is favored.
Final Thoughts and Recommendations
After evaluating both cameras thoroughly, here’s my bottom-line advice:
-
Choose the Nikon Coolpix S9900 if you want:
- Versatile superzoom for wildlife, sports, and landscapes
- Manual controls and better autofocus for creative shooting
- Video shooting in Full HD with stabilization
- Useful connectivity like WiFi, NFC, and GPS
- Larger, articulated screen aiding composition
-
Choose the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S930 if you want:
- Ultra-compact form factor for pocket carry and street candid moments
- Simplicity with fewer shooting options
- Occasional snapshots in well-lit environments without fuss
Neither camera fully targets professionals, as both lack RAW shooting and environmental sealing. However, for enthusiasts or travelers desiring lightweight setups or extensive zooming respectively, both have niches.
Closing & Personal Reflection
In my 15 years of camera testing, I’ve found that cameras like these reveal a fundamental compromise between performance and portability. The Nikon S9900 impressed me with its balanced feature set and responsiveness, suitable for ambitious hobbyists aiming to cover a broad range of photographic scenarios. The Sony S930, while dated and limited, remains a no-fuss companion for casual users reluctant to juggle complex settings.
I hope this detailed comparison aids your decision-making with practical insights grounded in rigorous hands-on testing. Should you have questions or want guidance on alternatives, feel free to reach out - I’m always eager to help fellow photographers find their perfect gear companions.
Happy shooting!
Disclosure: I have no financial affiliation with Nikon or Sony; all opinions are from independent testing and user experience.
Nikon S9900 vs Sony S930 Specifications
Nikon Coolpix S9900 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S930 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Nikon | Sony |
Model | Nikon Coolpix S9900 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S930 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2015-02-10 | 2009-01-08 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-750mm (30.0x) | 38-108mm (2.8x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.7-6.4 | f/2.9-5.4 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.4 inches |
Resolution of screen | 921k dots | 112k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 8 seconds | 1/8 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 7.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) | 3.00 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash options | - | Auto, Forced Flash, Slow Syncro, No Flash |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (30p, 25p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p) | 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 320x240 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 289 gr (0.64 lb) | 167 gr (0.37 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 112 x 66 x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") | 90 x 61 x 26mm (3.5" x 2.4" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 pictures | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | EN-EL19 | 2 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo / PRo-HG Duo, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at release | $300 | $219 |