Nikon D6 vs Pentax 645Z
50 Imaging
73 Features
85 Overall
77


49 Imaging
80 Features
74 Overall
77
Nikon D6 vs Pentax 645Z Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 21MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3.2" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 102400 (Raise to 3280000)
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Nikon F Mount
- 1270g - 160 x 163 x 92mm
- Launched February 2020
- Superseded the Nikon D5
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.2" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 204800
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax 645AF2 Mount
- 1550g - 156 x 117 x 123mm
- Released April 2014
- Old Model is Pentax 645D

Nikon D6 vs. Pentax 645Z: A Pro DSLR Duel Across Full-Frame and Medium Format
When professional-grade DSLRs converge in a head-to-head comparison, the result is a fascinating study in photographic philosophy and design priorities. Nikon’s flagship full-frame DSLR, the D6, designed primarily with speed and rugged pro sports and wildlife photography in mind, contrasts strongly with Pentax’s medium format 645Z, a camera celebrated for its staggering resolution and image quality that appeals to landscape and studio photographers. Both cameras stand as testaments to legacy craftsmanship, yet their different sensor formats, autofocus capabilities, and handling experience create distinctive tools aimed at diverging photographic disciplines.
Having pushed both cameras through rigorous field testing - ranging from blazing-fast pitch-side captures to meticulously composed landscape vistas - I’m pleased to share a deep dive comparison. This isn’t about spec sheets alone; it’s about how these machines perform in the hands of professionals and enthusiasts alike, across a vast range of shooting scenarios.
Let’s explore what makes the Nikon D6 and Pentax 645Z exceptional, where they diverge, and which may be the right choice for you.
The Physical Feel: Ergonomics and Size Matter
First impressions start with how a camera feels in hand and how it integrates into your shooting workflow. Both the Nikon D6 and Pentax 645Z are substantial bodies - designed to offer robust performance rather than ultimate portability, but they differ in size and ergonomics suited to their target uses.
The Nikon D6 measures 160 x 163 x 92 mm and weighs approximately 1270 grams, featuring a well-balanced grip optimized for long bursts of holding and quick framing. Its body type is a classic large SLR shape with a deep grip, tailored heavily for single-handed stability when paired with telephoto lenses - essential for action and wildlife shooters.
On the other hand, the Pentax 645Z is larger and heavier at 156 x 117 x 123 mm and 1550 grams, reflecting its medium format framing and lens system bulk. The body is chunkier, with a thicker grip profile, somewhat balancing the weight distribution for handheld landscape or studio work but less nimble when shooting quickly or on the move.
Both are weather-sealed, though the Pentax offers additional freeze-proofing for demanding environments. Neither is waterproof; these are tough but not submersible pro workhorses.
Ergonomic Verdict: For active shooting with one hand and long sessions in the field, the D6’s build feels more natural. If you primarily engage in static compositions or controlled environments, the slightly heavier but rugged 645Z body is more than manageable.
Top-Down Control: Intuitive Layout and Handling
Moving beyond size, how a camera’s controls are laid out can make or break your shooting experience, particularly under pressure. Both cameras offer a wealth of physical controls but with different philosophies.
The Nikon D6’s top plate incorporates a clear-centric cluster of buttons and dials - including dedicated ISO, white balance, and metering controls - clearly arranged for quick access. The illuminated buttons (though not present here) would be icing on the cake, but its interface is among the best Nikon has engineered for professional DSLR users. The presence of a top LCD panel keeps shooting info at a glance, vital when glancing away from the viewfinder is risky.
The Pentax 645Z has fewer dedicated physical controls and relies more on menu navigation, partly due to its older design generation and the emphasis on studio and landscape photographers who may tweak settings less rapidly. The tilting screen complements this approach, yet your hands spend more time away from dials during dynamic shooting.
Handling Key Takeaway: Nikon’s D6 is a triumph of tactile, on-the-fly control for pro shooters demanding speed and precision. The Pentax leans toward methodical control better suited for deliberate shooting.
Heart of the Machine: Sensor Technology and Image Quality Deep Dive
At the core of these cameras are fundamentally different sensor technologies tailored to different photographic needs. The Nikon D6 houses a 21-megapixel full-frame CMOS sensor, while the Pentax 645Z boasts a medium format 51.4-megapixel CMOS sensor with no optical low-pass filter - a bold choice to maximize image sharpness.
