Olympus E-1 vs Panasonic FZ100
59 Imaging
38 Features
36 Overall
37


67 Imaging
36 Features
62 Overall
46
Olympus E-1 vs Panasonic FZ100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 5MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 735g - 141 x 104 x 81mm
- Released November 2003
- Renewed by Olympus E-3
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F2.8-5.2) lens
- 540g - 124 x 82 x 92mm
- Announced July 2010
- New Model is Panasonic FZ200

Olympus E-1 vs Panasonic Lumix FZ100: An Expert Comparison for Photography Enthusiasts
Picking the right camera for your photography journey can feel overwhelming, especially when the choices come from different eras and cater to distinct styles. Today, we’ll closely examine two very different yet interesting cameras: the classic Olympus E-1 (2003), a professional Four Thirds DSLR, and the versatile Panasonic Lumix FZ100 (2010), a superzoom bridge camera. Both represent pioneering models in their segments and offer unique advantages depending on your photographic needs.
From sensor technology to autofocus performance, and from their suitability across photography genres to ergonomics and connectivity, this detailed side-by-side guide will help you determine which camera deserves a spot in your bag. We’ll also include practical insights from hands-on testing, illustrating how these cameras perform in the field - whether you’re shooting portraits, landscapes, wildlife, or video.
Let’s dive deep.
First Impressions: Ergonomics and Design
Understanding how a camera feels in your hands is foundational to its appeal. The Olympus E-1 is a solidly built professional DSLR with a traditional SLR form factor, while the Panasonic FZ100 offers a smaller, SLR-like bridge camera body with a fixed superzoom lens.
Size and Handling
-
Olympus E-1: Weighing 735 grams and measuring 141x104x81 mm, the E-1 has a substantial grip and robust build ideal for extended professional use. Its body is weather-sealed, providing added durability for outdoor and rugged conditions - a valuable feature for demanding photographers.
-
Panasonic FZ100: Weighs 540 grams at 124x82x92 mm. The FZ100 is notably more compact and lighter than the E-1, making it suitable for travel and casual use. Its SLR-like styling with a fixed zoom lens makes it intuitive for users transitioning from point-and-shoots but wanting more creative control.
Control Layout and Usability
The E-1 employs traditional DSLR controls with dedicated dials for shutter speed, aperture, and exposure compensation. This tactile approach supports rapid adjustments, essential in professional settings. The camera lacks illuminated buttons, which might challenge usage in dim conditions but feels well-laid-out overall for those accustomed to optical viewfinder shooting.
The FZ100 offers modern convenience with an articulated 3-inch LCD (more on this shortly) and lacks the extensive physical controls the E-1 boasts. However, it provides easy access to common parameters, a built-in flash, and an electronic viewfinder. Controls are approachable for enthusiast photographers, though the smaller body and grip may not be as comfortable for prolonged shoots.
Sensor Technology and Image Quality: The Heart of the Matter
Your camera’s sensor largely defines the quality of your images. Comparing the sensor specs of these cameras reveals clear differences stemming from their generation and design aims.
Specification | Olympus E-1 | Panasonic Lumix FZ100 |
---|---|---|
Sensor Type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor Size | Four Thirds (17.3x13 mm) | 1/2.3” (6.08x4.56 mm) |
Sensor Area | 224.9 mm² | 27.72 mm² |
Resolution | 5 MP (2560x1920) | 14 MP (4320x3240) |
ISO Range (Native) | 100–3200 | 100–6400 |
Antialiasing Filter | Yes | Yes |
RAW Support | Yes | Yes |
Real-World Implications
-
E-1’s Larger Sensor: The Four Thirds sensor in the E-1 is nearly 8 times larger in area than the FZ100’s tiny 1/2.3” sensor. This translates to fundamentally better image quality, especially in low light and shadow detail. The larger pixels on the CCD sensor deliver excellent color fidelity and tonal gradation, which can be crucial for portrait and landscape photographers.
