Clicky

Nikon Z5 vs Sony A6400

Portability
62
Imaging
75
Features
86
Overall
79
Nikon Z5 front
 
Sony Alpha a6400 front
Portability
83
Imaging
69
Features
88
Overall
76

Nikon Z5 vs Sony A6400 Key Specs

Nikon Z5
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - Full frame Sensor
  • 3.2" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 51200 (Expand to 102400)
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Nikon Z Mount
  • 675g - 134 x 101 x 70mm
  • Introduced July 2020
Sony A6400
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 32000 (Raise to 102400)
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Sony E Mount
  • 403g - 120 x 67 x 50mm
  • Revealed January 2019
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Nikon Z5 vs Sony A6400: The Definitive Mirrorless Camera Comparison for Enthusiasts and Pros

Choosing your next mirrorless camera is an exciting but often overwhelming decision. Today, we take a deep dive into two popular advanced mirrorless models: Nikon’s full-frame Z5 and Sony’s crop-sensor A6400. These cameras serve different segments but also overlap enough to warrant a thorough comparison. Based on extensive hands-on testing, technical analysis, and real-world use cases, we'll guide you through their strengths and weaknesses to find the best fit for your photography and videography needs.

Nikon Z5 vs Sony A6400 size comparison

First Impressions: Design, Build, and Handling

Both cameras are mirrorless but distinctly different in body style, size, and construction.

  • Nikon Z5: SLR-style body weighing 675g with solid environmental sealing against dust and moisture. The dimensions are 134x101x70mm, offering a substantial grip and balance, especially with larger lenses. The camera features a well-designed tactile interface with a tilting 3.2" touchscreen (1,040k-dot) and an OLED electronic viewfinder with 3,690k-dot resolution and 0.8x magnification.

  • Sony A6400: Compact rangefinder-style mirrorless weighing just 403g, significantly lighter and smaller at 120x67x50mm. It sports a 3" tilting touchscreen (922k-dot) and an EVF with 2,359k-dot resolution and 0.7x magnification, suffice for everyday use but less immersive than the Z5.

Nikon Z5 vs Sony A6400 top view buttons comparison

The Nikon body feels more robust and professional - ideal if you prioritize solid handling and environmental protection during travel or outdoor use. Sony’s smaller form factor excels for portability and discreet street shooting without sacrificing much in ergonomics, though prolonged one-handed shooting may fatigue the smaller grip.

Key Ergonomics Takeaway:

  • Nikon Z5 suits photographers who want a comfortable, weather-sealed camera for extended shoots.
  • Sony A6400 is perfect for travelers, street photographers, and vloggers valuing lightness and compactness.

Sensor and Image Quality: The Full-Frame versus APS-C Debate

At the heart of image quality lies sensor size and performance:

Feature Nikon Z5 Sony A6400
Sensor Type Full-frame CMOS (35.9x23.9mm) APS-C CMOS (23.5x15.6mm)
Resolution 24.3MP (6016x4016) 24.2MP (6000x4000)
Native ISO Range 100-51200 100-32000
Max Boosted ISO 102,400 102,400
AA filter Yes Yes

Nikon Z5 vs Sony A6400 sensor size comparison

What to Expect in Real Use

  • The Z5’s full-frame sensor inherently delivers better control over depth of field, wider dynamic range, and superior high-ISO noise performance. During our tests, it reproduced skin tones naturally and achieved cleaner shadows in low-light conditions, enhancing portrait and landscape shots.
  • The A6400’s APS-C sensor still offers excellent sharpness and color fidelity for its class but exhibits slightly more noise at ISO 3200 and above.

If you frequently shoot in low light or seek that creamy bokeh effect, the Z5 provides an edge, though the A6400 remains formidable for enthusiasts looking for versatility at a lower cost.

Anti-Aliasing Filter Impact

Both cameras include an AA filter, slightly softening image details to reduce moiré. This is standard in full-frame and APS-C designs at these price points, but sharpness can be further enhanced with quality lenses and post-processing.

Autofocus Systems: Precision Meets Speed

Reliable autofocus (AF) impacts all photography genres, from sports to macro.

Aspect Nikon Z5 Sony A6400
AF Points 273 points (hybrid PDAF + CDAF) 425 points (hybrid PDAF + CDAF)
Eye AF (Human & Animal) Yes Yes
Continuous AF Speed Moderate (4.5 fps burst) Fast (11 fps burst)
Tracking & Face Detection Good Excellent

Both systems use phase-detection pixels on the sensor with contrast detection to optimize speed and accuracy. Sony's 425-point system gives it a denser autofocus coverage and faster burst shooting, making it a top pick in tracking fast-moving subjects like wildlife or sports.

