Nikon Z7 II vs Sony RX10 IV
61 Imaging
80 Features
92 Overall
84


52 Imaging
53 Features
82 Overall
64
Nikon Z7 II vs Sony RX10 IV Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 46MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3.2" Tilting Display
- ISO 64 - 25600 (Bump to 102400)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Nikon Z Mount
- 705g - 134 x 101 x 70mm
- Released October 2020
- Previous Model is Nikon Z7
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Push to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-600mm (F2.4-4.0) lens
- 1095g - 133 x 94 x 145mm
- Released September 2017
- Old Model is Sony RX10 III

Nikon Z7 II vs Sony RX10 IV: The Ultimate Hands-On Camera Showdown for Enthusiasts and Pros
Choosing a camera is as much about understanding the tool’s soul as it is about scanning the spec sheets. Over my 15 years testing everything from beginner compacts to pro-level mirrorless beasts, I’ve found that practical use - what happens when you’re in the thick of shooting portraits, chasing wildlife, or under dim streetlights - is what really defines a camera’s value. Today, we pit two very different but tempting contenders head-to-head: Nikon’s powerhouse Z7 II full-frame mirrorless and Sony’s versatile RX10 IV superzoom bridge camera.
Both cameras command attention, but they’re designed for different kinds of shooters, with distinct philosophies and strengths. Whether you’re a meticulous landscape artist or a grab-and-go traveler, this comprehensive deep-dive will sift through technical wizardry, real-world performance, and user-centric details - and I’ll share from personal trials (sprinkled with a bit of geeky enthusiasm) to help you decide which camera earns a spot in your bag.
First Impressions: Size, Build, and Ergonomics
Looking at the headline numbers, the Nikon Z7 II is a sleek full-frame mirrorless camera with a robust yet refined body measuring 134x101x70mm and weighing in at 705g. By contrast, the Sony RX10 IV is a heftier bridge camera at 133x94x145mm and a noticeable 1095g - more than 50% heavier, mostly thanks to its integrated 24-600mm lens.
This one-two punch of weight and size tells you a lot about their use cases. The Nikon fits comfortably into a production setup, ergonomically designed with photographers in mind who prefer dedicated grips, external lenses, and a body that won’t tire your hand during extended shoots. The RX10 IV, while larger and bulkier, packs lens versatility right into the camera - making it a one-stop solution for those who want serious zoom without changing glass.
Handling the Z7 II feels incredibly refined. Its SLR-style body sports generously spaced buttons, a well-contoured grip, and a solid magnesium alloy chassis with professional-grade weather sealing. The RX10 IV, in classic bridge camera fashion, offers a well-padded grip but can quickly become front-heavy when zoomed in. It’s built weather resistant too, but due to the fixed opaque lens, it feels less nimble despite excellent ruggedness.
I appreciate Nikon’s subtle attention to tactile detail - customizable buttons, joystick for autofocus point selection, and logically placed dials make it a joy over long spins on the field. Sony’s control scheme is functional but feels more like a compromise between compact and DSLR world, which reflects its hybrid design.
Control Layout and User Interface: Which One Clicks Better?
From my onsite testing and studio workouts, control ergonomics often decide how quickly you can capture the shot. Nikon’s top-deck layout reveals an intuitive approach: dedicated ISO, exposure compensation wheels, and a well-positioned mode dial ensure fast adjustments without diving into menus. The tilting 3.2-inch touchscreen with 2.1 million dots responds crisply, bridging manual control and touch convenience.
Sony’s RX10 IV sticks with the 3-inch tilting touchscreen but at a lower resolution (~1.44 million dots), slightly less sharp but perfectly functional, especially given the camera’s superzoom emphasis. The top layout is more cluttered - catering to compact camera users who rely heavily on menu-based operation. Buttons and dials are multi-purpose but smaller, requiring more menu diving when you want to fine-tune settings fast.
Both cameras feature electronic viewfinders (EVFs) - Nikon’s boasts a stunning 3.69 million dot display with 0.8x magnification, while Sony’s EVF is smaller at 2.36 million dots and 0.7x magnification. Nikon’s EVF provides better clarity and eye comfort, a feature I found indispensable for critical focusing and composition in direct sunlight or complex scenes.
