Nikon Df vs Olympus E-300
59 Imaging
63 Features
62 Overall
62
![Nikon Df front Nikon Df front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/w300/fronton/Nikon_Df_0.jpg)
![Olympus E-300 front Olympus E-300 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/w300/fronton/Olympus-E-300.jpg)
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
Nikon Df vs Olympus E-300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3.2" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Boost to 204800)
- No Video
- Nikon F Mount
- 760g - 144 x 110 x 67mm
- Introduced December 2013
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Bump to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Introduced January 2005
- Additionally referred to as EVOLT E-300
- Newer Model is Olympus E-330
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Nikon Df vs Olympus E-300 Overview
Following is a extended assessment of the Nikon Df vs Olympus E-300, both Advanced DSLR cameras by rivals Nikon and Olympus. There exists a noticeable gap among the image resolutions of the Df (16MP) and E-300 (8MP) and the Df (Full frame) and E-300 (Four Thirds) possess totally different sensor sizing.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
The Df was unveiled 9 years after the E-300 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Mid-size SLR).
Before diving straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a concise summary of how the Df grades against the E-300 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Nikon Df vs Olympus E-300 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Nikon Df & Olympus E-300. The full galleries are provided at Nikon Df Gallery & Olympus E-300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon Df over the Olympus E-300
Df | E-300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | December 2013 | ![]() | January 2005 | More modern by 109 months |
Screen dimension | 3.2" | ![]() | 1.8" | Bigger screen (+1.4") |
Screen resolution | 921k | ![]() | 134k | Crisper screen (+787k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Nikon Df
E-300 | Df |
---|
Common features in the Nikon Df and Olympus E-300
Df | E-300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More precise focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Nikon Df vs Olympus E-300 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you'll have to take into account its weight and volume. The Nikon Df enjoys external measurements of 144mm x 110mm x 67mm (5.7" x 4.3" x 2.6") with a weight of 760 grams (1.68 lbs) while the Olympus E-300 has sizing of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") and a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs).
Check the Nikon Df vs Olympus E-300 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are working with at that moment. Below is the front view measurement comparison of the Df vs the E-300.
![Nikon Df vs Olympus E-300 size comparison Nikon Df vs Olympus E-300 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Df-vs-Olympus-E-300-size-comparison.jpg)
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Df and E-300 is 59 and 67 respectively.
![Nikon Df vs Olympus E-300 top view buttons comparison Nikon Df vs Olympus E-300 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Df-vs-Olympus-E-300-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Nikon Df vs Olympus E-300 Sensor Comparison
Typically, its difficult to envision the difference in sensor sizes just by going through a spec sheet. The picture underneath will provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the Df and E-300.
Clearly, each of the cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The Df with its bigger sensor will make shooting shallow DOF simpler and the Nikon Df will show greater detail having an extra 8MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs much more aggressively. The more modern Df will have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
![Nikon Df vs Olympus E-300 sensor size comparison Nikon Df vs Olympus E-300 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Nikon-Df-vs-Olympus-E-300-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Nikon Df vs Olympus E-300 Screen and ViewFinder
![Nikon Df vs Olympus E-300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Nikon Df vs Olympus E-300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Df-vs-Olympus-E-300-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Nikon Df vs Olympus E-300 Specifications
Nikon Df | Olympus E-300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Nikon | Olympus |
Model type | Nikon Df | Olympus E-300 |
Also referred to as | - | EVOLT E-300 |
Type | Advanced DSLR | Advanced DSLR |
Introduced | 2013-12-20 | 2005-01-10 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Expeed 3 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Full frame | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 36 x 23.9mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 860.4mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 8 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3 |
Max resolution | 4928 x 3280 | 3264 x 2448 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 400 |
Max enhanced ISO | 204800 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 50 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 39 | 3 |
Cross type focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Nikon F | Micro Four Thirds |
Available lenses | 309 | 45 |
Crop factor | 1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3.2" | 1.8" |
Resolution of display | 921 thousand dots | 134 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display technology | TFT-LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.7x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 30 seconds | 60 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 6.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | - |
Flash settings | Auto FP High-speed sync, front-curtain sync, rear-curtain sync, redeye reduction, | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | 1/180 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Max video resolution | None | None |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Optional | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Optional | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 760g (1.68 lb) | 624g (1.38 lb) |
Dimensions | 144 x 110 x 67mm (5.7" x 4.3" x 2.6") | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 89 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 24.6 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 13.1 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 3279 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 1400 photos | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | EN-EL14,EN-EL14a | - |
Self timer | Yes (2, 5, 10, or 20 secs) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | Compact Flash (Type I or II) |
Card slots | One | One |
Pricing at release | $2,747 | $800 |