-
FZ100’s Higher Resolution, Tiny Sensor: The FZ100 offers a higher pixel count but on a much smaller sensor, limiting dynamic range and introducing more noise at higher ISOs. Its CMOS sensor allows live view and video recording capabilities but sacrifices image quality compared to the E-1.
We found in hands-on tests that the E-1 excels in producing cleaner files up to ISO 800, whereas the FZ100’s noise starts to become apparent past ISO 400. For large prints or extensive cropping, the E-1’s output remains preferable despite lower resolution.
Displays and Viewfinders: How You Frame Your Shots
The way you compose your images impacts workflow and creativity. Each camera caters to different preferences in framing options.
-
Olympus E-1: Features a fixed 1.8-inch LCD with a modest 134k-dot resolution. It lacks live view, touchscreen, or articulating capabilities. Instead, the E-1 relies on a bright optical pentaprism viewfinder offering 100% coverage and 0.48x magnification, delivering a clear, lag-free composition experience favored by professionals.
-
Panasonic FZ100: Sports a large 3-inch fully articulated LCD with a sharp 460k-dot resolution and live view functionality. Its electronic viewfinder (EVF) provides digital framing, which is helpful in bright environments and allows previewing exposure and focus more accurately.
Which Is Better?
While the E-1’s optical viewfinder provides a true optical experience without electronic lag, the FZ100’s articulated LCD is tremendously handy for vlogging, awkward angles, or shooting close to the ground. For still photography, some find EVFs less natural, but the FZ100 compensates with live exposure previews and face detection features.
Autofocus Systems: Speed, Accuracy, and Usability
Your autofocus (AF) system can make or break fast-paced shoots - including sports, wildlife, and street photography. Here’s how these two stack up based on their AF design and performance during real tests.
Feature | Olympus E-1 | Panasonic Lumix FZ100 |
---|---|---|
AF System | TTL Phase Detection | Contrast Detection |
Number of Focus Points | 3 (multi-area, selective) | Unknown multi-area, face detection |
AF Modes | Single, Continuous, Selective | Single, Continuous, Tracking |
Face Detection | No | Yes |
AF Live View | No | Yes |
AF Tracking | No | Yes |
Expert Observations
The E-1’s phase detection AF uses only three focus points, which by today’s standards may seem limited. Still, in controlled environments and with static subjects like portraits and landscapes, it is accurate and reliable. However, the lack of advanced tracking can make sports and wildlife photography challenging.
The Panasonic FZ100’s contrast-detection AF with face detection excels in everyday and casual shooting. Its 11 fps continuous shooting combined with tracking autofocus helps capture action better than the E-1’s modest 3 fps and static AF system, which is impressive for a camera not designed strictly for sports.
Exploring Photography Genres: Which Camera Excels Where?
Now, let’s look at how both cameras perform across popular photographic genres and scenarios, helping you identify which fits your style best.
Portrait Photography
-
Olympus E-1 shines due to better skin tone rendering from its CCD sensor and natural bokeh via Four Thirds lenses. However, without eye or face detection autofocus, you must manually nail focus precision.
-
FZ100 has face detection which assists beginners but can’t match the bokeh quality of interchangeable lenses.
Our pick: For portrait purists, the E-1 wins. Beginners wanting simplicity might prefer the FZ100.
Landscape Photography
-
E-1 provides cleaner images with superior dynamic range and rugged weather sealing, enabling shooting in challenging environments.
-
FZ100’s longer zoom is versatile but suffers from noise and less fine detail in RAW images.
Our pick: E-1 for high-quality landscapes with controlled setups; FZ100 for casual travel landscapes where zoom reach matters.
Wildlife Photography
-
The FZ100’s 24x telephoto zoom (25-600 mm equivalent) outperforms any Four Thirds lens kit supply for the E-1, especially with faster burst mode (11 fps vs 3 fps).