Sensor Technology and Image Quality: The Full-Frame vs 1-Inch Debate
Now for the heart of the matter - image quality. The Nikon Z7 II wields a 46MP full-frame BSI-CMOS sensor (35.9x23.9mm) with no anti-aliasing filter - great for extraction of detail and sharpness, putting it squarely in the pro mirrorless category. The sensor area (~858 mm²) dwarfs Sony RX10 IV’s 20MP 1-inch BSI-CMOS sensor (13.2x8.8mm, 116 mm²) by over 7 times, which translates into more light gathering ability, dynamic range, and color depth on the Nikon’s side.
In practice, this means the Nikon delivers outstanding resolution, incredible subtlety in skin tones, and deeper tonal gradations - crucial for portrait and landscape work where fine detail or shadow nuance dictate the mood. The lack of an anti-aliasing filter further cranks up detail capture, though rock-solid optics and technique are needed to fully exploit it.
Sony’s 1-inch sensor is king of versatility and speed, and it punches well above its size with good noise control up to ISO 3200, but it can’t compete at high ISO or in extreme dynamic range scenarios. Its autofocus system is impressively quick, but the lower megapixel count means less cropping room and less print size flexibility.
In landscapes, Nikon’s sensor superiority shines through - rich colors, smooth gradients, and excellent shadow recovery. The RX10 IV’s sensor still does a good job, especially in bright conditions, but struggles in dim or high contrast environments.
LCD and EVF Experience: Touch, Tilt, and Visibility
The Nikon Z7 II sports a 3.2-inch, 2.1M dot touchscreen that tilts downward and upward offering flexibility for low and high-angle shooting. Its crisp resolution and responsive touch make menu navigation and focus point setting easy, aiding quick workflow even outside the studio.
Sony’s RX10 IV’s 3-inch, 1.44M dot touchscreen also tilts well but is a bit less sharp. It supports touch-to-focus, which is essential for quick shooting at longer focal lengths - like grabbing a fleeting bird or wildlife moment.
In both cameras, the EVF is a critical shooting aid. Nikon’s larger EVF gives you more immersion and precision in framing, especially at wide apertures or for manual focus work. Sony’s EVF is good but feels a bit cramped in comparison for long shooting sessions, although its refresh rate and lag are minimized thanks to the Bionz X processor.
Putting Image Quality to the Test: Real-World Shots
I set both cameras loose in a variety of scenarios to see how theory translates to practice:
-
Portraits: Nikon’s higher resolution and superior skin tone rendering make a real difference - creamy bokeh compliments the 493-point AF system with dedicated animal and eye-detection autofocus. Sony’s AF is snappy and reliable, but the smaller sensor’s background blur lacks the silky smoothness of the Z7 II.
-
Landscapes: The Z7 II’s detail-rich files and broad dynamic range stand out, capturing intricate textures like tree bark and rock surfaces beautifully. The RX10 IV, with its fixed lens and smaller sensor, produces satisfying shots but the detail and depth of field control can’t match the Nikon.
-
Wildlife and Action: Here, the RX10 IV’s 24fps burst (an absolute beast) and 25x zoom enable you to nail distant wildlife quickly. Nikon’s 10fps is still commendable but the necessity to carry and swap telephoto lenses can slow you down in fast-moving shoots.
-
Sports: The Z7 II’s autofocus tracking excels, particularly in low light, thanks to phase-detect points spread across the frame. Sony’s RX10 IV is fast but limited by maximum shutter speed and sensor performance in dim conditions.
-
Street & Travel: Sony’s RX10 IV wins points for “grab-and-go” versatility with its fixed lens, covering focal lengths from wide-angle to super-telephoto without any lens changes. Nikon’s size, weight, and lens swaps make it less discreet for street shoots but more adaptable overall.
The full gallery comparison shows both cameras have their charms, but image quality, clarity, and depth generally favor Nikon for static and controlled environments, while Sony shines in dynamic zoom-heavy fieldwork.
Autofocus Systems: Precision Meets Speed
For autofocus, the Nikon Z7 II features 493 phase-detect AF points with excellent face and animal eye detection. This extensive coverage and smart tracking made focusing near-instant and reliable, even in tricky light or with moving subjects. Its hybrid AF system blends phase and contrast detection smoothly.
The Sony RX10 IV uses a 315 point AF system, which while smaller, is nonetheless extremely fast. The Bionz X processor helps sustain rapid lock-on during continuous shooting, making it ideal for wildlife, sports, or even casual fast-moving subjects. But smaller sensor size means shallower depth of field control, affecting selective focusing in tight portraits or macro photography.
