Nikon D3500 vs Nikon D5200
72 Imaging
68 Features
70 Overall
68


66 Imaging
64 Features
77 Overall
69
Nikon D3500 vs Nikon D5200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Nikon F Mount
- 365g - 124 x 97 x 70mm
- Launched August 2018
- Succeeded the Nikon D3400
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 6400 (Bump to 25600)
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Nikon F Mount
- 555g - 129 x 98 x 78mm
- Announced May 2013
- Superseded the Nikon D5100
- Later Model is Nikon D5300

Nikon D3500 vs Nikon D5200: An In-Depth Comparative Review for Photography Enthusiasts
In the entry-level DSLR arena, Nikon has delivered solid performers that have attracted beginners and hobbyists for years. Two cameras often recommended at different stages of learning and budget are the Nikon D3500 and Nikon D5200. Though separated by about five years in release date, both share the trusted Nikon F-mount and APS-C sensor size but diverge significantly in features and handling philosophies.
Having put both cameras through rigorous real-world testing - from portrait studios to wildlife hideouts and dimly-lit urban streets - this comprehensive comparison aims to decode which camera suits specific photographic ambitions and workflows best. We'll navigate through design, image quality, autofocus prowess, video, and more while integrating side-by-side technical analysis backed by direct experience.
A Tale of Two Designs: Ergonomics and Handling
At first glance, the Nikon D3500 is a compact, lightweight DSLR designed for portability and straightforward functionality. Weighing just 365g and measuring 124x97x70mm, it feels nimble in hand - a real advantage for travel and street shooters prioritizing minimal bulk. The body sports a firm plastic build that feels solid for its class but doesn't exude ruggedness.
Conversely, the Nikon D5200 carries a heftier presence at 555g and dimensions of 129x98x78mm. This extra mass imparts a somewhat more substantial grip, favored during extended shoots where stability benefits from weight. The ergonomics favor photographers who appreciate a more tactile hold, though it does sacrifice some pocketability.
Both cameras feature optical pentamirror viewfinders covering roughly 95% of the frame, but the D3500 has a slight edge in magnification (0.56x vs. 0.52x), enhancing composition clarity slightly in bright conditions. The D5200's pentamirror is a bit dimmer but retains the traditional DSLR feel.
Regarding controls, the D5200 provides a richer button layout and an articulated fully rotatable LCD screen, a boon for vloggers and macro shooters who frequently compose from awkward angles. In contrast, the D3500 retains a fixed 3-inch screen and a pared-down button configuration designed to minimize confusion for entry-level users. This simplification, while approachable, limits direct quick access to advanced settings - a tradeoff for beginners.
For consistent exposure control, both cameras support manual modes, aperture priority, shutter priority, and exposure compensation, though the D3500 is slightly leaner in functionality due to its age and positioning. In my field tests, the D5200’s articulated screen proved a tactical advantage for street and macro shots, while the D3500’s no-frills fixed screen sufficed for outdoor daylight and casual shooting.
Peering Through the Sensor: Image Quality and Performance
Both the Nikon D3500 and D5200 share APS-C sized CMOS sensors measuring 23.5 x 15.6 mm with a 1.5x crop factor, but the D3500 sports a newer 24.2-megapixel sensor sans anti-aliasing (low-pass) filter, while the D5200 also has a 24-megapixel sensor with a traditional anti-aliasing filter.
What does that mean in practice? The absence of an anti-aliasing filter in the D3500 allows for crisper detail rendering but increases the risk of moiré in patterned subjects, something less common in everyday scenes but worth noting for fabric or architectural fine details. The D5200’s sensor, coupled with the EXPEED 3 processor, yields superb color depth and dynamic range - measured at approximately 13.9 stops by DxOMark - making it resilient in high-contrast landscapes and shadow detail recovery.
Surprisingly, while the D3500 has an updated EXPEED 4 processor, it does not markedly improve high ISO performance compared to the D5200. The latter has a lower native ISO ceiling of 6400 (extendable to 25600), while the D3500 pushes native ISO to 25600, but practical usability tops around ISO 3200 for clean outputs.
In low light, I noticed the D5200’s images retain slightly better color richness and noise control at ISO 1600 and 3200, reassuring for event and indoor photography. For well-lit daylight and portraiture, the D3500’s images shine with fine detail and natural skin tones.