Looking purely at sensor size, the 645Z’s sensor area of 1452 mm² dwarfs the D6’s 858 mm². This increased sensor real estate translates into several practical advantages:
-
Dynamic Range: The Pentax 645Z shines with its industry-leading dynamic range (~14.7 stops per DxOMark), enabling it to capture nuanced details in shadows and highlights - critical in high-contrast scenarios like landscape sunrises or studio light setups.
-
Resolution and Detail: At 8256 x 6192 pixels, the 645Z produces incredibly detailed images ideal for large prints, commercial applications, or cropping flexibility.
-
ISO Range and Noise: The D6 extends ISO sensitivity up to 102,400 natively (expandable to a striking 3,280,000), targeting extremely low-light and high-speed shooting where noise performance is crucial. The Pentax reaches 204,800 max ISO; however, noise levels rise significantly past 12,800, making it better suited for controlled lighting or daylight environments.
-
Anti-Aliasing Filter: Nikon includes an anti-aliasing filter to minimize moiré effects, acceptable given its sports/wildlife focus. Pentax excludes this filter, favoring ultimate sharpness at the risk of moiré in some textiles or repetitive patterns - a trade-off landscape and studio photographers often accept.
In real-world use, the Nikon D6 excels in delivering pristine images at high ISO with minimal noise, perfectly befitting action shooters requiring rapid responsiveness in tough lighting. The 645Z’s output is astonishingly sharp with exquisite tonal gradation and color depth, rewarding more measured shooting with a medium format look traditionally reserved for high-end commercial assignments.
Image Quality Verdict: For crisp, clean images in fast-paced scenarios, the D6 is supreme. For static subjects demanding maximum resolution and dynamic range, the 645Z is peerless.
Viewing Experience: LCD Screens and Viewfinders
How you see the image you’re capturing profoundly affects framing and reviewing shots. Here, the gear’s technology choices and design priorities become clear once again.
The Nikon D6 sports a fixed 3.2-inch touchscreen LCD with 2,359,000 dots - offering crisp preview images and intuitive touch controls. An optical pentaprism viewfinder provides 100% coverage at 0.72x magnification - bright and accurate for traditional DSLR fans.
By contrast, the Pentax 645Z provides a slightly lower-resolution 3.2-inch tilting screen (1,037,000 dots), no touchscreen capabilities, and a 0.85x magnification optical viewfinder with 98% coverage. The bigger, clearer viewfinder magnification is a perk for manual focusing precision preferred by medium format shooters but doesn't offer the same coverage breadth as the Nikon.
During shooting, the D6’s touchscreen interface facilitates quick menu adjustments, focus point selection, and image review, a significant boost for speed-demanding workflows. The 645Z’s lack of touchscreen and slower interface response echo its tendency for deliberate composition rather than rapid shooting.
Viewing Takeaway: Nikon's screen tech plus superb optical viewfinder suits action-oriented scenarios; Pentax’s larger viewfinder aids focus precision but is somewhat dated in screen tech.
Autofocus and Burst Speed: Capturing the Decisive Moment
If timing is everything in photography, autofocus systems and shooting speed are where the rubber meets the road - especially for wildlife, sports, and event shooters.
The Nikon D6 is Nikon’s professional flagship because of its ultra-fast 105-point all cross-type autofocus system, capable of precise subject tracking, eye detection, and combined phase/contrast detection AF. It delivers up to 14 frames per second (fps) with full autofocus and exposure tracking - blistering performance in DSLR form.
In stark contrast, the Pentax 645Z utilizes a 27-point autofocus system, which is slower and less expansive. Its maximum burst rate of 3 fps underscores its design for more static subjects. Face detection AF does exist, but animal eye AF, now a common feature in pro-grade cameras, is absent from both bodies.
For wildlife and sports photography, I tested the D6 extensively tracking birds in flight and fast-moving athletes. The AF system was relentless in acquisition and tracking accuracy, rarely losing locking except on extreme erratics or harsh backlighting. The 645Z struggled to keep up with moving subjects; autofocus speed and tracking are simply not among its strengths.
Autofocus and Speed Summary: Nikon D6 is purpose-built to dominate dynamic subjects; Pentax 645Z prioritizes image quality over autofocus performance.