In my experience, Nikon’s AF outperforms in precision tasks like portraiture or studio use, while Sony’s is king in action-packed scenarios where speed trumps subtlety.
Versatility and Lens Ecosystem: Adaptability Matters
Nikon’s Z7 II uses the native Nikon Z mount, with 15 prime and zoom lenses officially available - from ultra-wide 14mm fisheyes to the stellar 70-200mm f/2.8 zooms and specialty glass. The growing lens ecosystem includes high-quality fast primes perfect for portraits and macro work, plus third-party support is blossoming. Not having to carry multiple bodies for different genres is a big plus.
Sony’s RX10 IV sports a fixed 24-600mm f/2.4-4 lens offering remarkable reach and flexibility for a single camera. It tackles landscape wide angles, long telephoto wildlife, and macro (down to 3cm focusing distance) without fuss. However, lack of interchangeable lenses limits optical creativity and performance that specialized lenses can provide.
For the traveler or enthusiast who values simplicity, the RX10 IV streamlines photography; for professionals or specialists who want to tailor their optics, Nikon’s system offers a future-proof path.
Video Capabilities: 4K, Stabilization, and Audio
Both cameras offer strong video features, but with different target focuses.
The Nikon Z7 II delivers 4K UHD at up to 60p, 10-bit output with N-Log and HLG profiles, and sensor-based 5-axis in-body image stabilization. This makes it an excellent hybrid tool for those wanting professional-grade video alongside stills. Audio inputs for microphone and headphones add monitoring control, important for serious videographers.
Sony RX10 IV shoots 4K UHD at 30p max, and relies on its optical lens stabilization system. While it doesn’t hit the same high frame rates as the Nikon, it still produces excellent footage for casual or semi-pro use, and includes multiple video codecs like AVCHD and XAVC S. It also includes mic and headphone jacks, a welcome feature in this category.
For serious video shooters, Nikon’s Z7 II is the more versatile and future-ready camera; Sony is a solid companion for casual or field video work without equipment bloat.
Battery Life and Storage: Practical Considerations
The Nikon uses a dedicated battery pack promising around 420 shots per charge, with dual card slots supporting CFexpress, XQD, and SD UHS-II cards for fast, flexible storage and professional fail-safes.
Sony RX10 IV’s NP-FW50 battery supports 400 shots, slightly less endurance but respectable for a superzoom bridge. Storage is confined to single SD and Memory Stick Duo slots, which may limit buffer depth during bursts.
If you plan intensive shooting sessions or professional assignments, Nikon’s dual card slots and efficiency will keep you shooting longer with less worry about card failure or storage capacity.
Price-to-Performance: Investing Wisely
Retail price at announcement placed the Nikon Z7 II around $2996 body-only, targeting professionals and enthusiasts committed to image quality and flexibility. The Sony RX10 IV landed at around $1698, representing exceptional value for an all-in-one camera with huge zoom reach and speed.
If budget constraints or simplicity are priorities, Sony is an attractive package. However, investing in Nikon’s system unlocks an array of high-performance lenses and features that can grow with your creative ambitions.
Performance Rundown: Strengths and Weaknesses
Category | Nikon Z7 II | Sony RX10 IV |
---|---|---|
Build & Ergonomics | Professional, weather sealed, comfortable | Rugged, weather sealed, heavier and bulkier |
Sensor/Image Quality | Outstanding 46MP full-frame, superior dynamic range | Smaller 1” sensor, excellent for bridge category |
Autofocus | 493-point, face & animal eye AF, precise | 315-point, very fast, best for action and wildlife |
Lens Ecosystem | Extensive Z-mount lens options | Fixed 24-600mm f/2.4-4 zoom lens |
Video | 4K 60p, 10-bit, IBIS, full audio controls | 4K 30p, optical stabilization, solid quality |
Battery & Storage | Dual slots, CFexpress + SD, 420 shots | Single SD/Memory card, 400 shots |
Portability | Compact SLR-style body | Heavy bridge camera, less portable |
Price | Premium (~$3000) | Mid-range (~$1700) |
Which Camera for Which Photography Genre?
Let’s break down who benefits most from each tool:
-
Portraiture: Nikon Z7 II’s high resolution, outstanding color depth, and creamy bokeh win here. Advanced AF with eye and animal detection seals the deal for headshots and pet portraits.