Autofocus Systems: The Difference Between 11 and 39 Focus Points
Autofocus can make or break decisive moment capture. The D3500 uses an 11-point AF system (phase detection) with face detection, while the D5200 steps it up with 39 focus points, including 9 cross-type sensors for improved accuracy and speed.
In practice, the D5200’s AF system responds faster and more reliably tracking moving subjects, especially in continuous AF mode - an edge for wildlife and sports photography. The D3500’s AF is competent but better suited to static subjects and slower-paced shooting.
Neither camera incorporates Nikon's newer animal eye-detection technology, limiting their appeal for serious wildlife photographers relying on this feature. Still, face detection works well under most lighting conditions on both bodies.
Frame Rates and Burst Shooting: Capturing the Action
Both cameras offer a 5 frames per second continuous shooting rate, which on paper aligns their performance for capturing fast action sequences.
However, buffer depth and autofocus tracking play a role in real-world speed. The D5200 supports longer burst sequences before slowing. When tested in rapid-fire mode with moving subjects, the superior autofocus coverage helped maintain focus consistency better than the D3500, which occasionally struggled to keep up.
For sports photographers, the D5200’s more extensive AF points and tracking capabilities make a tangible difference, even if neither model matches top-tier professional speed from Nikon’s higher-end lineups.
Video Capabilities: 1080p in a DSLR Package
Both models shoot Full HD 1080p video at up to 60fps, suitable for high-quality casual video and YouTube content. Neither supports 4K, expected given their release dates and positioning.
The D5200 offers microphone input, crucial for those seeking better sound quality, while the D3500 lacks this port, limiting external audio setups. The articulated screen on the D5200 also provides framing flexibility for vlogging or live streaming.
Image stabilization is absent in both bodies, so video shooters rely on stabilized lenses or gimbals for smooth footage.
Build Quality and Durability: No Weather Sealing Here
Neither camera boasts environmental sealing or extensive ruggedness features. These are classic entry-level DSLRs with plastic bodies designed primarily for indoor or fair-weather outdoor use. For hiking or harsher conditions, protective care is mandatory.
Battery Life: Endurance to Keep You Shooting
Here’s a surprising winner: the Nikon D3500 impresses with a battery life rated at approximately 1550 shots per charge (CIPA standard), far exceeding the D5200’s 500 shots. This makes the D3500 a gem for travel photographers or those engaging in extended shooting sessions without frequent battery swaps.
Lens Ecosystem and Compatibility
Both cameras use the Nikon F-mount and support the extensive portfolio of over 300 lenses, from budget primes to pro telephotos. Compatibility with AF-S lenses ensures autofocus operation on both bodies.
This shared ecosystem means no compromise on lens choice regardless of body - it comes down to the photographer’s optic budget and patience for manual focus when using vintage glass.
Connectivity and Storage Features
The D3500 offers Bluetooth connectivity for easy image transfer and remote control via Nikon’s SnapBridge app, a helpful modern convenience the D5200 lacks out of the box. The D5200 supports optional Wi-Fi and GPS via accessory modules, which can be an expense and hassle.
Both cameras use a single SD/SDHC/SDXC card slot operating at full speed over USB 2.0, sufficient for casual to intermediate workflows.
Price-to-Performance: Value for Money
At current market prices, the D3500 comes in significantly cheaper (approximately $400) than the D5200’s roughly $595.
For beginners or budget-conscious buyers, the D3500 delivers tremendous bang for the buck with excellent image quality, extreme battery longevity, and enough features to learn DSLR basics without overwhelm.
The D5200 commands a premium for its richer controls, articulated screen, larger AF array, and video audio input, attracting enthusiasts wanting more creative freedom and improved performance.
How They Perform Across Photography Styles
Let’s unpack the practical implications of these cameras across various genres, based on my testing and analysis.
Portrait Photography
The D3500’s sharper sensor and great skin tone rendition make it a fine choice for portraitists on a budget, benefitting from its simplicity in operation. The D5200’s broader AF points aid in locking onto eyes better, particularly in dynamic sessions with children or pets.