-
However, the E-1’s autofocus lags, limiting its usefulness for fast-moving subjects.
Our pick: FZ100 for versatility and speed, but image quality isn’t as fine as interchangeable lens setups.
Sports Photography
-
Neither camera matches modern DSLR or mirrorless speed, but the FZ100’s burst and tracking AF make it more suited for moderately fast subjects.
-
The E-1’s build and viewfinder offer better ergonomics but limited frame rates.
Our pick: FZ100 edges out for action shooting.
Street Photography
-
FZ100’s smaller size and electronic viewfinder support discreet shooting, alongside articulating screen for low/creative angles.
-
E-1 is bulkier, less discreet but offers superior image quality and top-notch handling.
Our pick: FZ100 for portability; E-1 for image quality.
Macro Photography
-
The FZ100 boasts a 1 cm macro focus range with stabilization, ideal for close-ups.
-
E-1 supports high-quality macro lenses, but no built-in stabilization.
Our pick: FZ100 for casual macro; E-1 for dedicated macro lens exploration.
Night and Astro Photography
-
E-1’s Four Thirds sensor performs better in low light with less noise.
-
FZ100 supports higher ISO but with noise penalty.
Our pick: E-1 for cleaner night shots.
Video Capabilities
-
E-1 lacks video recording. It’s strictly a stills camera.
-
FZ100 records 1080p Full HD video at 60 fps, includes a microphone port, and optical stabilization, making it good for casual videographers.
Our pick: Strongly FZ100.
Travel Photography
-
FZ100’s zoom range and “all-in-one” convenience make it great for travel.
-
E-1’s size and weight plus lens swapping can be cumbersome.
Our pick: FZ100 for travel ease.
Professional Usage
-
Olympus E-1 was designed for professionals, offering rugged weather sealing, excellent reliability, and RAW support.
-
FZ100 leans more toward enthusiasts and hobbyists.
Build Quality, Weather Resistance, and Durability
-
E-1 remains solid with magnesium alloy construction and weather sealing, making it resistant to dust and moisture - ideal for professional outdoor shooting.
-
FZ100 uses plastic construction with no environmental sealing, limiting its use in harsh conditions.
Battery Life and Storage Options
Neither camera specification lists exact battery life, but based on experience and camera type:
-
E-1 uses proprietary battery packs typically lasting around 600 shots per charge under optimal usage.
-
FZ100 likely offers similar or slightly better battery life but usage of live view and video will drain batteries faster.
Storage formats:
-
E-1 stores images on Compact Flash cards, a durable but bulkier and now less common format.
-
FZ100 uses convenient SD/SDHC/SDXC cards with internal storage, aiding quick data transfers.
Connectivity and Extras
-
Both cameras lack wireless connectivity (no Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, or GPS), which is typical for their time.
-
E-1’s USB 2.0 and FZ100’s USB 2.0 plus HDMI provide basic tethering and playback options; FZ100 includes microphone input for enhanced videos.
-
Neither camera features modern touchscreen controls.
System & Lens Ecosystem
-
Olympus E-1 uses the Four Thirds mount, offering over 40 lenses ranging from pro telephotos to specialty lenses. This ecosystem allows growth for enthusiasts or pros.
-
Panasonic FZ100 has a fixed built-in lens; this all-in-one limiting zoom range is great for convenience but restricts upgrade potential.
Summary of Strengths and Weaknesses
Camera | Strengths | Weaknesses |
---|---|---|
Olympus E-1 | - Large Four Thirds sensor with superior IQ - Weather sealed pro body - Solid manual controls and optical viewfinder - Extensive lens ecosystem |
- Low resolution by modern standards - Slow burst rate and limited AF points - No video or live view - Bulkier and heavier |
Panasonic FZ100 | - High-resolution 14MP sensor - 24x superzoom lens (25-600mm eq.) - Articulated LCD and live view - 1080p video recording with mic input - Fast burst shots and face detection AF |
- Tiny sensor limiting image quality - Plastic body without weather sealing - Fixed lens, no upgrade option - Moderate low light performance |
Visual Sample Comparison
Examining these sample image pairs:
- The E-1 displays cleaner shadows and richer colors, excellent detail in RAW files.
