Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS
56 Imaging
44 Features
56 Overall
48
94 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 890g - 142 x 116 x 75mm
- Introduced February 2008
- Succeeded the Olympus E-1
- Updated by Olympus E-5
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 167g - 98 x 66 x 22mm
- Launched January 2013
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Overview
On this page, we are evaluating the Olympus E-3 versus Olympus TG-630 iHS, former being a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Waterproof and both of them are produced by Olympus. The resolution of the E-3 (10MP) and the TG-630 iHS (12MP) is fairly close but the E-3 (Four Thirds) and TG-630 iHS (1/2.3") posses different sensor measurements.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe E-3 was revealed 5 years prior to the TG-630 iHS and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-3 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus TG-630 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight to a in depth comparison, here is a concise overview of how the E-3 grades vs the TG-630 iHS when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-3 & Olympus TG-630 iHS. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-3 Gallery & Olympus TG-630 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-3 over the Olympus TG-630 iHS
E-3 | TG-630 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial exact focus | |||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-630 iHS over the Olympus E-3
TG-630 iHS | E-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2013 | February 2008 | More recent by 59 months | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-3 and Olympus TG-630 iHS
E-3 | TG-630 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch friendly display | Absent Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to lug around your camera frequently, you will have to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus E-3 enjoys outer measurements of 142mm x 116mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") accompanied by a weight of 890 grams (1.96 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-630 iHS has specifications of 98mm x 66mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") having a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-3 versus Olympus TG-630 iHS in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you choose at that moment. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the E-3 compared to the TG-630 iHS.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the E-3 and TG-630 iHS is 56 and 94 respectively.
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be tough to picture the difference in sensor measurements simply by researching a spec sheet. The photograph here will give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-3 and TG-630 iHS.
As you can see, each of the cameras have different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-3 with its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field easier and the Olympus TG-630 iHS will render extra detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop photos a bit more aggressively. The older E-3 will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Specifications
Olympus E-3 | Olympus TG-630 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus E-3 | Olympus TG-630 iHS |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2008-02-20 | 2013-01-08 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3968 x 2976 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.5" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 5.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 13.00 m | - |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 890 gr (1.96 pounds) | 167 gr (0.37 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 142 x 116 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") | 98 x 66 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.6 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 571 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 220 shots |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $670 | $200 |