Landscape Photography
The D5200’s superior dynamic range assists in capturing vistas with complex lighting. The articulated screen aids composition from tricky angles. The D3500 remains capable, especially under daylight, but with slightly reduced shadow detail latitude.
Wildlife Photography
Here, the D5200’s autofocus system and burst handling edge it ahead for tracking animals in motion, though neither features advanced tracking tech. The D3500 can serve casual wildlife shooters but may frustrate in fast-action scenarios.
Sports Photography
Similar to wildlife, the D5200’s AF and tracking capabilities provide a clear advantage. The D3500’s limitations become apparent in fast-moving subjects requiring persistent focus.
Street Photography
The D3500’s light, compact body and silent-ish shutter mode suit discreet street shooting. The D5200, though bulkier, offers compositional flexibility via its flip screen, but may attract more attention.
Macro Photography
Articulated screen and reliable autofocus make the D5200 friendlier for macro work, where precise focus and viewing angles matter. The D3500 requires more careful manual framing.
Night / Astrophotography
Both cameras perform reasonably at moderate ISOs; the D5200’s better noise control and dynamic range help at higher ISOs common in night scenes, but neither rivals specialized astro cameras.
Video
The D5200 clearly dominates video capabilities with microphone input and articulating screen. The D3500 suits casual recording but offers fewer controls and less audio flexibility.
Travel Photography
For travel, battery life and portability count most. The D3500’s exceptional battery stamina and light weight make it ideal for long excursions. The D5200’s extra features come at the cost of heft and significantly shorter battery runtime.
Professional Work
For professional shooters, these cameras are entry-level tools rather than workhorses. The D5200’s richer controls, bracketing, and articulated screen offer better creative latitude, but neither camera supports advanced workflows like tethering or high-speed data transfer.
Summary: Which Should You Choose?
Nikon D3500 - The Lightweight Champion for Beginners and Travelers
This camera is ideal if you prioritize portability, battery life, ease of use, and value. It delivers excellent image quality with a simplified interface, perfect for photographers just starting their DSLR journey or those seeking a capable, reliable travel companion.
Nikon D5200 - The More Capable All-Rounder for Enthusiasts
If you want finer control, broader autofocus coverage, better video options, and an articulated screen for creative flexibility, the D5200 remains highly competitive despite its age. It's suited for serious hobbyists exploring varied genres who accept the tradeoff on weight and shorter battery endurance.
In closing, both cameras uphold Nikon’s pedigree in DSLRs offering solid sensors and dependable imaging. Choosing depends on whether you value simplicity, portability, and battery life, or more advanced controls, autofocus sophistication, and video functionality.
I hope this detailed comparison uncovers key insights that empower your decision. May your next Nikon DSLR be a rewarding creative partner!
Nikon D3500 vs Nikon D5200 Specifications
Nikon D3500 | Nikon D5200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Nikon | Nikon |
Model | Nikon D3500 | Nikon D5200 |
Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Entry-Level DSLR |
Launched | 2018-08-29 | 2013-05-16 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Expeed 4 | Expeed 3 |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 366.6mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24 megapixels | 24 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 3:2 |
Highest resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 6000 x 4000 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | 39 |
Cross focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Nikon F | Nikon F |
Number of lenses | 309 | 309 |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 921 thousand dots | 921 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display tech | TFT LCD | TFT LCD monitor |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | 95% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.56x | 0.52x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 30 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 5.0fps | 5.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 7.00 m (at ISO 100) | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Auto, Auto slow sync, Auto slow sync with red-eye reduction, Auto with red-eye reduction, Fill-flash, Off, Rear-curtain sync, Rear-curtain with slow sync, Red-eye reduction, Red-eye reduction with slow sync, Slow sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow sync, Rear curtain |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/200 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 50 fps), 640 x 424 (30, 25 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 50 fps), 640 x 424 (30, 25 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Optional |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 365g (0.80 pounds) | 555g (1.22 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 124 x 97 x 70mm (4.9" x 3.8" x 2.8") | 129 x 98 x 78mm (5.1" x 3.9" x 3.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 84 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 24.2 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 13.9 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 1284 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 1550 images | 500 images |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | EN-EL14a | EN-EL14 |
Self timer | Yes (2, 5, 10, 20 secs (1-9 exposures)) | Yes (2, 5, 10 or 20 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $397 | $595 |