However, Nikon’s eye- and animal-eye AF perform exceptionally well, especially in portrait sessions where accuracy on the subject's eyes is crucial.

Practical AF Observations

  • The A6400’s rapid 11 fps shooting pairs exceptionally well with its autofocus, helping you capture fleeting action.
  • The Z5’s 4.5 fps is adequate for portraits, landscapes, and general use but less suited for high-speed burst shooting.

For precise tracking and sports or wildlife photography where speed is paramount, Sony’s A6400 is better equipped.

Handling and User Interface: Control Your Creativity

Nikon Z5 vs Sony A6400 Screen and Viewfinder comparison

The Nikon Z5 features a bright, tilting 3.2" touchscreen with intuitive menu navigation. Its electronic viewfinder is sharp and clear, assisting in manual focusing and composition. Controls are well-placed for fast adjustments, including a dedicated ISO dial and good exposure compensation control.

The Sony A6400 also offers a tilting touchscreen with touchscreen AF capabilities, a feature vloggers particularly appreciate. However, the smaller viewfinder and tighter control layout can feel cramped, especially for users with larger hands or when using heavy lenses.

Button Layout & Customization:

  • Nikon offers more programmable buttons and logical dial arrangements.
  • Sony has fewer physical customizable controls but compensates with extensive menu depth.

If you value tactile dials and an ergonomic interface during long shoots, the Nikon Z5 will serve you well.

Lens Ecosystem and Compatibility

Mount Systems:

  • Nikon Z5 uses the Nikon Z mount, relatively new but growing quickly with 15 native lenses available at launch. It supports the FTZ adapter for F-mount lenses.
  • Sony A6400 adheres to the Sony E-mount with over 120 lenses from Sony and third-party manufacturers, providing unparalleled variety from ultra-wide to super-telephoto primes and zooms.

Lens availability and selection are an important consideration. Sony’s system is more mature and versatile, giving you an edge if connectivity to specialty lenses or third-party glass is important.

Video Capabilities: Creating Beyond Stills

Feature Nikon Z5 Sony A6400
Max Resolution 4K UHD @ 30p (no crop) 4K UHD @ 30p (full pixel readout, no crop)
Full HD Up to 60p Up to 120p
Mic/Headphone Jacks Yes / Yes Mic only, no headphone jack
Stabilization 5-axis sensor-shift IBIS No stabilization in body
Recording Formats MOV, H.264 MP4, XAVC S

The Nikon Z5 stands out with its 5-axis in-body image stabilization (IBIS), which greatly improves handheld shooting, especially in low light or during video capture. You also have the benefit of headphone monitoring for audio quality control.

Sony’s A6400 lacks IBIS but compensates with excellent autofocus during video and the ability to shoot Full HD at 120 fps for slow-motion effects.

For serious video shooters, the Nikon’s combined stabilization, audio ports, and full-frame sensor produce smoother, higher-quality footage. The A6400 remains compelling for vloggers seeking compact size and sharp 4K video.

Battery Life and Storage: Keeping Up with the Shoot

Metric Nikon Z5 Sony A6400
Battery Model EN-EL15c NP-FW50
CIPA Rating 470 shots 410 shots
Storage Slots Dual SD (UHS-II compatible) Single SD (UHS-I compatible)

The Z5’s dual card slots are essential for professional reliability and overflow, while Sony’s single slot requires careful management.

Battery life on the Nikon Z5 is slightly better, lending itself nicely to all-day shooting sessions, including travel.

Specialty Use Cases: Strengths Across Photography Genres

Now let's explore how each camera performs in different photography disciplines.

Portrait Photography

  • Nikon Z5: Excellent skin tone rendering, smooth background bokeh from the full-frame sensor, and reliable eye AF make it a portrait powerhouse.
  • Sony A6400: Sharp details with effective eye detection, but crop sensor limits bokeh control.

Landscape Photography

  • Z5: Larger sensor captures landscapes with wide dynamic range and detail. Weather sealing is a bonus outdoors.
  • A6400: Sharp images but smaller sensor means less dynamic range. Compact size helps for hiking.

Wildlife and Sports Photography

  • A6400: Fast 11 fps burst, 425 AF points, and effective tracking favor action and wildlife.
  • Z5: Slower burst and AF, better for posed or slower subjects.

Street Photography

  • A6400: Compact and light, discreet for candid shots.
  • Z5: Heavier but sturdier with better ergonomics preventing fatigue.

Macro Photography

  • Neither camera includes specialized macro features but both can pair well with macro lenses. Nikon’s IBIS provides a slight advantage for handheld close-ups.

Night/Astro Photography

  • Z5’s better high ISO and larger sensor truly shine for low-light and astro use.

Video

  • Z5’s IBIS and audio jacks suit serious videography.
  • A6400 offers great autofocus and high frame rate recording for fun and fast-paced video.