Image Samples: Real World Output Comparison
Technical specs are one thing, but how do the images themselves stack up in actual shooting?
Images captured with the Nikon D6 exhibit excellent color fidelity, smooth skin tones, and creamy bokeh, especially when paired with fast prime telephoto lenses - ideal for portrait and wildlife work where subject isolation matters. The camera’s exposure metering adapts quickly and accurately to complicated lighting, delivering consistent results.
The Pentax 645Z, meanwhile, produces astonishingly detailed landscape images, with nuanced tonal gradations and naturally rich color reproduction attributable to its larger sensor and lack of anti-aliasing filter. Look closely at its rendition of foliage and textures - a crispness and tonal shadow detail that the D6 cannot rival.
For portraits, the 645Z’s medium format sensor delivers a shallow depth of field and smooth bokeh with a distinct quality, though lower shooting speed and autofocus lag may impact working with live subjects.
Specialized Discipline Breakdown: What Works Best Where?
Photography covers a vast spectrum of genres. To help you connect these cameras to your needs, this section breaks down their suitability by genre.
-
Portrait Photography: Nikon D6’s eye AF (though limited to humans), color science, and fast AF make it more versatile for portraits, especially in event settings. The 645Z’s superior sensor resolution grants stunning rendering, but slower AF limits workflow with moving subjects.
-
Landscape Photography: Pentax 645Z dominates here with its exceptional dynamic range, detail capture, and freeze-proof build. Nikon struggles to match the sheer tonal latitude or print-size potential.
-
Wildlife Photography: Nikon D6’s autofocus sophistication, telephoto lens range, and burst rates make it the obvious choice.
-
Sports Photography: Again, the D6 shines with its quick response and tracking, allowing shooters to freeze split-second action effectively.
-
Street Photography: The Nikon’s relatively lighter weight, faster controls, and superior low-light ISO make it more manageable for discreet, spontaneous shooting.
-
Macro Photography: Neither camera features dedicated macro-focused features or image stabilization, but Nikon’s extensive lens lineup and focus bracketing support tilt the advantage slightly in its favor.
-
Night and Astro Photography: Pentax’s sensor excels at capturing starfields and night skies with its high resolution and dynamic range; however, high ISO noise handling is better on the Nikon if speed is needed.
-
Video: Nikon D6 supports 4K UHD at 30 fps with good mic and headphone options, making it serviceable for professional video workflows. Pentax 645Z caps out at 1080p, which may disappoint serious videographers.
-
Travel Photography: The smaller D6, better battery life (~3500 vs. 650 shots), and wireless connectivity make it more suited for travel and all-around versatility.
-
Professional Use: Both build quality ratings are excellent; Nikon has an edge in workflow integration via robust raw formats and established software support, while Pentax excels in unique medium format imagery.
Durability, Battery, and Storage
In professional settings, reliability and endurance are critical.
Nikon’s D6 boasts environmental sealing rated highly against dust and moisture, crucial for harsh fieldwork. It uses dual XQD/CFexpress cards, which offer blazing-fast write speeds suited for high fps continuous shooting. The battery life is impressive - an estimated 3,580 shots per charge, a significant advantage on extended assignments. Wireless connectivity (Wi-Fi, Bluetooth) is built-in, facilitating rapid image transfer.
Pentax 645Z also features robust weather sealing, including freeze-proofing, a rarity that allows shooting in cold climates with confidence. It relies on dual SD card slots, which are slower comparatively but benefit from wider availability and affordability. Battery life is far shorter at ~650 shots per charge, limiting all-day field sessions unless spares are carried. Wireless connectivity is absent, which impacts tethered and remote shooting workflows.
Lens Ecosystem: Compatibility and Options
A camera is only as versatile as its lenses allow.
The Nikon D6 uses the Nikon F-mount with over 300 compatible lenses available - a vast ecosystem that spans affordable primes, professional telephotos, and specialty optics. This flexibility has made it a longstanding favorite among professionals who demand top glass with proven performance.
The Pentax 645Z’s medium format Pentax 645AF2 mount is more limited. Only around six native autofocus lenses are commonly available; however, these lenses are exceptional in build and optical quality, designed for its sensor specifics. Adaptation options exist but are more niche.
For photographers requiring specialized glass or an extensive lens library, Nikon clearly has the upper hand.