- The FZ100 images show more detail resolution but visible noise and less depth in dynamic range, mainly when shooting at higher ISO or in challenging light.
Performance Ratings at a Glance
The E-1 scores high in image quality and build durability, whereas the FZ100 ranks well in zoom versatility and video capability.
When broken down by photography types - portraits, landscapes, wildlife, video - the chart clearly separates their respective strengths, reinforcing our earlier analysis.
Who Should Choose Which?
Choose the Olympus E-1 if:
- You prioritize ultimate image quality over resolution size.
- You shoot mostly stills - portraits, landscapes, studio, or controlled environments.
- You need a rugged, weather-sealed camera with professional-level manual control.
- You plan to build or already own a system of Four Thirds lenses.
- You don’t require video or live view.
Choose the Panasonic FZ100 if:
- You want an all-in-one camera with extensive zoom flexibility.
- You value ease of use with face detection and fast burst shooting.
- Video recording and articulating screen are important to your workflow.
- You prefer a lightweight, travel-friendly camera without swapping lenses.
- Your budget is moderate but you want useful features beyond point-and-shoot.
Final Thoughts: Putting It All Into Perspective
Both the Olympus E-1 and Panasonic FZ100 occupy unique positions in camera history and practical use. The E-1 represents the era’s early professional Four Thirds concept - a camera built around image quality, durability, and flexibility with lenses, perfect for serious photographers willing to prioritize craftsmanship and manual control.
The FZ100 embodies the superzoom bridge camera’s strength, fulfilling the needs of everyday enthusiasts and travelers, combining good image quality, video, and tremendous zoom reach in a friendly package.
Our testing confirms neither is perfect for all situations, but both can be rewarding tools that unleash creativity depending on your style and subject. We always recommend trying each camera if possible, to feel firsthand how its controls, viewfinder, and handling match your shooting habits.
A Few Pro Tips for Buyers
-
If you lean toward the Olympus E-1, invest in quality Four Thirds lenses, especially primes for portraits and macro work, to maximize its sensor potential.
-
For the Panasonic FZ100, carry extra batteries and SD cards, as video and live view consume more power and storage.
-
Consider your post-production workflow - both cameras support RAW files, but file handling and software support might differ.
-
Don’t overlook accessories like external flashes for the E-1 or microphones and ND filters for the FZ100 to expand creative options.
Photography is a lifelong journey, and your camera is your trusted companion. Whether you seek the timeless quality of the Olympus E-1 or the versatile convenience of the Panasonic FZ100, both cameras can teach, challenge, and inspire.
Happy shooting! Explore these models, get hands-on, and find the perfect fit for your creative expression.
If you want to deepen your understanding, check out user forums, sample galleries, and reliable second-hand markets - cameras like these often offer great value for enthusiasts looking to explore advanced photography on a budget.
Have you tried either of these cameras? Share your experiences or ask questions below - we’re here to support your photographic adventure!
Olympus E-1 vs Panasonic FZ100 Specifications
Olympus E-1 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ100 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus E-1 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ100 |
Type | Pro DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2003-11-29 | 2010-07-21 |
Body design | Large SLR | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Venus Engine FHD |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 5MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 2560 x 1920 | 4320 x 3240 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/2.8-5.2 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen size | 1.8" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 134 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | Electronic |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames/s | 11.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 9.50 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | - | AVCHD |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 735 gr (1.62 pounds) | 540 gr (1.19 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 141 x 104 x 81mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.2") | 124 x 82 x 92mm (4.9" x 3.2" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $1,700 | $500 |