Travel Photography

  • A6400’s size and weight make hauling light and nimble.
  • Z5 balances versatility with durability for travelers who prioritize image quality.

Professional Workflow Integration

  • Nikon’s dual card slots, larger file sizes, and superior build target professional users.
  • Sony’s streamlined files and broad lens options satisfy advanced enthusiasts and vloggers.

Performance Scores and Value Assessment

According to technical benchmarks and our hands-on evaluation:

  • Nikon Z5 scores consistently higher on image quality, ergonomics, and video.
  • Sony A6400 leads in autofocus performance and portability.

Price Considerations

  • Nikon Z5 at $1,399 delivers full-frame capabilities at a competitive price.
  • Sony A6400 is more affordable at around $898 with some trade-offs in sensor size and build.

Final Recommendations: Which Camera Should You Choose?

User Profile Recommended Camera Why?
Beginner to Enthusiast Sony A6400 Lightweight, fast AF, great value
Portrait / Wedding Photographer Nikon Z5 Superior skin tones, bokeh, build
Wildlife / Sports Shooter Sony A6400 Fast burst and tracking autofocus
Landscape / Travel Photographer Nikon Z5 Better dynamic range, weather sealing
Vlogger / Content Creator Either (A6400 for portability; Z5 for video quality) Depends on video needs and size preference
Professional Use Nikon Z5 Dual cards, durability, image quality

Wrapping Up Your Decision

Both the Nikon Z5 and Sony A6400 are outstanding cameras offering excellent image quality and features tuned to different priorities and shooting styles. Your choice boils down to sensor size, autofocus needs, body size, and budget.

  • Choose Nikon Z5 if you want a full-frame sensor, stellar image quality in challenging lighting, better ergonomics, IBIS stabilization, and professional features like dual card slots.

  • Choose Sony A6400 if you need a compact, lightweight body with blazing AF speed for action or street photography on a tighter budget.

We strongly encourage you to handle both cameras in-store or via rental to experience control, size, and menu systems firsthand before buying. Also, consider the lens ecosystem you’ll rely on, as Sony’s currently offers a broader variety.

Happy shooting on your creative journey! Remember, the best camera is the one that inspires you to create consistently.

For further exploration, check out supported lenses, recommended accessories like external flashes or microphones for video, and bundle deals to maximize your investment.

We hope this comprehensive comparison gives you clarity and confidence for your next camera purchase. If you want hands-on lens and accessory suggestions or need more shooting technique insights for your chosen camera, feel free to explore our related guides and tutorials.

Nikon Z5 vs Sony A6400 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Nikon Z5 and Sony A6400
 Nikon Z5Sony Alpha a6400
General Information
Company Nikon Sony
Model type Nikon Z5 Sony Alpha a6400
Category Advanced Mirrorless Advanced Mirrorless
Introduced 2020-07-20 2019-01-15
Body design SLR-style mirrorless Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor Chip Expeed 6 Bionz X
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Full frame APS-C
Sensor measurements 35.9 x 23.9mm 23.5 x 15.6mm
Sensor area 858.0mm² 366.6mm²
Sensor resolution 24 megapixel 24 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 6016 x 4016 6000 x 4000
Max native ISO 51200 32000
Max boosted ISO 102400 102400
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW images
Minimum boosted ISO 50 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Total focus points 273 425
Lens
Lens mount type Nikon Z Sony E
Total lenses 15 121
Focal length multiplier 1 1.5
Screen
Range of display Tilting Tilting
Display diagonal 3.2 inches 3 inches
Display resolution 1,040k dot 922k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic Electronic
Viewfinder resolution 3,690k dot 2,359k dot
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification 0.8x 0.7x
Features
Slowest shutter speed 30 seconds 30 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/8000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 4.5 frames per second 11.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance no built-in flash 6.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash options Front-curtain sync, slow sync, rear-curtain sync, red-eye reduction, red-eye reduction with slow sync, slow rear-curtain sync, off Off, auto, on, slow sync, rear sync, redeye reduction, wireless, hi-speed sync
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Maximum flash sync 1/200 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM
Max video resolution 3840x2160 3840x2160
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4, H.264, XAVC-S
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB Yes USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 675g (1.49 lb) 403g (0.89 lb)
Dimensions 134 x 101 x 70mm (5.3" x 4.0" x 2.8") 120 x 67 x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested 83
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 24.0
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 13.6
DXO Low light rating not tested 1431
Other
Battery life 470 photos 410 photos
Type of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID EN-EL15c NP-FW50
Self timer Yes (2, 5, 10 or 20 secs) Yes
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II compatible) SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick DUO (UHS-I compliant)
Storage slots Dual 1
Retail price $1,399 $898