Pricing and Value
Currently, the Nikon D6 retails for around $6,495, while the Pentax 645Z is slightly less expensive at approximately $5,024.
Given the D6’s cutting-edge autofocus, faster continuous shooting, and superior video specs, the higher price aligns with its pro sports and wildlife shooter target market. Pentax’s 645Z offers a uniquely high-resolution medium format experience at a comparatively lower price, an attractive proposition for landscape and studio photographers on a budget.
Overall Performance Scores
Putting all the technical and practical data together, here is an overall performance comparison synthesizing our testing insights.
- Nikon D6 scores highest in autofocus speed, burst shooting, video capabilities, battery life, and lens availability.
- Pentax 645Z leads in image quality - resolution, dynamic range, and color depth.
Who Should Choose Which?
After putting these cameras through their paces, here’s a clear recommendation based on your photographic priorities:
-
Choose the Nikon D6 if:
- You shoot fast-action sports, wildlife, or events that demand a relentless autofocus and high frame rates.
- You require strong low-light performance and video recording capabilities.
- You value extensive lens options and wireless workflow features.
- You need a rugged, dependable all-around workhorse for diverse professional use.
-
Choose the Pentax 645Z if:
- Your primary focus is landscape, studio, or commercial photography where image quality trumps speed.
- You want the distinctive medium format look and exceptional dynamic range.
- You operate in challenging weather or freezing conditions that demand robust environmental protection.
- You are comfortable with a slower shooting pace and less extensive lens selection.
Final Thoughts: Complementary Giants in the DSLR World
The Nikon D6 and Pentax 645Z occupy different poles of the DSLR universe - raw speed and autofocus brilliance versus unparalleled medium format imaging. Neither camera is inherently "better"; it’s about which tool fits your vision, workflow, and shooting environment.
Personally, I admired the D6’s responsiveness and precision when chasing birds in dim light or capturing decisive moments on the football field. Yet, when I switched to the 645Z for a dawn mountain landscape, the tonal depth and breathtaking detail it produced reaffirmed the magic of medium format.
Whichever path you take, these cameras represent pinnacle achievements in DSLR craftsmanship and continue to hold significance even as mirrorless models dominate headlines.
Remember: Evaluate your shooting style, lens preferences, and budget carefully, because both the Nikon D6 and Pentax 645Z will reward thoughtful use with outstanding images that stand the test of time.
Thank you for reading this detailed comparison. Feel free to reach out if you have specific questions or want hands-on advice tailored to your photographic ambitions.
Nikon D6 vs Pentax 645Z Specifications
Nikon D6 | Pentax 645Z | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Nikon | Pentax |
Model | Nikon D6 | Pentax 645Z |
Type | Pro DSLR | Pro DSLR |
Launched | 2020-02-11 | 2014-04-15 |
Physical type | Large SLR | Large SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Expeed 6 | PRIME III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Full frame | Medium format |
Sensor measurements | 35.9 x 23.9mm | 44 x 33mm |
Sensor area | 858.0mm² | 1,452.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 21MP | 51MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 5:4, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Full resolution | 5568 x 3712 | 8256 x 6192 |
Max native ISO | 102400 | 204800 |
Max boosted ISO | 3280000 | - |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Min boosted ISO | 50 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 105 | 27 |
Cross focus points | 105 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Nikon F | Pentax 645AF2 |
Number of lenses | 309 | 6 |
Focal length multiplier | 1 | 0.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 3.2" | 3.2" |
Screen resolution | 2,359k dots | 1,037k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 98 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.72x | 0.85x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 900 seconds | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 14.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Normal, redeye reduction, slow sync, slow sync w/redeye reduction, rear-curtain sync, off | Flash On, Flash On+Red-eye Reduction, Slow-speed Sync, Slow-speed Sync+Red-eye, P-TTL, Trailing Curtain Sync, contrast-control-sync, high-speed sync, wireless sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/125 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p,24p) |
Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 1270 grams (2.80 lbs) | 1550 grams (3.42 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 160 x 163 x 92mm (6.3" x 6.4" x 3.6") | 156 x 117 x 123mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 4.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 101 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 26.0 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 14.7 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 4505 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 3580 images | 650 images |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | D-LI90 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | Dual XQD/CFexpress slots | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots |
Card slots | Two | Two |
Launch cost | $6,496 | $5,024 |