-
Landscapes: The Nikon’s dynamic range and resolution are crucial for texture-rich, wide-dynamic-range scenes. Sony’s zoom is convenient but cannot replace a dedicated wide-angle pro lens.
-
Wildlife: Sony RX10 IV has a clear advantage with enormous zoom range and ultrafast burst rates. Nikon’s telephoto lenses and AF still compete but require more gear.
-
Sports: Nikon offers superior tracking and performace at 10fps with professional autofocus; Sony is fast but sensor limitations reduce low-light capability.
-
Street Photography: Sony’s bridge camera allows quick framing across focal lengths without changing lenses, but is less discreet due to size. Nikon is more manual but more capable in image quality.
-
Macro: Nikon’s lens options with focus stacking support make it better suited for macro work, despite Sony’s good close-focus ability.
-
Night/Astro: Nikon’s large sensor and ISO performance are decisive advantages for clarity and noise control.
-
Video: Nikon’s advanced codec support and image stabilization push it to the professional video side.
-
Travel: Sony’s all-in-one zoom body keeps packing light without compromising focal range; Nikon demands more lenses but offers higher quality.
-
Professional Use: Nikon’s dual storage, higher build quality, and broader lens ecosystem make it a workflow favourite.
Final Thoughts: Match Your Camera to Your Vision
Over thousands of hours behind lenses - and countless miles across landscapes, studios, cityscapes, and arenas - I’ve found that there’s no one-size-fits-all camera. These two bring different strengths that appeal to different shooters.
The Nikon Z7 II is a spectacular, cutting-edge full-frame mirrorless powerhouse. It’s engineered for photographers invested in image quality, lens versatility, and professional-level features. If your work depends on exquisite resolution, dynamic range, and critical autofocus precision - especially for portraits, landscapes, and studio work - the Z7 II is worth every penny.
Meanwhile, the Sony RX10 IV stands as a testament to versatile convenience - a high-performing superzoom capable of handling wildlife, travel, and casual everyday shooting with minimal fuss. You get a seriously quick focusing system, remarkable reach, and trustworthy image quality without carrying a bag full of lenses.
Choosing between these cameras boils down to your workflow needs, photography style, and budget. Need a portable all-in-one shooter with blazing speed? The RX10 IV has you covered. Want the ultimate image quality and creative control for varied demanding work? Nikon’s Z7 II is your tool.
Whichever you pick, you’ll get a rugged, thoughtfully designed camera ready to elevate your craft. From my experience, investing in tools that inspire confidence and suit your creative approach always pays dividends in the final image.
Happy shooting!
If you want to explore some of these points in even more detail, or see specific sample portfolios and side-by-side RAW comparisons, let me know - I’ve got plenty more stories and data from countless shoots to share.
Images integrated in order:
Nikon Z7 II vs Sony RX10 IV Specifications
Nikon Z7 Mark II | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 IV | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Nikon | Sony |
Model | Nikon Z7 Mark II | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 IV |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2020-10-14 | 2017-09-12 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Bionz X |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Full frame | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 35.9 x 23.9mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor area | 858.0mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 46 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 5:4, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 8256 x 5504 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 102400 | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 125 |
RAW files | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 32 | 64 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 493 | 315 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Nikon Z | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-600mm (25.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/2.4-4.0 |
Macro focus range | - | 3cm |
Total lenses | 15 | - |
Crop factor | 1 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Tilting |
Display size | 3.2" | 3" |
Display resolution | 2,100k dots | 1,440k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 3,690k dots | 2,359k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.8x | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Highest quiet shutter speed | - | 1/32000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 10.0 frames per sec | 24.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 10.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Front-curtain sync, slow sync, rear-curtain sync, red-eye reduction, red-eye reduction with slow sync, slow rear-curtain sync, off | Auto, fill-flash, slow sync, rear sync, off |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/200 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 60p / 144 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p) ,1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 705g (1.55 pounds) | 1095g (2.41 pounds) |
Dimensions | 134 x 101 x 70mm (5.3" x 4.0" x 2.8") | 133 x 94 x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 420 shots | 400 shots |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2, 5, 10 or 20 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, continuous) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | CFexpress (Type B), XQD, SD (UHS-II) | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | Dual | One |
Retail price | $2,997 | $1,698 |